The same can be said for pretty much any exchange; don't let your bias cloud your judgement and let them try to resolve their issues rather than attacking them for trying.

Context for this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5192497.msg53203883#msg53203883. Watching.

Thanks for the input. The situation doesn't seem as bad as with Livecoin or Yobit, and they seem to be willing to address the accusations that they can before the campaign starts. I'll wait for that.

Thanks. This would probably enable me to help you.

Read everything again. The store has pegged the price at which it values WPP to 2 cents and invites the market to push the store price higher eventually.

This is an uneducated, and wrong opinion. No really active project ever will reach 0 number of issues, unless nobody is using it nor testing it. Most really active projects do indeed all have tens if not hundreds of open issues (and PRs). That's not the reason.

See above.

Taking out things is already taking years (not that it should in some cases). BIP 70 should have been removed ages ago, among other things. It gets discussed, agreed upon and then they wait. Then in some major revision they disable it on default (see, not yet removed). They remove it completely only in some subsequent major version. Years.

---

You need to look through Github discussions or read the IRC chats. Bitcoin software is by no means anywhere close to 1.0, if it ever gets there that is. This is just a flaw in most humans, you're trying to assign meaning to something meaningless like a 1.0 version number. If instead of 0.19.0.1, the last released version was released as 1.0. What difference would there be? None whatsoever (other than an play on emotions - look at the part about the flaw again above).

I'm not managing anything. They're gonna run the campaign with or without an escrow anyway.

Disclaimer: I know next to nothing about these accusations at the time of writing this. However, this comes back to my post regarding a flag on some exchange not long ago. Most exchanges are going to ignore these complaints, and we don't have sufficient access to verify anything which leads to this problem. They asked for help, and I almost provided it before I saw this. Whatever people decide is the right choice, I'm fine with that.

For the love of Bitcoin, never ever recommend anyone to use Bitpay. They are terrible, incompatible with many wallets and will censor vendors and users on demand.

Same type of service, but Bitpay is by far a bigger sell-out and can't be trusted with anything.

I was asked to escrow the new campaign to ensure that there are no issues here. What's the consensus here? I can't attest to the volume, but if I start tagging for fake volume then I'd have to tag >99% of the exchanges?

RIP Upbit.  
https://upbit.com/service_center/notice?id=1085
https://twitter.com/DoveyWan/status/1199614694304047104

Enough of this already.

Me removing myself from DT is insufficient as I control theymos, clearly.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insult.

---

For me, they're very much appropriate and fun. For you, and some others they may not be. This is why they're part of free-speech; controversy as Loyce said it.

That is a very common, proper way, of using British insults. I don't see how culture-differentiated way of insulting should be labelled childish. Are American insults childish too? As long as he's primarily on-topic, the insults should be deemed proper-use of the posting function (and not derailing exactly because it's on-topic). Solely insulting posts are, however, likely to be derailing (but this doesn't have to be the case either). You can answer a proper question, with a proper insult and it's still a valid response. Regarding complete derailing, I'm certain that we have some observable instances of much worse members that are not being dealt with. So why should TMAN?

Is anyone else not readying more than two words of these blobs, or is it just me?

Anything that promises a fixed guaranteed return of over 5-10% per year is very likely going to be a scam. Data has taught us this much. The specifics of the service don't really matter if the guaranteed offer is ridiculous IMO.

Racism and hate speech are the very definition of free speech. Whether it has social consequences or not is something else entirely.

Stop quoting this and/or offering it because it is impossible. Gunbot does not claim to offer ridiculous gains; it merely serves to automate your own trading strategies (you set indicators, you run it yourself).

If you take a closer look, it's an on-topic post makes with a lot of insults. It's fine as is.

Neither insults nor trolling is childish. That is not a valid argument and has been used ad-nauseam against both. It's fun to read if you're in the right mood, especially when it is on-point like here.

This sounds oddly familiar to what most Ponzi-scammers in the past would complain about (not claiming you are one here; it just smells familiar).

Whataboutism. I'm just pointing out inaccuracies. I'm fine with insults from anyone towards anyone. Where are all those virtue-signalling free-speech saints now?

This is untrue. His posts are unrelated to his campaign nor his signature. The manager can confirm this, so don't try using it when it isn't the case.