I doubt any dice site has that kind of computational power no matter how much they've earned. It would be like trying to use vanitygen to get 1UNPOSS1BLEADDRESS1234567890 and expecting it to happen instantly.

Yes, really   No lowercase 'L', no uppercase 'o', no uppercase 'i' and no '0' (number zero).

If you used -i (case insensitive) it would have looked for 1koeLen (and 1KoeLen and 1KOeLen and 1KOELen, etc. etc.) - but the number it should have returned should have been very low then (as there's many more possible hits).  If you used it with the -r (regex), then I think it accepts all those forbidden characters, but it wouldn't give an estimate of when it would be found (if I recall that correct).

Wow thats true, question2 edited the address and changed the 1 for an I. Im sorry to say it but thats definitive proof that ndnhc is a scammer. First of all if ndnhc wasnt question2 why would question2 change that address? His negative trust is because of his extortion attempt and it doesnt sat anything about this. Ndnhc hasnt been online since this accusation... Then again if question2 is not ndnhc why would he try to edit the address, why the fuck would he care about it?? It makes no sense to me. Even if he saw the thread, lets say he isnt not ndnhc and sees the thread, he obviously did, then logically if he wanted to defend ndnhc for some odd reason he could just post here and say, hey guys im not ndnhc or whatever but he decided instead to change his address.

How do I get hotmail to accept the mail from bitcointalk?

I also support your idea, ban the signature campaigns and the problems will be resolved ... at least we can try for 1-2 months and see what will happen. People (that who were banned) are still continuing to create or farm account every single day and I remember a couple of months ago the things were more different than now.

loan amount: 0.03
reason for loan: debt(non-bitcoin) + micro investment(bitcoin)
repayment time: 15 days
btc address: 1ECtRqkfnnDHSAM8amsXwJNdsEajnajWPj

Loan of 0.1-0.15
Term length 7days
Collertal hidemyass login 6months auto renew
Reason getting friend gift on purse
Address 1AmvY2FJ1to6ru7Fuh4fEc91ozqHijrRg2

Loan Amount : .7
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #aC6hcFP6663bDbtP

my collateral is my bitcointalk.org account
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #NY72l2l0oLV8BeoY

Really? 

Have you ever heard "Never judge a book by its cover?"

but how we can say they are really newbies?  When it is easy to make a new alt account.  Who can say I am a newbie evading a ban?

all these questions must be asked, a true newbie will browse around and read and learn. 

I agree with Open Source.. Its very important.

What do you mean 'only Screen'??

This is all demonstrably false. You might have taken note that people die all the time, billions and billions of them throughout history, and yet the universe has continued on unchanged.

Here's mine address ... please quote . thanks

1DArdPUNu5j69LaenpC4tk8vfTfMefncuw

-snip-
Techshare is correct in "BITCOINTALK STAFF SELECTIVELY ENFORCE THE RULES AND IGNORE CLEAR INSTANCES OF ABUSE TO PROTECT THOSE WITHIN THEIR PERSONAL CLIQUE"

Quickseller / Dogie / Muhammed Zakir are a quite the little echo chamber... there is a long list of these sorts of people being given preferential treatment while others are held to to the "letter" of the law. Seen it too many times across too many threads maybe it is time for Theymos to clean house a bit.

IYO either way muslims are bad and islam is bad.. what a bias judgement my friend!!!

-snip-
I don't understand how to do the siging of transactions from an offline wallet. I just assume one I've importated the paper wallet it is I consider that wallet hacked and no longer safe.  I know it requires me to make a bunch of different wallets on an offline computer but.. I like being as safe as I can be.  I was running the BTC core on an offline computer and doing it that way for a bit but I really like the bitaddress paper wallet layout and use, hence my curiousity for how safe it is.

TS has more then one positive rating, he has 12 positives. That scenario is not addressed above.

 -snip-
else
	score = unique_positive - 2^(unique_negative)
	if score >= 0
		start_time = time of first negative
		score = unique_positive since start_time - unique_negative since start_time

There is no decay. Ratings grow in weight from 1 to 10, then stay at 10 forever. (If the rated person has no negatives.)

-snip-
I am not sure why your trust score shows as zero when you have so many positive ratings. My interpretation of how trust scores are calculated means that your trust score should increase by 12 points every month. Maybe theymos can comment as to why your rating is not 100+ that it appears you should have. (The formula is somewhat complicated ) - he can comment if he wants to but I figured it out. When you have a negative rating, only ratings since after your first negative rating are counted for your trust score.

-snip-

If someone has 1 positive and 1 negative, then the time doesn't matter. They'll have a score of -1.

Examples:
Old -> New
+ - : -1
- + : -1
+ + - : ???
+ - + : 0
- + + : 1
+ + + : >=3
- - + : -3
+ - - : -3
- - - : -8

 -snip-

I think the user account should have a tag on it while it is banned. I think a little public shame goes a long way to deter people from breaking the rules.

Very interesting. I have to admit I do prefer ledger to trezor BÜT trezor do have more functions.