Bitcoin Forum
February 06, 2023, 04:59:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 24.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will we see a new ATH?
2023 - 38 (25.5%)
2024 - 58 (38.9%)
2025 - 40 (26.8%)
2026 - 3 (2%)
2027 - 2 (1.3%)
After 2027 - 3 (2%)
Never - 5 (3.4%)
Total Voters: 149

Pages: « 1 ... 19260 19261 19262 19263 19264 19265 19266 19267 19268 19269 19270 19271 19272 19273 19274 19275 19276 19277 19278 19279 19280 19281 19282 19283 19284 19285 19286 19287 19288 19289 19290 19291 19292 19293 19294 19295 19296 19297 19298 19299 19300 19301 19302 19303 19304 19305 19306 19307 19308 19309 [19310] 19311 19312 19313 19314 19315 19316 19317 19318 19319 19320 19321 19322 19323 19324 19325 19326 19327 19328 19329 19330 19331 19332 19333 19334 19335 19336 19337 19338 19339 19340 19341 19342 19343 19344 19345 19346 19347 19348 19349 19350 19351 19352 19353 19354 19355 19356 19357 19358 19359 19360 ... 31866 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26001992 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 5 users with 9 merit deleted.)
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 3819


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 03:50:34 AM

Fair enough, though I do hold the probability for there to be shenanigans in, pretty much any, custodial precious metals arrangement to be very near metaphysical certitude.
1675702749
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675702749

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675702749
Reply with quote  #2

1675702749
Report to moderator
1675702749
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675702749

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675702749
Reply with quote  #2

1675702749
Report to moderator
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1675702749
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675702749

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675702749
Reply with quote  #2

1675702749
Report to moderator
1675702749
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675702749

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675702749
Reply with quote  #2

1675702749
Report to moderator
1675702749
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675702749

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675702749
Reply with quote  #2

1675702749
Report to moderator
PoolMinor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1839
Merit: 1324


XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 03:55:44 AM

What did I win?!



2 Merits and 1 sMerit
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:05:28 AM

Fair enough, though I do hold the probability for there to be shenanigans in, pretty much any, custodial precious metals arrangement to be very near metaphysical certitude.

Well, I don't disagree with you on that. But you never know for sure, and hope springs eternal.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 3819


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:06:45 AM

Would be nice, wouldn't it?
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:08:04 AM

I had hope once..
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 3819


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:08:48 AM

look what the cat dragged in
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:09:37 AM

Would be nice, wouldn't it?

It sure would.
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259



View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:11:45 AM

Fair enough, though I do hold the probability for there to be shenanigans in, pretty much any, custodial precious metals arrangement to be very near metaphysical certitude.

Well, I don't disagree with you on that. But you never know for sure, and hope springs eternal.

As does human nature, ensuring that it always ends the same.  Whoever is in charge of the money will eventually steal it.  Opinion, based on history.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:12:23 AM

look what the cat dragged in

It's been a hard slog this. I'm trying to be cool. But holy moly. :'
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:21:59 AM

Fair enough, though I do hold the probability for there to be shenanigans in, pretty much any, custodial precious metals arrangement to be very near metaphysical certitude.

Well, I don't disagree with you on that. But you never know for sure, and hope springs eternal.

As does human nature, ensuring that it always ends the same.  Whoever is in charge of the money will eventually steal it.  Opinion, based on history.

Nah, not always, but way too often.
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:24:09 AM

look what the cat dragged in

It's been a hard slog this. I'm trying to be cool. But holy moly. :'

We are ten times up since this time last year, look at the bright side.
Personally, this is exactly where i thought we would be at the end of 2017. so I'm still happy.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:29:30 AM

look what the cat dragged in

It's been a hard slog this. I'm trying to be cool. But holy moly. :'

We are ten times up since this time last year, look at the bright side.
Personally, this is exactly where i thought we would be at the end of 2017. so I'm still happy.

I guess I hope I haven't let a monumental, total one-off chance at financial independence slip through my fingers. That isn't to say I have a lot to complain about.

But dammit Bitcoin. You go up now!
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3248
Merit: 7793


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:32:22 AM

A more humble person would have presented that as an opinion, not a fact.

Writing for example, "in my opinion they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"

Or "I believe that in reality they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"


That's bullshit.

jojo gave you a good enough and logical answer that is pretty much a well known fact that includes that there is a lot of gold that is maniplated and difficult to get possession of millions of dollars of it, take the government of germany for example trying to get possession of gold held in the usa. 

You, Arriemoller, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk and attempting to give assignments to get caught in the weeds with bullshit about a supposed better status(that you assume) if an asset is backed rather than not backed. 

