suchmoon
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
 |
October 27, 2016, 05:25:34 PM |
|
"rubbish"... yeah, that's what they do, rubbish promises that you insist on believing until you start denying it ever happened. It's a good thing they periodically wipe the intertubes clean of their fail by removing those rubbish sites (hashtalk, paycointalk, xpytalk, xpy.io, etc)... except those pesky archives... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
turdminer
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:26:42 PM |
|
so now they are hitting people up for money, under the guise of a garza like holiday promo, before the first game is 100% released? are they that unaware of how bad this looks? will there be holiday themed skins for these "stakers?" it's like the legendary hashlet/stakers crap all over again. why would they even dare...is this hubris, or are they trolling the "trolls," with all this retread garza shite?
This has got nothing to do with Garza it's a Halloween promotion.... you know you'll see a few thousand other companies doing the same thing this weekend. Is this hubris errr no it's a promotion The only person retreading garza shite is you and anyway if you no like you no buy  it is almost identical to the "legendary" hashlet sales (limited quantity only, except not really) that also coincided with various promotions including the infamous 911 scam. no kidding, companies use holiday's to promote, the comparison is not apropos. the point is, why do the exact same crap as the garza d-bag? not accepting ion for these promos is straight out of his playbook too, or at least similar enough to raise eyebrows. they shouldn't need any BTC (conveniently going up in price) at this point, and don't deserve anymore funding until they at least dust off the retread of "joust". they should really save the promotions for when they have a fully functioning service to provide, doing so now during a time of missed deadlines, disorganization, legitimate controversies etc is suspicious at the very least. all they are essentially doing is further bilking money from current investors as new investors have no real proof of concept or service to entice them. short term you are giving them more BTC, and also locking your ion into stakers. if this is their idea of a "reward," then you have to be very confident in their long-term success. |
|
|
|
andromeda66
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:04:20 PM |
|
so now they are hitting people up for money, under the guise of a garza like holiday promo, before the first game is 100% released? are they that unaware of how bad this looks? will there be holiday themed skins for these "stakers?" it's like the legendary hashlet/stakers crap all over again. why would they even dare...is this hubris, or are they trolling the "trolls," with all this retread garza shite?
This has got nothing to do with Garza it's a Halloween promotion.... you know you'll see a few thousand other companies doing the same thing this weekend. Is this hubris errr no it's a promotion The only person retreading garza shite is you and anyway if you no like you no buy it is almost identical to the "legendary" hashlet sales (limited quantity only, except not really) that also coincided with various promotions including the infamous 911 scam. no kidding, companies use holiday's to promote, the comparison is not apropos. the point is, why do the exact same crap as the garza d-bag? not accepting ion for these promos is straight out of his playbook too, or at least similar enough to raise eyebrows. they shouldn't need any BTC (conveniently going up in price) at this point, and don't deserve anymore funding until they at least dust off the retread of "joust". they should really save the promotions for when they have a fully functioning service to provide, doing so now during a time of missed deadlines, disorganization, legitimate controversies etc is suspicious at the very least. all they are essentially doing is further bilking money from current investors as new investors have no real proof of concept or service to entice them. short term you are giving them more BTC, and also locking your ion into stakers. if this is their idea of a "reward," then you have to be very confident in their long-term success. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This...............is legitimate criticism |
|
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:30:18 PM |
|
so now they are hitting people up for money, under the guise of a garza like holiday promo, before the first game is 100% released? are they that unaware of how bad this looks? will there be holiday themed skins for these "stakers?" it's like the legendary hashlet/stakers crap all over again. why would they even dare...is this hubris, or are they trolling the "trolls," with all this retread garza shite?
