Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 07:07:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 »
501  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin Diff Jump in About 7.5 hours. :( on: February 04, 2017, 09:15:09 PM
I'm going to turn my miners off for the next few hours. That should drop the difficulty increase to 2.5-3% at the most!  Grin
502  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: New rig. Pool or sell hashes? on: February 04, 2017, 07:46:41 PM
I have a [very] small amount of hashing power.

What are the most important points to consider in choosing to pool or resell?

What are the comparative pros/cons of pooling vs. hash-selling (rigrentals, nicehash, etc)?

These may be the same question, but I can't seem to find any source of information. Not even the hashing services publish anything on the matter, which is weird.

You can setup your miners pointing to Mining Rig Rentals with their proxy. When your miners are rented, well, they're rented and you're getting paid by the renter.
When your miners are not being rented, you set the proxy to automatically switch over to Kano.is or some other pool of your choosing. That way you can get a little of both.

However if your rigs are rented and pointed somewhere else, you are losing out on any blocks the pool finds during that rental time. [Unless you are mining on a PPLNS payment pool, the you will / may get some of your hash paid out.]
Hope that makes sense.
503  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin Diff Jump in About 7.5 hours. :( on: February 04, 2017, 07:34:00 PM
I just took a look at Bitcoin Wisdom to see what may be in store for us.

Currently looks like a (+8.64%) jump in about 5.8 hours or about 39 blocks. Of course that may change either way before then, but we're getting close.

I'm just thankful it's not showing a 12-15% diff increase.

Good lucks boys and girls and hold on tight!
Mine on!!  Grin  Cheesy  Grin  Cheesy  Cool

EDIT: It's showing an average of right at 1 block per 9 minutes.  Shocked


Bitcoin Difficulty: 392,963,262,344
Estimated Next Difficulty: 426,926,642,622 (+8.64%)  
Adjust time: After 39 Blocks, About 5.8 hours  
Hashrate(?): 3,090,761,642 GH/s
Block Generation Time(?):
1 block: 9.0 minutes

3 blocks: 26.9 minutes

6 blocks: 53.9 minutes

pretty expected with the price rise, difficulty could and probably will jump to even higher points after this price rise and after the difficulty adjustment. 10-15% is possible in the next few weeks if price holds or rises.

Looking like around +7.8% now with a little less than 4 hours to go, according to BitcoinWisdom.
I'm certainly glad to see it come down from the +mid-teens increase it showed after the last adjustment. Of course it could move either way in the next few hours.

We'll know for sure in a few hours. Smiley
504  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20+PH] Kano CKPool kano.is 0.9% PPLNS US,DE,SG,JP,NL,NYA on: February 04, 2017, 06:59:52 PM
Our luck is too low this month. Below 80%, and it keeps decreasing. I saw on antpool, some more than 1,000% luck. Whatis the key of luck?

You need to understand the benefits on mining on a smaller pool versus mining on a mega-pool like ant or f2

It's sort of like being a medium fish in a small pond versus being a very tiny fish in a huge pond.

On a smaller pool, the pool will find less blocks than a mega-pool. But instead of splitting the pool block reward with 700+ people, like on Kano, on ant you will have to split that reward with - I don't know 100,000 or more people.

I'm just pulling number out of thin air here, but if your hash rate earns you $1.00 per block on Kano, that same hash rate might only earn you $0.10 on antpoo. So even with more blocks found, you are still earning much less. And the important part: Tx FEE'S...

You MUST take into consideration that ant does not share the transaction fees with the miners. They keep them for themselves. Sometimes these fees are an extra full Bitcoin or more that is supposed to be shared among the miners. On Kano's pool you get those extra transaction fees on ant you get nothing. (Also the fees to mine on ant are more when all is said a done.)

