Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2019, 07:10:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 483 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!  (Read 452177 times)
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 10, 2016, 11:55:44 PM
 #3381

No blockchain for mordica and matlack, but do have this.

http://prestigeauditing.com/about-the-owner/ and linkedin.

Interesting how 2 people you are banking on to make you money right now since smiling-man.jpg/president is running your lawsuit and Adam Matlack/partner went into business with the guy who ran the data center where all of your hashlets were located.

Also, questioning the skills of the people involved, linked in lists partner at prestige auditing as Adam Matlack's job, and he is somehow unable to get this page removed from their own website when someone or other has claimed that they stopped working with Mordica at some time recently, but definitely not as fast as I would have if I was a victim of his.

Another good point

Not 2 just 1 Matlack.

Just because they worked together it means nothing to me. In my time I've worked closely with people who if given the chance for self gain would gladly stab you in the back and think it all part the corporate game of dog eat dog.

Nice to have a discussion with people of different perspectives helps me to understand stuff.


   

I said 2 because you said you were hoping to get money from a GAW lawsuit and smiling-man.jpg has a lot to do with the main one. I see a big difference between "working with" someone in the corporate world, and becoming "partners" at a company with someone who fucked someone over as much as Matlack claims to have been fucked by GAW/Mordica.

It's nice to have actual discussion, but this is one of the many times on this website where things just don't add up for me. If you got out of GAW before it really got bad you may be able to get something out of this one, but i really don't get it. working with the guy running the data center and using mrcoins to pump up the coin do not seem like actions of reasonable people that got screwed by GAw, yet here we are.

Remember just because he's an unprincipled Narcissist doesn't make him stupid. I say my chances to get some money back is around 3%, a month ago it was 1%.

Didn't figure you meant Garza that's why I said 1, he left my radar for profitability a long time a ago.

If things don't add up then don't push it too hard as that's when human emotion starts to kick in...blah blah blah you know the score.

In ALL crypto not just ION all the pieces are there to build the a puzzle but the really difficult bit is to figure out which piece is lie, which piece is true, which piece is fact, which piece is fiction and why would someone share their puzzle piece. Crypto for me is a total head fuck so I can understand totally get your last comment


 

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
1561576237
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561576237

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561576237
Reply with quote  #2

1561576237
Report to moderator
1561576237
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561576237

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561576237
Reply with quote  #2

1561576237
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1561576237
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561576237

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561576237
Reply with quote  #2

1561576237
Report to moderator
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 12:13:51 AM
 #3382

the 2 people are matlack and shinners who is running the gawsuit. becoming partners with the guy running the data center where their hashlets were located is not something that i would do, and it is why i have so many questions for their ventures since then.
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 01:22:07 AM
 #3383

the 2 people are matlack and shinners who is running the gawsuit. becoming partners with the guy running the data center where their hashlets were located is not something that i would do, and it is why i have so many questions for their ventures since then.

Where Garza screwed up is he shafted everyone not just the small guys a big mistake which he'll regret when he's in jail, don't you think with Moridica in toe it strengthens the case.

ION

My interpretation is

Mattlack       

Green Flag

Shinners       

Don't know but seems okay only came across him when I provided documentation for the law suit

Mordica         

Red flag, I'd have a beer as I bet he has some interesting stories but that's it I would a mile if he was involved with ION
 
I've been with XPY.io since the start as loyal customer hence the whales status. Mordica has never registered on my radar so if he's involved in ION I would like to know

My puzzle piece is Gawsuit & ION totally separate and Mordica zero ION involvement



Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
kken01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1009


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 01:35:46 AM
 #3384

what about all those promises matlack & his team made for paycoin? they never materialized + theres a series of failed crypto attempts from them and their circle
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 01:48:59 AM
 #3385

what about all those promises matlack & his team made for paycoin? they never materialized + theres a series of failed crypto attempts from them and their circle

Again nothing to do with ION

But lets drill into the detail what promises did Mattlack make show me what you have and lets have a debate. 

