https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/statsCurrency Flash Return Rate Average Variable Rate on CFD Total sum of active swaps BTC 0.0055% 0.0302% 3,380.38 BTC LTC 0.0055% 0.0108% 14,399.06 LTC
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, ich hab mir das gerade mal durchgeschaut - ist ja ganz nett, ein QR Code mit zumindest Adresse + Betrag wäre aber schon sehr fein... abtippen auf einem Handy ist nicht gerade lustig!
|
|
|
|
|
The only one I'm aware of is ripplescam.org, written by TradeFortress (well, see for yourself how he ended up himself...).
Google is not directly involved in Ripple, it's Google Ventures (which are independent from Google itself) who invested in RippleLabs. They also invested in the Bitcoin exchange project "Buttercoin" by the way, also e.g. Mike Hearn, a Bitcoin core developer and a great asset to Bitcoin works at Google. If you do mistrust them, that's your personal opinion, not a universal fact.
Nice try of trying to derail this thread further ("aside from this"... instead of "Sorry, I was wrong"), I'm outta here to not bump your promotion of your website even more.
|
|
|
|
Regarding Ripple, It's also somewhat deceptive. They made a few tricky moves regarding their open source status. It's a commercial product and their business model was to sell and market XRPs(similar to Mastercoin). At one point I asked: If Ripple is open source, why can't I just issue a new set of XRPs? XRP2.0? Soon afterwards the project seemed to have faded out of existence. Ripple also has virtually NOTHING to do with the original ideas associated with this name. It's all part of the Googleplex mega-complex, which I will never(and probably can never) be a part of due to my outspoken opinions on the surveillance machine they are running under the guise of 'entrepreneurship' and 'startups'. Thanks to St. Snowden I can now say these things without being branded a mentally insane schizophrenic(which some people in these circles have already tried to do). You can just fire up rippled and will immediately have 100 billion XRP at your disposal. Just like running bitcoind with a non-Satoshi block chain/genesis block however, no other server will accept these. You are free to fork Ripple, the only requisite (similar to Bitcoin) is that you change the name and logo. unless something has changed, you are only free to fork the CLIENT. Secondly it is unclear what sorts of patent protections there are surrounding Ripple. It's not a community project, it's a commercial project. <-- the server is called rippled, it is open source since September last year. You can just ask RippleLabs about pending patents (I'm unaware of any - and releasing source code before potential patents are granted would also not have been a smart move by them...), the only thing that is protected as far as I know is the "Ripple" brand and logo. |
|
|
|
Regarding Ripple, It's also somewhat deceptive. They made a few tricky moves regarding their open source status. It's a commercial product and their business model was to sell and market XRPs(similar to Mastercoin). At one point I asked: If Ripple is open source, why can't I just issue a new set of XRPs? XRP2.0? Soon afterwards the project seemed to have faded out of existence. Ripple also has virtually NOTHING to do with the original ideas associated with this name. It's all part of the Googleplex mega-complex, which I will never(and probably can never) be a part of due to my outspoken opinions on the surveillance machine they are running under the guise of 'entrepreneurship' and 'startups'. Thanks to St. Snowden I can now say these things without being branded a mentally insane schizophrenic(which some people in these circles have already tried to do). You can just fire up rippled and will immediately have 100 billion XRP at your disposal. Just like running bitcoind with a non-Satoshi block chain/genesis block however, no other server will accept these. You are free to fork Ripple, the only requisite (similar to Bitcoin) is that you change the name and logo. |
|
|
|
Ironically the only way to ensure that Bitcoin miners are not secretly colluding and you don't need to trust them is by having >50% of the global hash rate yourself, thus forcing others to trust you... I think I can explain it, let me give it a shot.
A centralized network is susceptible to attack. A decentralized network is resistant to attack.
A centralized con-artist is susceptible to attack. A decentralized con-artist network.......
...can only scam those who chose to "invest" into a dishonest scheme. Pirateat40s ponzi scam did not impact Bitcoin itself at all (and would have been far more evident in Ripple by the way) even though at some points his claimed balance must have been in the hundred thousands or did have any implications on user balances at e.g. MtGox. TradeFortress showed that you can scam people on Ripple (by scamming them... an interesting "proof of concept"), wrote ripplescam.org after that and proceeded to scam the users of his own webwallet services out of some undisclosed amount of BTC. Still this did not have an effect on anyone NOT using his "services" or falling for his scams or on Bitcoin (the system) itself. |
|
|
|
|
Ein GB an SSD Speicher kostet um die 50 cents... Um den preis eines big Macs kannst du also ein weiteres Jahr an Transaktionen speichern.
|
|
|
|
I guess eventually Ripple will need to comply with KYC and AML directives.
How should that even be possible? Ripple gateways (just like Bitcoin exchanges) probably will have to, Ripple itself is just a piece of software. |
|
|
|
|
Klingt nicht gerade realistisch, da die Blockchaindaten schon relativ zufällig sind - alleine mit einer zip-Kompression müsste man da ja auf ähnliche Werte kommen. Vermutlich ist also deine Anzeige nicht korrekt.
Trotzdem sind ein paar Dutzend GB ja eh ein Witz heutzutage...
|
|
|
|
|
A database dump for a rippled node.db (or at least transactions.db and ledgers.db files) since genesis would be great too.
|
|
|
|
Maybe it would be better if jgarzik would wrap the statement in [ code ] tags as it preserves whitespace? |
|
|
|
|
You are aware that Ripple is a decentralized exchange and you can buy bitcoins using any currency directly on there?
Anyways, I bid 3 mBTC.
|
|
|
|
(notice the timezones are different indicating these messages were generated by different app servers) Yeah, on the other hand GMT and UTC are the same time zone, might be an older loan with the yearly percentage still in place that expired? I still have "interest" in older ledger entries, newer ones only state "Swap payment" - there might be some overlap of terminology. |
|
|
|
|
I'd recommend you to go the extra mile from that point and connect your "mock API" to a local bitcoind, thus eliminating the need to trust blockchain.info.
|
|
|
|
|
I still wonder why larger pools don't do this... Also they seem to use bitcoind default rules and settings far too often for my taste.
|
|
|
|
|
Stell dir vor, es gibt auch Leute die steuern zahlen wollen und nicht auf Straftaten stehen...
|
|
|
|
Die Copy-Paste Fertigkeiten von Altcoin "Developers" hören vermutlich bei bitcoin-qt auf.  |
|
|
|
|
1. You did not specify anonymity as design goal in your example
2. Ripple is the network, it could be that you mean "RippleLabs", the company developing most software behind it? Anyone can set up validators by the way and anyone is free to choose their set of validators too.
3. What else? Gateways are the "licensed brokers" where you deposit fiat or crypto in your example, Ripple itself is the "P2P bulletin board" + trade engine. Transfers are atomic, so no need for additional escrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Warum diese Version nicht wirklich sinnvoll ist:
Ab Block 250 000 ist eher die CPU + HDD der limitierende Faktor, nicht die Bandbreite.
Außerdem gibt's bereits eine sehr gut geseedete Version für alle Blöcke bis 250 000, außerdem wird 0.9 da auch Verbesserungen bieten, die solche Torrents vermutlich unnötig machen werden.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