Okay, that's the last time I'm explaining this for at least another 6 months. LOL  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Mine on!!
505  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20+PH] Kano CKPool kano.is 0.9% PPLNS US,DE,SG,JP,NL,NYA on: February 04, 2017, 03:52:15 PM
block
506  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Overclocking AMD 7950s in Ubuntu, only 1 appears affected on: February 04, 2017, 03:43:23 PM
Good morning everyone. Sorry if this is in the wrong section.

I'm currently mining Zcash using 3 7950s running 14.04.2 Ubuntu, with Claymore's v11.1 miner. The mining is working well. All three cards are recognized. Without overclocking, I get roughly 215H/s from each card.   After overclocking using aticonfig commands, GPU 0 will go up to 240H/s, but the other two will stay around 215H/s.   When I type "aticonfig --list-adapters", all three cards are listed.    Am I missing something? It doesn't seem like the other two cards are being overclocked.

Thanks!

This should be in the Alt-Coin threads. This section is Bitcoin only.
507  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Bitcoin Diff Jump in About 7.5 hours. :( on: February 04, 2017, 01:55:54 PM
 I just took a look at Bitcoin Wisdom to see what may be in store for us.

Currently looks like a (+8.64%) jump in about 5.8 hours or about 39 blocks. Of course that may change either way before then, but we're getting close.

I'm just thankful it's not showing a 12-15% diff increase.

Good lucks boys and girls and hold on tight!
Mine on!!  Grin  Cheesy  Grin  Cheesy  Cool

EDIT: It's showing an average of right at 1 block per 9 minutes.  Shocked


Bitcoin Difficulty: 392,963,262,344
Estimated Next Difficulty: 426,926,642,622 (+8.64%) 
Adjust time: After 39 Blocks, About 5.8 hours 
Hashrate(?): 3,090,761,642 GH/s
Block Generation Time(?):
1 block: 9.0 minutes

3 blocks: 26.9 minutes

6 blocks: 53.9 minutes
508  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 11:17:01 PM
Thanks ya'll for the suggestions. Good, valid points. I've decided to give it a few days to think on it before making any moves.
If I do get an Avalon, I "think" I would rather spend the extra dollars on the 741 than the 721 just for the little bit of extra hash.
Good points, one and all.
Unless BM makes a price drop, I don't see myself getting any more miners from them.

I'm getting ready to leave the house for a while, so will get back to the thread later.
Just wanted to acknowledge the latest posts!
Thanks!  Grin
509  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool on: February 03, 2017, 10:40:49 PM
When changing the difficulty for one of my miners on Slushpool, how long will it take to come into effect? I have an S9 and am trying to decrease the bandwidth consumption. I understand if I increase the difficulty I should use less bandwidth because I will be submitting my shares and requesting work less frequently (am I right about this?).

Also, does anyone have any suggestions on how I can reduce my total bandwidth / traffic use if I have multiple (20+) S9's running on the same network? I will be using a cellular data plan, so it is important to minimize my data usage.

Thanks Smiley

I can't tell you about the difficulty settings as I have tried to change mine and have never gotten them set satisfactorily. So I just put them back at the minimum. Whatever vardif Slush talks about, I don't see it working or at least I'm not doing something right and there is almost no real information to make good judgement implementations - at least that's my take. Wink

As for reducing bandwidth for multiple miners, you may want to look into a proxy. I know Kano has one available for his pool and I would guess that Slush probably has one too. But I don't know how to implement it and really have no need as I'm only running 7 miners.
But I think a proxy is what you should look into.
Let us know what you find out. It could benefit others, myself included.

Good luck! Smiley
510  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 05:47:17 AM
Just did a run through of placing an order for the 741 and controller but did not pull the trigger.

For a single 741 and controller, the total cost would be $1,007.50. That includes $129.50 in shipping fees by FedEx. (Not sure if they would surprise me after the fact with any additional fees to the US.)

