I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. He will be adding that key's fingerprint to his BitcoinTalk account as soon as he gets access to a computer :-) He's been busy away from a machine that can access it at the moment. I'm sure we can provide those items, this was just a short-term fix as we recognised that we needed to give some kind of validation. My countersign of the key (Canonical have verified my identity on Launchpad, if you're concerned about that: https://launchpad.net/~n00bsys0p) is all we've managed for now, but we will be doing this properly as soon as we can organise it. We do realise the necessity for validation of download integrity, and shall be taking steps to improve this for future releases. btcsql, Dan is busy trying to deliver the EM for tonight testing and finish up fixing Rev 2 release. If it's so important to you, why don't you wait for the release? Causing unnecessary work for the team is totally idiotic. There are a lot of WAY HIGHER PRIORITY stuff over your unnecessary request. |
|
|
|
So folks, I have been following this thread from the beginning. Xc is the first currency I have truly been excited about since btc. I am about to make what is a large xc investment for myself. Anyone have a reason why they strongly feel someone should or should not invest in xc. Not basing my decision on this info, just curious as to where the community still stands. Thanks.
You shouldn't because you will push the price up while my buy orders aren't filled by people selling low to chase the next pump and dump.... |
|
|
|
DONT LISTEN TO KRYTOGRETZKY HE ACCUSES EVERY COIN BEING A SCAM . GET LOST!
I think you owe me an apology... or were you in on this scam with the dev? |
|
|
|
In order for the private mode to work with this release, you must have have UNPNP enabled on your router OR have the port mapped correctly inbound -- this will be resolved in a future release Can I suggest changing to "Enable XCend" ? Hmm.. I'm open to suggestions on this topic... XCend sounds pretty good, I like it. +1 |
|
|
|
So, how do you bypass the block chain completely? How does the coins get moved from the original address into these newly created wallets?
Did you read what he wrote before you started asking questions? He never claimed he is bypassing the blockchain completely. He is disguising one large transaction into many smaller transactions. He wrote: "We are not attempting to disguise the original sender, but we are disguising the amount of coins sent to one receiver." He does bypass the blockchain when the wallets are sent to the receiver. Today I have a few announcements and some surprises!
The closed beta of the new BurnerCoin wallet begins today. I want to thank everyone who sent me a pm requesting to be part of the beta! I have selected 10 beta testers and they will received the new wallets shortly after this announcement.
In my announcement on Monday I wrote we have been working on new technologies and today I would like to announce our new feature BurnerConnect will be enabled in the beta. BurnerConnect is a separate feature than Tor and we are considering it an advanced option.
BurnerConnect is a new anonymity feature that allows a sender to send BurnerCoins to a receiver via a direct tcp/ip connection! This method bypasses the blockchain and sends a specially created wallet to the receiver. The connections are established directly and no central server is needed.
How BurnerConnect will work...
1. The receiver gives the sender his/hers special BurnerConnect address. This address is a specially formatted version of the receivers IP address. Example: 102.32.91.42 = cxy-sy-mt-ry
2. The sender enters the receiver's BurnerConnect address into the new wallet.
3. The sender enters the amount he/she is sending and clicks send.
4. A new Burner wallet is created and the BurnerCoins are transfered to the new wallet.
5. A secured connection is then established with the receiver. The sender does not have access to the receiver BurnerCoins.
6. The new wallet is then sent to the receiver via the BurnerConnect connection. The blockchain is bypassed completely!
7. The receiver's client opens the wallet automatically and the BurnerCoins are now added.
8. The connection is immediately disconnected once the wallet is received.
We felt sending wallets/coins in this manner have numerous benefits for both the sender and the receiver. There are no central servers and exchanges needed for this technology. It is as simple as sending an email, and there is no record of the transfer in the blockchain.
BurnerConnect is up and running, and the beta testers will be able to use BurnerConnect along with Tor today!
I may be a bit new to Crypt coins / currencies but it does not seem like a good idea to break a transaction outside of the blockchain. How is the transaction validated? If the coins are truly outside of the block chain and the owner goes to sell them on an exchange, how does the exchange validate them? If they are outside of the block chain, how do you tell if they are counterfeit or not. It also begs the question if a coin can be moved in and out of the block chain does that call into question the validity of the block chain itself. Seems to me that moving coins in and out of the block chain opens the block chain to all sorts of potential shenanigans. I don't see the anonymity in this. IP traffic is super easy to trace. So, I dont see where the anonymity comes in here. Matter of fact this seems less anonymous than if the transaction was simply left in the block chain. But what do I know. I'm a noob. But, sure would like to understand better. Thanks Ok... If you are really saying that it DOESN'T bypass blockchain completely, then WARNING BELL is completely ringing off the hook, because look at point #6 from yesterday announcement.... Let me repeat it here again for you... 6. The new wallet is then sent to the receiver via the BurnerConnect connection. The blockchain is bypassed completely!Do you know how the fundamental of blockchain work? How do you send coins from one address to another bypassing the blockchain? Please do explain... So... does it or does it not bypass the blockchain? I just found it interesting that not another one of you questioned the obvious non-answer to my question of this tech as a huge red flag. So many people came to defend the dev blindly. Makes me really wonder how many of the defenders are shill accounts for the dev.... |
|
|
|
Requires UNPNP or Port Forwarding of TCP:32348. Can someone please explain to a noob like me how to do those things please? Thank you  For Netgear type router, you will need to go... Advanced (tab) -> Advanced Setup (Left) -> Port Forwarding/Port Triggering -> Add Custom Service Then you enter this:  Where Internal IP Address is your computer internal IP that you can get from IPCONFIG |
|
|
|
Buy into my sell wall please - c'mon cyberhack - cough cough please buy it! Ok maybe I'll raise it.. Sale price will be over soon.
