1142
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Wallet recovery - help needed
|
on: May 23, 2020, 03:21:44 PM
|
Have you tried accessing coinbase from its web version? AFAIK the only thing it asks to login is the email and the password; and you can recover passwords directly on your email. It may send you a SMS to "verify" it's you if have enabled SMS 2FA, but other than that, I don't even remember receiving a recovery phrase on coinbase when I registered (maybe older wallets did?)
|
|
|
1143
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Old pre 2012 wallet files on bitcoin core question
|
on: May 23, 2020, 03:12:08 PM
|
Priority is getting the BTC sorted out now. The recync of blockchain data is half way now.
Take into account, that once you click the "open wallet" on core, it will take a while and might look like the app is frozen. It's just scanning the whole blockchain for transactions on that wallet, and it will most likely take a while, don't panic if that happens (I've seen it happen to a couple of guys). If you have a moderately big ammount of coins, I'd suggest you buy a hardware wallet to store them, and once the BTCBTC is safe, you can proceed to claim (and dump, or store, that's up to you) the forked coins. IIRC, BCH, BSV and BTG are the ones that are currently worth the effort; you can check how to claim each one of them in LoyceV's guide (and service). But again, securing the BTC should be the top priority
Edit: A couple of weeks ago, a user sent me a wallet.dat file from 2009 to check if I could open it with Core. It ended up being a bought wallet, but the "important" thing is that it did open without needing to use upgradewallet. Each case is different, but you could first try opening them from inside Core with the "open wallet" option inside the "file" directory. Make sure to use different names to know which one you are operating
|
|
|
1144
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Old pre 2012 wallet files on bitcoin core question
|
on: May 23, 2020, 02:55:35 PM
|
---- It was not really about that; but rather about the huge amount of wallets without passwords that are being sold these days (that can't be unlocked in a human lifespan). Most recent case being this one. If you say the wallet is really yours, there is no reason to not believe you; and the only thing I wanted to make sure was that it was really the case. Now going back to your case... Do you know if all the wallet files are from bitcoin; or could they be mixed with other altcoins? If you are not sure about it; you can follow one of these 4 procedures: There are 2 3 ways : 1. Download client for cryptocurrency you think you own/use in past and load wallet.dat into that wallet client/application 2. Open your wallet.dat with any text editor and look for text/string which represent a cryptocurrency (on Bitcoin Core, usually list of the address are on bottom of file/line). It's painfully slow method and i don't recommend this method. For example, on my Bitcoin testnet wallet, there are 14.6K lines and i found list of my address on line 14357 3. Use pywallet ( https://github.com/jackjack-jj/pywallet) to get list of address of your wallet.dat. Check https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/25315 for more information Make sure you backup your wallet.dat before doing anything else. Actually just search for "name" and the address will be right next to it.
It's from another thread from some months ago with a similar case; old wallet files If you don't know in which address the coins are, you can dump the whole wallet with --dumpwallet. That will create a file that you can open with a text editor, and will contain the private masterkey and every private key with its correcponding address. You can manually check them, or simply sweep all/the masterkey
|
|
|
1145
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Old pre 2012 wallet files on bitcoin core question
|
on: May 23, 2020, 01:06:44 PM
|
And has been inactive since July 2017, and just woke up to start this thread. It could be a hacked account, it could not. I'm not saying that his case is not genuine; but seeing how many of this situations I've seen on this couple of months since I've been back to the forum.... well.... I tend to distrut everyone in certain situations (yes, no matter the rank). Besides, if it's a bought account/wallet, there's nothing stopping OP from lying; but still
|
|
|
1147
|
Other / Meta / Re: [TELEGRAM] Yet Another BitcoinTalk Notification BOT (merits, mentions, topics,+)
|
on: May 22, 2020, 08:57:49 PM
|
Or even better (it's a trivial condition, but I thin the result is greatly improved):
if amount=1: MERITS <b> $ {merits} </b>. You received <b>${amount}</b> merit from <b>${sender}</b> for <a href="${link}">${title}</a>
else: MERITS <b> $ {merits} </b>. You received <b>${amount}</b> merit from <b>${sender}</b> for <a href="${link}">${title}</a>
I beg for the pardon of the coders and techy guys; but I don't see any difference between those 2 lines... Adding the total merit count to the notification is a great suggestion tough
|
|
|
1149
|
Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk Party - Discord server
|
on: May 22, 2020, 11:26:01 AM
|
I'll also be leaving my participation here for the sake of making people hungry attracting more people to the contest (here or at the Games and rounds thread better?) There's a couple more pizzas and some making of in the imgur album too. Not as nice looking as @Rikafip's, but twice as tasty for sure
|
|
|
1150
|
Local / Primeros pasos y ayuda / Re: No me aparece mi balance ayuda
|
on: May 22, 2020, 10:58:00 AM
|
De primeras, podrias dejar de usar un monedero web; pero eso es algo secundario....
