....
Now that you are online, can i ask you a VanityGen question? Found some nice addresses, can import them in console & after a restart they show up in my receive coins address list. But i can't copy the public key, is this because the "-F compressed" param is not working from the compiled version bitcoin.it has online? Hmm... I had no problem with it at all. Did you try to view the wallet detail through the paper wallet? No, did not downloaded that code jet. Will try to see what happens Oh ya, if you are getting a cannot get public key error, make sure your wallet is unlocked at least for staking. |
|
|
|
....
Now that you are online, can i ask you a VanityGen question? Found some nice addresses, can import them in console & after a restart they show up in my receive coins address list. But i can't copy the public key, is this because the "-F compressed" param is not working from the compiled version bitcoin.it has online? Hmm... I had no problem with it at all. Did you try to view the wallet detail through the paper wallet? No, did not downloaded that code jet. Will try to see what happens Also, the code I downloaded from was from here: https://github.com/WyseNynja/vanitygenThat has the compressed modifications in a few files. |
|
|
|
....
Now that you are online, can i ask you a VanityGen question? Found some nice addresses, can import them in console & after a restart they show up in my receive coins address list. But i can't copy the public key, is this because the "-F compressed" param is not working from the compiled version bitcoin.it has online? Hmm... I had no problem with it at all. Did you try to view the wallet detail through the paper wallet? |
|
|
|
Hi guys, Am debugging my explorer when i found this block: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?112246Seems to me Bittrex is stacking there coins, can i conclude that this is there hot wallet? Always expected exchanges to stake just as we do, not that i mind coz i would do the same but after reading so much about exchanges never staking coz of security issues it was a little surprise to me Am i reading this correct? More reasons to not keep your XC on the exchange? Why not stake yourself?  Am just back from my holiday, was a great feeling watching the transactions coming in after 3 weeks  When you say your explorer, do you mean you are coding one up? |
|
|
|
Hi guys, Am debugging my explorer when i found this block: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?112246Seems to me Bittrex is stacking there coins, can i conclude that this is there hot wallet? Always expected exchanges to stake just as we do, not that i mind coz i would do the same but after reading so much about exchanges never staking coz of security issues it was a little surprise to me Am i reading this correct? More reasons to not keep your XC on the exchange? Why not stake yourself? |
|
|
|
rdnkjdi should be banned from posting in here in my opinion. I'd already noticed over the last week that anything he says is just constant negativity. Then just now I noticed his topic here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770801.0 where he is encouraging everyone not buy XC and other rubbish. Because Jasinlee has pissed him off in some way he's conducting a smear campaign against XC. Ive read this thread daily since it started. And I can tell you that rdnkdji has never had anything positive to say. He tries to hide his troll with semi legitimate questions every now and then, but don't be fooled, he's pure troll. This... it's like every other post, he's "suggesting" people should sell XC.... |
|
|
|
lots of people can tell you that jasinlee took their money and didnt deliver on promises, thats the bottom line.
Then deal with Jasin... not XC. Jasin has nothing to do with XC and their investors. |
|
|
|
|
He's a guy that is totally butthurt when his greediness in buying some ASIC with specs that looked too good to be true backfired and now is trying to drag other people down with him.
Class S asshole.
|
|
|
|
I'm really just tired of this. Obviously those with a vested interest will downplay this.
This thread is officially a warning to those contemplating investing in XC. I think the content stands on its own.
Any future questions I'll be happy to answer. All I see is "you have no proof" when there is plenty.
And "it doesn't matter" which baffles me beyond belief. But to each his own.
We are all tired of your fud. You just better watch yourself if someone lose their money through their investment of XC and they make an example of you. You have slandered XC which is unjustified because Dan is the creator of the coin. You just might be the first one to have BCT subpoena for your IP and have your ass sued for it if you keep this shit up. If you feel you have a legitimate legal complaint aganist Jasin, then go through legal means and stop whining on this forum. Bring your whining about your greedy investment of an unknown ASIC that didn't materialized to the correct place and not drag other people's investment down, you asshole. Nobody have any sympathy for your greediness gone wrong. It doesn't matter to me because I didn't get greedy and tried to invest in a product that looks too good to be true, you did. |
|
|
|
I think that the XC team could just make an unambiguous statement that Jasinlee is not part of the XC team. Then if someone has an issue with Jasinlee the answer can be that Jasinleee is not part of the XC team.