Oh shit, I didn't even notice that giant wall. If that's yours...nice one. It allowed me to arbitrage another few dozen XC today.  How big was this wall? Would have love to just eat it up so we don't have to deal with flashbit anymore. He's a toxic cancer to the coin. Always causing drama like a 5 years old on tantrum. |
|
|
|
Sorry, I panic bought a lot last night when it fell to the 700s.  |
|
|
|
|
Guys, seriously... it's so frustrating to see you guys keep quoting and responding to obvious trolls.
1. Don't quote them.
2. Don't answer them.
|
|
|
|
"It's not going to go away" |
|
|
|
The sad thing is when these scammers runs off with the btc, it means all those btc is lost from the alt-coins scene that could have been used toward supporting an innovative coin.... |
|
|
|
What's up with Urocoin? 1.8k BTC volume? I can see most other alts were dumped and everyone is buying in on the Urocoin pump, but already I can see the pump is over and everything is back on a decline. Guys, give it a few more days and people buying all this voot at 600 - 800 sat will be very happy like me I am going to miss this great sale  All my btc are on Vootcloud development  It's ok, MsCollec. I bought them all up for you. Just picked up about 300k Voot on sale.  |
|
|
|
It's been over 30min and it didn't come through.
sometimes they get rejected,you can try it again and see if it goes through Is there an error message/status check if it didn't go through? |
|
|
|
Shame on you dev! Your childish behavior last night made me form an entirely new opinion of you. You shouldn't even be in another coin's thread. You should be focusing 100% on development of your own coin and its investors. I respected you and was heavily invested into VOOT holding strong all the way from the days of 450 satoshi until last night. I refuse to support a dev like that no matter what the price does. I'M OUT. For those who don't know what I'm talking about, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=668876.1420Which part of that was nonfactual? If it was all facts exposing a scam, then I think it's everyone's duty in the forum to do so. The dev just isn't into Voot you know? How about the part where he said the coin was dead? The fud only starts on that page and carries on for two more pages. If dev has the time to be in other coin's threads, then he should be putting that time into further development of his own coin. It is NOT a dev's civic duty to go around exposing so called "scams", we have enough trolls here for that. I wish the best for those of you who remain invested in this coin. But I for one refuse to support a dev who exhibits such childish behavior. Please quote the post where he said the coin was "dead". I think your behavior now is quite childish.... It's like "you told on my friend, I am not your friend any more! so there!"... No it is not the same as that. It is about the principle which some of us investors still highly value. dude how many people have lost on scam coins. its just anger your releasing. our dev pointed it out before it went to more ridiculously prices where people would have lost more Scam coins are one thing. However, there is NO PROOF yet that ROX is a scam. Maybe it is, maybe not... but from the looks of it, everything is adding up. Check their recent twitter post... hmmm... IT HAS SCAM WRITTEN ALL OVER IT. The fact that they are posting on twitter tells me that they are still here and haven't disappeared. If this were a scam, wouldn't they be gone by now? Also it seems they are doing a great job so far of rectifying the situation. It is fair to give them until the time they have stated to come up with proof. If they do come up with proof, where does that leave VOOT dev? Thanks for all information now you can go back to your community If roxcoin unscams itself it just means that the voot dev wasn't correct. No more no less. Everything points to roxcoin being a ripoff; it stinks to high heaven. Still, they could actually have something fantastic that they'll release tonight. With their fake websites, etc. they condemned themselves to all of the FUD but that be reversed with a success. So if ROX pulls through, it just means VOOT dev was incorrect even though he caused many people to lose a lot of money for no reason? You can't be serious. I'm sure there are many people out there that would be very angry for such false accusations that accumulated to their loss. Just know that is the type of dev you are supporting. I do believe that you owe MsCollec an apology for exposing ROX coin which has been proven a clear scam.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=668876.msg7778837#msg7778837The same Camcoin scam artist is the creator of roxcoin. |
|
|
|
Flashbit you remind me of a friend I had who knew the exact amount of time till his next birthday, holiday, etc. Please can you refrain from creating hard deadlines when the team have been forthcoming enough that it will be near the end of the week. This ^^ True XC supporters want the team to deliver quality, but not necessarily just push something out due to some "deadline". If you play any computer games, you would want them to model after Valve. It's done when it's done. That's why all their games are super successful. Nothing but quality. Forcing the team to not sleep for 30-40+ hours in a roll just to make the deadline makes it a deathmarch and increased bug count. No dude, thats totally blizzard. They will be finishing their new game blizzard Soon(ish). Valve doesn't even release! Valve was the worst example ever! ps: xc forum rev 2 link : http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/162-xc-rev2-beta-2-release/Ok... Blizzard in some sense, but D3 kinda left a bad taste in my mouth. At least Valve haven't released a turd yet. |
