1801
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit MoonLander: A Modern and Efficient Scrypt USB Stick Miner!
|
on: April 25, 2016, 06:55:12 PM
|
FYI if you guys want a 100% sure way to test whether its a pool issue or something wrong with your computer/setup just run the script file with the --benchmark flag. This sets bfgminer in benchmark mode and does not rely on pool diff settings to test your setup. It essentially generates local work using a VERY low diff(lower than what a pool can do). This will produce about 30-60 shares a SECOND based on what frequency you set, so its a sure proof way to test everything is working correctly hardware side. I use a variation of this method to test your moonlanders before I ship them out. It allows me to have the stick return thousands of shares in the order of minutes, which would normally take a pool hours/days to do, and can quickly identify issues with the ASIC/stick. I haven't posted this before because it completely stresses out your system/stick, so don't try this on a RPi for example and get worried if something freezes up
|
|
|
1803
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit MoonLander: A Modern and Efficient Scrypt USB Stick Miner!
|
on: April 18, 2016, 06:58:14 PM
|
so i was checking these things out on a thermal camera and i think its the heatsink. the chips are around 150F or so but the heatsinks are like 80F you can clearly see the heatsinks are not as hot as the board.. and the chip is the hottest. i might order some tiny heatsinks for the top of the chips and then double space them on the usb hub.. that means only 3 can fit per superbpag 150F is nice and cool for these...I wouldn't worry unless temps go above 80c/175F on the ASIC itself. Of course it doesn't hurt to have more cooling...cooler ASIC=more efficient.
|
|
|
1804
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit MoonLander: A Modern and Efficient Scrypt USB Stick Miner!
|
on: April 18, 2016, 06:46:13 PM
|
Yea sorry guys the sick issue is on my to-do list since I knew people would have a problem with it with var diff pools. I just figured most pools have options for really low diff or can be set manually. I guess I was wrong.
The problem with the watchdog logic is that it was originally written for GPU miners, and was designed for locked up GPU mining threads. A lot of that logic has to be rewritten for ASICs, and I was talking with Luke-jr about it but it was a lot of work at the time so never got around to it. At the very least Ill uploaded compiled version with longer timeouts as a "dirty" work around.
BTW adding a low diff port takes a pool operator a couple minutes and a few lines of code to do, so I would email them and tell them if its possible to set a port for low diff.
|
|
|
1805
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly"
|
on: April 16, 2016, 06:34:31 AM
|
I wish Sidehack wasn't anti-Scrypt, I'd love to see what he could come up with for an EFFICIENT Scrypt miner using the A4 (I'm betting Innosilicon and their integrators go for the short-string higher-hash less efficient options).
On the other hand, if Innosilicon actually puts a buck on each string for their A4 based miner(s), it becomes a mostly moot point.
Guess you missed my project...I took the even more efficient Alchminer chip and have squeezed it to under 4w/MH at it most efficient setting (500kh/s). It can go to over 1MH on max speed(about 8-9 watts). Check out the link in my sig. And all of innosilicons A4 based miners are non string designs..they have about 4 chips per buck. Nah, I saw the moonlanded - the Alcheminer chip was, from what I've seen of it, about the SAME efficiency as the A2. I just don't like the limits the USB/board type design put on the chip for power and cooling. Given Innosilicon hasn't even released the A4 chips yet, how can you say how their miner design is going to look? Their *A2* designs has bucks, but they have stated the A4 is designed to work in a string setup - I don't recall that being an A2 option. Last announcement on Innosilicon's web site was "June" timeframe for the A4 chips to start getting shipped, "July" for miners, as I recall. The BIG question is "are they sticking with A3 release at the same time" that they stated in one of their early mentions of both chips? The NEXT big question is "how good will the A3 be when they release it"? Yea I meant A2, had a brain fart and thought your A4 comment was for the A2. As for the A4 should have some interesting stuff "soonish" to report
|
|
|
1807
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly"
|
on: April 12, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
|
I wish Sidehack wasn't anti-Scrypt, I'd love to see what he could come up with for an EFFICIENT Scrypt miner using the A4 (I'm betting Innosilicon and their integrators go for the short-string higher-hash less efficient options).
On the other hand, if Innosilicon actually puts a buck on each string for their A4 based miner(s), it becomes a mostly moot point.
Guess you missed my project...I took the even more efficient Alchminer chip and have squeezed it to under 4w/MH at it most efficient setting (500kh/s). It can go to over 1MH on max speed(about 8-9 watts). Check out the link in my sig. And all of innosilicons A4 based miners are non string designs..they have about 4 chips per buck.
|
|
|
1809
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit MoonLander: A Modern and Efficient Scrypt USB Stick Miner!
|
on: April 04, 2016, 03:23:52 AM
|
I am at 272. Cranked up the voltage a bit so far about .890mv Still cannot keep them running more than 30 mins before they fade away. I do have Minera restarting after two out of three die and do not come back for 10 mins. so what are you guys running these at?
im running them at 304..
