|
Technical question from a non-technical guy... Sorry if it comes out as something stupid, but I rather seek an answer to my ideas than putting them in a dark corner.
I was thinking about how some wallet providers or even individuals do sometimes use fees that are just "too low" to get fast confirmations. This may not be an issue when we are transacting between individuals, but it can be a pain in the ass in some cases. One of such cases, and the one that has led to this query, is the casino deposit feature.
No need to explain what a deposit is, but most, if not all casinos require at least X confirmations from the network in order to credit the deposit. Nothing wrong with that, since they cover themselves from a double-spending attack. However, in some situations, transactions get stuck and the player is left to wait (bad luck fella, use a higher fee next time) for a long time. The main reason this feature exists is to prevent double spends, as I have already mentioned, but I'd like to know if there is an alternative to it.
I know transactions with RBF can be double spent (or accelerated, call it however you like it most), but is there any other way to actually do this? CPFP is a kind of RBF, IIRC; so, if transactions that don't have RBF active can not be double spent, could hypothetically a casino run a node that is able to tell if a transaction has this activated, and in the event of it being negative, instantly credit the money with no confirmations required?
Sorry if the explanation got a bit messy, I can try re-explain it again if that's the case. Thanks in advance for taking the time to read this
|
|
|
|
Coming here today to tell you all about the new GOSU team that has been formed to participate in the Bitcarra Launch Event! In a few words, a competition on what team gets the most profit on a crash game. Long version of it can be found at our website! There's a prize pool of up to 200k $ |
|
|
|
|
No se si por haber empezado en este mundillo mucho antes de que hubiera atisbos de regulaicon o por que, pero me parece tan alienigena el concepto de mezclar bitcoin, mi identidad y bancos... De verdad que no entiendo muy bien lo que pasa a mi alrededor aveces
|
|
|
|
---
Stupid/nonsense/whatever you wanna call it reviews do get reported but sensible people and thus deleted. Cut the conspiracy crap please. |
|
|
|
|
Me gusta esto de volver despues de meses y ver caras nuevas que aportan material interesante a estas tierras... voy a tener que rebotar mas de vez en cuando
Dicho esto, me gustaria ponerme algo serio con esto. Aportan estos juegos realmente algo "nuevo"?, o simplemente son juegos que se pueden desarrollar sin teconologia blockchain pero que se han subido al HYPE de los NFT para intentar atraer una mayor cantidad de usuarios?
Lo de los juegos que "pagan" por jugarlos no es nada nuevo, y asi de primeras se me viene "Steemit monsters" a la cabeza, pero no termino de entender esta oleada que esta llegando ahora de todo el mundo hablando de ello (salvo que HYPE).
Aclarado eso, realmente merecen la pena estos juegos? Hablando en terminos realistas, de una persona que no se dedica a esto en cuerpo y alma. No quiero revolver mucho el pasado, pero aquello de que te pagaran por ver anuncios no es tan lejano, y algunos hemos podido probar de primera mano la "rentabilidad" de estos sitios
|
|
|
|
---
Thanks! Didn't know how exactly it worked/if it still worked... Current spam wave is using this post. "Pegas" may be the keyword? |
|
|
|
---
I've got over 50 reports on that same spammy thread(s) in 3 hours (and I've been gone, not online all the time). PS: Shouldn't Mindless Electron take care of those as soon as they appear? I've been gone for some months, but it used to work that way |
|
|
|
--
Asique.... no ha cambiado nada en casi medio año. Tampoco puedo decir que me sorprenda, pero bueno... a ver que pasa con el canal de YT, que parece un proyecto interesante y poco mas que decir |
|
|
|
Any action for this?
