Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[BitJunkie556]

Hey what pool are you guys getting good results with? I had switched to Nanopool a while ago after some bad luck with other pools, but now my average daily payout, even the estimate provided by Nano, seems low...

Also, wondering what kind of hashrate you guys are getting on RX 460's on Claymore's latest 12.5 release for Windows? Also, what are your numbers for R9 280/X? Thanks a lot guys.

And I do have to say... Claymore's Zcash miners have been tremendously unstable for me, even with his recommended settings as per the readme, but 12.5 seems to be running great! Awesome release, Clay!

[Bwtmn7]

has anyone setup claymore miner 12.4 with Fury and a newer driver than 16.3.2? because for me isnt working

[BitJunkie556]

has anyone setup claymore miner 12.4 with Fury and a newer driver than 16.3.2? because for me isnt working

Honestly, your best bet is to just run whatever is stable, even if you sacrifice a small amount of hashrate. If 12.4 with driver 16.3.2 runs stable and at a respectable hashrate compared to the other Fury owners, just  keep it up reliable, rather than having to babysit the rig...

[th00ber]

has anyone setup claymore miner 12.4 with Fury and a newer driver than 16.3.2? because for me isnt working

R9 Fury here !
Claymore 12.5 (-asm 1 -a 2 -i 5)
Driver 15.12
400-430H/s with powerlimit -50% (125w)

It's important to stick with those drivers, that is the best perf I got.
(With newer driver, I can't activate the ASM option, with give me around 340 H/s for the same powerlimit)

Here my dashboard : http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd

[blackjok3r]

Hey guys. I'm using 12.0 here. Is there any reason to upgrade to version 12.5?
I am using windows 7 SP1, clean install with everything removed including windows update.

I have a Sapphire 7950 (early ref card) with a AIO water cooler installed onto it running 1100/1575 and am getting a 290-300 haste rate with a 63C max temp. This seems low to me would it be worth increasing core speed until my temps are around 75C?.

I normally run NetRunner Linux 17.03 as my day to day OS, my windows install is just for games, as the AMD drivers (flgrx?) don't work on Linux anymore. I take it there is no way to mine HUSH/Zcash on Linux unless I buy a newer card or run Ubuntu 14.04 correct?

[BitJunkie556]

Hey guys. I'm using 12.0 here. Is there any reason to upgrade to version 12.5?
I am using windows 7 SP1, clean install with everything removed including windows update.

I have a Sapphire 7950 (early ref card) with a AIO water cooler installed onto it running 1100/1575 and am getting a 290-300 haste rate with a 63C max temp. This seems low to me would it be worth increasing core speed until my temps are around 75C?.

I normally run NetRunner Linux 17.03 as my day to day OS, my windows install is just for games, as the AMD drivers (flgrx?) don't work on Linux anymore. I take it there is no way to mine HUSH/Zcash on Linux unless I buy a newer card or run Ubuntu 14.04 correct?

Call me crazy, but isn't 63C kind of high for a water-cooled chip? I mean I overclock my GPU's pretty far and only turn fans to 50-60% and get like 65-70C... So for water cooling, 63C is smoking hot. I really wouldn't go much higher. And as far as I know, you're right where you should be after some research on the 280/X. I've heard people doing about 280+ sol/s on an R9 280/X, so with those aggressive settings on the 7950, yeah, you're numbers are probably a tad low, but it ain't worth blowing your card over. Good thing you're keeping that thing cool. I'm the thing hasn't blown yet tbh. If anything, maybe consider dialing back your settings...

The best thing to do would probably to flash a modded BIOS or something like that, but honestly the thing seems to be running pretty good even with a ridiculous overclock. I wouldn't even push my luck lol

[BitJunkie556]

Hey guys. I'm using 12.0 here. Is there any reason to upgrade to version 12.5?
I am using windows 7 SP1, clean install with everything removed including windows update.

I have a Sapphire 7950 (early ref card) with a AIO water cooler installed onto it running 1100/1575 and am getting a 290-300 haste rate with a 63C max temp. This seems low to me would it be worth increasing core speed until my temps are around 75C?.

I normally run NetRunner Linux 17.03 as my day to day OS, my windows install is just for games, as the AMD drivers (flgrx?) don't work on Linux anymore. I take it there is no way to mine HUSH/Zcash on Linux unless I buy a newer card or run Ubuntu 14.04 correct?