Before you share remember I'm a nice guy who just wants to build a puzzle  Smiley

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1017


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 03:27:52 AM
 #3386

what about all those promises matlack & his team made for paycoin? they never materialized + theres a series of failed crypto attempts from them and their circle

Again nothing to do with ION

But lets drill into the detail what promises did Mattlack make show me what you have and lets have a debate. 

Before you share remember I'm a nice guy who just wants to build a puzzle  Smiley

Honestly though i agree yes xpy doesn't have anything to do with ion from the project point of view but don't you think progress made on xpy projects is indicitive of matlacks ability for any crypto project? A coat of paint or a new name doesn't make his ability any different and this is what i think people are saying. Whether its ion, xpy, <insert new coin name here> matlacks ability is still his ability. His progress on projects in the past is however an indication on his current project.

Thats the concern. The difference here is he now has $300k or so but there is no mention of how thats being used. The cash doesn't seem to have a direction only those ion as bounties. The warchest to quote garza should be used to make the project advance... money makes money. $300k can become a lot more if he were to use it and their reluctance to use said funds to me says they don't want that project advanced. In IT time is valuable and waiting for the when its done is often a detriment for progress as time moves fast.

I request you ask team ion direct where the funds are going the USD and why they haven't actually a plan for it thats public knowledge. Its a pretty big concern in my opinion.
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 03:37:33 AM
 #3387

I have no proof that Mordica is involved with ION, but becoming "partners" with Matlack AFTER gaw makes me stay away from anything to do with Matlack, it just doesn't make sense.
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 03:52:30 AM
 #3388

I have no proof that Mordica is involved with ION, but becoming "partners" with Matlack AFTER gaw makes me stay away from anything to do with Matlack, it just doesn't make sense.

Thanks for sharing a puzzle piece   Smiley

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1017


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 04:07:54 AM
 #3389

I have no proof that Mordica is involved with ION, but becoming "partners" with Matlack AFTER gaw makes me stay away from anything to do with Matlack, it just doesn't make sense.

I agree on this. My big issue with mordica is that he did photos with garza against miners that didn't exist. He in a video said i'll spray on cement and prove it.... he knew the entire time that the mining equipment didn't exist. What possible reason could he have to lie its not like garza had his family hostage. My opinion on it is that mordica and garza both got greedy and kept the lie going as mordica wanted the $$$$ based on this alone i wouldn't trust mordica anywhere nor anyone associated with him because it means they overlooked this.

It'd be like trusting anyone hiring that fuck horus from cryptsy after he carried on with his shit being their security guy... kinda embarrassing.
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 05:25:35 AM
 #3390

what about all those promises matlack & his team made for paycoin? they never materialized + theres a series of failed crypto attempts from them and their circle

Again nothing to do with ION

But lets drill into the detail what promises did Mattlack make show me what you have and lets have a debate. 

Before you share remember I'm a nice guy who just wants to build a puzzle  Smiley

Honestly though i agree yes xpy doesn't have anything to do with ion from the project point of view but don't you think progress made on xpy projects is indicitive of matlacks ability for any crypto project? A coat of paint or a new name doesn't make his ability any different and this is what i think people are saying. Whether its ion, xpy, <insert new coin name here> matlacks ability is still his ability. His progress on projects in the past is however an indication on his current project.

Thats the concern. The difference here is he now has $300k or so but there is no mention of how thats being used. The cash doesn't seem to have a direction only those ion as bounties. The warchest to quote garza should be used to make the project advance... money makes money. $300k can become a lot more if he were to use it and their reluctance to use said funds to me says they don't want that project advanced. In IT time is valuable and waiting for the when its done is often a detriment for progress as time moves fast.

I request you ask team ion direct where the funds are going the USD and why they haven't actually a plan for it thats public knowledge. Its a pretty big concern in my opinion.


