Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2019, 08:55:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 28:
$0 - 5 (2.9%)
<$7,000 - 4 (2.3%)
$7,000-$7,499 - 0 (0%)
$7,500-$7,999 - 0 (0%)
$8,000-$8,499 - 1 (0.6%)
$8,500-$8,999 - 3 (1.8%)
$9,000-$9,499 - 4 (2.3%)
$9,500-$9,999 - 27 (15.8%)
$10,000-$10,499 - 24 (14%)
$10,500-10,999 - 12 (7%)
$11,000-$11,499 - 14 (8.2%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 15 (8.8%)
>$12,000 - 48 (28.1%)
>$20,000 - 14 (8.2%)
Total Voters: 171

Pages: « 1 ... 20100 20101 20102 20103 20104 20105 20106 20107 20108 20109 20110 20111 20112 20113 20114 20115 20116 20117 20118 20119 20120 20121 20122 20123 20124 20125 20126 20127 20128 20129 20130 20131 20132 20133 20134 20135 20136 20137 20138 20139 20140 20141 20142 20143 20144 20145 20146 20147 20148 20149 [20150] 20151 20152 20153 20154 20155 20156 20157 20158 20159 20160 20161 20162 20163 20164 20165 20166 20167 20168 20169 20170 20171 20172 20173 20174 20175 20176 20177 20178 20179 20180 20181 20182 20183 20184 20185 20186 20187 20188 20189 20190 20191 20192 20193 20194 20195 20196 20197 20198 20199 20200 ... 24357 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21246863 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (66 posts by 16 users deleted.)
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1410


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 11:59:27 AM

Dump because hit the bottom of the downtrend line (log scale).

Mine RVN and with 0% mining fees and get paid in BTC, ETH, XMR or RVN.

www.cudominer.com Get Cudo Miner
Auto coin switching, third-party miners, overclocking and remote management (Win/Linux)
Run from a USB stick or install from an ISO image (Linux)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1561582538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561582538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561582538
Reply with quote  #2

1561582538
Report to moderator
Colonel Panic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 26


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 11:59:41 AM

The argument for taint and title is strong
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/making-bitcoin-legal.pdf
The authors don't detail much experimental evidence about their new taint model (basically FIFO accounting for taint), but they do offer a couple of numbers which, if supported by more testing, would be quite impressive. At any rate, there's ample food for thought.

If the legislative landscape they hint at really comes into being, I don't know where I'd stand on the line between "hard" and "soft" approaches. Bitcoin enthusiasts? Investors? Law enforcement? All of these positions would entail both "good" and "bad" practical consequences from my self-interested point of view.

Nice piece of work. Computer scientists discussing legal implications with a practical, technically sound background. A rarity.

Tasty find merited.



One of the problems with such a 'taint' system that it doesn't address, is what of coins falsely declared stolen? In the paper they seem to assume all such declarations to be honest, but in practice it just moves the arguments to the lawyer-enriching 'how to get these coins declared stolen or not' level.
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1947


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:08:04 PM

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:08:43 PM

Why do so many here fail to see the significance of this chart?
 Huh

https://i62.servimg.com/u/f62/16/11/23/28/dump11.png

Why are you not intelligent enough to know the significance of what you posted?  The caption on your picture claims they took control of the market right when the CME opened their doors and then crashed it into the ground.  BZZZT WRONG ANSWER.  They did not magically gain control of the market when the CME that nobody even trades on opened.  They already controlled the market beforehand and were the ones who pumped it then dumped it in the first place.

They were on both sides of the trade.  While you were typing "bitcoin is the new internets of money!!111", they were typing "wow, these guys are fucking delusional idiots - the perfect targets to fleece".

Next you'll be telling me the gold and silver prices are not manipulated.
 Roll Eyes

Everything is manipulated by the (((money changers))).  They have a partnership amongst their roundtable groups like the CFR filled with Hebrew usurers and corporate CEOs to permanently rig markets and make it so they cannot lose.  This is the real reason why the insanely rich keep getting more insanely rich recently, otherwise they would make a bad choice and eventually wipe themselves out.

This is why people like Hillary Clinton impossibly turn $1000 into $100,000 trading pork futures in one day.  However, the markets are predictable to the extent that these movements all require accumulation periods, so any market you look at at any given time is in one of three stages:  blowoff top, crashing, or sitting at the trough in accumulation mode.
kurious
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1246



View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:12:10 PM

Why do so many here fail to see the significance of this chart?
 Huh




The chart of the historic downturn in prices is significant and 'many' here have indeed been through every day of it.

