Sure, don't miss your chance to get red text under your username to show how untrustworthy you are. Just like the OP and his friends!

Public Service Announcement -
This is just another Ponzi/Pyramid Scam
Do Not Invest!

Those who choose to post of their participation
support or encouragement for this scam will
be tagged with negative trust for proving
they wish to help the scammers operate this
Ponzi in return for a share of the funds stolen
from other users. Thereby proving they are not
trustworthy forum members.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

It still is a scam. Their new moderated thread has seen dozens of deletions of pertinent questions that Dogshite doesn't want to answer.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1601049.msg16088516#msg16088516

It seems he *really* doesn't want to explain why there is still no White Paper to detail the supposedly innovative nature of this dice site.

'Investment' service with shiny new anonymous domain registration and anonymous newbie forum account.

Red.Flag1.



Red.Flag2.

What kind of people offer to run a mixing service where they swap their bitcoin for your bitcoin?
The kind of people who are looking for a way to offload the bitcoin they already scammed from earlier schemes they operated.

Red.Flag3.

This whole setup looks like, well a setup designed to both scam money from people as well as launder their own proceeds of crime.

Unfortunately they're already spending the money they are being sent, even in the face of bold promises like:

OP has made no effort towards proposing a transparent or secure platform, yet given their oft-repeated talk of how they do not need any investment capital to operate, they could simple propose that all investment deposits be made to a legitimate escrow for the duration of the investment period.

Until they put such a facility in place to protect their investors funds all this thread is discussing is a scam-in-progress.

People are starting to wake up over on Recyclix fanboi-central.

@Hoàng If you have 9000 Euro with Recyclix you need to withdraw it because this whole McDonald's 'partnership' was just to boost their credibility through fraudulent claims and is sufficiently desperate a move, given how easily it was debunked, that it indicates this ponzi scheme can't survive much longer. They already set in place numerous ways to throttle the withdrawing of money, so it won't be long before you start hearing about how nobody is able to withdraw and you'll never see that 9000 Euro reach you.

@Recyclix It hasn't been 'addressed' multiple times, you used your claimed 'partnership' with McDonald's in order to falsely imply a level of legitimacy for your operation you do not have. McDonald's are not going to take kindly to an obvious ponzi scheme trying to promote itself, and its 'investment platform', through false association. Stop talking about how this has been 'addressed' when it hasn't. You said you'd give the name of this supposed 'partner' but I'm not seeing that information being posted quite as readily as the disturbing information about how you are setting up field offices in impoverished nations with weak financial oversight and shady banking systems.

Nobody got to verify the process Dogshite is claiming already took place and he refused to consider running a fair refund where everybody could have got their money back.

He's also refused to provide any numbers on how much money was stolen and the addresses it went to, or how much he still controls and the addresses it is in. You'd be hard-pressed to have broken a whole bitcoin in covering the expenses of this web-script dice-site they're fobbing their investors off with, so it isn't as if they can justify their refusal to refund fairly.

He has no good excuse for not having conducted this entire debacle in a transparent and verifiable manner to prove his innocence, so he just doesn't engage with the issue, leaving it to his sock-puppet shill accounts to wildly spray their vitriol about the place at anyone other than himself.

My guess is the end-game will be him ditching his 'dev' account and using his sockies to then turn against the shogdite account to try and make it appear as if they were not his sock-puppets. This thread then gets locked and drops off the front page and out of people's memory.

Bingo Stingo!

The ENTIRE fraud was predicated on Stuart's involvement lending it credibility. Had Homero tried the same shit without being able to namedrop his sugar-daddy, the grandiose claims and promises he was making about launching with blue-chip companies on board would have been ridiculed from the get-go.

Trying to alert the mainstream media to this 9/11 'Hashlet' scandal is pointless if it is all coming from our corner of the web, though. They'll only pick it up and run with it if one of their own feeds them a simplified breakdown of the story.

By one of their own, I mean the kind of people who work in the Press Office of Cantor's competitors.

Actually, that's not a bad idea. It would probably help to at least start the ball rolling on a case file being created which will allow Eric the opportunity to prove the identity theft element of this fraud. There is definitely a case for him to push for action on the basis that this scam is directly impacting him due to the allegations being posted by the scammer/shill accounts which detail his personal information while accusing him of criminal activity.

If they collect enough information about the scammer ip addresses, including the sock-puppet accounts they use here, it should be relatively easy to build an accurate picture of the unfolding events leading up to and during the period of time they were collecting investment funds through false misrepresentation.

Unless the fraudsters maintained a consistent use of ip masking or tor for each and every account they control, which I doubt they posses the discipline and patience for, it won't take much time or effort to collect and collate the account data.

Amusing and tiresome in equal measures.

Is there *any* chance we can legitimately squeeze Homero's 'brilliant cock' in there somewhere?

ooh errr, missus, fnarr fnarr and all that.

Or, Such, the kind of escrow who didn't want his good reputation to be used as a cover to obscure the fact that this 'refund' process is all bollocks anyway.

Don't forget the buy-in process for this shitcoin was essentially the scammers running a single-coin exchange on their website where people placed bids to buy and nobody knows who paid what for the coins or even if some of them were given to the scammers' other sock-puppet accounts (like Siameze, who 'accidently' dumped a million-coins on the market as the scam was being exposed) for free.

Couple that in with the opaque 'refund' of seven 'big investors', a couple of whom might be real but it is highly likely that it'll predominantly be the scammers sending their own free LIR back to themselves so they can 'refund' more of the btc away from the project, just like they immediately moved on from the coins stolen by their Phoenix1969 account.

Still, I'm sure the cheap dice web-script they are being fobbed off with innovative gaming platform they are being sold is worth the 472btc they handed over.

