Funny how Boolberrycoin is worth more than XC. Sigh...
Well... BBR marketcap is at around $337k... vs XC at $4.17 mil I wouldn't say they are more valuable. |
|
|
|
It's good to see the price holding without any buy-wall support. Looks like we may have gotten rid of all of the pump/dump day traders  Why do people who have no interest in owning XC hang out in the XC thread all day? The definition of trolling.... Teka, I think you really need to step up on moderating some of these trolling posts. Anything from propulsion / stealth923 should be insta-deleted. They are DRK shills. +1... I have not seen a single constructive post from both of these trolls. |
|
|
|
It's good to see the price holding without any buy-wall support. Looks like we may have gotten rid of all of the pump/dump day traders Why do people who have no interest in owning XC hang out in the XC thread all day? The definition of trolling.... Teka, I think you really need to step up on moderating some of these trolling posts. |
|
|
|
? Cinni has had (anon) Encrypted Messaging for several days now in their wallet. The update tonight is for EM invoicing / receipts.
Why not combine the two coins since you're both trying to do the exact same thing? Edit: And why is Cinni more anonymous then XC? Edit Edit: Because the Attention page of Cinni say's it's more anonymous. Why not get rid of DRK since DRK don't have any of the features of both XC and CINNI?!?! |
|
|
|
Whoever has all of the sell orders between 160-170k needs to pull them. There's a lot more money to be made then at that price mate.
Indeed. We will be making an announcement later today. Geez man, give the market a break, im still trying to "mine" from multipool. Lemme get some 0.000XC more !!!  Sorry man :-). Keeping up with the pace of XC's development is going to prove quite the task for everyone! Is the announcement... BIG or an update? |
|
|
|
I have stealth923 on ignore, but nothing is changing in the XNODE architect and nor is it flawed. It is the foundation for the XC Platform.
That's what we want to hear! Keep up the great work and let us handle the trolls. |
|
|
|
**XC "debate" **
I posted a question(s) about XC, and digit replied. People out of nowhere jumped in.
But, guess what? SEEMS I was correct about XC being pumped. LOOKS like it's starting to dump now. (I could be wrong, and it is just normal pullback, too)
So, let's just DROP this topic, because I am too late to present evidence to my friend who got in, bought more on the rise, and is now looking at a loss he will not get back anytime soon if he holds. It's a loss if he sells now. This effects none of us here CINNI-holders. So, I apologize for creating this shitstorm. It was NOT my intent.
~darylluke.
Let's look at the 3 days chart for CINNI and XC shall we and see what was a pump and dump...? Hope you didn't get your friend to get CINNI 3 days ago... would have lost more than 50%.... |
|
|
|
XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address.  Proof? It's like someone claiming CINNI is a scam without any proof... I don't think you really want to stir shit up without any proof. If XC ppl have to come try promote its coin on this thread, if the other coin have to download and join the cinni wallet chat to try promote theirs, cinni must be doing something pretty damn well. Cheers to the Cinni Thread, and lets keep it on cinni peeps, dont mind the stones in the road Since you guys brought up SCAM... Please read about CINNI: http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coinsThere's your scam. lol, that has been talked and cleared up like dozen of times, please come up with something better, more smarter and more believable if you have the hard need of coming to the cinni thread to try to spread FUD in behalf of your dying XC. lol  Dude, I own all the top "anon" altcoins, but you have people in this thread starting to talk FUD about other coins, including XC. That's not the way to go. Have proof, then state it, otherwise, don't say anything bad about other coins if you don't want attention that you don't want in this thread.... It's really simple. |
|
|
|
So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.
So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.
ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...? DRK multi-sig IS working...only masternode payments. And before you say fork...XC had to be check-pointed and a new wallet released a few weeks ago from an unplanned fork! Just to highlight to investors - everyone has been screaming that XC is flawed and now after all this development the Dev announces that he is going to COPY darkcoin's multi-sig architecture to get around the bad actor and coin stealing problem........what a waste of time... So what your saying is XC will copy #dorks closed source code? I see.  ..not code, learn to READ..essentially the Dev has now realised his is flawed and now needs to make an XNode the SAME as a Masternode in Darkcoin. Did you say the same thing about DRK masternode RC3 trying to go fix their payment and forking issue? DRK architecture is so closed source... you have not a single idea of what DRK really is doing... how can you say anything about architecture when you don't know yourself? |
|
|
|
Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go
Whats going to happen? Think about it. It will dump? my brain hurts from reading all of this...
Now I have to decide if I want to buy back in at a loss from yesterdays attempt to capitalize on the swing. Or cross my fingers and hope I can at least buy back at my selling price of yesterday. decisions decisions
Let me guess.... you sold and you want back in? I didnt sell all... I was playing the swings and gaining a few hundred at a time but i sold and then the price went up while i was sleeping and i fat fingered my buy back and screwed myself. So i have been watching and trying to buy back at as very little loss as possible. I dont want to buy back when there are people pumping it only to dump it. I have faith in this coin and was trying build my stash more. But if they are driving up the price to hold it there then ill buy back now and count my losses. Just looking for advice from the pros. Also this is the first time ive seen these buy walls on this coin Unless you are friends with the whales that do the actual pump..., then the only good strategy is buy and hold.... |
|
|
|
XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Proof? It's like someone claiming CINNI is a scam without any proof... I don't think you really want to stir shit up without any proof. If XC ppl have to come try promote its coin on this thread, if the other coin have to download and join the cinni wallet chat to try promote theirs, cinni must be doing something pretty damn well. Cheers to the Cinni Thread, and lets keep it on cinni peeps, dont mind the stones in the road Since you guys brought up SCAM... Please read about CINNI: http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coinsThere's your scam. |
|
|
|
Ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7335721#msg7335721 I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Lets set the record straight #1. XC is not a scam coin. #2. XC's XNode technology is still under development #3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code. #4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins Wow multisig !! I will return when REV2 is released. By the way, Does XC user know that every splitted tx has been charged tx fee(0.00001000). See you all later. You can't even solve 1.5 multi-path regular coin mixing... you think you can solve 2.0?!?!? LOL |
|
|
|
Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go
Whats going to happen? Think about it. It will dump? my brain hurts from reading all of this...
Now I have to decide if I want to buy back in at a loss from yesterdays attempt to capitalize on the swing. Or cross my fingers and hope I can at least buy back at my selling price of yesterday. decisions decisions
Let me guess.... you sold and you want back in? |
|
|
|
XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Proof? It's like someone claiming CINNI is a scam without any proof... I don't think you really want to stir shit up without any proof. |
|
|
|
So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.
So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.
ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...? |
|
|
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Lets set the record straight #1. XC is not a scam coin. #2. XC's XNode technology is still under development #3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code. #4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coinsThis is the thing that the DRK fudster kept on harping about. How can people not EMPHASIZE this point!!! #4... is the key to shut all the DRK fudster up all together. |
|
|
|
is this how my XNODE work? of course, this is not multi path. this happened on June 14th.   So, if XC gets dumped on MP, we know who is responsible. |
|
|
|
This or Cinni, who will it be
Speaking of which, why is Cinni incorporating everything XC is? I thought the two devs were working together. I mean hell, the cinni dev vouched for the xc dev and said he saw the code. So are the coins different or the same now? Gee... I don't know... all cars have wheels, brake, engine, windshield wipers, signal lights, seat belts, etc... Are all cars different or the same now? |
|
|
|
Pow time ended guys, it was so flashy that you didn't even noticed  I hope this is only a joke First scam coin in history where the dev instamined 100% because he set the blocks for instamining too high! |
|
|
|
Wat??? Where my Ipo money and wallet! I Ki11 You Dev!  WAT coin better than Yourcoin! Was there an escrow? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
