pilotbtc1
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 20, 2017, 03:11:42 AM |
|
Help! What can be? Installed windows 10 driver 16.3 RAM 16 GB motherboard Gigabyte 970 DS3P 4 video cards R9 390 power supply 1600 watts. Putting the miner Claymore and Optiminer in 1 or 2 hours is the reset of the miner completely, what can be? Thank you  |
|
|
|
|
|
jddebug
|
|
March 20, 2017, 04:55:33 AM |
|
for jddebug
What is your intesity setting i am using sapphire r9 280x and MSI 7970 lighting and have found that if I go for intesity higher than -i 2 my rigs start going unstable (restarting,hanging etc..) for the 7970 with downvolt to 1069 mV on the GPU core, on the r9 280 x I can do -i 4 and be stable with the downvolt of 980 mV.
7970 downvolt stable -i 2 get 290 to 300 h/s on claymore 12.4
r9 280 downvolt stable -i 4 get 290 to 300 h/s on claymore 12.4
All cards are running asm option
Hope this helps
This did help get me where I wanted to be. I was able to use -i 6 for my 7970's and they are stable so far. Thank you. Hi, so you undervolt them and now they are stabe with more then -i 2 ? No, I made changes that djolep07 made me think about. I have voltage set to about the same as djolep07. I have this in my config: -zpool equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -zwal (my wallet address).r10 -zpsw z -allpools 1 -i 6 -asm 1 (I had -i 8. Even though the miner sets intensity to 7 that is to high and it made everything slower. I believe that was the problem.) I didn't have -asm 1 in my config. I think the miner was automatically using it anyway but now I set it to use it for sure. Additionally, I noticed that my start.bat file didn't have the extra parameters in it anymore. I may have missed that when I did a previous update. So now it has all this in it: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ZecMiner64.exe Getting a nice 300+ H/s from each card now. So you are using more than -i 2 on 7970 cards and it is not crashing ? Thats correct. I am using -i 6 and it is completely stable. |
|
|
|
|
|
kim-yon
|
|
March 20, 2017, 06:27:59 AM |
|
There is no change in speed but it is more stable.
|
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
March 20, 2017, 06:39:37 AM |
|
There is no change in speed but it is more stable.
It is Marginally faster on my Tahiti, but i don't really see differences on Curacaro, Tonga, RX, Hawaii. |
|
|
|
jonathan.ma
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2017, 06:42:16 AM |
|
Hello,
I'm using cent OS 7.2, which has openssl 1.0.1e installed.
First it shows no /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 and /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 found.
I fixed this by creating symbol links to 1.0.1e so files.
But when running, it shows errors:
./zecminer64: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zecminer64)
./zecminer64: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zecminer64)
How to fix this?
Or will change this miner to be compatible with different openssl versions?
Thanks,
Jonathan
|
|
|
|
|
Kwiksave
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2017, 09:38:41 AM |
|
There is no change in speed but it is more stable.
It is Marginally faster on my Tahiti, but i don't really see differences on Curacaro, Tonga, RX, Hawaii. Same results here. |
|
|
|
|
Yusif
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2017, 10:12:16 AM |
|
There is no change in speed but it is more stable.
It is Marginally faster on my Tahiti, but i don't really see differences on Curacaro, Tonga, RX, Hawaii. Same results here. Maybe we need to change the clocks to get the best ratio. |
|
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
March 20, 2017, 01:34:40 PM |
|
sapphire rx 470 4GB reffrence clock setting please
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
|
ujang1
|
|
March 20, 2017, 03:32:49 PM |
|
Oh, the new version, we need to try what changes will be
|
|
|
|
yellowtie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2017, 07:55:50 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2017, 05:26:01 PM by yellowtie |
|
Hi! Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it. PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card. Model Sol/sec Power
----------------------------------------
7950 285 160
7970M 2GB 145 100
7970 300 215
7990 600 375
R9 270 180 180
R9 280 280 200
R9 280x 310 230
R9 290 340 250
R9 290 flash to 390 370 250
R9 380 230 200
R9 390 411 250
R9 390x 410 280
RX 460 150 60
RX 470 4Gb 299 150
RX 480 300 150
R9 Fury Nano 450 185
R9 Fury X 455 225
R9 Fury Nitro 470 250
|
|
|
|
|
HSLFunding
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2017, 09:52:18 PM |
|
This is my first post, but I have been using this forum for a while. I currently have an Alienware M18 R2 with two 7970m's. These cards are rated at 100W a piece and I am currently pulling right around 300Sol/s with 12.4 but I had to make a configuration change. When I moved from 12.2 to 12.4 the default intensity was changed from 3 to 4, as my cards only have 2GB of memory on them this intensity was too high and I dropped to about 200Sol/s. For ALL revision before this that I have used, the intensity was set to 3 by default. So look to see if your intensity has changed if you are getting lower Sol/s then you were with earlier revisions. Also, going from 12.2 to 12.4 with intensity set at 3 I went from about a peak of 285 Sol/s to, as stated above, about 300 Sol/s. Thank you Claymore for all your work and I gladly donate that dev Fee.  HSL |
|
|
|
|
HSLFunding
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2017, 01:39:41 AM |
|
Hi! Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it. PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card. ----------------------------------------
Model Sol/sec Power
7950 270 250
7970 292 270
R9 270 180 180
