Also X11 is nothing more than several other peoples worked combined together
So is the space shuttle.. what's your point? “For those who understand, no explanation is necessary; for those who don't understand, no explanation is possible” Can't cure stupid is the right saying here. |
|
|
|
Wow, must have hit the DRK's trolls nerve a bit with the knowledge that their masternode aren't really trustless and takes an IT expert that you must "trust" 4+ HOURS to setup...
Nah you didn't. It takes people of AnonyMint, gmaxwell et al calibre to "hit nerves" so to speak. I don't think you realize that you are a dumbass for not understanding Cryptographic Trustless terminology. Go ahead though, it is fun. Please do tell us how by letting someone setting up a Ubuntu system for you that there is "no chance" that the OS was compromised in the process. Please do tell us.... you dumb fuck I set it up myself. Stop spreading lies. First time someone pisses me off that much? You're a shame and should be ashamed. Funny how DRK bagholders like to troll in XC thread and then you ask them one question on their thread which is in their context and they go nuts in our thread. |
|
|
|
so I copied darkcoins closed source code?
the only scam is darkcoins 50% premine
No he meant X11, the PoW he came up with. I think initial mixers were some copied from some other coin. loljosh should have the details. Ask him. okay so you think loljosh created xnodes? I don't know what your smoking but the xnode protocol was developed by myself and other developers. It is based on my 20 years of experience of designing, coding and deploying advanced network solutions. here is an example of some of my work ----- >>>>>>>>> http://seclists.org/interesting-people/2002/Feb/107Sorry, Dan. Brought so many DRK trolls here today by showing one of DRK's biggest weakness.... |
|
|
|
so I copied darkcoins closed source code?
the only scam is darkcoins 50% premine
No he meant X11, the PoW he came up with. I think initial mixers were some copied from some other coin. loljosh should have the details. Ask him. Right... and Darkcoin is 100% original code right? Didn't even use any bitcoin technologies right? Do you know how open source license work? Are all DRK troll that ignorant? Is that why DRK is completely close source cause they copied too much codes that's probably not even open source? |
|
|
|
Haha you know you're doing something right when these TROLLS start slithering back in with their vitriolic statements. Why so mad?
Because a known troll came to Darkcoin thread and then back here spreading dumb propaganda. I don't blame him though. The whole XC thing started because atcsecure saw the "scam of darkcoin". Naturally the hate trickles down to everyone here. I don't see this ever going away. There will be bit of jibber-jabber every now and then, for the short term  A KNOWN troll lol. Go and check how many post I have made in the DRK thread.... Go, count them. I post in many forums because I invest in many coins unlike DRK bagholders. |
|
|
|
You know why Xnode will be way more decentralized at the end in comparison to DRK? It takes an expert 4 hours to set up a DRK masternode. 4 hours!! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg7564470#msg7564470DRK "trustless" weak point isn't even necessarily in their blockchain, but rather... Do you really trust the person setting up the masternode for you? Before the 7th of july people are gonna come here and they expect to find info such as this, how much easier it is for XC to setup a node and get the fees. We have to keep thread clean and tidy till then. In PST you can keep useful info about price, but right here there will be crazy influx of info-hungered investors and traders looking for proof XC is strong. I expect more volume than VRC at that day. Yea and XC's Xnode steals your coins since its not trustless.. Would you rather have, Darkcoin's Masternodes that are working perfectly and trustless ORXC's Xnodes that steal user's coins and are trusted, while not proving anonymity. I would be obliged to answer, were it not for another DKR troll. Back to your cave pest! edit: I find the "working perfectly" part hilarious. Just goes to show, DRK is like a dodgy garage, following 2 emergency forks and 2 failed updates, they go on to tell you its working perfectly.. Oh well, at least president chapeplin is testing it, so they will be fine. Funny, cause chaeplin helped XC when it's Xnodes were stealing its own users coins, and when Xsend was giving wrong transactions. The Xnodes stealing it's users coins issue has still not been fixed however and never will because its not trustless. Prove it... your Chaeplin can't even crack rev 1.5 .... Whatever he knows about pre 1.5 means nothing.... ps. Spreading FUD's about copying Fedora and can't really crack 1.5 and spreading FUD isn't called "helping" |
|
|
|
Haha you know you're doing something right when these TROLLS start slithering back in with their vitriolic statements. Why so mad?
