Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 03:13:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 737 »
1821  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: CivKit it is not a perfect marketplace but almost on: April 24, 2023, 01:56:30 PM
I think that it's one thing to propose something in a whitepaper, and an entirely different thing to actually build it. Just think about the 2017 era of ICOs, where so many projects looked like amazing, prosperous ventures and yet 90%+ of them turned out to be scams, too expensive to build or just technically impossible to build. That's not to say anything about CivKit, it's just to say not to take a whitepaper as an official sign that something is possible.

There won't be any ICO with this one, it won't need a new coin or token since it works only with BTC and there will be no possible return from it.
Or at least this is what they claim now!

A few things about this on the first lecture, the technical data can wait till I had another coffee
- not really a new concept, the same things has been already tried once
- interesting that they are using naira and BTC in examples, so guess this is already targeted at a specific audience
- I was really curious how they will handle escrows and disputes, again, nothing new, rebranded them as oracles (d'oh) that suffer from the same flaw as every previous solution, two or three people colluding will be able to force a decision even it's unfair. Furthermore, positions are either appointed by the team, thus stopping decentralization or voted in, which means they can be a victim of sybil attacks. (acknowledge by the whitepaper)
- the interesting part would be the so-called bulletin boards, but I think the design of such boards relying on offers relayed via nostr message would be really unappealing to the masses.
- the whole rank proof servers idea, seems neet but wouldn't it be also a simple attack target?

I'll read it later on in more detail, although for the average user what's more important is how easy it is to use, not the magic that happens behind the app.

I like the idea of ​​the marketplace even if I don't fully agree with the use of relays like Nostr as one could easily get to the relay host, instead it would be better if it were implemented directly in the blockchain

What do you mean by getting implemented in the blockchain instead of Nostr ? The signals between participants?

At least it comes from the founder team with Ray Youssef, the ex-founder of Paxful which is a peer to peer marketplace but was shut down weeks ago. I know Paxful is not decentralized but likely Ray retired from Paxful by some internal conflicts as well as pressure from law enforcement and regulation on Peer to Peer marketplaces.

There was a bit more than just regulations:
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2023/04/08/drugs-erratic-dismissals-and-feuding-founders-behind-bitcoin-marketplace-paxfuls-unraveling/

1822  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Bloodshed Lower Hashrate on: April 24, 2023, 01:16:30 PM
What would be a way to prevent miners from killing other miners? It happens with gold, USD, etc etc.

How many data centers have you seen being bombed by competitors in the US or EU?
You can't look at wars in Africa over mines or drug cartels wagering war in Mexico and think this will happen everywhere!

Just because there are people killing each other for gold mining in some 3rd world country doesn't mean:
- those people won't kill others for anything else, be it cattle, a motorcycle or some cash
- this will happen all over the world

And have we cured ALS yet or are we still using hashrate on mining currency over medical problems.

And we haven't found a  solution for hiccups and we still use a ton of energy to power water fountains.
Let's solve that first and then argue what medical advance will happen if we shut down all miners, which I dare to estimate at around 0 point 0!  Wink

Ananias and Sapphira were killed because of their hoard of currency.

And Icarus died because he used beeswax instead of gorilla glue!
1823  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Do you think China is playing a double game? on: April 23, 2023, 02:55:26 PM
How much will China profit if they take over everything that is in the US today and is connected to cryptocurrencies?

No bruh, it's a losing battle.
Not China against currency but us trying to teach newbies how ridiculously small  the whole crypto ecosystem is right now and how little there is to gain from it when with talk about a country with a GDP in the trillions.
Everyone says that countries need to attract crypto businesses so
- low or zero taxes for those companies
- zero taxes on profits
So, what are those countries going to benefit from when they will not tax anything, they will end with millions of untaxed citizens' money, huge capital outflow, and all this for what? 10-20 low-paid customer support jobs and a 100 sqm office?

Newbies would really understand to analyze the different implications between personal gain and country-level gains when it comes to crypto, the fact that one person is earning $ doesn't automatically mean for the said country there is also a net gain.

Back to the HK thing, it's just China showing a bit of carrot, wait for the stick, as soon s too much money pours into this and they start losing control they will shut it down in a split second.
1824  Economy / Economics / Re: Argentina Central Bank Running Out of US Dollars. Bitcoin as a Solution? on: April 23, 2023, 02:44:38 PM
First, Twitter rumors are not a source!