Kindly use the "report to moderator" button on the left side of the post to make moderators aware of this, nothing else we, individual users can do against this. |
|
|
|
|
Bueno, aprovecho este hilo que ya traia en su dia un objetivo para decir que evidentemente no he sido capaz de cumplirlo, y que creo que por fin voy a poder recuperar algo de tiempo para volver a estar de manera mas o menos activa por estas tierras. Se que han sido muchos meses fuera, asique si alguien tiene interes en hacer un resumen bienvenido será.
|
|
|
|
---
Si lo que andas buscando es que te demos dinero para montarte tu nodo la llevas un poco clara... Dicho esto, con la configuración que planteas no se va a conseguir realmente mucho. 500gb de HDD se van a quedar cortos en relativamente poco tiempo, el procesador va a a estar MUY apurado para tirar con los dos nodos, y 4gb de RAM van a estar un poco ahogadas tambien para poder estar escribiendo y leyendo constantemente. Se pueden montar nodos baratos, pero hay que saber que: -No sirven para beneficio economico -Hay que hacer una inversion algo mayor de 20$ |
|
|
|
|
This has actually drifted into a drama shitthread when the situation is rather simple...
Anyone that knows Ivan knows that what has happened here is not a shill attempt; but judging a situation from a distance without knowing the person and all the facts is always easier. I believe this is something we've all done at some point; it's easier to go against a nickname than a real person.
I'd also like to make a reminder that this is an international forum, where people from all over the globe come post and talk about crypto in general, and bitcoin in a more specific way. Not everyone is proficency in English here, it may not be their mother tongue, they may have only learnt it at school, etc. What may seem like an ambiguous wording of something may just be a rough translation of another, more strong language for the user. I'm no English professor to make judgments on the English level of each forum user, but when taking a decition like this one, where there seems to be a shill attempt, I'd take that into consideration too.
This has become much more than what it actually is, and I'd ask all of you to take a step back and take a deep breath; because nothing is solved when people are feeling personally attacked.
And as a matter of fact, yes, I am vocal whenever I find a situation (or the situation finds me) in which I believe the trust system is being incorrectly used. We are sometimes too trigger friendly when it comes to certain topics, and that's why some more thought should sometimes be put into them.
|
|
|
|
The point of creating this thread was to avoid the other thread being overrun with comments about whether a tag was deemed valid or not. It was mentioned in the firsts two paragraphs of the first post in this thread.
I do know how to read but I still fail to make sense out of it. You are basically doing an incorrect use of the trust system based on how you perceive things, not on hard evidence and make your own interpretation of the facts. Asking a casino you don't trust to give some funds so that you can try it on their own review campaign is, from my point of view, not wrong. The casino did later on provide said funds, no review was ever left. There is literally no harm nor ill intention on that. |
|
|
|
I don't really see the point of creating a thread to repeat what has already been said... Just in case I'll copy-quote my reply over there:
---
I have to say I'm with you on this one, Ivan. For starters, giving a negative in September for something that happened in May... it's a bit off from my personal point of view. To continue, the thread the comment was made into was a Review thread. Reviews can be both good and bad, and since no review was actually made in the end, the whole information from the tag is off. A little bit above Ivans' post, we can also see examplens making this exact point: I RECOMMEND NOBODY TO JOIN HERE
PEOPLE WHO WANT TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN WILL BE NEGATIVE TAGGED BY DT MEMBERS PROBABLY
STAY WAY FROM THIS SCAM ORGANISATION
I don't think so. He wants to pay for a review here on the Bitcointalk forum, why not? If someone makes an honest negative review, you think he should be negative trust punished by DT members? He said honest review, not shill. I guess they will pay for this job, even if the review does not present them with a positive feeling. As a side note, I don't think this is a right use of the trust system. I see a distrust on your personal trust list more fitting for this situation, but that may just be my own personal observation. TLDR; there was no review (negative or positive) so this is just a wild goose chase
|
|
|
|
---
I have to say I'm with you on this one, Ivan. For starters, giving a negative in September for something that happened in May... it's a bit off from my personal point of view. To continue, the thread the comment was made into was a Review thread. Reviews can be both good and bad, and since no review was actually made in the end, the whole information from the tag is off. A little bit above Ivans' post, we can also see examplens making this exact point: I RECOMMEND NOBODY TO JOIN HERE
PEOPLE WHO WANT TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN WILL BE NEGATIVE TAGGED BY DT MEMBERS PROBABLY
STAY WAY FROM THIS SCAM ORGANISATION
I don't think so. He wants to pay for a review here on the Bitcointalk forum, why not? If someone makes an honest negative review, you think he should be negative trust punished by DT members? He said honest review, not shill. I guess they will pay for this job, even if the review does not present them with a positive feeling. As a side note, I don't think this is a right use of the trust system. I see a distrust on your personal trust list more fitting for this situation, but that may just be my own personal observation. TLDR; there was no review (negative or positive) so this is just a wild goose chase |
|
|
|
|
No, they shouldn't pump the ranks of those of us that are not there yet. The only people that care about rank are usually low value contributors that care only for bounty campaigns.
