I've been having a doubt for a couple of months, and this thread looks like the place for it...

I know that referal links are not allowed; but are they allowed IF you are:

1)clearly stating that it is a referal link
2)providing the same link with referal link

Example....

---

I'm talking about a website I use and blablabla. When I finish the text wall; I provide the link this way:

Link to the site: bitcointalk.org
Referal link to the site: bitcointalk.org/ref/903175

If you want to help use the ref link, blablabla.

---

Providing the ref link, with a non ref link option is allowed? For my reading of the rules, I'd say no; but it looks like a different case than simply spamming the link and hiding it under links

Pues puedes, o bien postear contenido de calidad para que te demos meritos si lo creemos conveniente; comprar una membresía que hace que tu rango sea equivalente a Member, o contratar a alguien para que lleve tu ANN

Kind of. You are trying to move 0.001mBTC, with a fee of 0.04mBTC. Total transaction will move 0.00552mBTC, and 0.00057mBTC will be left in the wallet. Seeing how many satoshis you have to pay in fees, that remaining 0.00057mBTC will never be able to be used; and if I don't remember it wrong,g that is the "dust".


Signing a message and using a tag are 2 complete different things. You can sign a message, mostly to verify that an address is yours. You then have to provide the person that will verify it with the message, the signature, and the address. It's not like you sign a message and everyone can see it (they can, if you provide the already mentioned things)

El otro día no me quede del todo convencido con esta explicación que di, asique he decido comprobarlo. Hilo en inglés por si a alguien le interesa aquí.

Resulta que en ese caso hipotético, se me olvidó completamente tener el cuenta que los bloques tienen un tamaño máximo. Esa patinada, hace que todo lo dicho esté mal.

Si bien es cierto que 1000 satoshis de comisión son más que 600, en el mismo ejemplo de arriba, se pueden meter unas 16 transacciones de 30 bytes en lo que ocupa 1 de 500. Esto se ve reflejado en que los calculos reales deberian haber sido en base a lo que ocupan dentro del bloque, y no en su valor neto. Ocupando 500 bytes; tendríamos que 1000<<10000. Y que por lo tanto, las transacciones pequeñas con comisiones altas se van a confirmar antes.

Con esto es interesante recordar que se pueden aprovechar los momentos en los que la red no tiene tanta congestión para consolidar todas nuestras a una sola dirección con una tarifa de 1satoshi/byte; y reducir el espacio que mover estos fondos ocuparían en un bloque (y ahorrar moviendo los fondos cuando la red se congestiona).

Okay, that does actually make a lot of sense. I hadn't even considered block size; but if you can have almost 3 smaller transactions with a higher fee, instead of a bigger one with smaller fee; you'll earn 3 times more...

Thanks for solving that doubt! I'll leave the thread open in case someone wants to point out something more

Last week, I translated LoyceV's "consolidate your inputs" guide into Spanish, so that local users could also read it, and do the thing local boards are meant to do. As it is natural, some questions arose, and even if all of them were answered; one of them has gotten me thinking ever since.

A higher fees means that your transaction will be picked faster from the mempool than a lower fee transaction. But what happens when a transaction is big enough to pay more in fees than a smaller transaction with a higher fee? I'll add an example:

User A sends a 70 byte transaction at 60 satoshi/byte fee. It's a high fee, and that user is confident is going to be part of the next block. Total fee paid (size*fee); 4200 satoshi
User B sends a 200 byte transaction at 25 satoshi/byte fee. It's still a "high fee" IMO, but the user has no rush on getting that transaction sent, and believes the transaction will be confirmed within 4 hours tops. Total paid fee, 5000 satoshi

Fee from user A is higher than in B, but the net worth of the fee in B is higher than in A.

It is my understanding that because of that net worth, transaction B will be confirmed earlier than transaction A (5000>4200), but I'd like to double check it before I give an incorrect reply back in the local board.

Apreciate your replies on this, and thanks in advance for answering

a)He does not
b)Why would he?
c)Why is it relevant on a signature campaign application?

If the answer to C is "it is not", then why even bring it up?

Bump

Quoted, verified and archived

What about....

Only the email and the forum thread/PMs are official channels. This has been said a couple of times by TheQuin; social media is managed by another person that has nothing to do with support requests.