Second, if they ran out of US Dollars it would be because they can't afford dollars anymore as their currency is useless.
So, how in the name of god would they be able to buy Bitcoin when they can't buy $? Magic?

What Argentina is experiencing is the classical Weimar inflation problem  and not Bitcoin, not gold, not the euro, yuan, platinum, or any other thing that would help them since their problem is that they can't afford it in the first place. If they would have the money to buy 1000 BTC they would have the money to buy any hard currency!
1825  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Central African Republic drops Bitcoin as Legal Tender on: April 22, 2023, 04:13:45 PM
Are you sure they also had such a plan? AFAIK, only El Salvador is planning to build something like that [I did a quick search on Google, but had no luck in finding any connection to CAR].

CryptoCity & Crypto Island in Bangui, Central African Republic’s capital
https://sango.org/#cryptoCitySection
Of course, it's going to be built on tokens that, well, are not selling! And what incentive you will have as an investor?

Quote
Citizenship in the Central African Republic can be obtained by locking a fixed collateral of SANGO Coins in the amount of 60000$ for a period of 5 years. After the period ends, the SANGO Coins are returned to the owner.
Future access to a global network of services in major industries like healthcare, insurance and fintech, accessible from anywhere in the world through Sango App

Useless citizenship, a promise of zero tax on gains that will never be there, and some more vaporware.

They can help bring in foreign investments, make international trade easier, and even inspire technological advances. And on top of that bring in more tourists...

And how would they do this? Wishful thinking!
Nobody is going to invest in one of the poorest countries in the world that are one step away from a civil war just because they've legalized crypto.
Where are the returns from your investment going to come? Poverty is quite cheap and there are a lot of exporters, I don't think you can get too much for it!

1826  Economy / Economics / Re: Living ones life on assumption and promises on: April 22, 2023, 02:55:35 PM
You got the tabs mixed up, you wanted to go on lifecoachingtalk.org!

Seriously, these topics are really getting annoying, yeah we know this already, there are a ton of topics on the same subject, don't live your life in debt, don't live it on promises, don't risk money you don't have, don't be greedy, for god's sake, this is not some therapy forum!
Common, enough is enough at this point!
1827  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Will Michael J Saylor become the richest man in the history of mankind? on: April 22, 2023, 01:17:04 PM
Plus he couldn't give less of a shit about the principles on which bitcoin was founded... he represents nothing more than an insane level of greed which should not be emulated by anyone.

Let's not forget this:


Everyone becomes a believer when they smell the cash, just as how when there is no more money and no possibility of a get rich quick scheme they will be the first to betray and stab you in the back. But seems like the community needs a Bitcoin Jesus desperately, too bad they are selecting the worse of the worse.


1828  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Inactive BTC whale transfers $8M worth Bitcoin After 10 years Inactivity on: April 22, 2023, 12:49:02 PM
Yep, this is a good one.
I would add: what if the original owner has died (or just thinking about death and inheritance) and now his money got split between members of his family?

Hmm, not so sure, it doesn't look like or feel like it.
He is spending full inputs and moving them into batches of ~90 BTC but not of equal value, there is a 5 BTC difference between the current 5 addresses that hold those coins, plus he would have moved them all, right? If it were an inheritance they would have done it with all of it combined, not leaving some there, and for sure not a 3-hour difference between the two outgoing tx.

Well, probably I'm inclined to think of this because that's what I would do if I were him, split it slowly and carefully into small batches, make the back-ups, split again, and then slowly erase the traces by mixing them before liquidating smaller amounts. With $40 million even if I would go through KYC and pay all my taxes and be completely legit I still wouldn't want anyone to trace my steps. Imagine making a one-time payment at a coffee shop in the neighborhood or some online store with your name and address and some employee with too much time on his hand discovering you have 1000 BTC on you!
1829  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Will Michael J Saylor become the richest man in the history of mankind? on: April 22, 2023, 12:27:41 PM
He holds 140 000 BTC at this point. Nearly 1% of all BTC in circulation at the moment belongs to Michael Saylor.

He doesn't own those coins, Microstrategy does, and Saylor has only 16% shares of MicroStrategy!
Back to the drawing table!

If the monetary system collapses within 10 years and BTC ever reaches 10 million dollars, he will have a net worth of 1 400 000 000 000 USD. Aside from his other assets that I'm not aware of.

