I think nobody here talked about trying to keep the price at 1 sat, and nobody's expecting to exchange 1 byte for 1 sat. Surely peolpe will exchange kilobytes, megabytes, gigabytes, and so on; so there isn't actually any problem.

Try your luck on Slack. Having said that, I think the appeal form is your best shot here ...

---

Yep, on Liqui and Yuanbao. I also remember seeing some post(s) related to Openledger.

Antshares focusing only/more on Chinese exchanges/projects doesn't seem that relevant price-wise. Yes, Chinese + non-Chinese adoption will give Antshares more potential, yet any adoption is good.

The issue here is that there's a lack of updates. We've heard a while back that Antshares was communicating with 5 western exchanges, this probably hasn't advanced but a "we're still working on getting listed" or something like it, is better than nothing. Maybe give us the list, some of us could contact these exchanges and it may speed up things, you never know. Also concerning technical updates, we don't have much information, for instance, concerning the Mac wallet, we only know that it's been under development for quite sometime now ...

Sometimes Antshares posts stuff on their blog, but:
1- It's not as much accessed as this thread (by the Bitcointalk community, me included).
2- It takes ages to load.

A regular update here on this thread will give investors more visibility on the roadmap and sustain faith in the project. Even if there's no major update, there's always something to say unless you're on vacation, well actually there has always been communication about this one .

Okay, well I might have missed something then. The last thing I remember, is you asking for someone to confirm that one suspect address was a Bittrex one (which it was), so I was under the impression that you filtered out exchanges' addresses manually once they were added, suspected and confirmed.

Thx for the suggestion. I remember trying Avira for a limited period of time a while ago, I remember it needing more resources than Avast, but maybe it's not the case anymore. I also had Norton and AVG and these also needed more resources. If you say Avira can detect viruses that Avast won't, maybe it's worth the additional resources. Have you switched to Avira recently or was it a while ago?

I am not waiting for my tokens in my cabinet or any other place, for the simple reason that I didn't invest (reading back a bit would've made you figure out that much ...), I'm just an objective observer . Glad you are LYAO!! (not that you should be laughing when peolpe are potentially getting scammed). Have a good laugh .

I agree with you, yet if you go back some ten pages or so or if you check posts sometime after the end of the ICO, there was even less activity. Anyway, given what Aurum Project has posted, the team seems to be working on setting up masternodes, consulates, new features, a roadmap and the goldmine. Let's hope for the best.

Thx for the suggestion. Didn't know about this software, always used Avast, it's free, doesn't use a lot af resources and does the job (I think). I'll look into nod32.

Guys, please read a few pages back before accusing and drawing hasty conclusions.

This issue has been addressed before, everybody who closely followed this thread from the start knows that there was a misunderstanding. apriyoni (Nodio) never claimed SebastianJu was their escrow, they said they were in negociation with him (that is old story now). Nodio also has an escrow, but he is not from Bitcointalk (check the first post).

For the time being nothing says this is a scam (or not). What we have so far:
- apriyoni not logging in for some time.
- Investors telling us their funds didn't move and their tokens appearing on their accounts.

No actual investor came here shouting they were robbed ...

In my opinion, apriyoni just couldn't put up with the accusations here and decided not to log in anymore (which is not a solution) ... Anyway, it's too early to say anything with certainty.

What do you exactly mean? There used to be times when the only (notable) updates were Mints ... Now, there's one more exchange, a sig campaign is running and users post everyday ... So, for me this thread is getting more active. And yes stuff is always happening in the background, at least that's what investors hope .

Yes we can, but this wasn't the case. Once nodes were added, the wallet synced and sending/receiving was possible. For me, these are the main functions of a wallet and they were okay, so the wallet was working. Anyway, your work is appreciated .


These are not what I would personally qualify as big ... Yes it will offer more visibility, the effect might be big but the news aren't (in my opinion). These are indeed good initiatives, I just don't agree with calling them massive and major.


Now that you have unveiled a bit about it, let's see what comes after.

I just checked, Avast is configured to repair, if it fails, it tries to move the infected file to quarantine, if it fails, it deletes it. I don't remember if this is the default setting or if it was mine . Anyway, I changed it to ask , I think it's better than to exclude files/dirs, you never know. Thx.

Hi,

Having read what is written on other similar threads, I assume that the issue I am facing is a false positive. I am posting it in case there is a chance it can be something else ...

So, when dowloading the blockchain for Bitcoin core 0.13.1, on Windows 10 64 bits, Avast alerts me that a virus has been found and that it will be deleting it. Here is what it logs/deletes:


I'll be configuring Avast to ignore the blocks directory in order to move on. If anyone have an(other) advice, please don't be shy .

Thank you.

I see your point. If you are comfortable with filtering out exchanges addresses after adding them and then investigating them, then there is no need to lower the micropayment. Yet, I still think lowering it would easily filter any exchange address out as the transaction won't be possible to begin with. (and if I were an attacker, paying (n times) 0.000x instead of 0.0000x wouldn't hurt my ROI that much ).

That's the ICO price if you bought with the 20% bonus, the mean ICO price was more like 0.0003. On Bittrex the price is almost half of that, which is still 1.5 times the price of the first ICO, but still ... I personally didn't factor the first ICO price in when I invested ...


Yep, we all hope that. It's still sad to see such a promising project follow such a road (for short-term), but hey that's the market. Having ANS listed at least on one other exchange would make the price rise a bit I think. It is still a mystery to me how exchanges decide to list a coin or not ...

It seems being listed on several exchanges is somehow healthy for a coin, new buyers/sellers, new markets. When Xaur was listed on livecoin some days ago, it reached 18.5k sats and traded for around 15k for 2 to 3 days there, whereas it was trading at below 13-14k on Bittrex and C-cex ...

You do not need a wallet to get ANC, but only to claim them. ANC are automatically assigned to addresses depending on their balances after each block. If you don't want to claim them (and for now, I don't see any reason to claim), then you don't need a wallet. Having said that, the answer to your question would be yes.

Please The Ambia Fund, just stop tagging news as major/exciting when they aren't ... I don't know how high other people's expectations are, but mine are very high. When you say you have exciting news, I don't expect a Thunderclap campaign ...

Just to be clear, I'm not saying you guys won't deliver/succeed, it is just that you try to build up excitement out of nothing, which is marketing , but when you release the news, it's upsetting ...

You gave (are giving) false hopes to investors by comparing Belacam to Steemit.
You did the same when you talked about major news and you then released a vulgarization pdf.
You called your $500 giveaway massive on slack.

The only thing I consider major for now is your scholarship project, and at this point I don't expect anything really major by the end of December, I really hope the opposite will happen though. By using high expectations words and not living up to the promise, you just make people (at least me) lower their expectations i.e. lose faith ...

Well, as I understand it, BTC and bytes from the first round are not supposed to be blocked for someone to participate in the distributions. Having only BTC counts for the second round, having only bytes counts too, having both counts obviously.

CryptKeeper, I can't find a reference to what you say about not moving your BTC to be eligible to participate in subsequent rounds, can you (or someone else) point it out please?

Oui exactement. Les BTC peuvent ne pas être bloqués, ils doivent juste être là lors des snapshots (et pareil pour les bytes qui seront comptabilisés pour les distributions des rounds suivants).


Au plaisir Seccour.