You can also see the xPub key inside blockchain.com

Simple head to Bitcoin--Settings---Wallets&Addresses---Manage (on the wallet you want the xPub from)---More Options---Show xPub

I can provide screenshot if it's not clear enough, but it's kinda late and I'm going to have some sleep for the day. Will update it in the morning if you need so

They do, it's an automated feature, but records of withdrawals are only shown for the past 30 days (not sure about how long they store them).
They do also send an email every time you withdraw with the amount of coins and the tx id; so try looking for it and the checking on a block explorer to see where the coins actually went.

---

Also first time I hear about StakeCube too....

I'll go straight to the answers:

AFAIK, Trezor has a physicall vulnerability, so if someone has access to the device, they could get the seed and steal the funds. I don't use a Ledger wallet, so I don't really know about any backdoors to it. Nevertheless, both HW are secure enough to be the most used around, and you can always protect your funds with a passphrase; that is, to say in very vague terms, an extension of your seed. You can read more about it here

BCH, BTG, and any other forked coins (BSV for example), are a copy of the Bitcoin blockchain at a certain point. If you had 5 BTC in a wallet before the snapshot, you'll get the equivalent airdropped (not always 1:1) ammount of that Altcoin at that moment in that address. Think of these forks as Altcoins, you can't send a DOGE transaction on the ETH network.

I'll skip these, as I lack the knowledge to answer them....

That would be the reccomended order, yes. You first move your BTC, because you are going to be entering your private key into other platforms/wallets, and who knows who's looking... Then, once claimed, sweep them into your HW and you'd be done.

As a matter of fact, I'd say that Coinomi wallet is reccommended to claim forked coins, becuase it offers multi-coin support, so when you enter your private key, it should retrieve the coins on all the available forks at once. LoyceV does also offer a service to claim these coins

Edit: Typos (lol); and I've realized that the thread from Loyce does also offer a table with the wallets in which (some) of the forks can be claimed

I don't want to be "that" guy; but:

Rank-wise, you are currently cheating the campaign you are participating in. Had you created an account back in 2017; when you say you started working on it, you could have potentiallybeen a Sr Member by the time Merit was implemented; seeing that you have earnt 166 in total, you'd still be there. I admit that this may sound a bit too harsh and not really accurate.


I don't usually frequent Reputation because of the whole Drama issues I rather avoid; but it looks like you simply... don't care? "yes, I've been caught; I admit it, but nothing will actually happen; so what next?"
Again, I might be overeacting, but adding you to my distrust list a couple of weeks ago also seemed like overeacting; and looks like it wasn't...

Suchmoon distrusts that user, and you trust suchmoon, so I'd say that the reason it's not showing.

---

As for the OP, I don't speak russian, so I have no clue why the feedback was left. Nevertheless, if you move this thread to the Reputation board, and give some reason as to why the negative is uncalled for; you might get a chance of the user showing up to explain

And once again, you are completely ignoring the question about your account behaviour changed to show that you are not a hacked/sold account

A ban is a ban; be it temporary or permanent. Your lack of respect, and I'd even say disregard for the forum rules is amazing

BPIP doesn't show your alt account as banned. You've admitted to 2 ban evasions so far on the thread, but they seem to be minor; and if both were temporary, right now, you are not evading any ban.

You should respond to this before you do any "inner travel to rediscover the past and who you are"

New wallet---Import Bitcoin address or Private key---Paste the private key, with it's type:

To import a Legacy address (1...) , p2pkh:<privatekey>
To import a Nested segwit address (3...), p2wpkh-p2sh:<privatekey>
To import a Native segwit address (bc...), p2wpkh:<privatekey>

Sign the message on Tools---Sign/Verify

I have read your last reply before you deleted it (?), and something didn't seem right. AFAIK you are supposed to be able to access all your different wallets, no matter if its a desktop or mobile wallet.

Can you open blockchain wallet on your desktop, go to Bitcoin-->Settings--->Wallets&Addresses, and see if the problem is that you have 2 wallets, one is the default for the phone, and another one is set as default for the browser?

If that's the case, simple click Manage-->More Options-->Make default

Edit: already replied your below post here