Flat Earth

[notbatman]

^^^ I don't need to run a massive taxpayer funded scam, we've got eyes in the sky too.

[1715033351]

1715033351

[1715033351]

1715033351

[1715033351]

1715033351

[BADecker]

^^^ "gyroscope reacts to the galactic center" <--- proof of senility.

Come on! Even Batman knows this.     

[BADecker]

^^^ I don't need to run a massive taxpayer funded scam, we've got eyes in the sky too.

The curvature was there before the CGI.     

[guigui371]

^^
120 000 feet is just 35km

Try to go higher : maybe 35 000km like the satellites

Even an apple looks flat if you are close enough.  

[notbatman]

[reasons and excuses omitted]

You requested the high altitude image.


Meanwhile back on earth:

   The P900 can see too far and the globe fails the distance to the horizon test with a wide margin of error. Where's the fucking curvature asshole?

[guigui371]

Again the P900, man maybe i should buy one too ?
Does the P900 also mine BTC because that would make the perfect tool !

Experiment
For our experiment, we will use Google Earth because it's exactly the 3D sphere that is follows spherical Earth model dimensions. But you can easily model the same by any 3D modelling tool.

Best amateur high altitude balloons (because we don't trust NASA, right?) goes up to around 120,000 ft which is about 36.5 km above sea level. Everyone would expect to see nice curvature from this height, right? But then we see something like this:


Image from 121,000 ft (36km) balloon flight

It seems like that this tells us 100% that the Earth is really flat. But according to wise saying "measure twice, cut once" we will do some other experiment. How exactly should look like the curvature on this altitude? The Google Earth image will show us.


Google Earth eye altitude about 120,000ft (36km)

What does this tell us?
On the Google Earth model image there is also almost none curvature, but still if we look properly we can see very slight bend there. But is that conclusive? Unfortunately not. Add fuzzy atmosphere and consider some lens distortion effect and other influences and you can see we are not able to prove flat or curved surface from this kind of altitude. Also the balloon image above shows that earth horizon is below the center which means that center of the lens is up and if there is any barrel distortion it will make any bended line more flat. We just need go a lot higher!

Result: It's impossible to properly see curvature of the Earth from altitude 120,000ft, resp. 36km unless it's caused by lens distortion.

source : https://steemit.com/science/@jimmco/earth-curvature-and-why-not-everything-looks-like-expected


I won't copy and paste the rest that says that you need to go to at least 1 000km to start to see the curvature because you will not believe because you can't replicate it yourself (unless you guys send a proper rocket and prove the whole world that you are right).

[notbatman]

^^^ You're moving the goal posts from conclusive ground based observations with super-zoom cameras that anybody can replicate, to claims about high altitude observations that nobody can replicate.

Time to throw in the towel, you got nothing.

[guigui371]

^^
Throwing the towel ? Nah !

Do you have an actual P900 experiment that has been replicated by scientist ? (i'll be curious to read it).
Because all i can see about the P900 is that flat earther don't know about the aperture of a lens.

https://flatearth.ws/entrance-pupil#more-570

Question to you, why don't flat earther install a large telescope in New York and try to see the french Eiffel tower.

If the earth is flat, it wouldn't be to hard to spot an object that is more than 300m tall, it is only 6000 km away.

[notbatman]

[X-POST]

The globe fails a distance to the horizon test with a wide margin or error using the modern super-zoom lens; with a Nikon P900 I can prove my point conclusively, a test anybody can replicate.

You need Photoshop to replicate the big blue balls NASA gives you. They're not a space agency, they're a propaganda agency!

The Earth is flat by default, it's a falsifiable theory that the earth curves just beyond the limit of human eyesight. The globe is truly the king of hoaxes.

Here's the test, one anybody (including scientists) can replicate:

@BADecker, the camera (a Nikon P1000 in this case) is in good working order:

   Flat Earth Proven Again - 11.22 Miles and ZERO Curvature [Wide Awake] -- https://youtu.be/6hqzqmY9ny8

[Cryptotourist]

Here's the test, one anybody (including scientists) can replicate:

How come flat-heads use GPS for anything?
It's not FEPS ffs.
Kindly explain GPS for us Batty. How does it work?