How's that promised White Paper link coming along? I mean it is a white paper, it is meant to be written by the genius devs, not the marketing guy, so you don't have to worry about blaming the disappearance of the Phoenix1969 account on it not being available.

It could turn this project right around if you'd just show the community the write-up of the innovative tech you're developing for this innovative dice game. Because at the moment it looks peculiarly and very strangely almost *exactly* like a cheap dice web-script you can pick up for a fifth of a bitcoin.

Refund your investors, scammer.

No, not one, lots. Lying about being a long time member of good repute while collecting investment funds, that's just one lie of many.

I don't know if he and Phil are just delusional at this point or what, but they keep on firing out these PR fluff-pieces which make grandiose claims without ever offering any verifiable supporting information.


They keep talking about investing five million in two 'Blockchain Banks' in order to lend money to poor people yet Jawad couldn't answer the interviewer when he asked what the plan would be for people who fell into arrears on their payments or stopped paying entirely.

As for the company having money, well, given the proven deception and fraudulent misrepresentation Razormind have perpetrated during this weasel-worded 'Crowdsale' (which is just an ICO by another name) all through this time period when they are rattling the collection plate, what do you think the likelihood is that they've got hundreds of employees, a dozen offices around the world and millions in the bank to provide commercial-grade banking services for the poor?

27,000 'active users' of 'DeOS' as of January 2015, yet nobody has seen or heard from any of them and the platform itself doesn't seem to exist outside of Jawad and Razormind's sales-pitch.

I am genuinely fascinated as to where the fuck he thinks he's going with this astro-turfed operation! Insane.

[edit] While idly musing on this question I find myself exploring the details for the people Razormind claim work for them. They've gone and changed the original photo they were trying to fly for 'Olga Petrushka' which I proved was actually Chelsea Marshall, a write for Buzzfeed. The photo they have for 'Olga' now is that of an online freelance translator https://www.upwork.com/fl/olgapetrusha

But the real gems are buried deeper, there are some absolute doozies in that staff list which I'll post up tomorrow.

Damn, that is just so Homero. Almost too Homero. Could just be somebody yanking our chain because we're so used to his rather unique mangling of the language. Although he does seem to possess just the right mix of narcissism and stupidity that it could actually be him.

Hostname: cpe-66-69-33-196.satx.res.rr.com
IP Address: 66.69.33.196
Country: United States
Country Code: US (USA)
Region: Texas
City: San Antonio
Local time: 25 Aug 03:37 (CDT-0500)
Postal Code: 78228
Latitude: 29.4616
Longitude: -98.5735

Essentially the truth of the matter is that you intend to piss all over your investors by refusing to give them any details about what you have done with their money.

Odd thing is that you don't actually have a justifiable reason for doing so, other than your intention to hope people just drop the issue because, well, you are engineering the whole fraud after all.

Ah, yes, the scammer's usual refrain of "trolls are ruining my scam with their exposure of my criminal fraud!!1!1!!1"

Why won't you tell the people who own that quarter of a million dollars you took from them where it is? What has been taken, so far at least, and what you have spent of it. More importantly how much is left.

Do you think your investors don't deserve to know?


Quick, go fire up your sock-puppet shill accounts so they can screech homophobic slurs and tell the community how they trust you and how you are delivering etc. etc. and most definitely, ad nauseam.

Speaking of delivering, how's that cheap dice web-script innovative dice game coming along? Care to explain what is so innovative about it that the public are going to want to deposit their money with you, an anonymous criminal fraudster?

[edit]
Oh yeah, apart from your infamous "All ICOs are scam unless proven otherwise" post, prior to setting up your own ICO, you 'devs' were supposed to be releasing a White Paper, where is it?

I have the time to give it a read. I'm sure your investors would love to as well. Do you have a link?

Update:

Recyclix has still not offered up any evidence of their claimed partnership-through-association-with-an-unnamed-third-party-company 'deal' with McDonald's Netherlands, which went from being 'The Netherlands' to 'Well, not The Netherlands, we actually meant some independent restaurants', to 'Wait, we didn't actually say it was us! No, silly, it is another company we're not naming that we have a deal with who has a deal with . . .'

What they have made sure to do, of course, is talk about how they've sent a group of their shills to another dirt-poor country and done a presentation to convince people to send them money:


Remember, none of these promotions involves actual plastics recycling, the sole aim of these trips to impoverished nations with lack of financial oversight and enforcement is to convince more people to deposit money into their scheme and may well actually be part of the creation of a more effective means to disperse their European-based funds into far-flung opaque banking systems to prevent recovery when this ponzi scam collapses, which it will because of basic mathematics.

Things will never be 'up' for this shitcoin and its scam ICO.

Stop lying to your investors, sockie.

Says the sock-puppet alt of the fraudster 'devs'. So why exactly would any 'whales' be interested in a clone-coin attached to a cheap web-script dice game? One which is operated by conmen?

The only whales in this project are the scammer devs sitting on all that money they took. Nobody outside of this scam would be stupid enough to entrust a shonky dice site run by anonymous liars with their money.

So, any actual numbers being given yet to the half of the heist that has already been given its free pass, namely, the stolen funds taken by the current operator of the Phoenix1969 account, who is not, contrary to sock-puppet bullshit, Eric Hanson.

So Matlack, too, is skilled in the art of selling people things which don't actually exist.

How ironic.

It is probably connected to the 2014 'XHC' 'Honorcoin' scam whereby they conned a load of bitcointalk users into registering on their 'airdrop' coin giveaway website with their email address, bitcointalk username and a password which, of course, saw many people using the same password as their forum account, email, or even coin-exchange and ending up being hacked.