....
Like I said many times, they spread disinformation and also that verses are either mistranslated(possible mistranslation(low chance) or out of context verses. Some people quoted it here and I have replied what it is. Almost all of them were out of context verses and also it is for defense not for killing innocents.
Of course, Muslims rubber band the definition of "defense" to include just about anything they want to do, don't they? All Palestinian bombings of innocent people are of course "Defense". USA supports Israel, so it is the "Great Satan", so bombing USA is also good "Defense." I am not saying Zakir makes these rationalizations but they are very commonly done in the Islamic world. I understand what you are saying but there are rules for starting a war which obviously those terrorists aren't following and furthermore, they aren't following most rules at all. Clearly Islam embraces diversity. Those who think Islam is peaceful. Those who think Islam is peaceful but let's kill all the Jews (somehow it's self defense of course). Those who think Islam is peaceful but let's kill all the Jews and destroy the Great Satan. Those who think Islam is not peaceful. ...... But Islam doesn't tell to kill all Jews. I am expanding more on the popular interpretations and beliefs derived from clerics talking up the Koran, rather than your particular beliefs. Thus, Islam "embraces diversity" - including your beliefs. Just think, you can have your cake and eat it too. You can benefit from a "religion of peace" and at the same time, have the advantages of a "religion of violence." May I know what that interpretations are because my belief is Islam and Islam doesn't tell to kil Jews? You may have heard/saw wrong things. |
|
|
|
Went and looked, I'm on default trust, depth 2. The standard I'm guessing.
No, you're not. Why would that be a standard? You're not on the default trust list. That is just more evidence of your badly set up trust settings. I never change my trust setting and I saw mrklye has green light on his trust. 1:-4/ +3(3)It is very strange, this is my trust list:
~Vod
DefaultTrust
~EALand this is the trust score of MRKLYE : -5: - 4/ +3(3)This is interesting. I changed my trust list to default trust list *before* Blazr re-added negative trust feedback and the rating I saw is same as yours(IIRC). |
|
|
|
It seems that the sale was in fact faked and he slipped up that no one caught on. I would prepare to get your inbox spammed by a lot of PM's from this person.
Quickseller now whats your problem again ? Why do you think it was faked ? I was the one who started the scam accusation against Ume(before any negative trust was added) , Why would I be stupid enough to do that ? This? -snip- Compare this: "This" month=March.With this: I bought the account from Ume on 31st January.
That month=January. 2 whole months off. -snip- |
|
|
|
Its just activity, see the formula you linked. Its boild down to 3 basic steps:
the first major reduction to 75-30 seconds once your activity is over 14, but still not 60 or higher
the second reduction to 30-27 seconds once your activity is 60 or higher, but still not 100 or higher
the third reduction to 12-4 seconds once your activity is 100 or higher.
Once you reached 500 actitivty you will be stuck at a 4 second limit, which I notice once in a blue moon.
|
|
|
|
As the title states.
What do you look for (fees, limits, restrictions wise) in a Bitcoin funded prepaid debit card?
Low fees, high limits, ability to be used online and physically, minimum KYC pestering, and bitcoins converted upon transaction. I don't think anymore posts are needed. byt411 summed it up well! I have these suggestions to except last one. It is arguable whether to convert at the time of transaction or when funding. Maybe you can give that option to user and user can choose when to convert. I think that would be great! |
|
|
|
Is not better to keep btc in an encrypted usb? if you have a lot I mean  It can be corrupted if you didn't set up well but if you know what you are doing, it is secure to use a USB to store Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
+1. I support this. No doubt it will be abused. It is being "abused" now as well.
If it is supposed to be unmoderated why have a default level?
Probably to avoid spam. If everyone have same power, shills/scammers will win against legit users. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the constructive replies. I'm hoping to gain an understanding as to why the Bitcoin developers chose this behavior as a design/feature for the reference implementation of the wallet. They are intelligent individuals so there must be a reason beyond 'anonymity'. If one wanna stalk you at least he will have some work to do.
If you only have 1 address for input and output anyone can see anything they want with no efford
An understandable and valid point. However a stalker can use the power of a computer and scan the block chain much the way a block explorer currently does. Before the block explorer, it took some effort to trace a single address. With the block explorer, it's dead simple. Today it takes a little extra effort to trace multiple address back to the source. As Bitcoin matures, so will the tools and utilities that analyze the block chain, eventually making the trace-ability of multiple address dead simple to anyone. The fact that the block chain is a public record accessible to the public nullifies any type of 'anonymity'. Once a person is matched with an address, no matter how many they have, a computer can analyze the ins and outs, and provided the desired data. Bitcoin isn't built for anonymity even though it offers it but it has limits. Only way people can know two addresses are connected to each other is if a transactions used inputs from those two addresses but it still doesn't mean they are owned by *one* person. An address which has transactions going out has slightly less security than a brand new address.
I don't understand. In what context are you referring to 'security' here? P.S. Reusing address especially if you use a buggy client has a high risk of exposing private key of your address.
Interesting... I knew there was more to it. jbrnt probably meant what I said by "security issues". Reusing addresses especially if you use a buggy client exposes reused R values. Reused R values can be used to find your private key. For educational purpose only: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=977070.msg10669517#msg10669517. |
|
|
|
....