Also, why is there a hard cap on flat-head IQ? 80 seems to be the limit. Any comments there?

[BADecker]

Here's the test, one anybody (including scientists) can replicate:

@BADecker, the camera (a Nikon P1000 in this case) is in good working order:

   Flat Earth Proven Again - 11.22 Miles and ZERO Curvature [Wide Awake] -- https://youtu.be/6hqzqmY9ny8

Ship me your "Nikon P1000 in this its case," and I'll give it a whirl.

Ship to:
BADecker
c/o General Delivery
4949 E Van Buren St
Phoenix, AZ 85026

Be sure to include your return address in case of delivery failure.

PM me the date and time you shipped it, and estimated time for delivery. Your local P.O. should be able to tell you approx. delivery time.

Thanks. I always wanted one of those cameras.

[solosequenosenada]

[solosequenosenada]

***

[dewin]

wow, I can't believe in 2019 there are still people who assume that the Earth is flat. Ahhh, the flat earth society has members all around the globe

[odolvlobo]

Flat Earth Logic ...

That is not the flat earth model. Try again.

[notbatman]

@Cryptotourist,



   The "GPS" in your smartphone is triangulation from cellular towers, professional "GPS" uses a network of high altitude balloons maintained by the military.

@BADecker you don't deserve a P1000.

@dewin the flat earth society is "controlled opposition", a propaganda psyop to make the flat earth seem foolish with ideas like flying space pancakes.

@solosequenosenada the entire Copernican model goes in the trash. Begone with your mixed model meme monstrosities!

[Cryptotourist]

@notbatman selfie:

That's my Batty, that's exactly how I thought you'd look like.

~ professional "GPS" uses a network of high altitude balloons maintained by the military.

Is the military also part of the NASA conspiracy? Cos they do use G for global mother fucker.
Also do we have planes, or only fucking balloons? No Batty, you're a solid 50. Single-celled.

#

Why is it you like the number 314 as a width or length parameter, for the images you post?
Is it also part of the sickness?

[sirazimuth]

^^^ Instead of spouting nonsense ....blah blah

......

Relativity and gravity in theory have been falsified to the extent that these theories remain theories. Since they are theories, the falsification lies in their application......
blah blah <word salad>...

....You're neck deep in theoretical bullshit and can't change a fucking light bulb to save your life bruh.

.....

^And this is why I love this thread.
You got the OP nutter, batty boy, who rambles on about flat earth, domes, a 30 mile wide sun, columbs thingy (or wtf it is he babbles about) nasa hoaxes, all in a very seemingly coherent fashion, (and funny memes)
though anyone with half intelligence knows it's all a load of bollocks.... and then you have his main thread debating arch nemesis, BADecker,
an evolution denying, creationist nutter who doesn't know jack shit about science and appears...

..... to be rambling incoherently.

When is the Bruce Wanker video coming out, goddammit!!

[notbatman]

...[FROTH]...

~ professional "GPS" uses a network of high altitude balloons maintained by the military.

Is the military also part of the NASA conspiracy? Cos they do use G for global mother fucker.
Also do we have planes, or only fucking balloons? No Batty, you're a solid 50. Single-celled.
...[FROTH]...

1. NASA is a military connected propaganda agency not a space agency; outer space is a hoax.
2. The globe is a hoax, the system could project the data on a tetrahedron and they'd call it TPS.
3. I suspect Space Force jets fly up and hook the "GPS" "satellites" after their balloons pop and they start falling.
4. Do they have planes that fly that high [balloons @1000mi]? Not according to this declassified USAF chart:

[BADecker]

1. NASA is a military connected propaganda agency not a space agency; outer space is a hoax.
2. The globe is a hoax, the system could project the data on a tetrahedron and they'd call it TPS.
3. I suspect Space Force jets fly up and hook the "GPS" "satellites" after their balloons pop and they start falling.
4. Do they have planes that fly that high [balloons @1000mi]? Not according to this declassified USAF chart:

Still trying to prove the earth is flat using NASA pictures, eh?