If the monetary system collapses then there are two possibilities
- 10 million dollars will buy you a lollipop
- nearly all the wealth in the world will be destroyed, making it impossible for BTC to have a market cap of 210 trillion.

You can't have the cake, eat it, and also throw it in somebody's face at the same time!  Wink
So let's stick to the scenario where Bitcoin is reaching 1 million without any apocalypse!
1830  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Inactive BTC whale transfers $8M worth Bitcoin After 10 years Inactivity on: April 22, 2023, 10:03:31 AM
Interesting that here no-one mentioned the top reason Reddit users did
- 10 years in jail ?  Grin

Either way, even if it's about regaining aces or regaining freedom for sure it's not about the price!
If he wanted money he would have cashed out way earlier, in 2027 when the was just a bit lower and not even mentioning when it hit $60k, besides, after one hop the coins haven't moved so definitely not moved to an exchange.

Anyhow, the really interesting part is that he's not moving random sums priced in $ or rounded BTC values, he's moving entire inputs and breaking them into ~90 BTC. Wonder if he plans on mixing them.

1831  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Why Coinbase & Binance does not support Bitcoin LN? on: April 21, 2023, 02:09:49 PM
Why would Binance support the lightning network when they can sell you WBTC in BSC.  Tongue

They don't even call it WBTC (which is on ETH) or anything else, but straight BTC!
And they have two of them!

@OP
Since Binance is charging more for a segwit transaction and a higher minimum you can pretty much guess how many pigs will fly till they add LN!!!
But CZ will post some bs on Twitter, some #safu thing and most will forget he's actually one of Bitcoin's biggest enemies.
1832  Economy / Speculation / Re: What if BTC won't see ATH again? on: April 21, 2023, 01:09:36 PM
Problem:
Quote
What if BTC won't see ATH again?

Solution:



Seems like way too many are concerned more about the price and the gain in $ than realizing Bitcoin will work as intended by Satoshi even at $100 or $100k.
I remember Bitcoin being called "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" not a quadruple your money every cycle earning scheme.
1833  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: THE RATES AT WHICH BITCOIN ATMs MOVES IS MIND BLOWING on: April 21, 2023, 11:33:21 AM
Is this data up to date? Because about a month ago, a software defect was discovered in one of the largest servers for these devices in the United States, and it caused a large number of these devices to stop.

It was the arrest of Sonny Meraban who ran Bitcoin of America that caused that decline, not General Bytes who came back online shortly after
https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/ohio-cryptocurrency-charges/

Bitcoin of America had over two thousand ATMs and they are all gone, forever!
General Bytes actually added a few more ATMs by the end of the month.



1834  Economy / Economics / Re: Pay your debt with monkeys! on: April 21, 2023, 11:15:07 AM
The real question here is why would the Chinese accept monkeys as payment? Are they going to eat them? Grin
Are they doing to sell them to the ordinary people as pets(or maybe put them into zooparks)? 4000 dollars per monkey seems like a lot to me.

Somebody else said the same about the monkey price, but I mention, this is the price Google gives me for a healthy pet monkey of the same genus.
Probably a wild animal just traped and sent in a cage to a foreign country would maybe be 500-1000 at most including the costs but I have like zero clues about monkey prices, monkey farming, and monkey trading!

where did you read that they only have 18 Zoos in China?
because I try to search about this and I found this website saying"In 2021, the number of parks and zoos in China amounted to 22,062.", even this article says that China has 1000 Zoos in their country

Both the 28 and the 1000 numbers are somewhat correct.
There are only 28 zoos that respect normal animal welfare standards, the rest are private enterprise or municipal owned small zoos with terrible conditions, cramped, and without vets, so by Western standards, they would qualify mostly as a poultry farm than a zoo.

China’s terrible zoos and why they’re still thriving
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2100775/chinas-terrible-zoos-and-why-theyre-still-thriving

As for the question everyone asked, let's be real
- 100 000 monkeys won't fed even one city for a day
- you don't buy 100 000 monkeys for zoos when the species are known to be the best at reproducing in captivity

They are going to do testing on them it's obvious as the sky is blue, and everyone knows it.

But my question is, when China were loaning out such amount of money to Sri Lanka why didn't they asked for collateral before releasing such huge amount of money to them? Seems they had no option to accept whatever Sri Lanka offer to pay back to them.

