_javi_
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:15:39 PM |
|
i just burned a small psu in a rig with 8.0 which was fine with 7.0 (i knew it was at the brink of its capabilities). No regrets.. it was an old one.
but beware: Definatly usage power increase in this version.
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:17:21 PM |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig. the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning. I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s. With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU. But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU. Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw. 5x 390,5x480,2x7950s 3 psus total watts 3300 all on a single 240 volts ac circuit 12.5 amps= 3000 watts total hashrate 2.8 Kh/s 
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:19:52 PM |
|
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)  where did you get this grafic? I built an API layer that allows me to switch between whatever (gpu) coin is (currently) the most profitable automatically. The graphing is just a "nice to look at". I wouldn't mind people using it but I suspect it will land up being DDOS'd rather quickly.
|
|
|
|
Havane
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 3
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:20:08 PM |
|
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
|
|
|
|
batko
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:24:16 PM |
|
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
same problem, i have 2 Rigs 5x480 Nitro, and 4x480 Nitro sometimes fan up to 100%, reboot solve problem.
|
Donation: ETH: 0x0c8ce94dd3d1bfd09c0f887559c61d1b551e4b4d
|
|
|
Heatspeed
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:25:20 PM |
|
Each rx 480 nitro gets about 195 H/S
~ 1.2 H/s/Watt
Execpt GPU 0 is always a bit higher like +5% than the other GPUs
Anybody know why?
Maybe because the monitor is plugged in there?
|
|
|
|
vi1son
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:26:40 PM |
|
Wow! My old 7850 gives 91H/s now/. 
|
|
|
|
HardwarePal
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:28:50 PM |
|
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
same problem, i have 2 Rigs 5x480 Nitro, and 4x480 Nitro sometimes fan up to 100%, reboot solve problem. 99% a riser problem
|
|
|
|
Eisenkopf89
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:33:26 PM |
|
My Fury X have about 310H/s 😁
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:38:34 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
|
|
|
|
auctioneeeeer
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:39:50 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
It's been said many times before, but we're also drowning out the CPUs aka botnets by making GPUs more faster.
|
|
|
|
Heatspeed
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:40:51 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
Exept linux unsers 
|
|
|
|
Assaro
Member

Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:42:14 PM |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig. the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning. I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s. With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU. But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU. Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw. 5x 390,5x480,2x7950s 3 psus total watts 3300 all on a single 240 volts ac circuit 12.5 amps= 3000 watts total hashrate 2.8 Kh/s  3x r9 390 + 1x r9 290 = 1130w-1150w - 1120 h/s 3x r9 390 = 930w-950w - 885 h/s 3x r9 290 = 830w-850w - 725 h/s in total 2730 h/s = 2890w - 2950w
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1072
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:43:12 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
actually nvidia are earning less because it is not on par with amd
|
|
|
|
HardwarePal
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:44:49 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
Yes, but it's a thrill getting 20% bumps in hashrate 
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:49:37 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
actually nvidia are earning less because it is not on par with amd dont remind me so, Amph.. please 
|
|
|
|
svetliopi44
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:56:29 PM |
|
Wow! My old 7850 gives 91H/s now/.  One or two gigabyte card?
|
|
|
|
not.you
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1726
Merit: 1018
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 07:00:27 PM |
|
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
It's been said many times before, but we're also drowning out the CPUs aka botnets by making GPUs more faster. It's squeezing out more and more miners since this is for a very specific build (windows, 64 bit, newer AMD cards). Not only that, it is making a few specific card models more profitable since each new version is raising the high hash card by more sol/s then the low hash cards. Incrementally a very specific mining machine build is becoming more profitable at the expense of other builds.
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 07:05:09 PM |
|
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)  where did you get this grafic? I built an API layer that allows me to switch between whatever (gpu) coin is (currently) the most profitable automatically. The graphing is just a "nice to look at". I wouldn't mind people using it but I suspect it will land up being DDOS'd rather quickly. would it be ok for me to use your API, if so how do I connect?
|
|
|
|
Mr047
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 07:06:47 PM Last edit: November 24, 2016, 08:09:45 PM by Mr047 |
|
For those, who need comparison data and interested in Claymore miner progress  power of the wall vX - version of Zcash miner -i 6 GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 Power on v8 7870 115 95 65 55 40 35 32 110w 7950 190 155 125 95 70 45 38 140w 7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48 150w 270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32 100w 280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51 165w 285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32 130w RX 470 4Gb 180 155 145 120 70 60 50 120w
|
|
|
|
|