|
|
|
|
Realemente se trata de una chuminada, pero Theymos acaba de publicar una lista con el top de personas que han hecho reportes buenos durante el ultimo año en el foro. Por lo menos 2 somos de por esta zona curiosamente (y más curiosamente todavia, he empezado a buscarme debajo de DdmrDdmr y no entendia xk no me encontraba). Sin mucho mas que añadir a esto, dejo la lista: +-------------------------+--------------+
| User | Good reports |
+-------------------------+--------------+
| actmyname | 38580 |
| Ratimov | 33267 |
| eaLiTy | 13852 |
| GazetaBitcoin | 4750 |
| hosseinimr93 | 3800 |
| friends1980 | 3090 |
| DaveF | 2744 |
| lovesmayfamilis | 1665 |
| Rikafip | 1548 |
| Csmiami | 1529 |
| Mbitr | 1458 |
| miner29 | 1403 |
| xandry | 1225 |
| mk4 | 1173 |
| dkbit98 | 1165 |
| suchmoon | 1162 |
| Barcode_ | 1010 |
| Lucius | 972 |
| xhomerx10 | 852 |
| LoyceV | 834 |
| DdmrDdmr | 832 |
| sandy-is-fine | 811 |
| OmegaStarScream | 769 |
| NotFuzzyWarm | 724 |
| Xal0lex | 698 |
| pooya87 | 677 |
| SiNeReiNZzz | 595 |
| DroomieChikito | 580 |
| vareole | 569 |
| UserU | 560 |
| Lafu | 550 |
| odolvlobo | 546 |
| UnclWish | 511 |
| alucard20724 | 504 |
| Charles-Tim | 504 |
| RickDeckard | 447 |
| colires | 435 |
| ETFbitcoin | 425 |
| bluspirit | 418 |
| LeGaulois | 364 |
+-------------------------+--------------+ Hilo de referencia: aquí |
|
|
|
|
Wow, this is to say the least surprising. I haven't been really active the last couple of months and I'd have expected many more people to be ahead of my reporting habits...
Thanks for bringing the data and I can only say I feel honored to be among those top reporters
PS: Happy reporting to everyone!
|
|
|
|
El único tema es que no pase algo con la red general entre que vendes por la web y acudas al cajero de turno. Hoy observo que, por ejemplo, hay un conjunto de cajeros que están sin saldo disponible según su página web (retiro no disponible).
Bueno, es algo que efectivamente puede pasar; pero es un problema que radica en tratarse de un servicio centralizado. Puede pasar lo mismo si lo haces mediante Binance y el banco te cobra una comision porque les apetece... Por otro lado, entiendo que el código de 14 dígitos de referencia que te da para la retirada, debe ser un hash de la dirección BTC de depósito.
Siempre habia pensado que se trataba simplemente de un código interno que utilizan dentro de sus sistema |
|
|
|
<...>
Tenía la duda acerca del contravalor utilizado si haces la operativa de esta manera, dado que puede pasar tiempo entre el momento de venta y el momento del retiro del efectivo. Por lo que se ve, el valor es el del momento de la venta en la web. Si cuando vas a efectuar el retiro el BTC ha subido o bajado, éste hecho no afecta el montante que puedes retirar. Como sistema, entiendo que la ventaja es que el tiempo de la TX lo pasas en casa, y no delante del cajero (pudiendo llevar a ser más o menos largo según los fees elegidos). Menos estrés ... Basicente, el valor que se mantiene es el que hay en la web de ellos en el momento en el que se transmite la tx |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