Product   Total
AvalonMiner 741 × 1   $818.00
AvalonMiner Controller × 1   $60.00
Subtotal:   $878.00
Shipping:   $129.50 via FedEx
Payment Method:   Manual Payment
Total:   $1,007.50

Only payment method according to "Jon" is BTC and wire transfer. After looking at it like that, I'm having second thoughts. I'll sleep on it and see if that number looks any more palatable tomorrow.

Don't have enough coins in the wallet right now anyway and I doubt my small credit union is up to speed on international wire transfers. So next week may be a better decision making time after the next difficulty jump kicks in. It's looking like a 9%+ increase at the moment with about 1 3/4 days remaining.

We shall see what happens.

I would still be grateful for anymore answers /opinions to my assorted questions. Grin
Thanks folks.

Best wishes and MINE ON!
511  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 03:05:31 AM
Just make sure you don't mix the two PSUs in the same circuit a.k.a. in the same hash board.

Yes sir. I'm aware that is a big no-no. I'm running dual power supplies (two PSU's per miner) on five of my total of seven miners. Running four S9's 24/7 and running three S7's when the temp is cold enough and I run those instead of running the gas (central heat) furnace in my house.

So the S7's right now are only running for about 8-12 hours per day on cold days. The S7's are only making about ~$1.50 per day profit, but at least I'm not running the furnace for half the day. So I come out ahead by a few dollars.

The other PSU's I have on hand that are in use are an EVGA 1600 G2 Gold and a single APW3-12-1600.

Eight miners, of whatever current, newest hardware, is about all my little house can handle.  Tongue
512  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 01:59:28 AM
I guess I need to do some more reading/studying up on the power requirements.

I don't know what the off sets mean.
Thanks!

EDIT: Never mind. I DO understand what you are saying about the off sets. Smiley
My bad.

You were quick thats all.  give me an hour I am switching to -1  to see what happens

Okay great. It's good to see what different power inputs produce!
513  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 01:58:43 AM
HP DPS-1200 is only able to do max. 900 W, when the voltage is 110 V.
See my specs link above.

Okay. Yes, I follow you.
As I'm trying to say, I'm not planning on trying to power the 741 with a single PSU. I will use two PSU's. A 1200w and a 750w.

My intent was to power "half" of the 741 with the DPS-1200 and the other "half" of the 741 with the DPS-750.

I'm sorry if I've not been clear.  Smiley

Thank you.

514  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 01:45:04 AM
I guess I need to do some more reading/studying up on the power requirements.

I don't know what the off sets mean.
Thanks!

EDIT: Never mind. I DO understand what you are saying about the off sets. Smiley
My bad.
515  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 01:42:55 AM
Actually HP DPS-1200 is able to do even little more than the rated power, so I would say it is safe to use it if your voltage is 200-240VAC and cooling works ok at your miner place.

I don't have any more 240v available. Only 110/120v outlets and the mentioned PSU's. I have three "sets" of them.
Are these unable to be powered by the PSU's I mentioned?

I was going to use two power supplies to power a single 741.
Power three PCIe plugs with one 1200w and the other three plugs with the 750w. So two PSU's per 741.

Am I missing some point or something else here?

Thank you. Smiley
516  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 01:38:21 AM

Okay  there is voltage off set 


I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean.

517  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 01:05:05 AM
I would look into a stronger power supply than that. You do not want to push a PSU to 96% of its rated load considering you want it running 24/7/365 for as long as possible.

Well yes, I have the pair of PSU's that are powering a single S9. A 1200w and a 750w make the pair.
So if the 741 uses 6 PCIe's, I could run three pcie plugs from each of the PSU's powering three plugs on each side with it's own PSU.
I pretty much assumed I shouldn't power the miner with just the 1200w single PSU.
Sorry if I wasn't clearer in my original post.

Thanks!
518  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon A7 announced on: February 03, 2017, 12:27:23 AM
I know this is probably a "variable" answer question, lol, but since I have never owned any Avalon products.... Please bare with me. Smiley

I am considering a 741 or more in the future. I have only had BM products so far with S7's and S9's. The hash rate of the BM products are pretty nice but all of the hardware issues and price are a BIG turn-off and make me hesitant to spend so much on something I feel skeptical about.