Because this is not Bitcointalk, if Sri Lanka would have had the collateral it would have used that.
Besides, to the ones approving or asking for the loan it doesn't matter, they are not the ones paying it, and to China, it doesn't matter either, they can loan one billion, then bribe the next government with a few million and those will sell them things worth 2 billion for that debt.
Simple as that, it's easy when it's not actually your money!
1835  Economy / Economics / Pay your debt with monkeys! on: April 20, 2023, 05:49:12 AM
Sounds completely unrealistic? Yes, it does!
Is it actually real? Yes, it is!
Can even be applied at country level? Definitely!

Sri Lanka planning to send 1,00,000 toque macaque monkeys to China

Quote
Cash-strapped Sri Lanka is considering exporting up to 100,000 endangered monkeys to China, the agriculture minister said Wednesday, raising concerns among conservationists.

The toque macaque is endemic to Sri Lanka and common on the island but is classed as endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list. Sri Lanka bans almost all live animal exports and the proposed sale comes as it faces its worst-ever economic crisis. No financial details were made available.
"They want the monkeys for over 1,000 zoos they have across China," Agriculture Minister Mahinda Amaraweera told AFP.
"I have appointed a committee to study the request and see how we can do this."

Of course, there are a few questions about it and darker aspects of this:
- I don't know how a species that numbers over 1 million can be considered endangered, but let's leave it like that
- even if they have 1000 zoos that means 100 monkeys of the same species for each zoo and that is just not real
- what they are going to do for real with them, and most hint at labs testing, which stops being funny  
- how much of the debt will be really erased for this?

But nevertheless, Sri Lanka is in so much debt that it needs either cash or a way to pay out its debts to China so, probably for the first time in human history monkeys will be used en masse to pay for a portion of that debt, giving a whole new meaning to the term "monkey business".
At $4000 per monkey (google sources) that would make about $400 000 000 (in theory, not including costs), around 5% of the 7 billion they have in debt with China.

So, do you feel like you could show up at your bank and hand them two or three monkeys to cover your mortgage?
1836  Economy / Economics / Re: Russian Gas ban - A problem for Europe or suicide for Russia? on: April 19, 2023, 11:34:23 AM
It seems bad news to those who say the Russian economy is collapsing because Russia can only sell oil and gas to Europe. And Europe no longer needs Russian energy, so Russia's economy will soon collapse and will lose badly in the war. Europe was fortunate to be able to fill their gas reserves by the winter of 2022. But I wonder what will happen to them this winter when they are importing LNG from the US as an ally, and the US is selling at four times the market price.

How about you stop with the disinformation, seriously, stop!

The same parroting about 2020 prices is really getting old, every propagandist here takes the 2020 gas prices as a reference but forgets to mention why gas was cheap then. Funny thing, they forget also to mention that oil trading now at $80 is ....drums.. 120$ dollars more expensive than it was in 2020!
So let's once and for all deal with this whole crap!

Dutch TTF is right now trading at 42E/ MW, it's high against 2020 value but if you go back beyond that period you will see it's nowhere that expensive:
https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/TGJ23/performance?mode=monthly

For example, if we go for a 10 years period so before the invasion of Crimea you will see that the price was, what a surprise
Quote
Period Open: 27.350
so it's not 3 or 4 times more expensive but only 60%.

But!!, it doesn't stop there the 42E/MW is just Dutch TTF, the prices for LNG are different:
https://aegis.acer.europa.eu/terminal/price_assessments
And as you can see LNG trades right now:
Quote
2023.04.18   34.786   34.985   34.814   -7.908
at a 7.8 Eurous DISCOUNT against pipeline gas!
This also means that the US is selling cheaper LNG than gas coming from Russia, Algeria, or via Turkish pipelines.

So let's do simple math and put the 27.35 price at which EU was buying Russian gas in 2013 against the LNG prices now at 35 and you got one big whooping, oh wait, it's not 3x is just 30% increase. And what a surprise, even Russia admitted this before the war, this is from 2018, so before the war
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/energy-diplomacy/us-lng-price-up-to-40-higher-than-russian-gas-novak/20225
Quote
The price of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the U.S. is at least 30-40 percent higher than Russian pipeline gas, Russia's Energy Minister Alexander Novak said on Saturday.
Of course, it was even by then manipulation but at those time they had to be at least decent so he only said what the minimum decency allowed him to say.