There is no fucking decent backing of any asset that is not manipulated, including gold.  Bitcoin happens to be a paradigm changing phenomenon because it is the first ever asset class that is backed by decentralized and trustless proof of work.  Sure, in the end, the bitcoin project might fail, but currently we have an asset that looks like it has real decent promise, and if any of the less than 1% of the world who currently HODL some bitcoin recognize the paradigm shifting contribution of bitcoin, they are likely to profit from such recognition by HODLing.  Sure there are going to be other folks who profit from HODLing bitcoin as well, even if they do not recognize the enormity of its paradigm shifting contribution as a new asset class.

So good luck with your attempt to find some asset class that is backed by something (such as gold) and is not manipulated to shit in a much more centralized way than bitcoin, which is currently king of decentralized proof of work backing value in practice.
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:51:54 AM

A more humble person would have presented that as an opinion, not a fact.

Writing for example, "in my opinion they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"

Or "I believe that in reality they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"


That's bullshit.

jojo gave you a good enough and logical answer that is pretty much a well known fact that includes that there is a lot of gold that is maniplated and difficult to get possession of millions of dollars of it, take the government of germany for example trying to get possession of gold held in the usa. 

You, Arriemoller, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk and attempting to give assignments to get caught in the weeds with bullshit about a supposed better status(that you assume) if an asset is backed rather than not backed. 

There is no fucking decent backing of any asset that is not manipulated, including gold.  Bitcoin happens to be a paradigm changing phenomenon because it is the first ever asset class that is backed by decentralized and trustless proof of work.  Sure, in the end, the bitcoin project might fail, but currently we have an asset that looks like it has real decent promise, and if any of the less than 1% of the world who currently HODL some bitcoin recognize the paradigm shifting contribution of bitcoin, they are likely to profit from such recognition by HODLing.  Sure there are going to be other folks who profit from HODLing bitcoin as well, even if they do not recognize the enormity of its paradigm shifting contribution as a new asset class.

So good luck with your attempt to find some asset class that is backed by something (such as gold) and is not manipulated to shit in a much more centralized way than bitcoin, which is currently king of decentralized proof of work backing value in practice.

Don't you mean "I, JJG, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk"?
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 04:54:06 AM

look what the cat dragged in

It's been a hard slog this. I'm trying to be cool. But holy moly. :'

We are ten times up since this time last year, look at the bright side.
Personally, this is exactly where i thought we would be at the end of 2017. so I'm still happy.

I guess I hope I haven't let a monumental, total one-off chance at financial independence slip through my fingers. That isn't to say I have a lot to complain about.

But dammit Bitcoin. You go up now!

I get that feeling too sometimes, but as long as it stays the course I plotted in my mind I'm usually calm.
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 05:01:46 AM

I have a mind plot of 80000 at the end of this year, I'm still bullish.
The only thing that concerns me is the plethora of clonecoins that have plopt up lately, they might suck up some of the fiat that might otherwise haver gone to bitcoin. If so we might get a lower  price, but still much higher than the latest ATH in my opinion.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 3819


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 05:06:33 AM

A more humble person would have presented that as an opinion, not a fact.

Writing for example, "in my opinion they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"

Or "I believe that in reality they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"


That's bullshit.

jojo gave you a good enough and logical answer that is pretty much a well known fact that includes that there is a lot of gold that is maniplated and difficult to get possession of millions of dollars of it, take the government of germany for example trying to get possession of gold held in the usa. 

You, Arriemoller, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk and attempting to give assignments to get caught in the weeds with bullshit about a supposed better status(that you assume) if an asset is backed rather than not backed. 

There is no fucking decent backing of any asset that is not manipulated, including gold.  Bitcoin happens to be a paradigm changing phenomenon because it is the first ever asset class that is backed by decentralized and trustless proof of work.  Sure, in the end, the bitcoin project might fail, but currently we have an asset that looks like it has real decent promise, and if any of the less than 1% of the world who currently HODL some bitcoin recognize the paradigm shifting contribution of bitcoin, they are likely to profit from such recognition by HODLing.  Sure there are going to be other folks who profit from HODLing bitcoin as well, even if they do not recognize the enormity of its paradigm shifting contribution as a new asset class.

So good luck with your attempt to find some asset class that is backed by something (such as gold) and is not manipulated to shit in a much more centralized way than bitcoin, which is currently king of decentralized proof of work backing value in practice.

uhhh...thanks JJG...uh...you can put your shirt back on man
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3248
Merit: 7793


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 05:09:57 AM
Last edit: February 01, 2018, 05:20:00 AM by JayJuanGee

A more humble person would have presented that as an opinion, not a fact.