|
|
|
Flashbit you remind me of a friend I had who knew the exact amount of time till his next birthday, holiday, etc. Please can you refrain from creating hard deadlines when the team have been forthcoming enough that it will be near the end of the week. This ^^ True XC supporters want the team to deliver quality, but not necessarily just push something out due to some "deadline". If you play any computer games, you would want them to model after Valve. It's done when it's done. That's why all their games are super successful. Nothing but quality. Forcing the team to not sleep for 30-40+ hours in a roll just to make the deadline makes it a deathmarch and increased bug count. |
|
|
|
Bit of advice - stop rehashing the past as there were many mistakes made by many people and I admit I certainly wasn't helping the situation but what I ask is that you would embrace XC and think about the future. We need to be positive, and set an example for the newbies and support each other. Give me a big HUG! I know you want to. Ha!
You were the one that went on insulting people when I was trying to help you... You should know EXACTLY why date issue is a super sensitive matter. Learn to not insult others when they are trying to help in the future. |
|
|
|
ATCSecure (Dan) how is your progress with Rev 2/mainnet and EM, are we expecting another release this evening or tomorrow as planned?
Progress is pretty good. You can expect to hear from Dan with a Rev 2 update before long. EM is already finished for initial test, so we just have to release it around the end of the week. That's all sorted already. Much appreciated for the update. By end of week do you mean by end of day tomorrow we should be able to test EM? That would be awesome. We've been intentionally flexible about the date since we don't want to impact Rev 2's coming out. But you can count on it coming out around the end of the week. Not really what I asked but hey I'll take it and understand where you're coming from. Look forward to it dude! I think the team has already mentioned that "end of week" doesn't mean Friday. It's more like by "end of week" which includes the weekend. Let's not "hype" it so we have a new round of FUD again. Seeking clarification resembles FUD. Talk about super sensitive. Get a life dude. I think you need to get a life if all you constantly do is ask for dates of stuff.... What?? You weren't here for the flash crash because the delivery was late by a few mins?!?! Sorry did you say something - ignore. Let the count down begin until 7/7 officially ends in Eastern Time Zone - Boston Time!
Now less than 4 hrs away until DOOMS DAY
Down to the wire. Oh my.................... can we say nail biter! We will see if they can pull this off.. not long now.. wowowowow!
My God enough already. I dont ignore people but you just went on it. Thanks though u can't see this. LOL! Ya... so you could do this again? like calling it doomsday? lol... You were the one that started the doomsday countdown BS... |
|
|
|
ATCSecure (Dan) how is your progress with Rev 2/mainnet and EM, are we expecting another release this evening or tomorrow as planned?
Progress is pretty good. You can expect to hear from Dan with a Rev 2 update before long. EM is already finished for initial test, so we just have to release it around the end of the week. That's all sorted already. Much appreciated for the update. By end of week do you mean by end of day tomorrow we should be able to test EM? That would be awesome. We've been intentionally flexible about the date since we don't want to impact Rev 2's coming out. But you can count on it coming out around the end of the week. Not really what I asked but hey I'll take it and understand where you're coming from. Look forward to it dude! I think the team has already mentioned that "end of week" doesn't mean Friday. It's more like by "end of week" which includes the weekend. Let's not "hype" it so we have a new round of FUD again. Seeking clarification resembles FUD. Talk about super sensitive. Get a life dude. I think you need to get a life if all you constantly do is ask for dates of stuff.... What?? You weren't here for the flash crash because the delivery was late by a few mins?!?! |
|
|
|
ATCSecure (Dan) how is your progress with Rev 2/mainnet and EM, are we expecting another release this evening or tomorrow as planned?
Progress is pretty good. You can expect to hear from Dan with a Rev 2 update before long. EM is already finished for initial test, so we just have to release it around the end of the week. That's all sorted already. Much appreciated for the update. By end of week do you mean by end of day tomorrow we should be able to test EM? That would be awesome. We've been intentionally flexible about the date since we don't want to impact Rev 2's coming out. But you can count on it coming out around the end of the week. Not really what I asked but hey I'll take it and understand where you're coming from. Look forward to it dude! I think the team has already mentioned that "end of week" doesn't mean Friday. It's more like by "end of week" which includes the weekend. Let's not "hype" it so we have a new round of FUD again. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
