This is why I feel that the current West Indian team have no chance of lifting the World Cup this year.
Leave lifting the world cup, they will not even pass the first round. They will end up being the 2nd or third bottom team if not the most bottom team of the group stage. I will forget talking about WI lol I would rather talk about India and Australian team. Who wants to talk about a team who even do not get attention from their own country. WI had their glorious time and it's gone past. They still can come back but this will take time. You need to work in the root level to have a good future.
|
|
|
We can expect this time KKR to bounce back and beat the CSK and does not happen like the last match where KKR was down badly in the match. CSK have won the toss and elected to bowl first. KKR will have to put a big total on the board in order to win this match.
Dangerous Lynn is out on 82 and Russell is also out this time easily in 10. KKR are now 134/5 in 15 overs. Karthik and Gill are batting and if they can bat for another 15 -20 balls they might reach close 175 runs. Else if they lose quick wickets CSK may keep them under 160 Looking at Tahir's bowling it's easy to say that Dhoni planned it to stop Russell. If Russell starts hitting then he knows that stopping Russell is very hard job. Eventually Russell got trapped by Tahir after hitting the six from the one ball earlier. At one stage I thought KKR will score easily over 200 but now I think they are looking for 180 some runs. If they stop in this line then they will have to bowl really well to stop CSK. My pick for today is CSK and in the other match SRH.
|
|
|
Fees are supposed to be a priority mechanism: if you're in a hurry, you pay more, and your transaction gets confirmed faster. That would work fine,
Yeh I know, but the dynamic calculation for the wallets basically causing this high fees for us. Most of the people really do not care to edit the fees I think. Great topic. That time (when the topic was created) the fees were really low. I think it was even around 1 sat/B if I can recall correctly. By the way, do you think I should move this topic to Bitcoin Technical Support board? I know not many people will see this topic in this board. All will be spamming to increase their activities LOL ~snip~ It's good that you were able to manage with lower fees, but how long did it take to get confirmed?
Not that long I was expecting. I thought it will take few weeks lol but in reality it took, The tx was confirmed after 672 minutes! Then in the 2nd tx instead of paying the crazy fees I again picked low fees (3 sat/B). It was confirmed after 98 minutes!
|
|
|
You need to provide enough evidences so that the DT can tag them (if they have an account here in Bitcointalk). Here is a format you can follow: Scam Report Format [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Copy and paste it in new thread then fill all data. Note: This is the first time I heard about buff.bet and after visiting the site it looks to me very professional looking website.
|
|
|
You should be noticing that last few weeks, the mempool is packed with tx and people are paying very high tx fee. I also paid some crazy tx fees until yesterday I realised that if I pay low fees still it's not taking much longer time. I had some issues yesterday to send some fund and in the process of solving it I discovered this low fees phenomenon which I thought worth sharing with everyone. I am just not sure which board to share. I have Bitcoin Discussion in mind. I also have Development & Technical Discussion, Mining, Bitcoin Technical Support, Beginners & Help, Currency exchange in mind then I though to post it in Bitcoin Discussion with the hope that more people will read this to get benefit. I can not just post the same topic in several boards. Check this image: https://i.imgur.com/9ahocyt.png (I did not embed it intentionally because this will take the entire space) 1 to 6 sat/B is crazy then everything looks normal. 91 to 96 sat/B is again crazy then until 104 sat/B looks normal 105 to 106 sat/B is crazier until 160 sat/B 161+ sat/B is where the most of the miners are picking the transactions. So automatically the current recommendation is 160+ sat/B. If you are using Electrum then it's recommending any value from 1 to over 100 which I experienced yesterday for the tx to confirm within the next 10 blocks. Yesterday when I did my first tx then I manually picked my fees since I did not have much worry about the tx confirmation time. I picked under 2 sat/B. I was assuming this will not confirm in weeks LOL but it did not happen(!) The tx was confirmed after 672 minutes! Then in the 2nd tx instead of paying the crazy fees I again picked low fees (3 sat/B). It was confirmed after 98 minutes! Now if you see the regular fees which Electrum recommended me then you will see the craziness. Check the fees differences. I can bring you more 10+ tx I made in the last few day and all are the same with high paying tx because I used Electrum recommended fees. So, my suggestion is that, Stop paying high fees while you can spend very less fees for a transaction. Pick something even less than 2 sat/B. I hope it helps. Cheers :-) Note: Please feel free to share this in other boards which were mentioned earlier. More people needs to see this. Thanks.
