|
Sorry for OT,
But Slush hasn't had a block in over 7 hours, and that's with over 209 PH.
It's time for the blocks to fall!!!!
|
|
|
|
COME ON guys and gals... Let's CRACK this SOB!!
Then on to some GREEN BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Enough is enough!!!!!
what the ****? where are the blocks? This is getting ridiculous!!! The usual suspects are grabbing all the blocks according to BlockTrail. I have three and 2/3rd's S9's on the pool - one board has been sent off for repair - and my older three S7's also. About 60TH's is all I can muster. Let's knock this MF'er out!!!!! Then three or four quick blocks afterwards!  |
|
|
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
Well, well, well, you can never tell... Might be back above 1,200 by the end of the weekend. Who knows? |
|
|
|
|
COME ON guys and gals... Let's CRACK this SOB!!
Then on to some GREEN BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Enough is enough!!!!!
|
|
|
|
We were getting 6-7 blocks a day sometime when we had a pool hash rate of the mid 30's. The good ol days!  Oh what a difference doubling the difficulty makes.  Yes, I meant to add that in my comment in addition to the lower participation rate.  |
|
|
|
I admire the morality and transparency going on in this pool. A lot. Including those providing the support. The amount hash power of this pool is no where near where it should realistically be from an overall comparison of pools.
It seems the general miner community prefers the PPS negative payment structure with the pool pocketing the transaction fees that are greater than the reward payout. At least, it seems that way for now based upon pool network percentage shares.
Is there any effective way to offer a better deal than some of these pools, like Antpool, while you keep the transaction fees if desired by the miner?
Just thinking if you offered your current pool structure and the alternative structure that people seem to be flocking towards, you could show transparency in both and offer links via the dashboard to both styles. Similar to what some pools do anyhow, yet with your much more transparent statistics. One could even show a breakdown of what they would have earned on the alternative payout structure for comparison.
People, seeing a dashboard where one side keeps the fees and the other doesn't (with a comparison), may help education the mining community. And, given the success of these pools pocketing transaction fees, it seems some education is very necessary.
I like the much more open payout structure at Kano. I also recognize the miner hesitation to join when seeing last pool block 37 hours ago. Even if that number is purely psychological from a payout standpoint. My thoughts are there must be a way to combine both the quality and transparency of Kano with the tactics of larger pools that are clearly dominating the overall network.
I'm certain many people would want to help support this pool with such an endeavour, from back-end work to helping with other methods like running social media accounts. Of course, this all boils down to the real question: Is there an interest here in proactively growing?
We were getting 6-7 blocks a day sometime when we had a pool hash rate of the mid 30's. The good ol days! |
|
|
|
So I originally had a question about KANO POOL PAYOUTS and created a thread about it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1816372.0My payouts page shows i should have gotten paid a total of 0.01529572 in the form of four payments: 455999 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00490208
455993 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00456871 455933 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00348673 455877 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00233820 My rewards page shows the same. But my bitcoin receive address shows only two transactions for a total of 0.00919057 (see this link: https://bitref.com/18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL) Can someone help explain this to me? I thought the cumulative amount i see in my payouts page should be the same as the amount in my wallet. I use KEEPKEY wallet. Thank you The blocks above in bold have matured and will be paid out on the next block the pool finds. What VRobb said. ^^^^^^Above. I lost track of the blocks that have actually been paid out. |
|
|
|
So I originally had a question about KANO POOL PAYOUTS and created a thread about it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1816372.0My payouts page shows i should have gotten paid a total of 0.01529572 in the form of four payments: 455999 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00490208
455993 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00456871 455933 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00348673 455877 18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL 0.00233820 My rewards page shows the same. But my bitcoin receive address shows only two transactions for a total of 0.00919057 (see this link: https://bitref.com/18ra2rHjbQMgPCKqBqemkvdRmwhigRXnBL) Can someone help explain this to me? I thought the cumulative amount i see in my payouts page should be the same as the amount in my wallet. I use KEEPKEY wallet. Thank you The blocks above in bold have matured and will be paid out on the next block the pool finds. |
|
|
|
Is anyone else able to login in to the website? I keep getting a "Logins currently disabled" message
Yes. That usually happens when Kano detects bots trying to connect to the pool. |
|
|
|
I've done it loads of times, it doesn't take 3 hours.
Ah, what the hell. I just got into the miner with the appropriate URl and bumped the freq. from 500 to 575Mhz and see how it handles the temps. Since it is a rated 550Mhz miner by BM, I don't want to take too high. I'll repost back after it has finished. Almost four minutes and counting,  EDIT: DAMN!!! It came back in about five minutes. Much faster than I imagined. That will definitely be the way I change freqs. in the future without having to re-flash again!! Great tip and info!!!! +2  Feeling brave! 575Mhz was running fine with no temp issues, so I just bumped again to 600Mhz. That means all four S9's will be hashing at 600 when/if it comes back!!! |
|
|
|
Block by danbe179!
Nice!! Two more blocks to go! ;-> |
|
|
|
.... I hesitate to call the loss of fan control and the easy changing of frequencies an upgrade....
Changing freq on older rigs with 2.0 hasn't changed, it's just hidden... It's still at h ttp://your_rig's_IP_here/cgi-bin/minerAdvanced.cgi Very interesting. It DOES take you to a frequency control page. However, when I decided to bump one of miners from 550 to 575, it popped up a warning saying it would take 3 hours to search frequencies before it starts mining. I decided, No. Thanks for the tip anyway. I've done it loads of times, it doesn't take 3 hours. Thank you for the info! So it may take about the same length of time it takes for an initial flash from older FW to the Auto-tune? About an hour for me. Another question please, will it allow a frequency change to 575Mhz or any other freq that is not 550,600, or 650? I know it shows that it available along with the normal large range of frequencies as were seen in the older no auto-tune FW. Just wondering if it might have a hard time settling in at one of the freqs. that is not 550, 600, 650. Thank you for any further info you can provide!! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