General questions in no particular order:

Compared to the S7's/S9's, what are the cooling needs of the Avalon's? Do they usually require external fans blowing on them, a very cool ambient temps, or do they handle their default hash rate pretty well with about the same (or less) cooling needs than the BM products?

From what I have gathered on the threads, the sound is a little less than the S9's. (No bigge, just curious) Is that a mostly correct idea? What about heat output? About the same or less than BM products?

I know the power consumption and needs of the Avalon's are less than BM products. I'm running most of my miners with 110v PSu's and have three of these PSU's available for any future miners. http://www.centrix-intl.com/details.asp?productid=13388

S9PSUKIT   110v/120V 80+ Gold Power Supply For Bitmain Antminer S9 Bitcoin Miner. Include (2) Original HP 1200W & 750W 80+ Gold, (2) X-Adapter REV 4, (10)Pair 14

Are there any issues using these PSU's? From the pictures and specs it appears the 741 only uses 6 pci connectors. If correct, will that HP 1200W handle the load or is that cutting it too closely for power draw since the 741 uses ~1150w? I'm guessing it would probably be best to still use both PSU's to power the miners.

I have no experience using Rasp Pi's or anything like that (but I am tech-savvy) . From what I understand from the 741 web page, I can run two (or more) 741's from a single controller. How easily can, say, just two 741's be setup without an increased jumble of wires/cables, etc. Pretty simple?
Other than for setup, I'm assuming that no PC/laptop needs to be connected and they are basically stand-alone except for the controller. Is that correct?

I guess the last question off the top of my head is, other than buying the miner and the controller, what other equipment/supplies are needed to run the miner? Or more specifically, two 741's? I'm not talking about power or Ethernet cables. Got plenty of all that.

Thanks for listening. Any and all comments / suggestions for an Avalon newbie are very welcome. I'm just dying for more hash but don't want to spring for another BM product.

Sorry about the long rambling post. I'm just pulling questions off the top of my head. Smiley
Thanks all!!  Grin Grin

PS: How are they for slight over-clocking? Do they handle it well and stay stable? What is the "stable" over-clock hash rate? Thanks!! Smiley Smiley

PPS: Any coupons available out there?  Grin Grin Grin
519  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool on: February 02, 2017, 09:13:46 PM

Good luck on the potential new job, furry guy!

But if you don't mind me asking, what does the new job have to do with what pool you mine on?

Maybe you're just looking for less variance here on Slush over Kano?

I moved from Kano's pool because I value voting for SegWit over a slight long term profitability advantage. But that's just me...

Thank you for the good wishes.

Well, the new job would allow me to add at least 2 more modern miners to my four S9's and three S7's (that I run when it's cold enough so I don't turn the heat in the house on.) I feel I would have a bigger impact on Kano pool with that. But I understand that's faulty logic and what hash I have now would be a help there regardless. (Don't really know why I was thinking that way to begin with.)  Huh

The second part, yes, I moved to Slush for less variance because I cash out at the end of each month to help with the power bill and other bills.
I've been an IT guy for 20+ years and I'm currently under-employed and under-paid working for a non-profit. So the new job would give me the freedom of not having to worry about the bills or how many coins I can earn each month. I'm waiting on an answer from one job interview and have another interview next week.

I will "probably" stick here a little longer - new job or not - but I do want to go back to Kano in the near future. I'm not a SegWit fan myself.  Grin

Best wishes and happy mining! Smiley
520  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-01-30] Bitcoin Core Dev’s Blocksize Reduction Proposal Draws Ire from ViaB on: February 02, 2017, 01:47:28 AM

Quote
BU as “every software has Bug. We have bug too and lost some money.”

I am just guessing, but if he can't even get basic English right, I'm not surprised they have bugs.

And just how well do you speak Chinese?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!