Curioso el necrobump que le acaban de hacer a esto....

Sin embargo, no viene mal del todo, ya que no me parece haber leido en las respuestas anteriores que estos tags/etiquetas solamente son visibles en el explorador de blockchain. Cuando "registras" estas direcciones, lo estas haciendo en una base de datos interna de blockchain.com; por lo que si utilizas cualquier otro explorador, estos no van a estar disponibles.

Bitcointalk username: Csmiami
BTC address: 3Covid19s5zLNzQHGGLBeqkizwApUb19bj

@giammangiato you did quote me in the other post, but check if you are receiving a notification for this mention

I've just been mentioned in another thread, and the bot has given the following message:

See how there's a double "i" at the end of the nick. I've checked the post in Loyce Club, and it's not a typo that got fixed.

The bot seems to only notify whenever a message of yours gets quoted; but not when the @you (or type your name without @). I've been using the bot for almost 2 months now and I've had that issue since day 1; so I'd say that's what he's talking about

Your past feedback was for some multi-accounting stuff. That has literally nothing to do with the escrow situation here. I have not given you the benefit of the doubt, because after a 4 year inactivity period you refuse to sign a message to verify your identity, and tried to extort the escrow into releasing the funds with the following nonsense:

---

Funny you say that in the same post you say that you can't sign a message... I may not know if you are lying or not, but signatures don't lie; so that's kind of the point


These 2 contradictory statements make me think that you are not in control of that address.

Well, the whole situation is a mess, so I wouldn't blame you for that, lol.

Putting it simply, for what I've understood so far:

- 4 years ago a loan took place, whatever happened there, zarzarb ended up escrowing 0.01BTC for Watoshi-Dimobuto. (I have snipped the whole original Loan, because it's not really relevant here)
- Zarzarb offered to use a monitored address
- Fast forward 4 years, OP comes back to the forum and wants to have those funds released
- Somewhere in between (2017), the funds were moved to another address, there is no explanation so far about this
- Zarzarb requests a signed message to prove that it's the original owner
- OP has been saying it'd be too much effort to sign messages, and considered zarzarb was taking those funds as a loan and ask for an almost 8.5BTC repayment (lol)
- It's been suggested that the original repayment address is used to release the funds, OP agrees, but that brings a question up: If he has access to that address, why doesn't he sign a message?

I think that is pretty much the current situation. I have not mentioned the thread Lauda created, because I didn't catch it on time, now it's locked, and I don't think that anything different from what has been said here was said.

The only thing that is questionable here is the fact of the funds changing address when it was a clearly "monitored" one; but from there, to using that funds on his personal lending thread as OP suggests, there quite some space

Unless you are using Electrum with a hardware wallet, you can't create nested segwit addresses. Even with hardware wallets, you have to change the derivation path (which is pretty easy to do).

Nah, yours is still working fine


The "from for" was the odd message, but not on your bot. But as I recall seeing the message from this morning saying that you 2 could collaborate, I assumed some playing around had been done.

I really hate the forum on the phone....

have you guys started merging both bots?
I've just received the merits notification on giamancciatos first, with some cryptic message before yours

Sorry for typos and stuff, I'm on the phone enjoying the sunlight on the street

Creo que a alguien se le ha olvidado 2017-18 con todo el bum de ICOs y posterior de IEOs...

Cualquiera puede crear su shitcoin, darle un poco de propaganda, y o irse con los fondos invertidos, o hacer un bonito dump al poco de empezar a hacerse trading. Es ilegal? En principio creo que no; pero depende mucho de la normativa de cada pais, y la interpretacion de las leyes de los juristas locales. Por otra parte, importante diferenciar blockchain de moneda, ya que la tecnologia si que se esta implementando en muchos sectores para mejorar algunos sistemas (a bote pronto, se me ocurre que se está utilizando con los containers de las grandes navieras)

I know that's the address; but the only thing we can see there is that it was emptied in 2017. I think I recall zarzarb saying he used that address for different escrow deals/trades, so that could explain the volume of transactions.

Why did he move the funds? Only he can answer that, but it could be something as simple as a change from a desktop wallet to a hardware wallet, a firmware update.... I'm not saying he didn't use the funds for his own benefit, I'm just pointing out that there is nothing suggesting that, at least based on my criteria

But there is no hard evidence suggesting zarzarb used those funds on his lending service. He could have moved them because he changed his wallet, to update the wallet onto a Segwit one.... or he could have moved to another address which has many movements and the funds remain unnoticed, but are still there. He can't really know what happened, and as long as the funds are still somewhere, I see no issue with them being moved a couple of years later.

If he did use said funds to finance his lending service? Well, that'd be really unethical; but there's nothing actually suggesting that (or I'm not seeing it).

He is not; you can't expect to come back 4 years later, not verify yourself; accuse the escrow of stealing the funds, and think that everyone will nod to that without making any questions and checking your every move looking for indicators of the account being stolen/sold.

---

Looks like you deleted the part in which "users like me have made you pay for other's loans...." so who are those "users like me", and what loans have they made you repay that weren't yours? Was that with an alt account?

---

---

He does have my respect for being THAT straight; but still LOL. Not sure what he can't text....

LOL, NO

You make a quality post---Some user with Smerits sees it and if they think it deserves merit, they send the merit.

Zarzab pointed out that he had a defaulted loan on his trust feedback, and that the escrowed funds should go to the creditor of that loan. AFAIK, the connection between his account and the one taking the loan was made on that thread, so I'd bet that's the reason

Funny I haven't seen this ultimatum posted here....


I must say; sending the funds to the original repayment address, event if the coins may get burnt, should be the optimal result, because it should be in control of OP. But, if that address is in control of OP, there is nothing stopping him from signing the message, so we're cricling back to the same point...

It's also true that it may seem odd that zarzab moved the funds of a monitored address, but the reasons for doing so can be a lot, so it's not really a valid point after 4 years.
Easiest solution? Sign the damm message like you were told 4 days (i think) ago and end this agony at once

Chipmixer campaign has chosen the 2 Open Slots they had. But Darkstar has changed the thread title to and said that
So maybe the campaign is not still CFNP