|
|
|
Thanks TryNinja, HCP and nc50lc. Some of the explanations from HCP make sense to me. Here was the situation for me, I have this HD wallet but when I spend then I pick an address, take its private key and restore the single address wallet to spend from it. This specific address had more than enough balance which I was suppose to spend. And before spending the issue raised tx, I sent another tx few hours ago which had very low fee (believe me it was only 1.9 sat/B LOL) and for this reason it was unconfirmed at the time I was initiating the 2nd tx. So when I tried the 2nd tx, I always ended up with the errors I mentioned on my OP (@nc50lc, there were always the green icons on the left and one unconfirmed tx). ie. the input doesn't exist, or has already been spent. So, it's confusing why it had to add my previous tx with the new tx I was initiating? So, it seems it is trying to spend a UTXO that wouldn't exist if your transaction was actually created. The tx was created and the UTXO was already exist if my third paragraph on this post make sense to you. There were only one unconfirmed tx and those confirmed txes were confirmed long ago in that specific address (wallet) Definitely seems like the issue is caused by having unconfirmed transactions etc... I am most certain about it which concludes that if you have an unconfirmed tx then you can not initiate another tx? (this is actually the same happened here. Later once the unconfirmed tx confirmed then I was able to create the 2nd tx. )
|
|
|
Username: qwertyup23 Post count: 1207 BTC Address (must be SegWit): 39bUfe1baQkwaQRL2TZPngF7RgvwWHGUVw
I had an issue with my segwit address before when I tried to enroll in this campaign. I hope that I use the correct address this time! Trying my luck!
Yes, this is a Segwit address. Segwit addresses start with 3 or bc1. Legacy address start with 1 I hope now you will be able to identify the addresses. ~snip~
Minor update on the campaign side of things, rather than just 2 open spots I am going with 2-6 open spots. Most likely somewhere in between. If you ever wanted to apply, this is almost certainly your best shot at getting in. Even more so if you are active in Local sections.
Good to see more slots. More people will have chance of champagne party :-P
|
|
|
~snip~
Or are you saying that the output in red (0.01211596 BTC) is part of your first transaction, that you didn’t write that address in this tx and basically it showed up from nowhere?
Correct! The output in red is basically the entire transaction of the previous unconfirmed payment I made. I did not include this payment with the current tx I was initiating. The greed output was my actual payment. Including the fees it was suppose to be 0.00522031BTC but if you see the image, on the amount sent section it added up amount from previous tx too (total: 0.01711596 btc). Basically I wanted to send the fund to a gambling site to bet. If I was successful to send the fund then I would lose the bet LOL (Lucky me) Anyway, sorry about the off - topic. I am still not sure why it's happening, 1. Why the earlier tx included with the current one? 2. Is this the reason of the error(s) I experienced? Sorry about the late response. I already forgot about this since I was watching the match that I was intended to bet. Additional question: What happen if I sign a tx but do not broadcast?
|
|
|
I won't remove anyone applying, and just for clarification (some people messaged me about my members posting here asking me to remove them), my warning was to those that will derail this thread and/or attack chipmixer/Darkstar_ in any way. I'm no dictator that will remove people who are actually helpful here or wants to apply, I don't own you guys .
What would my chances be if I were to apply Darkstar_? I guess the chance is that there will be only one more spot left to apply :-P Nah, I'd give him a spot under the trusted exception if he wanted to join Ah, that doubles my enthusiasm Okay, I stop my spamming now LOL. Good luck to every one who apply
|
|
|
~snip~ This match is going to be a tight one. Kohli just got out and its basically 50-50 at this point. I hope AB sticks till the end and the remaining RCB batsmen need to support him out in the middle. If RCB lose this one, I think they might set a new record of 7 losses in a row in the IPL.
If KXIP can take AB de Villiers then the match will be in KXIP's control. Few minutes ago I was telling my brother in law that RCB always play good at the start and then at the end they lose control. This team is very much dependent in Kohli and AB de Villiers. Anyway, last two balls two fours. Seems like they have a chance but I am not still sure about RCB. Any moment they can lose AB de Villiers and then game is off for them. Let's see what we have today. It's getting exciting.
|
|
|
I won't remove anyone applying, and just for clarification (some people messaged me about my members posting here asking me to remove them), my warning was to those that will derail this thread and/or attack chipmixer/Darkstar_ in any way. I'm no dictator that will remove people who are actually helpful here or wants to apply, I don't own you guys .