Now to address the other of your concern.
Europe was importing 155 billion cubic meters of Gas, there is a single gas pipeline that transports gas to China at a 25 million capacity!
How have they switched selling gas from Europe to China? Simply, they haven't!

Quote
Russian gas exports to countries outside a group of former Soviet republics plunged by 45.5% in 2022, figures from gas giant Gazprom showed Monday.
Gazprom said in a statement that exports outside the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) totaled 100.9 billion cubic meters compared to 185.1 billion in 2021.

That 2022 number includes the two months before the war and another 6 months in which Yamal worked.

So next time, rather than regurgitating the stupid Russian propaganda, look for facts!
Otherwise, you will have the same shock as commies had when the USSR went bust because till that moment they were sure the USA is in a civil war, western Europe is dying of hunger just to find out there were more washing machines in Bremen than in all of Russia!
1837  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Bitcoin hunter became the hunted on: April 19, 2023, 11:09:30 AM
To be fair, he is not "against centralized shitcoins" and is not pro-Bitcoin. He is against cryptocurrencies, full stop.

To be fair you haven't provided anything to back up your claim other than what you persoanlly think of the said person!
Being against exchanges that are trying to bypass every regulation, that play around with people's money, shady ICOs that run with user funds and ETF is not being against Bitcoin, it's actually following Bitcoin's whitepaper by the book.

Remember?
- not your keys, not your coins
- remove the third party from a  transaction
- no IOU promises instead of real coins in your own wallet.

I can't understand how someone who is against thinks that do exactly the above these but on the other hand claims that Bitcoin is the only true decentralized currency against Bitcoin.

Moreover, you're telling me that an advisor at MIT who held courses entitled:

Quote
Blockchain And Money
This course is for students wishing to explore blockchain technology’s potential use—by entrepreneurs and incumbents—to change the world of money and finance. The course begins with a review of Bitcoin and an understanding of the commercial, technical, and public policy fundamentals of blockchain technology, distributed ledgers, and smart contracts. The class then continues on to current and potential blockchain applications in the financial sector.
which you can download from here or even watch on youtube was doing so for years promoting bitcoin and blockchain solutions to his students and taking questions and debunking myths about time settlements, transactions costs, decentralization and so on just because his hidden agenda was to...what? Tax the hell out of shitcoins and exchanges that print money and offer them to newbies only to let them devalue one month later and then start a new hype?

So let me spell it again: All this is BULLSHIT!
This guy has promoted bitcoin and blockchain more than 99.9% of this board has ever done but for some weird conspiracy theory, he must be evil just because he's the chairman of the SEC.

Bitcoiners persecution complex at its finest. Government bad and wants to kill Bitcoin! But Bitcoin is brave and strong and is defeating the government! And of course people here don't read the article, but get outraged by the bad government man that hates Bitcoin.

We need an enemy! Because not everything is going to plan and you can't invest 1$ today and get 10 trillion tomorrow we need somebody to blame, and of course, is the evil gubbermint! The lower the understanding about the basic economy and the deeper the frustration from its own failure the higher the need to find a culprit that is to blame, an all-powerful entity who has nothing better than sabotage this, but of course, at the same time this all-powerful being that controls everything will be brought down by somebody buying 10$ of coins.

The whole thing is so frustrating I can't even describe how much I'm willing to curse everything right now
- Saylor said Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme, then when he smelled the $ invested millions of other people's money just for profit and he's the hero of the community
- Gensler held course about Bitcoin for years in front of MIT students, not Twitter clappers, but because he is now the chairman of the SEC he is the evilest person in the world

Seriously, f^&%^&% this shit!
1838  Economy / Economics / Re: Why America Can Be The Biggest Economy In The World? on: April 18, 2023, 08:07:51 PM
In this thread, I want to discuss the story of a country that for the last 100 years has succeeded in becoming the largest economic power in the world, especially if it's not the United States. even though about 150 to 200 years ago the American economy was nothing when compared to, for example, the British Empire, the Chinese empire and also the kingdoms in Hindustan, but only in a short time, the current American country could become a giant power in proportion to GDP (Gross Domestic Product). reached 24% of all GDP in the world.
~

Have you tried looking at the population?
1800:
USA  ~ 5 million
China  ~300  million
India ~ 170 million

In 1900 the USA population went up to ~76 million, that's the main reason for the growth compared to other countries in this short span!

because of the petrodollar. after the ww2, countries all over the world agreed to use USD to buy oil in Saudi. since USD is being used worldwide, there is no doubt they can instantly become big. the demand for USD will ofc grow. more governments will be buying USD because it's the only currency accepted to buy gas.

