Funny you should mention implement change not giving a shit about their current investors because thats what the xpybits people did. Those investors invested to get what was advertised and didn't actually get that. They got a wait and then no delivery but a implemented change without giving a shit to the current investors. If they did care they would have considered the investors finished the product and gave the option for those not wanting the advertised product to transition.

At a profit? There is no such thing as profit for everyone. Anything in investing is always neutral. Money in ALWAYS equals money out. For someone to profit someone has to make a loss. There is no such thing as profits for everyone.

Explain how those that left exited with a profit? A profit in extra xpy? Its only a realised profit when its actual sold to evaluate. When its not sold its a potential loss or profit.

I wouldn't call the posted above roadmap a good AD unless its actually implemented. Is something thats not out good AD? At that point in time it can be considered possibly... if later it never comes then was it an AD that was bad and promoted a scam? I get it you're invested you want it to succeed and you like it. I just find it amusing that you don't acknowledge any of the red flags.. you simply turn all red flags into orange ones with a green lining. To be balanced in your investment you need to actually give credit where they are and acknowledge them... to better your investment you should raise them to turn the red ones into green through action not ignorance.

the points were to buy xboxones etc remember. but you got 1 point for each $3 spent and were overpaying for the xbox. if you figure they buy ions in market buy then ionomy sells those ion for btc its a cleverly hidden profit to them. ie you arent getting a free xbox you're buying your own at a higher cost.

Congrats Arjan the fix you did works fine. I've had a successful stake now on a single large input. I had compatibility for windows 7 turned off and no issues. Thanks for the prompt action on this.

Once the peers less than v2.5 are ignored this will be an update that should be pushed out to people asap. I.e. get the netcoin.io site updated to have the version on etc.

Nice work again mate.

Any chance to paraphrase and add those 3 questions I recently put up about how transparency will be provided for those ion buy backs to market etc?

Horus was speaking out against someone shilling onecoin in the trollbox. Whilst onecoin is a clear scam it was funny to see him not let up. A mod told him to send his suggestion to support and he was pleading to talk to the mod over skype etc to explain. Nordman piped in with something to the extent of what can you do their rules are their rules (poloniex). Kinda funny since they constantly spouted send a ticket to support in cryptsy's box. Also funny that people were crying foul about cryptsy insolvency and nordman etc said stop fudding and banned people etc that didn't obey their rules.

Now i'll be clear I think onecoin is a complete scam but does horus really have any credibility as a compliance checker haha he didn't even do compliance on his own exchange with the ongoing job... what happened to his he'll work to get to the bottom of it after radio interview he just went quiet. Maybe a call out in poloniex about his cryptsy affair might put nordman and horus back into perspective.

and totally not insider information

So if the coin has been mining in the past and existed... how are they mining a geeneesis block now when the genesis is the first block.

Man that coin is the scammiest scam of them all. she's going on about 10 million users and 1 million merchants. I haven't seen a single merchant.

Mr ganza must be so jealous of her ability to scam.

Hey bitpop I reckon josh and her should make a scam baby and get married, they are like perfect for each other in every way. Wonder what they'd name their child.

Thanks arjan. You're doing fine don't put so much pressure on yourself. This was a fast fix test. I'm going to download it and check for you. In 2 hours I have a stake due. Will let you know then if it works.

Not just horus. Horus and Nordman. I love how nordman still tells people their statements are FUD. Honestly Nordman and Horus have both lost the lifetime right to use the word fud.

Unless they want to state on record that they were the biggest fud'ers in history for cryptsy when there were red flags. If they say they didn't know then their opinion of declaring fud is so far fucked up that they shouldn't do it. Their fud radars are completely screw lose so they have no right to declare what is and isn't fud.

Smallbit in polo trollbox did tell Horus to stop mark farming to make people pink. I hate seeing them there after their shenanigans in crypto exchanges. They are both pink which makes them higher looking members but in reality they should after their record not be ever looked on as credible community members.

People should reply to their comments in the trollbox with do you think we should trust you after the cryptsy thing and all with your statements ? See how they reply. Ask them if they would trust them after seeing what happened with cryptsy.

Not trying to scare. Arjan is going to look into ignoring the peers with 2.5

Mine did fork twice at random times without doing this. I also got into an infinite sort of loop of attempted stakes that orphaned because they were relayed and picked up by nodes less than 2.5.

I found that having the 2.5 only checks makes sure this problem doesn't occur.

Also I just noticed before that there is a delisting notice on bittrex if volume less than 0.3btc per day for last 14 days. Possible delist date is October 7th which is 5 days time.

Might be worth those with stakes pushing half of their stake into a sell or buy to generate some volume. Bag holding without more investors won't keep it on the exchange. It'd be nice if it was listed on poloniex and I've sent a request in before but didn't hear back. Anyone else tried contacting them?

