Nur mal so als Hinweis: Stellenanzeigen in Österreich müssen das Gehalt beinhalten, zumindest den Kollektivvertrag nach dem ihr bezahlt, ansonsten Verwarnung, ab dem 2. Mal dann 360€ Strafe.
https://www.wko.at/Content.Node/branchen/oe/Aussenhandel/Branchennews/Gehaltsangaben_bei_Stelleninseraten.html

Viel Erfolg!

Laut Eingangspost:
Das hier habe ich gemeint.



Ich verwende das unter Windows und klicke auf mein butens Icon und habe dann einen buten Graph + Report vor mir.
Erstellt wird der aber aus einer frisch zusammengestellten Datei, die vorher aus csv-Dateien eingelesen/erzeugt wird...

Does not scale and is far from neutral. Is supporting a church charitable? The NRA? Greenpeace? PETA?

Eventuell kanst du ja einen einfachen CSV-Exporter von bitcoind schreiben und den Open Source freigeben, der die nötigen Daten in ein Format abspeichert, das man dann in deine Anwendung importieren kann. Damit kann man das Ding auch einfach auf einem PC/VM ausführen, der nichts mit Bitcoin zu tun hat und trotzdem alles machen, was man braucht. So ein Exporter wäre vermutlich nur ein paar Dutzend Zeilen in Python z.B.

Ich persönlich verwende ja ledger-cli, daher brauche ich sowas wie dein Programm eh nicht, aber viel Spaß/Erfolg damit trotzdem.

As far as I understand it, over time transactions will become less and less malleable until only "canonical" transactions are considered valid.

This would however be a had fork in Bitcoin, so it might take quite a while until it is implemented/in effect. While clients and even "honest" miners might not create/relay/mine non-canonical transactions, they are currently valid, so to attack someone, you might need to mine yourself in that case (much harder than just modifyting a transaction on the go like currently). Still attackable though.

Du könntest doch auch einfach alle möglichen Szenarien durchrechnen und die als Übersicht generieren, oder? Dann hat man gleich die günstigste Version im Blick.

Übrigens: Quellcode? Woher soll man wissen, dass das kein Walletstealer ist?

Nobody can run an identical Bitcoin network either, as that would be a hardfork of the block chain. "Bitcoin" is defined as the Satoshi block chain. You can however more or less easil change a few things in the code (checkpoints...), create a new genesis block and run a new network with the same rules as Bitcoin.

It's the same with Ripple - you can compile and run a node in the OpenCoin ledger chain or you can create your own (even easier than with Bitcoin, as there are no checkpoint hashes afaik.). This would (just like a "Bitcoin2" with a different genesis block) however be a full hard fork of the current ledger, so you (just as with Bitcoin) won't be able to transfer anything to/from people using the mainline network.

If you want to go further, you can also change rules inside Ripple too (e.g. start with 100 instead of 100 billion XRP, create new ledgers every 3.14 seconds...) and so on. Calling something not "open source" (which is a quite well defined term - rippled even is "free software") because nobody bothered to do that is a bit... strange.

Here are some "forks" (mostly working branches from developers for the mainline implementation though): https://github.com/ripple/rippled/network

Unfortunately there is no real released fork of Ripple so far, NWO seems to have decided he wants to write his own software, Splash so far has just a thread with intentions and nothing more and ProtoShares wnats to implement consensus but that's only the double spend prevention part.

It would be possible of course, depending on what you want to do, you might be wise to stay back for a while longer until rippled gets a bit more stable and the refactoring efforts are completed. They recently hired a guy for developer relations though, so if someone reads this and thinks of starting something, please contact RippleLabs by all means!

Afaik it already should be possible to withdraw BTC again, they fixed it.

He believes he can look at his stats and then send half of the money to the ppl. he got it from.
It's easily possible to extract that data from the ledger by the way too...

Anyways, interesting that people even on Bitfinex are afraid to go long now - even though coins are cheap.

Unicredit Slovenia does not want you to receive money from one of their other customers?!

Anyways, I'd recommend making a trip to Graz or maybe Radkersburg/Fürstenfeld/Deutschlandsberg if you prefer a smaller town and having a personal talk with the bank(s) there if it has to be an Austrian bank, I doubt there will be much information about business accounts + receiving money from Bitstamp on the internet anyways.

This already exists in Singapore on Ripple.

Are you sure you can do this legally in the US?

Fidor is a german direct bank only open to people living there.

If you are anyways based in Slovenia, why not use Unicredit - Bitstamp's bank?

That's wrong though, centralization is of course a viable method but it is not used in Ripple.

Mining is nonsense to prevent double spends if consensus really holds... BUT it also (re-)distributes currency units proportionally by hash rate (with some variance due to the random nature of bitcoin's PoW) to any participant.

Luca Mattheis also is giving a wrong answer there (which is more of a comment to another answer by the way) - while there is a chance to create tons of validators, they (unlike mining nodes) do not automatically have a say in transaction ordering.

Either checking ripplecharts, a public server via API or setting up their own server and checking there.

To the topic: That exit happened about half a year ago, not last week or something.

Ripple does not mine, but is decentralized...

If you want centralized altcoins there was one a few years back with a similar approach to PoS (Realcoin or something like that?). Most centralized solutions seem to be pegged to USD, EUR etc. though.

LindenDollars (SLL) are also some centralized altcoins, but there is no source code available for them.

That does not even remotely make sense...

Your 10% markup for example is useless, as even just selling yesterday would mean the price moves more than that - anyone who were to send fiat simply would be smart to let the 0.1 BTC be and keep the funds frozen forever just to screw with the BTC seller.

Anyways, you say I sell 1 BTC, we both put 0.1 extra on the table and then you say I need to pay 0.5, to get my 1.1 back? I would for example publish a transaction that depends on the 1.1 that is paid back to me, so there is no chance that this gets cheated... if you want to get your 0.6 (0.1 from the table + 0.5 of my 1.1), then you'd have to release the funds.

Yeah, that's why blackmail is only a theoretical idea in the real world - right? 

ORLY, the 2008 version doesn't list something that was released in 2009?! Wow!

Anyways, XBT is the only currency symbol that even remotely could potentially be accepted by ISO (or rather the bank that overlooks this list).