At the moment the message I am getting is..."jasinleee is not part of the team...but he kindof is....but not really ...but he sortof is...but it's not official...but he is not...but he sortof is..."
As someone else said...it should not be the XC teams job to defend Jasinlee over something that has nothing to do with XC. Particularly if Jasinleee is not even part of the XC team.
I don't know how much more official it has to be... http://xc-official.com/the-xc-team/Do you see Jasin on there? No? Then he's not part of the "team".... |
|
|
|
the qibuck coin debacle.
You mean the biggest news XC's had in its existence so far? Developing a web 3.0 platform? With Qibuck, its first client, funding it? Man, you guys can be hard to please. Did you not read the press release? Link??? |
|
|
|
rdnkjdi... May we see your orders from Cryptsy? Arlyn asked for them today. You have had enough time, so it shouldn't be a problem. Right? Can you post them here so we can see you have a valid argument. Not the other guys... just you. As you can see from my above post I am taking some heat here because I think Jasin not keeping you guys in the loop is not right. I am acting in good faith so can you reciprocate and show your orders. It would establish trust. Thank you.
Sure I said I'd be happy to answer any other questions. Just have low tolerance for word games and Synchillis has worn out my patience. Not really sure exactly what this proves except the price I purchased cache with. http://imgur.com/zU9f4pFI plan on following my post up with timelined quotes from Jasin and the people in lite coin forums who have been scammed. I've been offered a refund w cache being worth $0.04 - worthless now that it's not being pumped by Jasin. Jasin was offering .01btc per cache so I would've purchased $7,200 worth of cache. Since I was getting it at 65% price on average at Cryptsy I suppose I probably spent 4,600ish in real dollars. So my 1,500 cach worth 4,600 would be worth $75 if I took a refund. I was able to get a lower rate on ASIC hash power that Jasin is promising in two months a week ago for a lower price per mhs than what I paid him. At the hash rate jasin is promised in a few months (what hes promised for the 3rd time?) it won't be worth much more than the cache refund. If I was guessing - if he does deliver (doubtful) it'll be a ripoff of buying someone else's old chip design. Hmm... your screenshot shows that you purchased a total of 0.016261148 btc of cache. What are you trying to show there? I don't get it. It's a small section and from a phone screenshot. Someone on the chat thread was asking. If people want to know the exact number of cache and have proof I can figure out a way to get it from my computer. It may be dozens of screenshots. You can easily go back to crypsy and track the prices with jasins announcement. I stated I would answer questions from anyone who was not the wordplay guy and was attempting to do so. Your post title is so misleading. Jasinlee is not "one of the developer" of XC. He might deliver PoBC in the future, but he's definitely not one of the developer of XC. He doesn't even have any hands in the core of the codes now. So, by you spreading FUD about XC and trying to tank the price of XC, who do I go after for that? That's your ultimate objective isn't it? Trying to drag XC down since you lost money on some stupid purchase of an ASIC. XC is not something that Jasin created. Dan is the creator of XC. How many times does it take for people to get it through your troll skull? Go troll in the Cache coin thread instead. |
|
|
|
rdnkjdi... May we see your orders from Cryptsy? Arlyn asked for them today. You have had enough time, so it shouldn't be a problem. Right? Can you post them here so we can see you have a valid argument. Not the other guys... just you. As you can see from my above post I am taking some heat here because I think Jasin not keeping you guys in the loop is not right. I am acting in good faith so can you reciprocate and show your orders. It would establish trust. Thank you.