Because of this discovery about DRK ... "Trustless"... IF you can really trust the person setting up the DRK masternode... How much does it cost to compromise the setup "expert" so that your masternode is no longer trustless but actually is a honeypot? In fact, how many masternode that are setup today by these experts aren't already honeypot? Any statistics on that? That's why you guys have BANNED master node key? So trustless that you guys need to ban certain masternode? If you are using DRK to send stuff "anonymously", you should be really worried cause you really don't know how many honeypot has been setup in the wild already. I don't know if you're naturally stupid...if that's the case I won't bother responding to you and I'm deeply sorry for the mental pain that thinking does to you... But In case you didnt know, You can setup a masternode by yourself. There are tutorials out there, if you're too lazy to do so, then you can trust someone else to do it for you but that's just OPTIONAL. Most masternode owners set it up by themselves, eliminating having to trust anyone.
Unlike XC, where Xnodes will steal your coins no matter who sets it up, and where Xsend doesnt even work.And masternode key? Dude why have you resorted to Lying now...just pathetic. You can tell that many people in the DRK thread that MANY have paid other people to set it up for them because ... oh it's "SO EASY" right?!?! Funny... Why can't you answer the question... Please do tell us how by letting someone setting up a Ubuntu system for you that there is "no chance" that the OS was compromised in the process. |
|
|
|
Wow, must have hit the DRK's trolls nerve a bit with the knowledge that their masternode aren't really trustless and takes an IT expert that you must "trust" 4+ HOURS to setup...
Nah you didn't. It takes people of AnonyMint, gmaxwell et al calibre to "hit nerves" so to speak. I don't think you realize that you are a dumbass for not understanding Cryptographic Trustless terminology. Go ahead though, it is fun. Please do tell us how by letting someone setting up a Ubuntu system for you that there is "no chance" that the OS was compromised in the process. Please do tell us.... |
|
|
|
More DRK's trolls comment ignored...
Right... that's why your user name is DARKota and you started trolling when the fake "trustless" model of DRK have been outed??!?! |
|
|
|
Haha you know you're doing something right when these TROLLS start slithering back in with their vitriolic statements. Why so mad?
Because of this discovery about DRK ... "Trustless"... IF you can really trust the person setting up the DRK masternode... How much does it cost to compromise the setup "expert" so that your masternode is no longer trustless but actually is a honeypot? In fact, how many masternode that are setup today by these experts aren't already honeypot? Any statistics on that? That's why you guys have BANNED master node key? So trustless that you guys need to ban certain masternode? If you are using DRK to send stuff "anonymously", you should be really worried cause you really don't know how many honeypot has been setup in the wild already. |
|
|
|
I wish I could clone Teka, so we have him moderating this topic 24/7 ruthlessly, and make 1 FUD TRUE.
There is no point in moderating people who clearly have no evidence behind their accusations especially those about sock puppet accounts and xc being a scam. I would rather not delete these posts because it proves how much, we have here and how much people want to attack our product. Also these users who have a clear agenda will have a post to come back to and regret. That's funny, you're trying to make it seem as thought you dont delete posts that are saying the truth. You do my friend, and there are many complaints against you. I know for sure that you're probably emailing atsecure right now to get him to delete my posts about XC that is the truth. That XC copied Darkcoin's Darksend and Masternodes with it's mediocre Xnodes and Xsend that don't even work, plus the Xnodes steal users coins. You're a funny liar mr Teka. Wow, must have hit the DRK's trolls nerve a bit with the knowledge that their masternode aren't really trustless and takes an IT expert that you must "trust" 4+ HOURS to setup... |
|
|
|
DRK's troll comment ignored....