Writing for example, "in my opinion they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"

Or "I believe that in reality they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"


That's bullshit.

jojo gave you a good enough and logical answer that is pretty much a well known fact that includes that there is a lot of gold that is maniplated and difficult to get possession of millions of dollars of it, take the government of germany for example trying to get possession of gold held in the usa.  

You, Arriemoller, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk and attempting to give assignments to get caught in the weeds with bullshit about a supposed better status(that you assume) if an asset is backed rather than not backed.  

There is no fucking decent backing of any asset that is not manipulated, including gold.  Bitcoin happens to be a paradigm changing phenomenon because it is the first ever asset class that is backed by decentralized and trustless proof of work.  Sure, in the end, the bitcoin project might fail, but currently we have an asset that looks like it has real decent promise, and if any of the less than 1% of the world who currently HODL some bitcoin recognize the paradigm shifting contribution of bitcoin, they are likely to profit from such recognition by HODLing.  Sure there are going to be other folks who profit from HODLing bitcoin as well, even if they do not recognize the enormity of its paradigm shifting contribution as a new asset class.

So good luck with your attempt to find some asset class that is backed by something (such as gold) and is not manipulated to shit in a much more centralized way than bitcoin, which is currently king of decentralized proof of work backing value in practice.

Don't you mean "I, JJG, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk"?

Nope.  Did not mean that, and you know, better....  Roll Eyes   You really want to talk about some kind of backing of an asset (bitcoin or otherwise) or merely get caught up with irrelevant nonsensicals?  hahahhaha



uhhh...thanks JJG...uh...you can put your shirt back on man

O..k..   sorry for getting all butt-naked there.   Cry

PoolMinor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1839
Merit: 1324


XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 05:18:36 AM


Don't you mean "I, JJG, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk"?

He won't admit it, never has, but yes.
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1685


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
February 01, 2018, 05:19:58 AM

A more humble person would have presented that as an opinion, not a fact.

Writing for example, "in my opinion they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"

Or "I believe that in reality they will be unbacked goldtethers...just like the current paper gold market...no thanks"


That's bullshit.

jojo gave you a good enough and logical answer that is pretty much a well known fact that includes that there is a lot of gold that is maniplated and difficult to get possession of millions of dollars of it, take the government of germany for example trying to get possession of gold held in the usa.  

You, Arriemoller, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk and attempting to give assignments to get caught in the weeds with bullshit about a supposed better status(that you assume) if an asset is backed rather than not backed.  

There is no fucking decent backing of any asset that is not manipulated, including gold.  Bitcoin happens to be a paradigm changing phenomenon because it is the first ever asset class that is backed by decentralized and trustless proof of work.  Sure, in the end, the bitcoin project might fail, but currently we have an asset that looks like it has real decent promise, and if any of the less than 1% of the world who currently HODL some bitcoin recognize the paradigm shifting contribution of bitcoin, they are likely to profit from such recognition by HODLing.  Sure there are going to be other folks who profit from HODLing bitcoin as well, even if they do not recognize the enormity of its paradigm shifting contribution as a new asset class.

So good luck with your attempt to find some asset class that is backed by something (such as gold) and is not manipulated to shit in a much more centralized way than bitcoin, which is currently king of decentralized proof of work backing value in practice.

Don't you mean "I, JJG, are engaged in trivial bullshit and distracting talk"?

Nope.  Did not mean that, and you know, better....  Roll Eyes   You really want to talk about some kind of backing of an asset (bitcoin or otherwise) or merely get caught up with irrelevant nonsensicals?  hahahhaha

Neither, just would like people that I normally consider intelligent and sharp to differentiate between opinions and facts, we are not teenagers on facebook, (well, I'm not entirely sure about you).

Pages: « 1 ... 19260 19261 19262 19263 19264 19265 19266 19267 19268 19269 19270 19271 19272 19273 19274 19275 19276 19277 19278 19279 19280 19281 19282 19283 19284 19285 19286 19287 19288 19289 19290 19291 19292 19293 19294 19295 19296 19297 19298 19299 19300 19301 19302 19303 19304 19305 19306 19307 19308 19309 [19310] 19311 19312 19313 19314 19315 19316 19317 19318 19319 19320 19321 19322 19323 19324 19325 19326 19327 19328 19329 19330 19331 19332 19333 19334 19335 19336 19337 19338 19339 19340 19341 19342 19343 19344 19345 19346 19347 19348 19349 19350 19351 19352 19353 19354 19355 19356 19357 19358 19359 19360 ... 31866 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!