LiskHQ (OP)
|
 |
March 02, 2016, 11:48:00 PM |
|
Web Wallet is down  It's back online. Lisk Country Ambassadors InitiativeLisk has fans world-wide who are interested in the idea of decentralised applications and custom blockchains. To strengthen the bond between the Lisk core team and local communities in different countries we have created the country ambassadors initiative. Get all information on our blogOh wow, that is awesome! I love how this coin is being spread wider and wider! It will equal into a better and fairer distribution of the coins! ps. working on the swedish translation now  Thanks, looking forward to it!
|
Lisk.io - Blockchain Application Platform
|
|
|
honest john
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 02, 2016, 11:56:08 PM |
|
Warning Bter Crypti withdrawals are not processed for some time! Do not be fooled by the low prices! It is a bad idea to purchase Crypti there to attend the ICO, if you do not get out it. This message below is active for 48 hours now. Bter seems not want to fill the hot wallet. No response from the support so far  . https://i.imgur.com/juCwdcn.pngThanks for the advice. What screenshot software did you take that with? I like the gradual fade to the whited out areas in it.
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 01:39:23 AM Last edit: March 03, 2016, 01:53:18 AM by cannabanana |
|
Since i did not get any answer to my last question i ask again. What will lisk coin be used for? quote from MalReynolds "Sidechain dapps permanently free vs. mainchain perpetual "gas" payments required" So where will the value of a lisk coin come from if it is not used as some kind of fuel like ether in ethereum? Can someone can clarify this or is this just a stupid pump thread?
Dapps will pay a nominal fee to register a side chain on the main Lisk blockchain. After that small registration fee, there are no continuing sidechain payements to the Lisk Foundation. As usual, correct me if I'm wrong, Max. As sidechain apps charge for the services they are providing, they will probably ask for Lisk as their payment, since that is easiest to do (although writing for example Bitcoin processing directly into a Lisk app is theoretically possible). Sidechain users will have to purchase Lisk at an exchange to use those sidechain services. This will result in upward buying pressure for Lisk as a coin. Take for example any future Lisk sports betting dapps. Lisk would effectively be the casino sports room tokens used among gamers to settle their wagers. Those tokens would have to be purchased on an exchange, and could be later "cashed out" at an exchange for other currencies such as BTC and eventually USD. Vegas, baby. This sounds waaaaaaaay too complicated to do on Lisk.
You should checkout Breakoutcoin and its Gaming/Fantasy sports platform, they're planning an ICO in April: http://www.breakoutcoin.com/the-coinMy team DraftForge is also doing this and has been for a while without an ICO haha. We might also incorporate LISK in it soon Will your venture be Fully Licensed and Regulated like BreakoutGaming? http://calvinayre.com/2015/01/13/business/interview-with-gian-perroni-on-break-out-gaming/Also note that Breakout Gaming is backed by real life Poker celebirities like Johnny Chan, Huck Seed, Jennifer Harman, Ted Forrest, Todd Brunson, David Benyamine, Layne Flack, Toto Leonidas, Jeffrey Lisandro and Vladimir Shchemelev, etc: http://www.pokerlistings.com/chan-brunson-headline-new-alt-currency-poker-site-breakout-gaming-39373http://www.pokersites.com/news/johnny-chan-backs-bitcoin-poker-site-2743You should join the BreakoutCoin chat on Slack: https://brocoin.slack.com perhaps you can collaborate with them. a poker or gambling coin is not the same as lisk. You should consider bringing lisk into your life. That and those stories are from freakin 2014.
|
|
|
|
FNetV1
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 02:04:05 AM |
|
Fourth week bounty summaryI just wrote down all Facebook likers (484 stakes), Twitter followers (911 stakes), Newsletter subscribers (1675 stakes), Signature participants (281 stakes) and translators (53 stakes). Week #1 ValuesWeek #2 ValuesWeek #3 ValuesIMPORTANT! This is the last week (2nd March - 9th March) to receive a bounty stake! The number of participants grew extremely big, we didn't anticipated that. Therefore this will be the last week of the bounty campaign. After this week I won't count new stakes anymore! I will distribute the bounties amongst all those who participated after Lisk has launched. Here you can view the signature stakes for all weeks. The other lists won't be released, because there exists a privacy conflict. I saw that recently some users only wrote into this thread that they participated in the signature campaign. You need to send me a PM! If you are not on this list, please send me a PM until the 4th March! After the 4th I will not add you to the 4th week list! Thank you very much. What does it mean to see my username only on the far right column, the only column that isn't labeled. I didn't see my user name on the week1, week2, and week3 column but I did took park on the signature campaigns since the very first day on the 24H period. I have been displaying the signature since everyday. Is there anything wrong?
|
~~Ad Space Available! PM: FNetV1 with your offers~~
|
|
|
Bigcabrito
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 02:34:01 AM Last edit: March 03, 2016, 04:44:56 AM by Bigcabrito |
|
What does it mean to see my username only on the far right column, the only column that isn't labeled. I didn't see my user name on the week1, week2, and week3 column but I did took park on the signature campaigns since the very first day on the 24H period. I have been displaying the signature since everyday. Is there anything wrong?
