cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 20, 2014, 03:16:17 PM |
|
Devs threw in the towel and there's now enough panda coin on the market to make sure mining never gets profitable again.
when enough people stop mining, you could still make some profit even with the current exchange price of ~25 Satoshis I expect some huge volatility down the road (both up and down). Christian
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
February 20, 2014, 03:17:26 PM |
|
What clocks are you running? I bet you can do better with some more time and of course, after Mr Buchner improves cudaminer for Maxwell cards. (looking forward to that!)
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 20, 2014, 03:36:07 PM |
|
What clocks are you running? I bet you can do better with some more time and of course, after Mr Buchner improves cudaminer for Maxwell cards. (looking forward to that!) I cannot really promise that this produces actual speed benefits. There's no specific new features that a compilation for sm_50 would provide and which sm_35 (Titan kernel) doesn't already offer. One can only hope that the compiler does some better code generation when targeting sm_50. Christian
|
|
|
|
ManIkWeet
|
|
February 20, 2014, 03:49:41 PM |
|
I cannot really promise that this produces actual speed benefits. There's no specific new features that a compilation for sm_50 would provide and which sm_35 (Titan kernel) doesn't already offer.
One can only hope that the compiler does some better code generation when targeting sm_50.
Christian
Aha, this is where nVidia engineers could go ahead and shine then, making their compiler more efficient!
|
BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
|
|
|
DeltaQuebec
|
|
February 20, 2014, 04:06:08 PM |
|
Devs threw in the towel and there's now enough panda coin on the market to make sure mining never gets profitable again.
when enough people stop mining, you could still make some profit even with the current exchange price of ~25 Satoshis I expect some huge volatility down the road (both up and down). Christian Agreed.
|
|
|
|
Tamis
|
|
February 20, 2014, 04:15:07 PM |
|
Hi people !
Something very intriguing happened to me a few hours ago. I'm mining Dopecoin an alt that uses scrypt. I'm using the 02-04-14 version with auto-tune. The most I got in all my tries was around 200kh/s with my gtx 670.
I restarted cudaminer without looking at the output and was surprised to hear the fan of my GPU working a lot faster. I look at the cudaminer window and was shocked to see it was mining at 340mh/s ! I scrolled back to see what config auto-tune used and it was k14x28. I checked on the pool stats to see if the pool was getting the same hash/sec and it was.
Usually my gpu is at 63°C and this time it was at 85°C. I thought I was a jerk not to have noticed I could mine a lot faster earlier and decided to solo mine instead of pool mining. Setup a new .bat with -l k14x28 and got the usual 200kh/s again.
I could not get the 340mh/s again (solo or pool mining)... Tried a lot of times to have auto-tune figure it out again but it did not :/
The gpu usage was the same when mining at 340 or 200mh/s only temp changed.
Did that already happen to anyone else ? How can I get this mining speed again ??
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
February 20, 2014, 04:34:41 PM |
|
Hi people !
Something very intriguing happened to me a few hours ago. I'm mining Dopecoin an alt that uses scrypt. I'm using the 02-04-14 version with auto-tune. The most I got in all my tries was around 200kh/s with my gtx 670.
I restarted cudaminer without looking at the output and was surprised to hear the fan of my GPU working a lot faster. I look at the cudaminer window and was shocked to see it was mining at 340mh/s ! I scrolled back to see what config auto-tune used and it was k14x28. I checked on the pool stats to see if the pool was getting the same hash/sec and it was.
Usually my gpu is at 63°C and this time it was at 85°C. I thought I was a jerk not to have noticed I could mine a lot faster earlier and decided to solo mine instead of pool mining. Setup a new .bat with -l k14x28 and got the usual 200kh/s again.
I could not get the 340mh/s again (solo or pool mining)... Tried a lot of times to have auto-tune figure it out again but it did not :/
The gpu usage was the same when mining at 340 or 200mh/s only temp changed.