Honestly though i agree yes xpy doesn't have anything to do with ion from the project point of view but don't you think progress made on xpy projects is indicitive of matlacks ability for any crypto project? A coat of paint or a new name doesn't make his ability any different and this is what i think people are saying. Whether its ion, xpy, <insert new coin name here> matlacks ability is still his ability. His progress on projects in the past is however an indication on his current project.


I honestly don't and it’s not a coat of paint

I cannot stress enough Garza is an unprincipled narcissist a very clever man who walked away with millions, this is no easy thing to do.
I think when KNC screwed him over that was when he began planning, many people don't give him enough credit and position him as a dumb ass which is so wrong....

Think about it. He goes from zero to a market cap higher than LTC, loads of hype, fly's to Florida for a big LTC face off it doesn't happen, again loads of hype. Back at the office orders are flowing in for haslets. He shows up and…..  fires his dev team Huh

I do not agree with your assumption

Thats the concern. The difference here is he now has $300k or so but there is no mention of how thats being used. The cash doesn't seem to have a direction only those ion as bounties. The warchest to quote garza should be used to make the project advance... money makes money. $300k can become a lot more if he were to use it and their reluctance to use said funds to me says they don't want that project advanced. In IT time is valuable and waiting for the when its done is often a detriment for progress as time moves fast.


This is something that would have to come directly from ION. I don’t need to know so I won’t ask as I’ve already ticked that box. Anyway even if I was able to pull that data that data would be tainted because I've provided it

As a whale I could answer but that would be pure speculation so not worth listening too.


Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 05:36:49 AM
 #3391

I have no proof that Mordica is involved with ION, but becoming "partners" with Matlack AFTER gaw makes me stay away from anything to do with Matlack, it just doesn't make sense.

I agree on this. My big issue with mordica is that he did photos with garza against miners that didn't exist. He in a video said i'll spray on cement and prove it.... he knew the entire time that the mining equipment didn't exist. What possible reason could he have to lie its not like garza had his family hostage. My opinion on it is that mordica and garza both got greedy and kept the lie going as mordica wanted the $$$$ based on this alone i wouldn't trust mordica anywhere nor anyone associated with him because it means they overlooked this.

It'd be like trusting anyone hiring that fuck horus from cryptsy after he carried on with his shit being their security guy... kinda embarrassing.

Completely agree Mordica isn't a red flag he's an ejection seat. Every call I saw him he always looked so stressed   

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1017


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 05:45:24 AM
 #3392

what about all those promises matlack & his team made for paycoin? they never materialized + theres a series of failed crypto attempts from them and their circle

Again nothing to do with ION

But lets drill into the detail what promises did Mattlack make show me what you have and lets have a debate.  

Before you share remember I'm a nice guy who just wants to build a puzzle  Smiley

Honestly though i agree yes xpy doesn't have anything to do with ion from the project point of view but don't you think progress made on xpy projects is indicitive of matlacks ability for any crypto project? A coat of paint or a new name doesn't make his ability any different and this is what i think people are saying. Whether its ion, xpy, <insert new coin name here> matlacks ability is still his ability. His progress on projects in the past is however an indication on his current project.

Thats the concern. The difference here is he now has $300k or so but there is no mention of how thats being used. The cash doesn't seem to have a direction only those ion as bounties. The warchest to quote garza should be used to make the project advance... money makes money. $300k can become a lot more if he were to use it and their reluctance to use said funds to me says they don't want that project advanced. In IT time is valuable and waiting for the when its done is often a detriment for progress as time moves fast.

I request you ask team ion direct where the funds are going the USD and why they haven't actually a plan for it thats public knowledge. Its a pretty big concern in my opinion.


Honestly though i agree yes xpy doesn't have anything to do with ion from the project point of view but don't you think progress made on xpy projects is indicitive of matlacks ability for any crypto project? A coat of paint or a new name doesn't make his ability any different and this is what i think people are saying. Whether its ion, xpy, <insert new coin name here> matlacks ability is still his ability. His progress on projects in the past is however an indication on his current project.