You might have been missed when Max was collecting the names for the signature. On another note, it could also mean you didn't have the signature active on the first two weeks. But that would infer you're lying to the Lisk team... YOU'RE NOT LYING NOW, ARE YOUUU!!!??  Open a support ticket mentioning this, display any proof regarding your signature being active the first 2 weeks. If you don't have any, just display your replies on the first and second week and forward them to support. I don't see this as being a big issue to be honest, don't worry about it too much it'll get resolve.
|
|
|
|
MalReynolds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 05:09:31 AM Last edit: March 03, 2016, 05:34:35 AM by MalReynolds |
|
I've been thinking about this some more. The post above discusses my desire to say something specific in the whitepaper on the maximum ISP latency acceptable for running a Lisk mainchain node. (I am worried we are going to have a lot of disappointed Active Delegates when they realize they can't run a Lisk mainchain node from home on their spare PC and they actually have to rent a server at Vultr for $5 per month). I also ask for confirmation that sidechains can run at slower block times that the mainchain, and if that alone would allow the use of slower, high-latency ISPs.
These are important and hard questions that nobody really knows the answers for yet. One of my first goals when Lisk goes live with 0.5.5 is to set up some cheap sidechain nodes and run some timing experiments to get some answers. I want to give my future sports dapp customers great service!
We will have to do this as a community. I will try it from the office and from home. Then take the latencies to different IPs and post them. If we all do this, we should find a minimum. Testing latencies as a community scattered around in an uncontrolled worldwide environment is very inefficient. I fear such efforts will not give us the answers we need. Once the Lisk mainchain is running, I would strongly recommend setting up a closed cluster of 16 Pi2s connected by Ethernet, all running the guestbook dapp among themselves as a Lisk sidechain. Sixteen Pi2s is the maximum number of sidechain support nodes allowed by 0.5.5 if I remember the Crypti conversations correctly. You could throw this whole cluster together for around $1000, maybe even run it as a Lisk-sponsored thesis project in the Aachen university environment. Once this test cluster is up and running, the next step is to start putting known test latency delays between the nodes, slowly increasing these delays until the sidechain delegate network finally fails. Lots of valuable scenarios could be examined and documented in a whitepaper. There's lots of software that is used for network testing of this sort, and even people who specialize in doing such test setups. Maybe you could hire them as a consultant if there is no interest in doing it as an Aachen area engineering project. See as an introduction: http://bencane.com/2012/07/16/tc-adding-simulated-network-latency-to-your-linux-server/http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netemhttp://wanem.sourceforge.net/http://www.trafficsqueezer.org/Max, controlled testing like I am proposing here would provide vital information required to convince and sell major businesses into running enterprise dapps on Lisk side chains. These tests would show Lisk is a serious player on par with Ethereum, willing to prove our performance claims with hard facts and proven numbers on bare metal hardware. This kind of Pi2 cluster research would be relatively cheap. You have the financial resources now to easily do such testing. Having a Lisk sidechain engineering test bed like this would be an invaluable resource. The photos alone of such a testbed for use in Lisk public relations would be a justifiable advertising expense if nothing else. I urge you to delegate this task to some local engineering student whose progress you can easily monitor. Have them set up such a testbed as soon as possible, so testing can begin as soon as the Lisk mainchain starts. Ha. Here's somebody coming at you with a crazy idea on how to spend some of that new Lisk development money you now control. Use me as a test case on learning how to handle such fools!
|
|
|
|
Bigcabrito
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 05:39:37 AM |
|
I've been thinking about this some more. The post above discusses my desire to say something specific in the whitepaper on the maximum ISP latency acceptable for running a Lisk mainchain node. (I am worried we are going to have a lot of disappointed Active Delegates when they realize they can't run a Lisk mainchain node from home on their spare PC and they actually have to rent a server at Vultr for $5 per month). I also ask for confirmation that sidechains can run at slower block times that the mainchain, and if that alone would allow the use of slower, high-latency ISPs.
