Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Bitcoinaire]

Lets get a nice weekend pump going, for old times' sake!

[HairyMaclairy]

[realr0ach]

Got a totally decent Imperial Stout lined up for this evening. One nice thing about the last year in crypto is not drinking more, but drinking better.

You will need to upgrade to Nazi beer hall music for that:

https://youtu.be/xYFwshTwx1Q?t=12

http://youtu.be/bYkcWy9Vy6E?t=22

Such inspiring.

[serveria.com]

oh no. this thread is still full of bears !)  

Bears are:

1. Losers who sold at the bottom and don't want others to succeed/do better
2. Losers who don't have balls to join in and are jealous and full of hate because others have more guts
3. Losers who can't afford crypto investments because they live in their parents' basements
4. Losers who are being paid by the real bear whales to troll and proclaim doom
5. Losers who don't believe in bitcoin because they are into some other shitcoins/precious metals etc etc etc
6. Losers who want to buy cheaper but always miss the moment so are always bearish

Did I forget something/someone?

P.S. Funny thing that I suspect that after we'll reach the moon (100k+) I might cash out and turn into a bear myself   

[sirazimuth]

If anyone here is going to the Super Bowl per chance,
make sure you wave a giant BUY BITCOIN sign,
preferably behind the scantily clad cheerleaders....

[Globb0]

FS

slightly used Lambo Huracan Spyder
Nero Nemesis Matt
Nero Ade, Sportivo Unicolor w/Alcantara Seat Trim
20" X 8.5J Fr & 20" X 11J Rr Mimas Nero
loaded
only 2730 km

$287K firm

In 2020 it will be only 2.87 BTC according to John Mcafee
I pass for now, thanks. 

Only 0.287BTC going by McAfee's late 2020 prediction.

You can win almost that in the ATH game here.

Aha that will work, Unless, Lambo's spike!!1!one! 

When 1 million bitcoin holders cash in, there will be a lambo shortage

[realr0ach]

Bears are:

People who figured out bitcoin transaction validators are designed to centralize and transactions aren't blinded (fungible) so it's just a permissioned ledger, cashless society slavery system.  And it has built-in, rent seeking middlemen and doesn't remove counterparty risk, making it garbage compared to metals anyway.

[Globb0]

Bears are:

People who figured out bitcoin transaction validators are designed to centralize and transactions aren't blinded (fungible) so it's just a permissioned ledger, cashless society slavery system.  And it doesn't remove middlemen or counterparty risk making it inferior to metals to boot.

Its not quite as catchy as the bear necessities song

[Biro Bob]

I like that bear!

[vroom]

guys, sell your lambos and buy bitcoin to start the weekend pump. satoshi needs your support now!

[Globb0]

I like that bear!

2BTC I can arrange a date for the 2 of you

[BitcoinBunny]

If anyone here is going to the Super Bowl per chance,
make sure you wave a giant BUY BITCOIN sign,
preferably behind the scantily clad cheerleaders....

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

[Searing]

Cheap Coins!

(Ack!  too soon...sorry Ack!)

[criptix]

Ah the tears - wish i had followed that in real time  

15 k tommorow and 20 k in two days - take loans, mortgages and 5x leverage!!!!!  

[Thekool1s]

[Starving_Marvin]

Can't wait for the rebound. What a bloodbath.

[Ibian]

The price is still TOO DAMN HIGH! to buy. So very bored.

[Sitarow]

Look.

We're now well into a 15-minute chart correction and the market is as calm as a sleeping baby. Not a hint of the panic of the last 48 hours.

That shows you. It was all market making by ultra-aggressive shorters. They had their covering level targeted the whole way down and once reached, left the building with their "winnings". That's why we got these pummelling dumps on the turnaround from the bounces on the way down.

I wouldn't be surprised if there's still a significant part of the market that's short and yet to cover.

I am 100% in agreement.

[realr0ach]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

It's not men trying to exploit women, it's women trying to exploit men.  Women were never the breadwinners in evolution.  If men traditionally have the resources, the woman then evolves into trying to con the man into giving them up.  This is why women score better at linguistics than men and speak more words per day on average.  Linguistics is basically the art of manipulation and conning people.  The women who were not good at conning people all died and didn't pass on their genes.  

That's why the Jews - the most well-known scammers - score higher in linguistics than anyone.  It's not intelligence, it's just straight up mastery of fraud.  If a woman is talking to a man, generally she is trying to trick him into doing shit for her.  If that fails to work, or as a dual prong attack, she can also fall back onto portraying herself as a sex object then trying to extort the man for resources using that.  If it was up to me, I would ban women from wearing makeup and dressing like bimbos just because it's all part of sketchy con game to try and manipulate people and I'd force them to get by on more legit means.

[criptix]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

It's not men trying to exploit women, it's women trying to exploit men.  Women were never the breadwinners in evolution.  If men traditionally have the resources, the woman then evolves into trying to con the man into giving them up.  This is why women score better at linguistics than men and speak more words per day on average.  Linguistics is basically the art of manipulation and conning people.  The women who were not good at conning people all died and didn't pass on their genes.  

That's why the Jews - the most well-known scammers - score higher in linguistics than anyone.  It's not intelligence, it's just straight up mastery of fraud.  If a woman is talking to a man, generally she is trying to trick him into doing shit for her.  If that fails to work, or as a dual prong attack, she can also fall back onto portraying herself as a sex object then trying to extort the man for resources using that.  If it was up to me, I would ban women from wearing makeup and dressing like bimbos just because it's all part of sketchy con game to try and manipulate people and I'd force them to get by on more legit means.

Look roach, if you arent feeling good while getting scammed by such a girl:




you are retarded  


(this is just how nature works)