Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Biro Bob]

I like that bear!

[vroom]

guys, sell your lambos and buy bitcoin to start the weekend pump. satoshi needs your support now!

[Globb0]

I like that bear!

2BTC I can arrange a date for the 2 of you

[BitcoinBunny]

If anyone here is going to the Super Bowl per chance,
make sure you wave a giant BUY BITCOIN sign,
preferably behind the scantily clad cheerleaders....

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

[Searing]

Cheap Coins!

(Ack!  too soon...sorry Ack!)

[criptix]

Ah the tears - wish i had followed that in real time  

15 k tommorow and 20 k in two days - take loans, mortgages and 5x leverage!!!!!  

[Thekool1s]

[Starving_Marvin]

Can't wait for the rebound. What a bloodbath.

[Ibian]

The price is still TOO DAMN HIGH! to buy. So very bored.

[Sitarow]

Look.

We're now well into a 15-minute chart correction and the market is as calm as a sleeping baby. Not a hint of the panic of the last 48 hours.

That shows you. It was all market making by ultra-aggressive shorters. They had their covering level targeted the whole way down and once reached, left the building with their "winnings". That's why we got these pummelling dumps on the turnaround from the bounces on the way down.

I wouldn't be surprised if there's still a significant part of the market that's short and yet to cover.

I am 100% in agreement.

[realr0ach]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

It's not men trying to exploit women, it's women trying to exploit men.  Women were never the breadwinners in evolution.  If men traditionally have the resources, the woman then evolves into trying to con the man into giving them up.  This is why women score better at linguistics than men and speak more words per day on average.  Linguistics is basically the art of manipulation and conning people.  The women who were not good at conning people all died and didn't pass on their genes.  

That's why the Jews - the most well-known scammers - score higher in linguistics than anyone.  It's not intelligence, it's just straight up mastery of fraud.  If a woman is talking to a man, generally she is trying to trick him into doing shit for her.  If that fails to work, or as a dual prong attack, she can also fall back onto portraying herself as a sex object then trying to extort the man for resources using that.  If it was up to me, I would ban women from wearing makeup and dressing like bimbos just because it's all part of sketchy con game to try and manipulate people and I'd force them to get by on more legit means.

[criptix]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

It's not men trying to exploit women, it's women trying to exploit men.  Women were never the breadwinners in evolution.  If men traditionally have the resources, the woman then evolves into trying to con the man into giving them up.  This is why women score better at linguistics than men and speak more words per day on average.  Linguistics is basically the art of manipulation and conning people.  The women who were not good at conning people all died and didn't pass on their genes.  

That's why the Jews - the most well-known scammers - score higher in linguistics than anyone.  It's not intelligence, it's just straight up mastery of fraud.  If a woman is talking to a man, generally she is trying to trick him into doing shit for her.  If that fails to work, or as a dual prong attack, she can also fall back onto portraying herself as a sex object then trying to extort the man for resources using that.  If it was up to me, I would ban women from wearing makeup and dressing like bimbos just because it's all part of sketchy con game to try and manipulate people and I'd force them to get by on more legit means.

Look roach, if you arent feeling good while getting scammed by such a girl:




you are retarded  


(this is just how nature works)

[Ludwig Von]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

It's not men trying to exploit women, it's women trying to exploit men.  Women were never the breadwinners in evolution.  If men traditionally have the resources, the woman then evolves into trying to con the man into giving them up.  This is why women score better at linguistics than men and speak more words per day on average.  Linguistics is basically the art of manipulation and conning people.  The women who were not good at conning people all died and didn't pass on their genes.  

That's why the Jews - the most well-known scammers - score higher in linguistics than anyone.  It's not intelligence, it's just straight up mastery of fraud.  If a woman is talking to a man, generally she is trying to trick him into doing shit for her.  If that fails to work, or as a dual prong attack, she can also fall back onto portraying herself as a sex object then trying to extort the man for resources using that.  If it was up to me, I would ban women from wearing makeup and dressing like bimbos just because it's all part of sketchy con game to try and manipulate people and I'd force them to get by on more legit means.

Roach, are you aware that you are using more words than anyone else (maybe except JJG Wink ) on this forum?   

[jonoiv]

Look.

We're now well into a 15-minute chart correction and the market is as calm as a sleeping baby. Not a hint of the panic of the last 48 hours.

That shows you. It was all market making by ultra-aggressive shorters. They had their covering level targeted the whole way down and once reached, left the building with their "winnings". That's why we got these pummelling dumps on the turnaround from the bounces on the way down.

I wouldn't be surprised if there's still a significant part of the market that's short and yet to cover.

I am 100% in agreement.

Bfxdata doesn't show long or short since 18th Jan.  Very strange!

https://www.bfxdata.com/positions/btcusd

[sirazimuth]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

<Snip >typical nonsensical drivel

Roach, are you aware that you are using more words than anyone else (maybe except JJG Wink ) on this forum?   

So why quote?

[realr0ach]

Probably your last chance as I guess they will ban cheerleaders altogether as they are so incredibly offensive like the F1 pit girls according to maniac uber liberals.
I mean it's not as if sex helped anyone to get here in the first place, right?

It's not men trying to exploit women, it's women trying to exploit men.  Women were never the breadwinners in evolution.  If men traditionally have the resources, the woman then evolves into trying to con the man into giving them up.  This is why women score better at linguistics than men and speak more words per day on average.  Linguistics is basically the art of manipulation and conning people.  The women who were not good at conning people all died and didn't pass on their genes.  

That's why the Jews - the most well-known scammers - score higher in linguistics than anyone.  It's not intelligence, it's just straight up mastery of fraud.  If a woman is talking to a man, generally she is trying to trick him into doing shit for her.  If that fails to work, or as a dual prong attack, she can also fall back onto portraying herself as a sex object then trying to extort the man for resources using that.  If it was up to me, I would ban women from wearing makeup and dressing like bimbos just because it's all part of sketchy con game to try and manipulate people and I'd force them to get by on more legit means.

Look roach, if you arent feeling good while getting scammed by such a girl:

The shelf life on that girl is like 5 years, 20-25, and then what are you supposed to do with them?  Men age like fucking uranium and women age like bread.  You can't have these nutcases roaming around thinking they're going to be scamming people for shit at age 50.  Better to ban them from becoming bimbos in the first place.  White sharia law.

[Ibian]

Roach has neither money nor charisma. No wonder he spends all day ranting on the internets.

That said, he is strictly speaking correct. Women do use words and sex to get resources from men. Just as men use resources to get sex and flattery from women. It's a mutually beneficial trade.

He is also, of course, correct about the jews. They do have the highest IQ in the world, especially verbal IQ. This does not need to be contested, anyone can look it up.

[Toxic2040]

+1 WOsM for compelling imagery.

Look roach, if you arent feeling good while getting scammed by such a girl:




you are retarded  

(this is just how nature works)

+1 WOsM for compelling imagery.

[pera]

This fuckers right here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-02/bofa-to-decline-all-cryptocurrency-transactions-on-credit-cards

[SecondLeoTheSecond]

This fuckers right here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-02/bofa-to-decline-all-cryptocurrency-transactions-on-credit-cards

Understandable move and might turn out to be good in the mid-term (in a non-speculative way)