2 i had to crank up to .950mv, the rest are at .900mv
i cant track down why they stop hashing.. it has NOTHING to do with speed or heat, i have 2 superbpag hubs and sometimes the 4 on one hub go for hours and then one on the other one will stop in seconds from turning on and its completely random, different stick each time. it has nothing to do with hardware errors cause my errors are 1 or 2 per hour. the red and orange light still blinks on them all. so its receiving data. turning on the bfgminer stats it says its sending the stick that isnt hashing data from the queue.. for some reason bfgminer isnt seeing the share. Unfortunately its next to impossible to track down what is causing this, but my guess would be the vcom driver, or a bug in bfgminer thats out of the scope of my driver. The driver is fairly simple and low level...if the yellow lite is blinking it means the ASIC is operating fine and correctly returing shares, but for whatever reason those share bits are never making it to my driver thread thats "waiting" to read a response. I know the windows vcom driver had this issue, especially with USB 3 ports. If your on windows make sure you download the latest silicon lab driver that was updated last month.
|
|
|
1810
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit MoonLander: A Modern and Efficient Scrypt USB Stick Miner!
|
on: April 03, 2016, 06:20:39 PM
|
so what are you guys running these at?
im running them at 304..
2 i had to crank up to .950mv, the rest are at .900mv
Mine are at .8v or so, 288MHz. Mostly limited by one stick that won't go any higher; another wishlist item I have for bfgminer is to set frequency by serial number. Bfgminer already lets you do this...quote from the FAQ section. Q: How can I set frequency to a particular stick in a mutistick setup under bfgminer?If you want to specify frequencies for each individual miners you can point which frequency gets set to which miner by changing the global --set MLD:clock=144 to --set MLD@/dev/ttyUSB0:clock=320 (note I haven't really tested if you can keep the global option and lets say just set one stick to a different frequency...if you do it this way you might have to specify frequencies for each miner port individually even if some of them are the same, since the global option might override individual frequencies). So if you have two sticks and want two different frequencies your options might look like this: ./bfgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://us.litecoinpool.org:3333 -u jstefanop.1 -p 1,d=16 -S MLD:/dev/ttyUSB0 -S MLD:/dev/ttyUSB1 --set MLD@/dev/ttyUSB0:clock=320 --set MLD@/dev/ttyUSB1:clock=304 If your running windows just use the proper windows COM port syntax @\\.\COM1 etc.
|
|
|
1812
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly"
|
on: March 29, 2016, 04:21:11 PM
|
Is this a Bitmain thread :p ...so back on topic...wth is going on with Bitfury? They have added zero hash, and this chip is nowhere to be seen...which makes me think they are having major issues with the production version of the chip/immersion board.
|
|
|
1814
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit MoonLander: A Modern and Efficient Scrypt USB Stick Miner!
|
on: March 22, 2016, 08:44:39 PM
|
I believe my HUB isn't performing to what it says. I got the superbpag USB 3.0 Superspeed HUB, http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00W4X3DAA?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00, and when I plug a moonlander in, it wont read on bfgminer. My computer will give the error "usb device not recognized the item has malfunctioned", I thought I received a destroyed miner, but when I connected my other two, it gave me the same error. I connected the miners directly into the computer and they all work. Yet I'm having an issue of the speeds slowly decreasing and bfgminer 5.4 declaring it "SICK. Does anyone know how I can fix this? Should I increase the intensity? Also to get multiple miners working at one time, should I run two instances of bfgminer each with its own config or can I put in the config to use two login information? This is the hub I recommend. http://www.amazon.com/Superbpag-Portable-Charger-Transfer-Samsung/dp/B013OK10YM/ref=pd_sim_sbs_147_1?ie=UTF8&dpID=41LaxmqTREL&dpSrc=sims&preST=_AC_UL160_SR160%2C160_&refRID=0FW4KH14FP92J3MHA2XFIt has an internal really well constructed Powersupply, and is the only hub I found that can handle all 7 ports running full speed. The on you linked probably has an external crappy brick PSU which is probably not good enough. For the "Sick" issue it probably means you have the difficulty set too high...so it takes forever for the stick to submit a share, so bfgminer "thinks" its sick. Remember these are low powered devices and most pools think you are connecting high speed ASICs to them and have stock high difficulties. Make sure you are using vardiff with low initial diff, or forcing a diff of under 100. 16 diff per stick is a good starting point. This will give a share every second or so.
|
|
|
1815
|
Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Alchemist 256MH Scrypt Miner
|
on: March 20, 2016, 01:31:35 AM
|
Putting one of my units up for sale. I am the dev of all the firmware/bfgminer ports for this device, so it has the latest firmware on all 8 hashboards, and runs the latest version of bfgminer. Stock these units did about 200MH, with my upgrades they do ~240, and work on all pools.
These have been selling for around 1800-1900 on eBay...can do a bit lower but don't lowball me :p
Location? and iys a bad idea to compare this place to ebay. ebay is for idiots and scammers on here you get the true value no some imagined value so dont get your hopes up of getting ebay prives In NY...and I beg to differ, I've already sold a few of these for the same price. The same people that are on here buy on eBay when they DONT want scammers, since both buyers and sellers are protected. If anything all the scammers and lowballers are here. The only difference with eBay is that price is obviously inflated by 10% or so since sellers need to cover fees.
|
|
|
1817
|
Economy / Computer hardware / [WTS] Alchemist 256MH Scrypt Miner
|
on: March 18, 2016, 08:20:46 PM
|
Putting one of my units up for sale. I am the dev of all the firmware/bfgminer ports for this device, so it has the latest firmware on all 8 hashboards, and runs the latest version of bfgminer. Stock these units did about 200MH, with my upgrades they do ~240, and work on all pools.
These have been selling for around 1800-1900 on eBay...can do a bit lower but don't lowball me :p
|
|
|
|