I honestly don't and it’s not a coat of paint

I cannot stress enough Garza is an unprincipled narcissist a very clever man who walked away with millions, this is no easy thing to do.
I think when KNC screwed him over that was when he began planning, many people don't give him enough credit and position him as a dumb ass which is so wrong....

Think about it. He goes from zero to a market cap higher than LTC, loads of hype, fly's to Florida for a big LTC face off it doesn't happen, again loads of hype. Back at the office orders are flowing in for haslets. He shows up and…..  fires his dev team Huh

I do not agree with your assumption

Thats the concern. The difference here is he now has $300k or so but there is no mention of how thats being used. The cash doesn't seem to have a direction only those ion as bounties. The warchest to quote garza should be used to make the project advance... money makes money. $300k can become a lot more if he were to use it and their reluctance to use said funds to me says they don't want that project advanced. In IT time is valuable and waiting for the when its done is often a detriment for progress as time moves fast.


This is something that would have to come directly from ION. I don’t need to know so I won’t ask as I’ve already ticked that box. Anyway even if I was able to pull that data that data would be tainted because I've provided it

As a whale I could answer but that would be pure speculation so not worth listening too.



Can you explain please why matlacks ability under xpy isn't indicative of his ability under ion? Do you believe he didn't try under xpy or? and why?

Also if mordica was involved in ion can you explain why under xpy he did dodgy things and why he isn't likely under ion.

Can you please explain why you don't need to know why there is no transparency of $300k in USD as an investor? I would think its a very big concern and raised capital should be something any investor would question the use of though and no attack but i'll be frank a comment of not needing to know is rather foolish when you invest.
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1017


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 05:49:42 AM
 #3393

I have no proof that Mordica is involved with ION, but becoming "partners" with Matlack AFTER gaw makes me stay away from anything to do with Matlack, it just doesn't make sense.

I agree on this. My big issue with mordica is that he did photos with garza against miners that didn't exist. He in a video said i'll spray on cement and prove it.... he knew the entire time that the mining equipment didn't exist. What possible reason could he have to lie its not like garza had his family hostage. My opinion on it is that mordica and garza both got greedy and kept the lie going as mordica wanted the $$$$ based on this alone i wouldn't trust mordica anywhere nor anyone associated with him because it means they overlooked this.

It'd be like trusting anyone hiring that fuck horus from cryptsy after he carried on with his shit being their security guy... kinda embarrassing.

Completely agree Mordica isn't a red flag he's an ejection seat. Every call I saw him he always looked so stressed   

So just to be clear if mordica was linked to ion you would abort completely and renounce any ion investment due to the dodginess? How have you evaluated your position when its been shown that allen shinners and adam matlack have had past and "may" have current dealings with mordica?
hollandvan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 06:08:42 AM
 #3394

pathetic coin, all bagholders, only a few volume in yobit, you guys daily discuss here for what? Dev is a scammer, you guys don't admit?

o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1017


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 06:32:31 AM
 #3395

pathetic coin, all bagholders, only a few volume in yobit, you guys daily discuss here for what? Dev is a scammer, you guys don't admit?

i want nauterelle to come back and tell us we're all gay... err or is that carlos. God i miss those retards haha.
eyeballer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 11, 2016, 12:11:46 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2016, 12:45:36 PM by eyeballer
 #3396

No blockchain for mordica and matlack, but do have this.

http://prestigeauditing.com/about-the-owner/ and linkedin.

Interesting how 2 people you are banking on to make you money right now since smiling-man.jpg/president is running your lawsuit and Adam Matlack/partner went into business with the guy who ran the data center where all of your hashlets were located.

This link shows that Matlack partnered with Shinners, and that Mordica partnered with Shinners. I guess that makes them partners together, but it doesn't indicate that Matlack trusts Mordica, endorses Mordica, or engages in a direct partnership with Mordica. I guess you could say they have parallel status since each one is chose to partner with Shinners, but that's really not the same as choosing to partner with each other.