These are important and hard questions that nobody really knows the answers for yet. One of my first goals when Lisk goes live with 0.5.5 is to set up some cheap sidechain nodes and run some timing experiments to get some answers. I want to give my future sports dapp customers great service!
We will have to do this as a community. I will try it from the office and from home. Then take the latencies to different IPs and post them. If we all do this, we should find a minimum. Testing latencies as a community by stumbling around in an uncontrolled worldwide environment is very inefficient. I fear such efforts will not give us the answers we need. Once the Lisk mainchain is running, I would strongly recommend setting up a closed cluster of 16 Pi2s connected by Ethernet, all running the guestbook dapp among themselves as a Lisk sidechain. Sixteen Pi2s is the maximum number of sidechain support nodes allowed by 0.5.5 if I remember the Crypti conversations correctly. You could throw this whole cluster together for around $1000, maybe even run it as a Lisk-sponsored thesis project in the Aachen university environment. Once this test cluster is up and running, the next step is to start putting known test latency delays between the nodes, slowly increasing these delays until the sidechain delegate network finally fails. Lots of valuable scenarios could be examined and documented in a whitepaper. There's lots of software that is used for network testing of this sort, and even people who specialize in doing such test setups. Maybe you could hire them as a consultant if there is no interest in doing it as an Aachen area engineering project. See as an introduction: http://bencane.com/2012/07/16/tc-adding-simulated-network-latency-to-your-linux-server/http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netemhttp://wanem.sourceforge.net/http://www.trafficsqueezer.org/Max, controlled testing like I am proposing here would provide vital information required to convince and sell major businesses into running enterprise dapps on Lisk side chains. This kind of Pi2 cluster research would be relatively cheap. You have the financial resources now to easily do such testing. These tests would show Lisk is a serious player willing to prove our performance claims with hard facts and proven numbers. Having a Lisk sidechain engineering test bed like this would be an invaluable resource. I urge you to delegate the task to someone to set such a testbed up as soon as possible, so testing can begin as soon as the Lisk mainchain starts. I love how you think Mal. Scientific. You make a very valid point in addressing latency and ways to figure out how to maximize the network. It could very well be the start of peer reviewed research for Lisk. In my opinion though, there are some potential issues with the proposal that will need to be addressed to move forward with this: - Guidance - Right now Olivier and Max have their full attention on Lisk, they would have to hire someone to guide the project and report findings.
- Time Sink - IF Lisk decides to test this themselves, it would inevitably distract them from Lisk core development, causing a rift in time management.
- Funding - They would need to address how much they are willing to spend on the project, and if it is worth it.
With this in mind, I can see how testing it in different IP's might be an issue, as there would be no control group. But, we might as well try (it's free, doesn't need guidance and would not distract core development) since the community is one hell of a resource. Oh, by the way, this post is not meant to start a discussion whether it can or cannot be done. I highly believe it CAN be done, once the potential issues (and maybe others I've missed) have been addressed.
|
|
|
|
YNWA2806
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 06:17:35 AM |
|
Any updates on bter status? Soppurt tickets can take there over a week....
|
|
|
|
GoldenEye
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 06:18:35 AM |
|
Warning Bter Crypti withdrawals are not processed for some time! Do not be fooled by the low prices! It is a bad idea to purchase Crypti there to attend the ICO, if you do not get out it. This message below is active for 48 hours now. Bter seems not want to fill the hot wallet. No response from the support so far  .  Thanks for the advice. What screenshot software did you take that with? I like the gradual fade to the whited out areas in it. I used gimp with the Airbrush tool.
|
|
|
|
GoldenEye
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 06:19:34 AM |
|
Any updates on bter status? Soppurt tickets can take there over a week....
No changes 
|
|
|
|
dzarmush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 06:24:36 AM |
|
Did anyone track their money and find ICO bitcoin address? Can anyone confirm that over 1000 btc was invested? I've been offline for the last two weeks and as far as I understand Lisk team doesn't give any proof. Or am I wrong?
|
|
|
|
Bigcabrito
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 06:33:55 AM |
|
Did anyone track their money and find ICO bitcoin address? Can anyone confirm that over 1000 btc was invested? I've been offline for the last two weeks and as far as I understand Lisk team doesn't give any proof. Or am I wrong?