Again with the petrodollar myth?
The US became the largest economy in the last decade of the 19th century overcoming China, how much oil was traded then?
Oh, wait, where was Saudi Arabia then?
1839  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Bitcoin hunter became the hunted on: April 18, 2023, 05:09:20 PM
Oh poor Gensler  Grin
You have been trying to hunt down Bitcoin for a long time now as the ring leader, yet you are caught shilling another cryptocurrency, is this another 24hrs Jack Bauer episodic Mayhem?

Seriously, what is this bullshit?
It's ^&*^% video from 2019, 4 years ago, he wasn't "caught" he was doing it openly and the videos have been online for years, now somebody decided to make a fuss about this by cropping 10 seconds out of it and he has a story!

Algorand was developed by a professor at MIT, and Gary Gensler was an advisor at MiT, in one of those videos on of the developers of the coin was standing right in front of him, he asked for an example, of course, he will pick one done by his own colleagues who are standing 2 meters away there!
For god's sake, he had a course on blockchain and crypto, what was he supposed to do, talk about what?
https://ocw.mit.edu/search/?q=Prof.+Gary+Gensler


I have no doubt that this man is in for some trouble, I am not the Law 👮 bug.......

Yeah right, in trouble for what?
You read the headline and suddenly you know all the laws, he will get 100 life sentences for that for sure!

Gensler failed to reject and he loves power too so after he became FED chairman, he attacked Bitcoin and cryptocurrency market to get a power he wanted.

When did he do that?
He has claimed numerous times that Bitcoin is the only crypto that is not a security, how is that attacking Bitcoin?

Gary Gensler: ‘Everything But Bitcoin’ Can Be Accountable Under SEC Jurisdiction
https://beincrypto.com/sec-chairman-gary-gensler-caught-shilling-algorand-now-deems-it-a-security/
He is against centralized shitcoins, not anti-Bitcoin!, that's why every "dev" and shitcoin bagholder is getting triggered by his actions!




1840  Economy / Economics / Re: Coinbase CEO asks UK to slow down on Crypto Regulations - lift bank bans on: April 18, 2023, 04:50:56 PM
Brian Armstrong says, UK and Europe could take it slow on the crypto regulations and have proper framework so that it can become center for the eased crypto regulations.

Coinbase when it needs access to markets and to let investors buy coins :
- We need regulations as soon as possible, we need ways for people to invest, SEC do something fast!!

Coinbase when it needs to follow the regulations by the book:
- Why so many regulations, we need to take it slow, why so many rules, we're going to the EU&UK!

Coinbase when the UK turns out to be just as strict:
- Please let us alone, we just need to earn money!!

Quote
Tomorrow, Tuesday April 18, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is set to be a headliner at UK Fintech Week, an example of just how seriously we are working in the region. Some 22% of UK adults currently own cryptocurrency, with 28% likely to buy or trade crypto in the next 12 months.

I don't know what others think but every 1/4 adult in the UK owning crypto right now and 1/2 of them doing so in 12 months sounds like he's pulling those numbers out of his you know what.

Also, look what he wishes for, stablecoins:
Quote
Deliver a regulatory framework that promotes stablecoins.  Stablecoins are the entry point to digital finance and promoting the development of  sterling-denominated stablecoins, in conjunction with other new forms of money (e.g. CBDC), plus  allowing issuers to deposit cash reserves at the Bank of England, would put the UK on the map

Quote
Put Web3 and blockchain at the heart of government, with a cross departmental  strategy that capitalises on the next wave of tech innovation and digitisation of the economy.  Doing so will create a bigger, fairer and more digital economy, and boost UK competitiveness

I think that some of those guys have lived too much in their own world and they don't realize that a lot of every country's economy doesn't care a bit about web 2.0, web 3.0, and the rest of the numbers till one quadrillion. 9 years have passed since this so-called revolution of digital assets should have started as a lot of guys including Armstrong cheered alongside Gavin and they aren't making a dent in the real economy, it has been restricted to a parallel universe where people trade coins and lose money in shitty projects and nothing else, in short vaporware.
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 737 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!