Did that already happen to anyone else ? How can I get this mining speed again ??
may-be the infamous "google chrome" trick... ? The boost must have fired up for some reason
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
patoberli
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2014, 04:35:15 PM |
|
Try to open a website with flash showing, for example a youtube video. This sounds as if your GPU doesn't clock up to 3D speed clocks while running cudaminer. You could check that with the free program GPU-Z (if you use Windows).
|
YAC: YA86YiWSvWEGSSSerPTMy4kwndabRUNftf BTC: 16NqvkYbKMnonVEf7jHbuWURFsLeuTRidX LTC: LTKCoiDwqEjaRCoNXfFhDm9EeWbGWouZjE
|
|
|
Jayjay04
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 20, 2014, 04:41:30 PM |
|
Is anybody using a GTX 465 here ? What's your hashrate ? Thx
|
|
|
|
|
Tamis
|
|
February 20, 2014, 05:42:37 PM |
|
Is anybody using a GTX 465 here ? What's your hashrate ? Thx
Having a flash video running does not change anything... It's something else ! Not figuring out what is making me crazy ok Gpu-z is helping ! Gpu-core clock is only at 705 Mhz ! Why the f*** is it not running full speed... Will have to do some reading it seems !
|
|
|
|
Jayjay04
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 20, 2014, 05:52:54 PM |
|
Is anybody using a GTX 465 here ? What's your hashrate ? Thx
100-120kh, what's your? 180khash/s Clock: 775mhz Memory: 1603 PSU: 550w Parameters: -H 1 -d 0 -i 0 -l F11x16 -C 2
|
|
|
|
Jayjay04
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 20, 2014, 05:58:49 PM |
|
Can't put the image in the chat... there http://imgur.com/CHYtmpEBut I'm not using the most recent update... seem to be not working with the overclocking of the card
|
|
|
|
debido666
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:05:39 PM |
|
Is cudaminer dependent on processor performance to give better hash rates?
with -H 0 and -H 1 options the CPU can become a bottleneck. Otherwise no. actually for scrypt and scrypt:2048 you get an extra 20khash/s (scrypt:2048) with H1 compared to H2 interesting. -H1 does 4 times more transfers over the PCI express bus than -H 2. Surprising that it's faster. I intend to get rid of all the transfers and do the hash evaluation on the GPU soon (like I do when hashing Keccak). This will allow us to run nVidia cards with 1x connections through risers without performance impact. Christian Maybe for users with only one card in a system? Multi-cards = bad?
|
|
|
|
debido666
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:08:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Tamis
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:10:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
liomojo1
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:14:13 PM |
|
i was just writing you this, cause i had this issue too. Just remove the inspector from the folder and the shortcut. Anyway this inspector is very nice program, i undervolted my 760 and now it runs 285khs at 1.075 v instead of 1.20
|
|
|
|
Morgahl
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:17:51 PM |
|
I have a good use for this. Thanks for the tip.
|
|
|
|
Morgahl
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:26:07 PM |
|
What clocks are you running? I bet you can do better with some more time and of course, after Mr Buchner improves cudaminer for Maxwell cards. (looking forward to that!) I cannot really promise that this produces actual speed benefits. There's no specific new features that a compilation for sm_50 would provide and which sm_35 (Titan kernel) doesn't already offer. One can only hope that the compiler does some better code generation when targeting sm_50. Christian What about the Barrel Shifter that AMD crows so much about that Kepler was missing? This was added to Maxwell
|
|
|
|
69charger
|
|
February 20, 2014, 06:42:17 PM |
|
What clocks are you running? I bet you can do better with some more time and of course, after Mr Buchner improves cudaminer for Maxwell cards. (looking forward to that!) I cannot really promise that this produces actual speed benefits. There's no specific new features that a compilation for sm_50 would provide and which sm_35 (Titan kernel) doesn't already offer. One can only hope that the compiler does some better code generation when targeting sm_50. Christian What about the Barrel Shifter that AMD crows so much about that Kepler was missing? This was added to Maxwell I wanna see Christian DO A BARREL SHIFT!!! LOL
|
|
|
|
|