Sure I said I'd be happy to answer any other questions. Just have low tolerance for word games and Synchillis has worn out my patience. Not really sure exactly what this proves except the price I purchased cache with. http://imgur.com/zU9f4pFI plan on following my post up with timelined quotes from Jasin and the people in lite coin forums who have been scammed. I've been offered a refund w cache being worth $0.04 - worthless now that it's not being pumped by Jasin. Jasin was offering .01btc per cache so I would've purchased $7,200 worth of cache. Since I was getting it at 65% price on average at Cryptsy I suppose I probably spent 4,600ish in real dollars. So my 1,500 cach worth 4,600 would be worth $75 if I took a refund. I was able to get a lower rate on ASIC hash power that Jasin is promising in two months a week ago for a lower price per mhs than what I paid him. At the hash rate jasin is promised in a few months (what hes promised for the 3rd time?) it won't be worth much more than the cache refund. If I was guessing - if he does deliver (doubtful) it'll be a ripoff of buying someone else's old chip design. Hmm... your screenshot shows that you purchased a total of 0.016261148 btc of cache. What are you trying to show there? I don't get it. |
|
|
|
rdnkjdi is a total XMR shill. I own no xmr. My posts should back this. It's the more interesting anon coin to me atm due to cryptonote. If you want an effective method to argue against it - read up on what happened yesterday that forked it without needing any hashing power by exploiting cryptonote bugs. Or the size of the blockchain. And the fact that it needs GBs of ram. Or that the developers that wrote and understand the original source are likely the ones attacking XMR Or that all of the devs agree the core code written in C with no comments is incredibly dangerous and they don't fully comprehend it. Ya. I don't own any XC. I just hang out on this forum the whole day and talking about it. Right... |
|
|
|
Just my 2 cents.
Here's my 2 cents: I don't care. Seriously. Does anyone even know what type of criminal past Satoshi Nakamoto was involved in? Did that stop the success of Bitcoin? Trolls will troll. rdnkjdi is a total XMR shill. You feed the troll even a tiny bit of attention and they go crazy. Just don't feed the trolls. Dan is the developer and nothing else matters. |
|
|
|
XC is doing rather well. I see no proof here. So until you post some. I this bullshit
rdnkjdi is a XMR shill and he's butthurt he lost some money ordering some ASIC. |
|
|
|
|
Now you all should know to not even respond to rdnkjdi. He's just a XMR shill trolling in our thread all along. Please just completely ignore whatever he post in this thread.
Remember, don't feed the trolls.
|
|
|
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) yeah, of course it's fast... I generated my xchat adress this way, but when I imported this adres in my wallet and I asked my public key it gave me a public key witch was very long it was even you cryptogretzky who said it didn't work I would like to test something...
I made myself a vanity adress for xchat
would someone please try to contact me over xchat?
adress: XCHATsLztdvJxb2BkrgVuoq7uoC73u6ghj
pubkey: Ro4rYufnJy7RYFnuJBaD1iz5Rrr8o77fyKbcnkAbqC57JCS148WVMabshBjHd1JsZGoJ2JZtj6LYtfP e8bavoY51
(I've noticed that my pub key is really long, that's why I want to test this)
If it works I'll explain it in a tutorial
Said Invalid destination public key I do remember that test. Didn't know you use vanitygen before. The public key is extremely long too for me when I import the uncompressed private key. When I import the compressed private key though, the public key I get back is normal.... of course that defeat the purpose of the vanity address since the search is based on uncompressed address. So... ultimately, will need to modify the vanitygen to make it search based on compressed address instead of uncompressed address. eg. make the following changes in pattern.c len = EC_POINT_point2oct(pgroup, pubkey, POINT_CONVERSION_UNCOMPRESSED, eckey_buf, sizeof(eckey_buf), vxcp->vxc_bnctx); to make it use POINT_CONVERSION_COMPRESSED instead. Now... if only I can compile it.... Ok, I FINALLY got the vanitygen to compile and it also generated compressed address that you can get valid public key out of from the wallet... it's not really for the faint of heart to get it to compile properly on Windows.... total pain in the butt. If someone needs to know how to compile it, I will see if I can reproduce the steps I took to get it to compile (most of the hassle was getting all the libraries that it needed to work) Anyway, a few changes are needed to make it generate compressed address. Luckily, I found a fork of the vanitygen that already has the compressed address changes that is needed. The location of the github is here: https://github.com/WyseNynja/vanitygenTo make it generate valid XC address using this, you will need to use the following command: vanitygen -X 75 -F compressed Xwhatever
I didn't have a chance to compile oclvanitygen to test to see if it works since it won't really run with 13.xx drivers with my R9. You might have better luck than me.... Please note that XC address is base58 encoded so you can't have O (capital O), I (capital i), 0 (zero), l (lowercase L) in your pattern. No need to compile, you can download the complete set here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/VanitygenIf you don't compile, then the following caveats definitely apply... 1. You need to generate compressed address/private keys because the XC wallet shows compressed public keys. 2. Which means you need the generator that support compressed address from lifeboat.com link (don't really know how trustworthy that exe is. Definitely want to run it offline and never let it connect to the net again just in case it sends the private key to some offsite location sometimes after) 3. You need to have older GPU to run oclvanitygen.exe (from that lifeboat.com link) since oclvanitygen don't support newer GPU like R9 type. |
|
|
|
I'm the messiah coming to save your investment !