Either way need to raise the volume or resign to the fact of a delist being possible.

That's not enough... make sure not to listen to lower node versions or it may fork again! see my above post as you didn't reference that.

bittrex October warning on delist 0.3 last 14 days. Mentions devs can get in contact with bittrex support if active development.

People in dev team want contact bittrex?

dunno but price is leaking down so I'm turning my stakes from stake coins into dgb. Shooting for 200m dgb in the end.

In your netcoin.conf change listen=1 to listen=0

then add this at the bottom of that file

connect=84.105.200.241
connect=194.135.161.250
connect=49.147.111.86
connect=186.145.237.69
connect=93.215.45.219
connect=104.52.248.27
connect=108.174.171.46
connect=162.245.17.83
connect=69.43.42.57
connect=81.64.200.182
connect=125.238.73.30
connect=24.119.187.242
connect=162.255.117.105
connect=88.79.173.189
connect=50.36.228.182
connect=98.202.147.55
connect=68.108.10.35
connect=188.134.72.213
connect=96.248.111.169
connect=74.118.192.18
connect=98.115.147.74

these are all netcoin v2.5 nodes. The lower ones won't screw your chain then, until its fixed. Connect doesn't add to the listen like addnode it only allows connect to that. This has worked fine for me. I agree its not ideal but it works.

Agreed that evidence and supposition are not the same. Any proof they own gravel and it is being renamed? Remember supposition and huey saying its being renamed aren't the same thing... this is a trust thing and not evidence. You asked for a fact the fact is they said they were ionomy pte and they aren't.

I don't know how you can't argue that.. technically they aren't registered as ionomy but "are" acting as ionomy.. its a company that doesn't exist and is such a scam company its a lie. Until its registered as such they shouldn't be stating that's what they are.

The lack of answered questions that matter. Its been 6 months now and they transparency is lacking especially when they said they were going to be such.

But lets do the age old one. Ionomy company registration. They stated they were registered that when it was incorrect. Yes they say its gravel and its being renamed... no submitted financial reports etc. They have costs and wages and the like for company but no info.

Ok so its being renamed... care for them to prove such statement. How is it that when they are paying to be an incorporated company in Singapore it can't be updated? Are you in agreement that the Singapore government is somehow constantly incompetent and can't update a record? Or perhaps ion's director company are incompetent and not fixing it? Its such a simple thing yet can't be done.. they did however state that they were incorporated in Singapore as Ionomy which was flat out incorrect. This is a FACT as you wanted to know. On this the company doesn't exist as ionomy which makes it a false company by name and possible scam.

Ignorance is lack of information or knowledge. The questions raised here are never answered by ionomy and investors such as yourself are happy with this. Basically you are freely being ignorant. Since you don't want this knowledge or information as a reasonable investor would query as to why when asked they are so averse to giving it then one can assume that in this blissful ignorance that ionomy must be a land of rainbows and happiness. Unicorns are the products... people swear they exist and have seen them but they aren't out in place to the general publics view.

btw i'd be quite concerned if the wallet is unstable as hell. I don't run it but from what I hear people are directed to the web wallet. This defeats the purpose of being your own bank and honestly if you can't maintain a stable wallet why don't they just have an access database with static coin numbers as a reward system? $200k plus in usd and the can't pay to get the wallet stable? So what exactly are they using the bounty money for if they aren't actually trying to get stuff completed with those funds?

and the answer is it depends on how many confirmations the coffee shop accepts. Risk of a double spend for a $2 coffee is low so they could take 0 confirmations.

As a coffee shop owner I could require 20,000 (like your masternode) confirmations before I accept... o noes they are still waiting in line.

O and if you count block times etc why say just ion its a miracle as ALL alt coins that I've seen have faster block times than bitcoin.

No shit, every coin that isn't bitcoin has a transaction time that looks to be a miracle. Also as a dev there is transaction sent and confirmation. Bitcoin actually sends pretty instantly.... you have to decide yourself if its a trustable transaction based on confirmations so your statements a bit misleading.

What did you used to dev? Maybe you can help them out with gravity it seems to be.... behind

Who are the five? I think valid questions like I ask would only cement someones thoughts on it if the answers meet their expectations, wouldn't you agree? That is unless asking questions is considered a bad thing and threat to ion's legitimacy?

Come now

fear, uncertainty and doubt. Well of course
fear - because its happened before and 80% of new coins are just trash and scams waiting to happen
uncertainty - no gravity game yet... no actual releases of anything so ionomy team raise this uncertainty
doubt - the questions are aimed to either highlight doubt people should have or squash it

The opposite is what you 3 are doing with ion and that's rainbows, unicorns and ignorance.