What would my chances be if I were to apply Darkstar_? I guess the chance is that there will be only one more spot left to apply :-P ~snip~ You'd have a pretty good chance @Hhampuz, well there you have it :-D
|
|
|
If you wish to apply privately for whatever reason (fear of Hhampuz removing you from your current campaign, etc)
Nice sarcasm LOL I will try my luck :-) Username: Royse777 Post Count: 1935 BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1qsvtx9svs5t3n2afe5fc8nl9jjdtfk3prxphwj4 Cheers :-)
|
|
|
Chris Gayle missed his century by just 1 run. Scored 99* from 64 balls. Can you believe that this guy went unsold during the first round auctions? Right now he is ranked #3 on the top run scorers for thus season, with 322 runs from 7 matches.
And he has the back injury, bowlers know that he has weakness in body length deliveries. Also consider the age. Gayle is a legend and it's always pleasure to see he hits those sixes. RCB is responding well like they did in all the matches. Just hope that they do not lose track at the end or they will have another loss. I think it will be the 7th consecutive loss if they fail today.
|
|
|
Here you guys will find the match details: https://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/43914118Vishnu.Reang is right. Every team will play against each of the nation in the group stage. If I am not wrong then top four will play the semi and then final in the Lord's. It's a one and half month long event. This year surely is a cricket year :-)
|
|
|
~snip~
Even the current West Indian team has got a number of good players. If they put 100% in to their game, then they will be able to beat anyone. But first they need to put aside the personal differences and bond together as a team.
It's not football that in a camp few weeks of practice makes good understanding between players. Cricket is different. For sure West Indies have good player but I doubt they are fit for ODI matches. They are doing well in T20 but T20 and ODI are two different format. Besides finding a good combination in betting and bowling is crucial. It requires lots of matches to play and experiments in both net and real matches.
|
|
|
~snip~ Lol. This is weird. Also, it looks like I won my bet by betting on Rajasthan and they pulled through after an amazing over by Bumrah towards the end. I hope I win my bet on RCB in the upcoming match too.
If the 2nd innings wins then sure you are going to win this RCB one too :-) My bad luck that I can not bet since I am having trouble sending BTC to my gambling account LOL. I am still considering to bet for KXIP. The rate is good for them which is tempting me LOL
|
|
|
~snip~
I didn't ask about installing new update. I asked, Is this necessary Uninstall the previous version & deleting all appdata files?
Oh sorry, I don't think it's necessary. These are the files only and them has nothing to do with the new installations. Consider them as a file you copy and paste from any other computer or drive.
|
|
|
~snip~ I’m not sure. Since you received the “missing inputs” error, you must be trying to spend the inputs coming from the unconfirmed transaction. Would you mind sharing the tx id of the unconfirmed tx and try making your tx again, but this time pressing “Preview”, “Copy” and pasting what you get here?
Good to see your comment. I was waiting for you :-) I wish I could share the unconfirmed tx which I spent earlier today. It's low fees so I am thinking this will take a long time to confirm. Anyway here is the senior: I am trying to spend 0.005BTC The fees will be 0.00022031BTC at 50.3 sat/B (as you can see) If you check the 4 outputs then you will see the red one is the output that I spent earlier and the tx is still unconfirmed. I am not sure why it's coming in this transaction? By the way the other two outputs marked as black are the same address which I am sending from. I am using single address. ~snip~
Is this instruction necessary for installing every new update?
As far as I understand that it's good to have latest update installed. This keeps you safe from any unexpected risks. By the way, I am still having the same problem. I think it's not about the version I have, it's something to do with the unconfirmed tx I have. I am just not sure. I am still waiting for TryNinja. Cheers :-)
|
|
|
Do you have any Local transaction in your wallet? If so, remove it and try making the tx again.
I do not have a local transaction but I have an unconfirmed transaction. Is this related to this transaction? If yes then how? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
I'm not seeing that error but if you're not using version 3.3.4 I suggest you update ASAP.
I just tried. Updated to the latest but still I see the same massage. I am going to uninstall again and then delete everything from my appdata folder. Then restart the system before installing a fresh copy.
|
|
|
|