Ok ... and ? I'm happy you was not at the start of BTC supporting it with your vision and idea ... Just leave ... You do realize that not seeing the "con" side of an investment is a bad idea right? Any coin I decide to invest in I will welcome criticism to. Informed decisions are not blindly optimistic ones We are looking for constructive criticism, not fud. XC has proven itself to be a legitimate currency with high standards for any tech put out publicly. I remember you were a very active member in one of the fud threads. Further you did not listen to our answer and took your own conclusions. It's mostly because I've not seen any real answers. I do have a question - how does XChat compare to Bitmessage - does it offer better anonymity and if so how? It's funny you ask that, because even BitMessage is asking for independent audit for their system. Do YOU know how BitMessage is really anonymous and good in any way? How do you compare one system to another when both systems are not at the audited phase yet? Bc one is open source? So what if it's open source? The question is... even if it's open source, do YOU know how secure it is. BitMessage is still awaiting independent audit themselves like I said. Even if both are open source, if both have not been audited independently... you don't really know how secure it is. eg. there is nothing to quantify against each other. It's like arguing about who's lawn is greener without a spectrophotometer or... who can throw the ball faster without a calibrated radar gun. We are just not at the point to ask questions like that yet. Open source anon software > closed source that claims to be anon. Ya... as if you can read code. Open source shit is not better than close source... You are telling me that GIMP is better than Photoshop? USBcoin was open source... so what? There was malicious code in there to allow the scamming dev to create fake coins and made over 120 btc from the scam. Open source codes that aren't maintained and audited by experts all the time are some of the most vunerable because there can be zero day exploit simply because any flaws are immediately seen by black hats while the white hats people are sleeping. Snapchat, Whatsapp, Line... EVERY SINGLE one of these are not open source. You think normal people give a crap about it? People who are serious about anon and into cryptocurrencies. Yes. Very much so. People who are not serious will buy doge Ya... people that have money and can move market can't read codes. They rely on experts review. Guess what? XC will have those reviews and bounties post Rev 3. You are welcome. |
|
|
|
I'm the messiah coming to save your investment !
Ok ... and ? I'm happy you was not at the start of BTC supporting it with your vision and idea ... Just leave ... You do realize that not seeing the "con" side of an investment is a bad idea right? Any coin I decide to invest in I will welcome criticism to. Informed decisions are not blindly optimistic ones We are looking for constructive criticism, not fud. XC has proven itself to be a legitimate currency with high standards for any tech put out publicly. I remember you were a very active member in one of the fud threads. Further you did not listen to our answer and took your own conclusions. It's mostly because I've not seen any real answers. I do have a question - how does XChat compare to Bitmessage - does it offer better anonymity and if so how? It's funny you ask that, because even BitMessage is asking for independent audit for their system. Do YOU know how BitMessage is really anonymous and good in any way? How do you compare one system to another when both systems are not at the audited phase yet? Bc one is open source? So what if it's open source? The question is... even if it's open source, do YOU know how secure it is. BitMessage is still awaiting independent audit themselves like I said. Even if both are open source, if both have not been audited independently... you don't really know how secure it is. eg. there is nothing to quantify against each other. It's like arguing about who's lawn is greener without a spectrophotometer or... who can throw the ball faster without a calibrated radar gun. We are just not at the point to ask questions like that yet. Open source anon software > closed source that claims to be anon. Ya... as if you can read code. Open source shit is not better than close source... You are telling me that GIMP is better than Photoshop? USBcoin was open source... so what? There was malicious code in there to allow the scamming dev to create fake coins and made over 120 btc from the scam. Open source codes that aren't maintained and audited by experts all the time are some of the most vunerable because there can be zero day exploit simply because any flaws are immediately seen by black hats while the white hats people are sleeping. Snapchat, Whatsapp, Line... EVERY SINGLE one of these are not open source. You think normal people give a crap about it? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