Like I said many times, they spread disinformation and also that verses are either mistranslated(possible mistranslation(low chance) or out of context verses. Some people quoted it here and I have replied what it is. Almost all of them were out of context verses and also it is for defense not for killing innocents.
Of course, Muslims rubber band the definition of "defense" to include just about anything they want to do, don't they? All Palestinian bombings of innocent people are of course "Defense". USA supports Israel, so it is the "Great Satan", so bombing USA is also good "Defense." I am not saying Zakir makes these rationalizations but they are very commonly done in the Islamic world. I understand what you are saying but there are rules for starting a war which obviously those terrorists aren't following and furthermore, they aren't following most rules at all. Clearly Islam embraces diversity. Those who think Islam is peaceful. Those who think Islam is peaceful but let's kill all the Jews (somehow it's self defense of course). Those who think Islam is peaceful but let's kill all the Jews and destroy the Great Satan. Those who think Islam is not peaceful. ...... But Islam doesn't tell to kill all Jews. |
|
|
|
CCEDK has partnered with Bit-X.
Yeah, I know but they should come up with something different. Not an exact one. I thought I could find something good when I saw "Debit nanocard" but I was really disappointed when I saw fees. |
|
|
|
Sending change to a new address means you are never reusing an address. That improves anonymity and security. An address which has transactions going out has slightly less security than a brand new address.
Does it though? How does it improve anonymity when you can see where the change has gone and it just makes it more likely that you will spendlink from the addresses in the future. Every time change is send to new address. Except persons who you told that they are your addresses, nobody has concrete proofs they are you addresses unless it is somehow linked in a transaction. When reusing address i.e. always sending change back to the input address, people will know how much Bitcoin you have, where you get your Bitcoin etc... After evaluating both cases, first is better than second i.e. sending change to new address is better than sending it back to the input address. P.S. Reusing address especially if you use a buggy client has a high risk of exposing private key of your address. |
|
|
|
Will this work on mac?
Yes. It's written in Python. P.S. From Github pywallet repo: Dependencies for Mac OS X: 1. Install MacPorts from http://www.macports.org/ 2. sudo port install python27 py27-twisted py27-pip py-bsddb python_select 3. sudo port select --set python python27 4. sudo easy_install ecdsa |
|
|
|
Exact copy of BIT-X card. No difference! IMHO this is a worst thing: No activity - Fee is waivered/No fee in case of minimum 5 BTC or equivalent on balance at all times.Inactive fee is waived if we store 5 BTC or equivalent?  Edit: You must remove this as this isn't true. Low commission: We guarantee the lowest commission on all card transactions, as well as low service fees |
|
|
|
Well shorena, someone has to decide whats right and whats wrong, you cant be 100% accurate, of course not but because you cant doesnt mean you should let every scammer do whatever they want, by your logic default trust should be eliminated aswell, since how do we know that people who is on default list is 100% correct always when they mark someone as a scammer or red trust them? Are you willing to delete default trust?
People in default trust list aren't 100% accurate but they are more accurate than others. |
|
|
|
Anyone here knows how to put two Adbit banners in a Row ? They always appears in the Center in column. I tried removing the "center" tag from Adbit ad code but still it won't happens. Any help will be Appreciated  Size? do you can help me? i want block traffics from a address,i think he use from bot, becasue i cant see source at google analytics, and google analytics cant show source, Post the address he is withdrawing Bitcoin to in your ANN thread, not here and PM me that link. |
|
|
|
That is the silliest thing you heard is because you don't know Islamic teachings and rules and just rely on medias. Now it's you who is essentially calling ISIS Muslims. Did I? I responded to your first line. |
|
|
|
|
Game accounts are not valid collateral. They are easy to reclaim and hard to sell.
|
|
|
|
That is the silliest thing you heard is because you don't know Islamic teachings and rules and just rely on medias. |
|
|
|
1. Buy a trusted senior account.
2. Start a ponzi on Bitcointalk.
3. ? ? ?
4. Wonder why Bitcoin gets horrible press.
and this is exactly, what I meant by OP...anyway, it is not on me to decide, just saying there is imho huge negative impact to bitcoin generated by this section. The problem is not the section, is allowing these kind of trash on the forum at all, just fucking ban every thread that promotes a ponzi, easy as that, no need for a section for it, but probably mods are going to come and say "its too hard to moderate all ponzies" or "we dont have time to delete all ponzies" wich is bullshit, i doubt it takes that much time to totally delete each of those ponzi threads There are cloud mining providers which are actually ponzi but they claim they ain't. If we start moderating ponzis, we will see more of these and it will be hard to differentiate scam and legitimate. Now, at least we know those are ponzis. What will happen if those come under new names and in different boards? Damn you always find a way to make them stay unmoderated, dont you, with you im refering to everyone. First of all, if you wanto cloud mine you ahould be doing it only on already trusted sites, how else can they even come like?? I dnt get your point at all. Keep your eyes open! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=878387.0If what you said is rephrased: First of all, if you wan to invest, you should be doing it only on already trusted sites, how else can they even come like?? |
|
|
|
Discrimination: muslim bakers never get wedding cake orders from gays... How great of you!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