"Trustless"... IF you can really trust the person setting up the DRK masternode... How much does it cost to compromise the setup "expert" so that your masternode is no longer trustless but actually is a honeypot? In fact, how many masternode that are setup today by these experts aren't already honeypot? Any statistics on that? That's why you guys have BANNED master node key? So trustless that you guys need to ban certain masternode? |
|
|
|
You know why Xnode will be way more decentralized at the end in comparison to DRK? It takes an expert 4 hours to set up a DRK masternode. 4 hours!! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg7564470#msg7564470DRK "trustless" weak point isn't even necessarily in their blockchain, but rather... Do you really trust the person setting up the masternode for you? Before the 7th of july people are gonna come here and they expect to find info such as this, how much easier it is for XC to setup a node and get the fees. We have to keep thread clean and tidy till then. In PST you can keep useful info about price, but right here there will be crazy influx of info-hungered investors and traders looking for proof XC is strong. I expect more volume than VRC at that day. I think by rev 3 public release, we need to have these marketing point ready to let the world know about. |
|
|
|
You know why Xnode will be way more decentralized at the end in comparison to DRK? It takes an expert 4 hours to set up a DRK masternode. 4 hours!! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg7564470#msg7564470DRK "trustless" weak point isn't even necessarily in their blockchain, but rather... Do you really trust the person setting up the masternode for you? |
|
|
|
Roede94105 here, Yidakee on IRC #Darkcoin (aka GhostPlayer in this forum) helped me setup my master node today, took about 4 hours, everything went ABSOLUTELY smoothly, he took the time to explain everything and I am now a MN owner thanks to him! If you have no knowledge like me, but want to setup a MN in a safe way and while protecting the network, contact him! Yer a wizard, Yida  My pleasure!! for reference, roede did sign up for a Full Masternode Setup, so I did do all the server side setup. And never ever touched the funds. Total trustless setup! It takes 4 hours to setup a MN by an expert? |
|
|
|
my stake finally started 3 days ago, it made 2 minting transactions and hasnt had another one since.. what happend, nothing is changed. do I need to be worried about all the stake meat i'm losing? or is this just a hiccup?
Coins take on average 9 to 15 days to stake, once they have staked, the timer starters over again. You can check your coin age easily under "coin control" Is it better to have 50 (lower) or toward 1000 (higher) coins per address? Technically it doesn't matter, but also it is not about coins per address, but coins per transactions (coin-blocks) so you can take 1000XC's and split into 20 separate "50XC" transactions or just keep it as 1 single 1000XC transaction over-time your payouts would be the same though Thanks, Dan. I am asked this question because yesterday you mentioned that the sweet spot is between 50 to 500 coins per transaction. What is your meaning by "sweet spot" if it doesn't matter at the end? Well it the end it may not matter although the network is secured through staking, so having more "coin-blocks/transactions" to stake is better overall. While your "per-stake" reward is lower, you have more of them and if you spread it out correctly over 10 days, you could have daily "stake" payments. Thanks again. Now, I will know how to help the network by allocating all my coins properly. |
|
|
|
my stake finally started 3 days ago, it made 2 minting transactions and hasnt had another one since.. what happend, nothing is changed. do I need to be worried about all the stake meat i'm losing? or is this just a hiccup?
Coins take on average 9 to 15 days to stake, once they have staked, the timer starters over again. You can check your coin age easily under "coin control" Is it better to have 50 (lower) or toward 1000 (higher) coins per address? Technically it doesn't matter, but also it is not about coins per address, but coins per transactions (coin-blocks) so you can take 1000XC's and split into 20 separate "50XC" transactions or just keep it as 1 single 1000XC transaction over-time your payouts would be the same though Thanks, Dan. I am asked this question because yesterday you mentioned that the sweet spot is between 50 to 500 coins per transaction. What is your meaning by "sweet spot" if it doesn't matter at the end? |
|
|
|
my stake finally started 3 days ago, it made 2 minting transactions and hasnt had another one since.. what happend, nothing is changed. do I need to be worried about all the stake meat i'm losing? or is this just a hiccup?
Coins take on average 9 to 15 days to stake, once they have staked, the timer starters over again. You can check your coin age easily under "coin control" Is it better to have 50 (lower) or toward 1000 (higher) coins per address? |
|
|
|
Im only wondering why a prominent holder of a different coin only here to disrupt the thread. If you gave some argumentation along with your "huh" maybe you get some back!
"huh" = Someone calling himself an investment professional claiming it takes an equal amount of money to marketcap to double the price. What do you think would happen to the price of the discreetly unnamed $40MM marketcap coin, if someone started buying it up with another $40MM. The price would 5x at minimum. Shush back to your scam-coin, developed by a scammer... It takes that much ignorance to blindly support that kind of coin... The dev insta-mining 2kk coins, and he goes saying... "mmm...so look, I'm open about it...trust me now..." here is Darkcoin ANN; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.0"Release date: 11PM EST, 18th January 2014 / No premine" i guessed everyone is just dumb to know anything or don't want to know anything. slap in the face Hmm... you do know the dev INSTAmined 40%+ of the coin the first day by having major rewards per block, then instantly knocked the rewards down so that no one will EVER be able to mine as much as the instamined coins right? Are you just ignorant or a DRK troll? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560138.0and let me google that for you... https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=darkcoin%20instamine |
|
|
|
|
So... now we know this was all a long con like I said a few days ago....
You gain a little trust from the people by giving a few coins back to the communities, but then you go and hide 3 million extra coins....
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