On second thought, I think I was wrong on this. So the 7950 and 280 have 28 compute units. The 7970 and 280X have 32. Seems like all have same memory bus width and so on, and I think the ~280+ sol/s, is with an R9 280X... So I'm thinking that maybe the fact that the 7950 has 4 less compute units is what's causing the discrepancy, even with the crazy overclock. Not sure if that really is the issue, but it might be an explanation as to why your card seems more limited in hashrate.

[blackjok3r]

I'm mining Hush coin on aika pool and that reports a 298 hash rate, for 6 hush coins a day. I'm pretty happy with that so far and to be honest I will probably leave it alone. Hopefully HUSH will be worth something. Seems to be zcash exactly but they have more user friendly wallets and stuff being made. But with zcash being added to alphabay, that shits gonna go bananas in price soon. It may even be worth my while making a dedicated rig if I can source some more 7950/7970's.

My watercooler has a very slow fan, and the rad is tiny. It's only there for noise factor as the card I got second hand had a broken fan. Its a really cheap gaming setup I made years ago, but I should have been mining with it from the start. Such a waste.

[kaese2002]

has anyone setup claymore miner 12.4 with Fury and a newer driver than 16.3.2? because for me isnt working

Fury should still use 15.12...running @440H/s each

[tankersss]

Is this normal that I get a lot of DC's from equihash.eu and just some rejects from US one, or is it the servers problem or so ? Also I'm using 280x (~304Sols/s).

[tearsdontfall]

Miner is detecting my card as 470 but my card is Sapphire nitro+ rx 570 8GB... I am getting around 275 hash... is this okay??

[Blisk]

Linux version not working because of using old ssl library
libssl.so.1.0.0

[yudhistira]

Why my RIG with AMD R280 Saphire suddenly shutdown when start mining with v12.5
windows 7 64 bit RAM 4Gb

need advice please

[wa11mine]

Why my RIG with AMD R280 Saphire suddenly shutdown when start mining with v12.5
windows 7 64 bit RAM 4Gb

need advice please

Use -old 1 if your rig worked on 12.4 or below

[Claymore]

Linux version not working because of using old ssl library
libssl.so.1.0.0

Since you use Linux, it should not be a problem for you to get required version of OpenSSL. But I will check if I can link it statically in next update.

Why my RIG with AMD R280 Saphire suddenly shutdown when start mining with v12.5
windows 7 64 bit RAM 4Gb
need advice please

Usually it means that your PSU is weak.

[Valgar]

I'm getting a lot of issues with the Claymore miner within NiceHash in the past week, anyone else getting this?

This happens on 3 separate rigs running different cards, Furys, 280 and 390.

What often happens is periods of rejected shares even though the cards are rock solid stable and periods of disconnects/timeouts, I've tried switching regions but the same issue. If I switch miners I get no issues, but of course Claymore is the best performing.

[fredeq]

I'm getting a lot of issues with the Claymore miner within NiceHash in the past week, anyone else getting this?

This happens on 3 separate rigs running different cards, Furys, 280 and 390.

What often happens is periods of rejected shares even though the cards are rock solid stable and periods of disconnects/timeouts, I've tried switching regions but the same issue. If I switch miners I get no issues, but of course Claymore is the best performing.

Getting the same.
My idea is there is a new coin/pool out there that is not properly supported by CM miner, hence the rejects.
Hush? Zencash?

[Claymore]

I'm getting a lot of issues with the Claymore miner within NiceHash in the past week, anyone else getting this?

This happens on 3 separate rigs running different cards, Furys, 280 and 390.

What often happens is periods of rejected shares even though the cards are rock solid stable and periods of disconnects/timeouts, I've tried switching regions but the same issue. If I switch miners I get no issues, but of course Claymore is the best performing.

Getting the same.
My idea is there is a new coin out there that is not properly supported by CM miner, hence the rejects.
Hush? Zencash?

Please PM me the log file so I can check the reason.

[fredeq]

I'm getting a lot of issues with the Claymore miner within NiceHash in the past week, anyone else getting this?

This happens on 3 separate rigs running different cards, Furys, 280 and 390.

What often happens is periods of rejected shares even though the cards are rock solid stable and periods of disconnects/timeouts, I've tried switching regions but the same issue. If I switch miners I get no issues, but of course Claymore is the best performing.

Getting the same.
My idea is there is a new coin out there that is not properly supported by CM miner, hence the rejects.
Hush? Zencash?

Please PM me the log file so I can check the reason.

Log sent. I think nicehash also sent new diff right before rejects started "Pool sets new share target: 0x000f0f0f (diff: 4352H)"

[Valgar]

Please PM me the log file so I can check the reason.

Which logfile is this? The Nicehash one Named "log" or "log1"?