This was the biggest unseen flaw prior to beginning the ICO. The coinbase multi-sig vault account they use for keeping the ICO Bitcoins safe does not provide them with a BTC address. What max has done to remedy this problem is he's posted several screenshots and videos of the coinbase account associated with the ICO. You're not wrong, they are very aware of this issue. Found it! A video which demonstrates our coinbase vault....in the coinbase app and website. The quality is very bad, because I had to record it from my Android Phone and edit it using some Android App. Else it would have taken me many more hours to upload the video to Google Drive from the smartphone. It should suffice for now.  I already wrote the coinbase support to check out if there are other options for us. They forwarded my case to a "subject matter expert". After examining the issue I forwarded your case to our subject matter experts who can help. They will get back to you shortly. Thank you for your patience while they take a look. Please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eronkdDE84Y
|
|
|
|
USBitcoinServices.Com
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 06:50:00 AM |
|
I just added the ICO List to my signature and spreading the word out, so hopefully many people start using this coin!
And here participating for the ICO Posting once per week!
|
|
|
|
Outlander
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:00:57 AM |
|
I just added the ICO List to my signature and spreading the word out, so hopefully many people start using this coin!
And here participating for the ICO Posting once per week!
I didn't see the ICO list in your signature.
|
|
|
|
GoldenEye
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:05:38 AM |
|
Any updates on bter status? Soppurt tickets can take there over a week....
No changes  bter support answered now: "I am afraid it may still take a while. If you want it cancelled, please let me know."
|
|
|
|
Bank_sy
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:09:58 AM Last edit: March 03, 2016, 08:04:40 AM by Bank_sy |
|
with ethereum doing so hot, will be interesting to see how lisk does  added sig.
|
|
|
|
H.W.Z
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:20:47 AM |
|
Added your signature. Just noticed this ICO.
|
|
|
|
dzarmush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:22:56 AM |
|
Did anyone track their money and find ICO bitcoin address? Can anyone confirm that over 1000 btc was invested? I've been offline for the last two weeks and as far as I understand Lisk team doesn't give any proof. Or am I wrong?
This was the biggest unseen flaw prior to beginning the ICO. The coinbase multi-sig vault account they use for keeping the ICO Bitcoins safe does not provide them with a BTC address. What max has done to remedy this problem is he's posted several screenshots and videos of the coinbase account associated with the ICO. You're not wrong, they are very aware of this issue. Found it! A video which demonstrates our coinbase vault....in the coinbase app and website. The quality is very bad, because I had to record it from my Android Phone and edit it using some Android App. Else it would have taken me many more hours to upload the video to Google Drive from the smartphone. It should suffice for now.  I already wrote the coinbase support to check out if there are other options for us. They forwarded my case to a "subject matter expert". After examining the issue I forwarded your case to our subject matter experts who can help. They will get back to you shortly. Thank you for your patience while they take a look. Please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eronkdDE84Y Thank you
|
|
|
|
Undermood
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 950
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:33:52 AM |
|
added the signature.
|
╓▄▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▄╖, ,▄██▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▄, ▄████▀▀░░ ░╙▀▓███▓, ,███▓╣▒▒▒░░╓╖╖╖╖╖╖,░░░▒▒╢▓▓▓[ ╓▓██▓▓▓███▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██▓╢▓▓▓▓ ╖▒▓▓▓▓▓██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▓██████▓▓▓▓▒░, ╫▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ "▓▓▓▓▓▓ ╟ ▐▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓╖ ▓▓▓▓▓▓░ ]▓ ,▓▓░░░░╙▓▓▓▓▓▄ ╓▓▓▓▓▓▓`░░ ▐▓▌ ╟▓▓▌░░░ ╙▓▓▓▓▓▓ ╓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░╓▓▓▓ ╟▓▓▓▓ ░`▓▓▓▓▓▓, ╟▓▓▓▓▓╜░░░░╓▓▓▓▓ ╙▓▓▓▓▓,░ ░ ▓▓▓▓▓▓╖ ,▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒░╟▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓╖░ ╙▓▓▓▓▓▌ ╓██████▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓` ╙▓▓▓▓▓▌ ░░╙▓▓▓▓▓▓█████▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ╙▓▓▓▓▓▓ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓███▓╢╣╢╢▓███▓█▀ ▓▓▓▓▓▓@░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▀ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▄░▒▒░▓▓▓▓▓▓██▓████▀▀ ╙▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀` | | InfinitusToken.io | | ███ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ | | | | ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ███ | | ⚑⚑ Read our Whitepaper ⚑⚑ Medium ⚑⚑ Telegram |
[/ta
|
|
|
mezmerizer9
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:59:25 AM |
|
Joined your signature campaign. Just wonder if you have any plan how to spend the collected ICO money.
|
|
|
|
|