Si en el explorador ves que en una dirección que sabes que es tuya hay algo, es que lo hay. Lo más probable es que se trate de un bug de blockchain.
Siguiendo la primera recomendación, podrias comprar un Monedero Fisico (ledger, trezor....) para almacenar las monedas y controlar TU tus claves privadas.
Para recuperar las monedas que no te aparecen, puedes descargar Electrum para Bitcoin, y Electron Cash para BCH. Al crear un monedero nuevo en estas aplicaciones, selecciones "ya tengo una semilla", introduces la frase de 12 palabras que se te proporciona al registrar un monedero (accesible en el centro de seguridad), en opciones; marcas el cuadro de BIP39, y para Bitcoin, seleccionas el tipo de monedero como Legacy (no se como funciona BCH, pero no creo que cambie mucho la cosa).
Asegurate de hacer las descargas desde las fuentes oficiales, utiliza contraseñas seguras, y no las almacenes en nada digital. Además, te recomendaría mover todos los fondos a una wallet nueva tan pronto como hayas accedido a ellos, ya que al introducir la semilla en un ordenador, puede verse comprometida.
|
|
|
1151
|
Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: 50 BTC transferidos con probabilidad que sean de satoshi.
|
on: May 22, 2020, 10:24:06 AM
|
- No te notificará si ha movimientos (que yo sepa).
En el monedero de Core estoy 100% seguro de que en Windows 10 te llega una notificación cada vez que hay un movimiento. Hacec mucho que no utilizo Electrum para nada más que pruebas y experimentos, por lo que no estoy ahora mismo seguro; pero diria que también te llegaba una notificación. Dentro de los bots de telegram, yo utilizo @bitcoin_savings_bot . Es facil de usar y configurar
|
|
|
1152
|
Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: 50 BTC transferidos con probabilidad que sean de satoshi.
|
on: May 21, 2020, 10:41:53 PM
|
¡Pregunta!
Y no es porque esté casado, ni mis herederos, etc*. pero o ¡pero! como uno puede sin hacerlo manual (Tracking), que lo entiendo perfectamente, rastrear "x" dirección, existe alguna aplicaciòn que me lance estas notificaciones, cuando le establezca o configure si "x" direcciones realizan "send".
Hay varios bots de telegram que te notifican cada vez que hay un movimiento en una dirección que tu le has pedido monitorear. Aparte de eso, puedes importar a Electrum o Core una dirección pública, que te crearan un monedero "watch-only", y también verás (no estoy seguro de las notificaciones) todos los movimientos de dicha dirección
|
|
|
1154
|
Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements
|
on: May 20, 2020, 06:14:21 PM
|
This way all merits will be the same and no new merits will be bornt.
And no one would rank up, because everyone would hoard his merits and total circulation would be close to 0
|
|
|
1155
|
Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: 50 BTC transferidos con probabilidad que sean de satoshi.
|
on: May 20, 2020, 05:52:24 PM
|
Por lo que se ha estado comentando en el Discord del foro, puede que esa dirección fuese de Hal Finney. Por lo que se rumorea; le dejó bastantes direcciones a sus hijos/nietos/descendencia, y podria tratarse de alguno de estos moviendo las monedas o a una nueva dirección, o a venderlas. Me parece una teoria bastante mas sensata, la verdad
Otra teoria que acabo de leer, es una de las direcciones "innaccesibles" de Craight Wright Y otra cosa que desmiente que sean de satoshi por aqui.....
|
|
|
1156
|
Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements
|
on: May 20, 2020, 05:47:52 PM
|
Why should smerits exist? Why couldn't merits be sendable? For every merit you could receive, you can send it too. But you will lose it from your reputation score.
It was designed that way to "control" the number of Merits in circulation; a 2:1 proportion is not a bad one, and it's had no issues. There are some merit sources to compensate for those "burnt" half. I don't really know what you mean with reputation score... but how are reputation and merits related in any way?
|
|
|
1158
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 0.50 BTC reward for a valid password.
|
on: May 20, 2020, 01:37:50 PM
|
I don't really get what you mean, didn't you say that you imported the private key in Electrum? The link for the video you shared is wrong.
Not really; the video was working when he posted it; I saw it and it was an Electrum wallet, with the address that had the 150+ BTC and a lot of text in Russian. What I don't get is that he first said that he had the address and had swept it, and then he goes on to say that it's a scam and he lost money??? I'd ask for a signed message if he is really in control of the address, but this last turn on this thread is being really mind-blowing
|
|
|
|