This has got nothing to do with Garza it's a Halloween promotion.... you know you'll see a few thousand other companies doing the same thing this weekend. Is this hubris errr no it's a promotion The only person retreading garza shite is you and anyway if you no like you no buy it is almost identical to the "legendary" hashlet sales (limited quantity only, except not really) that also coincided with various promotions including the infamous 911 scam. no kidding, companies use holiday's to promote, the comparison is not apropos. the point is, why do the exact same crap as the garza d-bag? not accepting ion for these promos is straight out of his playbook too, or at least similar enough to raise eyebrows. they shouldn't need any BTC (conveniently going up in price) at this point, and don't deserve anymore funding until they at least dust off the retread of "joust". they should really save the promotions for when they have a fully functioning service to provide, doing so now during a time of missed deadlines, disorganization, legitimate controversies etc is suspicious at the very least. all they are essentially doing is further bilking money from current investors as new investors have no real proof of concept or service to entice them. short term you are giving them more BTC, and also locking your ion into stakers. if this is their idea of a "reward," then you have to be very confident in their long-term success. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This...............is legitimate criticism I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode. In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!! Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind.... |
|
|
|
kken01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:50:51 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2016, 07:09:05 PM by kken01 |
|
i guess you missed the /s which means sarcasm. obviously its most likely reckless incompetence. rubbish? thats the thing matlack ran till last xmas or january. location singapore and company graval. next thing he was associated with was bitlend.io that xpy.io tried to promote btw. it was "located" in dubai but was never found in gov registry. its either matlacks or his inner circles modus operandi and no its not a threat its a statement that they should have their things in order before someone asks every agency there to check this "entity" that supposedly operated from their country for years without proper documentation. they should respect their host country and follow their rules, dont you agree? or are these texans above all laws? its very simple if you cant get answers from them then you have to request them from the government theres a chance they are getting screwed by their local contact but we cant know because its "company confidential" and ionomy doesnt care  its also possible adam matlack outright lied and graval has nothing to do with anything (like he lied numerous times during paycoin fiasco so nothing new. blind trust is a dangerous thing) but of course a scrypt.cc shill would not care about these things... if you didnt care back then why start now! oh right: "its crypto" ! |
|
|
|
|
Franz_Huber
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:27:57 PM |
|
Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....
I never had any GAW problems, because I did not believe any of their lies from the start - and I won't have any ION problems either, because there's no way I'd ever touch this premined, intransparent, scammy shit. |
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:29:14 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2016, 07:50:06 PM by suchmoon |
|
I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.
In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!
Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....
Not this shit again Hashlets were not POW... or PO (proof of) anything at all, except Garza's ability to coerce someone into drawing those PNGs. It was a fucking ponzi scheme as the SEC explains quite eloquently in its lawsuit. And it was based on marketing tricks like that. Fast forward to 2016, you got ION stakers from some mysterious unknown source being sold for BTC, as a promotion for... what exactly? Or is it yet another round of crowdsourcing? Weren't you shills just recently trying to say that ionomy has been using its ICO funds slowly and wisely and doesn't need any more investments? Obviously Garza's model has been improved here, you get payouts in ION, which the team has a free supply of. Edit: if it's not immediately obvious - ionomy stakers are also not POS or proof of anything, you can't lie your way out of this one (although you'll try for sure). |
|
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:44:15 PM |
|
i guess you missed the /s which means sarcasm. obviously its most likely reckless incompetence. rubbish? thats the thing matlack ran till last xmas or january. location singapore and company graval. next thing he was associated with was bitlend.io that xpy.io tried to promote btw. it was "located" in dubai but was never found in gov registry. its either matlacks or his inner circles modus operandi and no its not a threat its a statement that they should have their things in order before someone asks every agency there to check this "entity" that supposedly operated from their country for years without proper documentation. they should respect their host country and follow their rules, dont you agree? or are these texans above all laws? its very simple if you cant get answers from them then you have to request them from the government theres a chance they are getting screwed by their local contact but we cant know because its "company confidential" and ionomy doesnt care its also possible adam matlack outright lied and graval has nothing to do with anything (like he lied numerous times during paycoin fiasco so nothing new. blind trust is a dangerous thing) but of course a scrypt.cc shill would not care about these things... if you didnt care back then why start now! oh right: "its crypto" ! I missed the /s so it was sarcastic crap that's okay then Script.cc shill what are you talking about ?? again you mention it.... how about you speak with some facts and justify that comment |
|
|
|
kken01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:12:36 PM |
|
i would rather not share your nick from the paycoin days because i respect your privacy. do you deny your weird support of scrypt.cc?
you dont really have anything to hide but theres few things like age, location, etc that can be deduced if someone knows your old nick. its the internet so rather err on the side of caution
if you say its ok to share your nick then il post the scrypt.cc stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:13:46 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2016, 08:39:07 PM by WildShark |
|
I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.
In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!
Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....
Not this shit again Hashlets were not POW... or PO (proof of) anything at all, except Garza's ability to coerce someone into drawing those PNGs. It was a fucking ponzi scheme as the SEC explains quite eloquently in its lawsuit. And it was based on marketing tricks like that. Fast forward to 2016, you got ION stakers from some mysterious unknown source being sold for BTC, as a promotion for... what exactly? Or is it yet another round of crowdsourcing? Weren't you shills just recently trying to say that ionomy has been using its ICO funds slowly and wisely and doesn't need any more investments? Obviously Garza's model has been improved here, you get payouts in ION, which the team has a free supply of. Edit: if it's not immediately obvious - ionomy stakers are also not POS or proof of anything, you can't lie your way out of this one (although you'll try for sure). Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract.. This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls... |
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:04:17 PM |
|
Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract..
This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls...