R9 280x 323 300
R9 290 340 250
R9 290 flash to 390 370 250
R9 380 200 200
R9 390 411 250
R9 390x 440 280
RX 470 4Gb 299 150
RX 480 330 150
R9 Fury Nano 435 275
R9 Fury X 455 275
R9 Fury Nitro 470 275
Model Sol/sec Power 7970M 2GB 145 100 A 7970M is equivalent to a 7870 desktop clocked at 850/1200 and I run these at stock speeds as my laptops cooling power is limited and the memory will not clock even 5 more Mhz Settings for mining are all standard but intensity is set to -i 3. [EDIT] I am also running drivers 17.3.1, sometimes mining will only start on one card or one of the cards is very low, around 50 sol/sec and to fix it: 1. I stop mining. 2. Stop MSI Afterburner or any monitoring software I have. 3. Enable Crossfire. 4. Disable Crossfire. 5. Startup Mining and I have full speed on both cards again. I have never tried re-enabling my hardware monitors as it just adds complexity I don't want to deal with. |
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
March 21, 2017, 03:05:18 AM
Last edit: March 21, 2017, 04:07:26 AM by rpg |
|
Hi! Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it. PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card. ----------------------------------------
Model Sol/sec Power
7950 270 250
7970 292 270
R9 270 180 180
R9 280x 323 300
R9 290 340 250
R9 290 flash to 390 370 250
R9 380 200 200
R9 390 411 250
R9 390x 440 280
RX 470 4Gb 299 150
RX 480 330 150
R9 Fury Nano 435 275
R9 Fury X 455 275
R9 Fury Nitro 470 275
7950 depends. I have 2 doing 285 with 160 watts and a gigabyte doing 320 with the same watts.fury nitro does 485 at 1040 oc. With clock speed does 465 @ 250 watts. Haven't measured the oc watts Edit: make it 500 @ 1190. 55c with fan at 65% |
|
|
|
|
Mastker
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2017, 06:37:01 AM |
|
Hi! Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it. PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card. ----------------------------------------
Model Sol/sec Power
7950 270 250
7970 292 270
R9 270 180 180
R9 280x 323 300
R9 290 340 250
R9 290 flash to 390 370 250
R9 380 200 200
R9 390 411 250
R9 390x 440 280
RX 470 4Gb 299 150
RX 480 330 150
R9 Fury Nano 435 275
R9 Fury X 455 275
R9 Fury Nitro 470 275
I think your R9 nano power is too high. It is about 200W for 435. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
March 21, 2017, 07:23:50 AM |
|
Hi!
Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it.
PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card.
My MSI R9 380 2G makes 230 Sol w/o over w/c |
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
March 21, 2017, 07:43:11 AM |
|
Hi! Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it. PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card. ----------------------------------------
Model Sol/sec Power
7950 270 250
7970 292 270
R9 270 180 180
R9 280x 323 300
R9 290 340 250
R9 290 flash to 390 370 250
R9 380 200 200
R9 390 411 250
R9 390x 440 280
RX 470 4Gb 299 150
RX 480 330 150
R9 Fury Nano 435 275
R9 Fury X 455 275
R9 Fury Nitro 470 275
I think your R9 nano power is too high. It is about 200W for 435. even lower when you use a custom rom |
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
|
omshree
|
|
March 21, 2017, 08:51:35 AM |
|
Nano 185 @470hash
|
Donate if you like 1ANALSEXXGMd6HaN6CzQXtURLC5H9TjKoo
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
March 21, 2017, 09:08:41 AM |
|
sapphire rx 470 4GB reffrence clock setting please
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
thesaltonsea
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2017, 11:24:48 AM |
|
for jddebug
What is your intesity setting i am using sapphire r9 280x and MSI 7970 lighting and have found that if I go for intesity higher than -i 2 my rigs start going unstable (restarting,hanging etc..) for the 7970 with downvolt to 1069 mV on the GPU core, on the r9 280 x I can do -i 4 and be stable with the downvolt of 980 mV.
7970 downvolt stable -i 2 get 290 to 300 h/s on claymore 12.4
r9 280 downvolt stable -i 4 get 290 to 300 h/s on claymore 12.4
All cards are running asm option
Hope this helps
This did help get me where I wanted to be. I was able to use -i 6 for my 7970's and they are stable so far. Thank you. Hi, so you undervolt them and now they are stabe with more then -i 2 ? No, I made changes that djolep07 made me think about. I have voltage set to about the same as djolep07. I have this in my config: -zpool equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -zwal (my wallet address).r10 -zpsw z -allpools 1 -i 6 -asm 1 (I had -i 8. Even though the miner sets intensity to 7 that is to high and it made everything slower. I believe that was the problem.) I didn't have -asm 1 in my config. I think the miner was automatically using it anyway but now I set it to use it for sure. Additionally, I noticed that my start.bat file didn't have the extra parameters in it anymore. I may have missed that when I did a previous update. So now it has all this in it: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ZecMiner64.exe Getting a nice 300+ H/s from each card now. So you are using more than -i 2 on 7970 cards and it is not crashing ? Thats correct. I am using -i 6 and it is completely stable. Hi, im now testing with your settings and -i 4 and its stable for more than 24h. What clocks and vcore do you use for the 7970s ? |
|
|
|
|
Faboo005
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2017, 12:00:59 PM |
|
Does anybody know how much system RAM volume matters to intensities?
I have various cards spread over a few rigs. I've noticed some reduce intensity on the basis of not enough memory, where other rigs with the same GPUs dont. I assumed this was linked to GPU memory, but the cards are the same with the same 3gb. So is this reduction actually linked to system RAM volume?
|
|
|
|
|
|