The link doesn't tell me the nature of the partnership at all. Maybe there's a profit sharing arrangement, but if so, that would seem to derive from Shinner's telecom auditing practice. Is there any reason to believe Shinner's auditing practice is anything other than above-board? (I mean besides the fact that you think Shinners should not choose to partner with Mordica.)

Suppose Matlack sees Shinners as someone good at his job and they have some mutual benefit for each other. And suppose Mordica also sees some benefit to partnering with Shinners. Should Matlack rescind his partnership with Shinners just because Mordica also sees his own partnership with Shinners as a good business opportunity?

The main liability for Matlack in partnering with Shinners seems to be that heroes on bitcointalk will say, "Gotcha! Matlack partnered with Mordica. It looks bad... Or at least, can be made to seem bad." But the logic by which it looks bad is faulty, and relies upon readers not really paying attention to the facts.

As far as I know, Mordica has no involvement with the ionomy.com project and never has. Does anyone have any evidence to the contrary?


Shinners is running a lawsuit now? I thought Shinners tried to organize a class action lawsuit comprised of people who believe they were unlawfully mistreated by GAW. Wouldn't it be a law firm conducting the suit, not Shinners? Who exactly is banking on Shinners? and in what way?
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 12:52:40 PM
 #3397

I have no proof that Mordica is involved with ION, but becoming "partners" with Matlack AFTER gaw makes me stay away from anything to do with Matlack, it just doesn't make sense.

I agree on this. My big issue with mordica is that he did photos with garza against miners that didn't exist. He in a video said i'll spray on cement and prove it.... he knew the entire time that the mining equipment didn't exist. What possible reason could he have to lie its not like garza had his family hostage. My opinion on it is that mordica and garza both got greedy and kept the lie going as mordica wanted the $$$$ based on this alone i wouldn't trust mordica anywhere nor anyone associated with him because it means they overlooked this.

It'd be like trusting anyone hiring that fuck horus from cryptsy after he carried on with his shit being their security guy... kinda embarrassing.

Completely agree Mordica isn't a red flag he's an ejection seat. Every call I saw him he always looked so stressed   

So just to be clear if mordica was linked to ion you would abort completely and renounce any ion investment due to the dodginess? How have you evaluated your position when its been shown that allen shinners and adam matlack have had past and "may" have current dealings with mordica?


Can you explain please why matlacks ability under xpy isn't indicative of his ability under ion? Do you believe he didn't try under xpy or? and why?

He doesn’t have a scheming Garza or Mordica to contend with. This environment = 100% failure. The fact that he’s still around when it would be so easy to disappear in this shower shit is to me a green flag

Also if mordica was involved in ion can you explain why under xpy he did dodgy things and why he isn't likely under ion.


This what I’m trying to figure out. Is Mordica involved with ION. By involved I mean at any level and in any capacity. If he is then that for me is a red flag a very BIG red flag.

For this to be green it would have to be zero that’s all I need to know not interested in any detail, everything seen so far has been speculative


Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 01:03:04 PM
 #3398

pathetic coin, all bagholders, only a few volume in yobit, you guys daily discuss here for what? Dev is a scammer, you guys don't admit?

In the land of troll I would class you as a t

keep the posts coming because I have a bag of bad jokes and insults that I would love to share with the world

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 02:45:19 PM
 #3399

No blockchain for mordica and matlack, but do have this.

http://prestigeauditing.com/about-the-owner/ and linkedin.

Interesting how 2 people you are banking on to make you money right now since smiling-man.jpg/president is running your lawsuit and Adam Matlack/partner went into business with the guy who ran the data center where all of your hashlets were located.

This link shows that Matlack partnered with Shinners, and that Mordica partnered with Shinners. I guess that makes them partners together, but it doesn't indicate that Matlack trusts Mordica, endorses Mordica, or engages in a direct partnership with Mordica. I guess you could say they have parallel status since each one is chose to partner with Shinners, but that's really not the same as choosing to partner with each other.