Does your staker have an address on the blockchain? Better yet - since ION code is open source - show us where the block reward is linked in any way to the staker rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:13:11 PM |
|
Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract..
This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls...
Does your staker have an address on the blockchain? Better yet - since ION code is open source - show us where the block reward is linked in any way to the staker rates. The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain... |
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:26:53 PM |
|
The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...
Please do share those addresses. |
|
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:30:24 PM |
|
The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...
Please do share those addresses. They are company private as stated many times... |
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:35:44 PM |
|
i would rather not share your nick from the paycoin days because i respect your privacy. do you deny your weird support of scrypt.cc?
you dont really have anything to hide but theres few things like age, location, etc that can be deduced if someone knows your old nick. its the internet so rather err on the side of caution
if you say its ok to share your nick then il post the scrypt.cc stuff
If you'd rather not share then don't. So to answer my question you need to reveal personal details or information that would lead to personnal information being made public Do whatever your moral compass dictates......your choice I just want to know what you mean by my wierd support of script.cc........ why call me a script.cc shrill ? I don't understand |
|
|
|
|
Pattberry
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:36:21 PM |
|
Where have you announced this as already there is invested $500.000 in it?
Seems a bit fishy to me
looks like a ripoff fan of ICONOMI, who took the name and ran to the shop to get another ICO with the same name  i would suggest you to provide further details regarding the staked wallets and the team behind ION |
|
|
|
|
CryptoBuds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1042
HODL
|
|
October 27, 2016, 10:07:37 PM |
|
Whats the ICO price today?
I'm sorry to say you've missed the ICO. ION is currently $.15 on ionomy and $.17 on Yobit. If you interested then checkout https://ionomy.com/The ICO price was $0.20 - $0.25, so the coin is currently 25%+ lower than ICO. Make sure you tell the whole story. |
|
|
|
CryptoBuds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1042
HODL
|
|
October 27, 2016, 10:10:30 PM |
|
so now they are hitting people up for money, under the guise of a garza like holiday promo, before the first game is 100% released? are they that unaware of how bad this looks? will there be holiday themed skins for these "stakers?" it's like the legendary hashlet/stakers crap all over again. why would they even dare...is this hubris, or are they trolling the "trolls," with all this retread garza shite?
This has got nothing to do with Garza it's a Halloween promotion.... you know you'll see a few thousand other companies doing the same thing this weekend. Is this hubris errr no it's a promotion The only person retreading garza shite is you and anyway if you no like you no buy it is almost identical to the "legendary" hashlet sales (limited quantity only, except not really) that also coincided with various promotions including the infamous 911 scam. no kidding, companies use holiday's to promote, the comparison is not apropos. the point is, why do the exact same crap as the garza d-bag? not accepting ion for these promos is straight out of his playbook too, or at least similar enough to raise eyebrows. they shouldn't need any BTC (conveniently going up in price) at this point, and don't deserve anymore funding until they at least dust off the retread of "joust". they should really save the promotions for when they have a fully functioning service to provide, doing so now during a time of missed deadlines, disorganization, legitimate controversies etc is suspicious at the very least. all they are essentially doing is further bilking money from current investors as new investors have no real proof of concept or service to entice them. short term you are giving them more BTC, and also locking your ion into stakers. if this is their idea of a "reward," then you have to be very confident in their long-term success. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This...............is legitimate criticism I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode. In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!! Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind.... That is called further centralizing the coin. Why does the team want all of the coins in their possession? |
|
|
|
CryptoBuds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1042
HODL
|
|
October 27, 2016, 10:15:39 PM |
|
I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.
In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!
Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....
Not this shit again Hashlets were not POW... or PO (proof of) anything at all, except Garza's ability to coerce someone into drawing those PNGs. It was a fucking ponzi scheme as the SEC explains quite eloquently in its lawsuit. And it was based on marketing tricks like that. Fast forward to 2016, you got ION stakers from some mysterious unknown source being sold for BTC, as a promotion for... what exactly? Or is it yet another round of crowdsourcing? Weren't you shills just recently trying to say that ionomy has been using its ICO funds slowly and wisely and doesn't need any more investments? Obviously Garza's model has been improved here, you get payouts in ION, which the team has a free supply of. Edit: if it's not immediately obvious - ionomy stakers are also not POS or proof of anything, you can't lie your way out of this one (although you'll try for sure). Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract.. This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls... The coins that Ionomy stakes, where did they get them from? Did they pay for them like everyone else? If not, every coin they stake is indeed a free coin. Please explain how they are not free. |
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
October 28, 2016, 12:10:00 AM |
|
The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...
Please do share those addresses. They are company private as stated many times... Right, so we're supposed to just take your word for it. Sounds 100% legit, you should get WSJ bloggers to write a shill piece about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