Many, however, will not agree with why the near-exponential rise of Bitcoin in 2017 ended and reversed.   Perhaps because correlation is not always evidence of causation.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:26:42 PM

cofefeGandalf
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:28:58 PM



Dummass enterprise, that's the wrong direction!
d_eddie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 607



View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:30:54 PM

The argument for taint and title is strong
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/making-bitcoin-legal.pdf
The authors don't detail much experimental evidence about their new taint model (basically FIFO accounting for taint), but they do offer a couple of numbers which, if supported by more testing, would be quite impressive. At any rate, there's ample food for thought.

If the legislative landscape they hint at really comes into being, I don't know where I'd stand on the line between "hard" and "soft" approaches. Bitcoin enthusiasts? Investors? Law enforcement? All of these positions would entail both "good" and "bad" practical consequences from my self-interested point of view.

Nice piece of work. Computer scientists discussing legal implications with a practical, technically sound background. A rarity.

Tasty find merited.

One of the problems with such a 'taint' system that it doesn't address, is what of coins falsely declared stolen? In the paper they seem to assume all such declarations to be honest, but in practice it just moves the arguments to the lawyer-enriching 'how to get these coins declared stolen or not' level.

Hm, I hadn't thought of that.

Can you name a scenario where the game of falsely reporting a crime ("someone stole my coins!") has a positive probabilistic sum? Penalties can be harsh, and partners in crime won't be happy to see their newly tainted coins decrease in value.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:35:11 PM

B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 266

1 btc = 1 btc


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:52:35 PM

I have found a way to get lambos (s, for more than one) but it's quite disgusting... do you wanna know more?
RayX12
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 552


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:53:00 PM

Why Why Why ... so much manipulation?  Shocked

Vlada69
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 5

In Kano we trust


View Profile WWW
April 09, 2018, 12:58:06 PM

Why Why Why ... so much manipulation?  Shocked


Coz those same whales wants you to quit.
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 266

1 btc = 1 btc


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:58:33 PM

Why Why Why ... so much manipulation?  Shocked


you just have to fuck her...



her daddy is a son of a bitch but he has a lot of money and will make your lambos rich... but he has too a lot of enemies...

Cheesy.

have a nice day.
pacman7331
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 66

Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:01:49 PM

OK I blame my loss on TradingView.com.

I was looking at the Daily RSI today and it showed it was ABOVE 40 at about 42.

NOW I look at it after the dump and it shows we NEVER went above 40 and bounced off it instead. So that means the RSI on Trading view is dishonest.

If I had pictures of the RSI earlier today I could prove that. But I know what I saw.
I was never going to go long if the RSI bounced off 40.. It was above 40.
I don't watch it all day, but once it's above 40 the only way to get back below it is to have it fall below.

WTF TRADINGVIEW.COM?!?  Huh
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1501



View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:09:41 PM

Why Why Why ... so much manipulation?  Shocked

The price action can be so cruel and mean sometimes.

Whales are such meanies!  Angry

pacman7331
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 66

Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:17:07 PM

It dropped because the goddamn RSI bounced off 40... but this morning it was above fucking 40. I even posted about it. Fucking tradingview RSI indicator on the daily was telling a lie.
Lontonbit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 108



View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:18:07 PM

welcome soros to the community, a beautiful red candle as a grand opening appearance!
pacman7331
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 66

Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:19:02 PM

Rsi pushing above 40 resistance. Looks bullish.

Now if you look at the RSI it shows it bounced off 40... HOW THE FUCK? THEY REDREW THE LINE IN THE PAST??  Huh Huh Huh Huh

ONCE THE LINE IS ABOVE 40 YOU CAN'T THEN MAKE IT GO BELOW IN THE PAST!

The Indicator must be averaging and redrawing after the fact. Thats totally crap.

I sent a message to Tradingview.com about this.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:20:15 PM

Could it be a Soroshort?
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1020


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:23:29 PM

Rsi pushing above 40 resistance. Looks bullish.

Now if you look at the RSI it shows it bounced off 40... HOW THE FUCK? THEY REDREW THE LINE IN THE PAST??  Huh Huh Huh Huh

ONCE THE LINE IS ABOVE 40 YOU CAN'T THEN MAKE IT GO BELOW IN THE PAST!

You realize these graphs are not carved in stone, they are just pixels on your screen?
Pages: « 1 ... 20100 20101 20102 20103 20104 20105 20106 20107 20108 20109 20110 20111 20112 20113 20114 20115 20116 20117 20118 20119 20120 20121 20122 20123 20124 20125 20126 20127 20128 20129 20130 20131 20132 20133 20134 20135 20136 20137 20138 20139 20140 20141 20142 20143 20144 20145 20146 20147 20148 20149 [20150] 20151 20152 20153 20154 20155 20156 20157 20158 20159 20160 20161 20162 20163 20164 20165 20166 20167 20168 20169 20170 20171 20172 20173 20174 20175 20176 20177 20178 20179 20180 20181 20182 20183 20184 20185 20186 20187 20188 20189 20190 20191 20192 20193 20194 20195 20196 20197 20198 20199 20200 ... 24357 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!