The link doesn't tell me the nature of the partnership at all. Maybe there's a profit sharing arrangement, but if so, that would seem to derive from Shinner's telecom auditing practice. Is there any reason to believe Shinner's auditing practice is anything other than above-board? (I mean besides the fact that you think Shinners should not choose to partner with Mordica.)

Suppose Matlack sees Shinners as someone good at his job and they have some mutual benefit for each other. And suppose Mordica also sees some benefit to partnering with Shinners. Should Matlack rescind his partnership with Shinners just because Mordica also sees his own partnership with Shinners as a good business opportunity?

The main liability for Matlack in partnering with Shinners seems to be that heroes on bitcointalk will say, "Gotcha! Matlack partnered with Mordica. It looks bad... Or at least, can be made to seem bad." But the logic by which it looks bad is faulty, and relies upon readers not really paying attention to the facts.

As far as I know, Mordica has no involvement with the ionomy.com project and never has. Does anyone have any evidence to the contrary?


Shinners is running a lawsuit now? I thought Shinners tried to organize a class action lawsuit comprised of people who believe they were unlawfully mistreated by GAW. Wouldn't it be a law firm conducting the suit, not Shinners? Who exactly is banking on Shinners? and in what way?

Shinners is one of the named plaintiffs in the lawsuit, he organized it, he picked the lawyers. Again, I question his integrity and knowledge by knowingly partnering with Mordica after the fact. If Matlkack and shinners had brains and/or abilities they would never let themselves appear on a webpage like that Mordica after Mordica fucked them over. The fact that neither has seen fit to do actually delete that webpage off of the internet again makes me question how good they are at what they are claiming to do. And yes, Matlack should rescind his partnership with Shinners because there is no way that it could be a good business opportunity if the guy who robbed him of 6 figures is involved.
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 551



View Profile
September 11, 2016, 02:49:38 PM
 #3400

No blockchain for mordica and matlack, but do have this.

http://prestigeauditing.com/about-the-owner/ and linkedin.

Interesting how 2 people you are banking on to make you money right now since smiling-man.jpg/president is running your lawsuit and Adam Matlack/partner went into business with the guy who ran the data center where all of your hashlets were located.

This link shows that Matlack partnered with Shinners, and that Mordica partnered with Shinners. I guess that makes them partners together, but it doesn't indicate that Matlack trusts Mordica, endorses Mordica, or engages in a direct partnership with Mordica. I guess you could say they have parallel status since each one is chose to partner with Shinners, but that's really not the same as choosing to partner with each other.

The link doesn't tell me the nature of the partnership at all. Maybe there's a profit sharing arrangement, but if so, that would seem to derive from Shinner's telecom auditing practice. Is there any reason to believe Shinner's auditing practice is anything other than above-board? (I mean besides the fact that you think Shinners should not choose to partner with Mordica.)

Suppose Matlack sees Shinners as someone good at his job and they have some mutual benefit for each other. And suppose Mordica also sees some benefit to partnering with Shinners. Should Matlack rescind his partnership with Shinners just because Mordica also sees his own partnership with Shinners as a good business opportunity?

The main liability for Matlack in partnering with Shinners seems to be that heroes on bitcointalk will say, "Gotcha! Matlack partnered with Mordica. It looks bad... Or at least, can be made to seem bad." But the logic by which it looks bad is faulty, and relies upon readers not really paying attention to the facts.

As far as I know, Mordica has no involvement with the ionomy.com project and never has. Does anyone have any evidence to the contrary?


Shinners is running a lawsuit now? I thought Shinners tried to organize a class action lawsuit comprised of people who believe they were unlawfully mistreated by GAW. Wouldn't it be a law firm conducting the suit, not Shinners? Who exactly is banking on Shinners? and in what way?

Thanks for your perspective.... For me more information about this puzzle piece is good

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 483 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!