Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[HairyMaclairy]

Funny that you frame your number 4 in terms of a timeline rather than in terms of price points. I personally do not believe that you can predict bitcoin in terms of a timeline, even though there is some credence to some of the elliot wave concepts, but we have to see how each leg of any wave plays out.. which is not necessarily up, as you are implying.

I don’t believe in Elliott waves but do consider Bitcoin to have regular time rhythms on both a micro and macro level.

[Icygreen]

I see green! More green!

Oh yeah! Icygreen 

[d_eddie]

(snip)
(snip), a legend with 49/470 merit earned against 203/414. Over 4 times as much. Theymos's new ranking system indeed provides more useful information than the old. And prompt scouting is available, anyway.

Hey, mighty Theymos, do you hear us? We need more statistics, like "Imagination", "Magic Dust" or "Emep", which might stand for "Earned Merit per Eligible Post (ratio)".

What's your denominator there? EMEP's 'per eligible post' might maybe be better.

Maybe by "Eligible post" I meant "Activity since the Merit System" rather than "Actual posts since the Merit System". The second quantity isn't available anyway. I haven't refined the idea too much, actually. I might get lucky in Meta (I threw it there, too).
Thanks for the bug hunting.

I did get lucky in the Meta thread. Theymos replied and he's open to suggestions. No promises, but an explicit formula with few inputs is preferred.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3380469.msg35435886#msg35435886

[Last of the V8s]

I did get lucky

More like deserved recognition is what you got. And you were seniorified for the effort. Congratulations.

[d_eddie]

Anyway I'm getting really tired of this and really annoyed that there isn't one single person to step forward to say that they understand what I mean. Even though I really do believe in what I am saying and I think that I have good arguments behind it even I am starting to feel like a troll at this point. So I think I am going to disengage from this pursuit.

Disengage from Nazi noise too, and you could find even more respect.

[Last of the V8s]

[bitcoinPsycho]

to the button mooooooooon BTC

[Torque]

Sarcasm or reverse psychology? Lol

[samson]

Seems to be a bit of a breakout, $9400 in on BitFinex

[Totscha]

Sarcasm or reverse psychology? Lol

European, it's sarcasm.

[Icygreen]

Sarcasm or reverse psychology? Lol

Both 

[jojo69]

The inevitable EOS crash will be one of the most satisfying to watch ...

oh god...please

[dimitriaustralia]

The tweet that got a low activity new twitter account permanently suspended.
http://www.bitcoinb.io/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/tweet-that-got-account-permanently-suspended.png

[bakasabo]

It seems we got stumbled on bears. Binance 10min ago...
Seems that it will be hard to get to 10k $ today/this week

[Totscha]

The tweet that got a low activity new twitter account permanently suspended.

IMHO every account with such an amount of hashtags in a single tweet should be permabanned. Good riddance!

[Ibian]

Anyway I'm getting really tired of this and really annoyed that there isn't one single person to step forward to say that they understand what I mean. Even though I really do believe in what I am saying and I think that I have good arguments behind it even I am starting to feel like a troll at this point. So I think I am going to disengage from this pursuit.

Disengage from Nazi noise too, and you could find even more respect.

Hitler did nothing wrong.

[infofront]

Didn't you know this is the Wall Observer Maximalist thread.

I know exactly what you mean but risk being shouted at to say that here 

On the date of the bitcoin cash fork. Bitcoin core forked too didn't they? That was when segwit was activated. The original bitcoin in reality is an etheric and ambigous thing which probably no longer exists. The real shit slinging match is over the brand.

"Wall Observer BTC/USD"
You may be confused by /r/btc, but BTC is Bitcoin. You're more than welcome to create a Bcash or Bitcoin Pizza Wall Observer thread in the altcoin section.

As far as the "original" Bitcoin, I'm sure you can find a copy of Satoshi's original software release from 2009, but you're going to be the only one running it. And you'd be missing out on some amazing new features, which have allowed Bitcoin to scale relatively well without increasing the blocksize or increasing centralization.

[infofront]

Anyway I'm getting really tired of this and really annoyed that there isn't one single person to step forward to say that they understand what I mean. Even though I really do believe in what I am saying and I think that I have good arguments behind it even I am starting to feel like a troll at this point. So I think I am going to disengage from this pursuit.

It's difficult to have an objective discussion on this topic, as you can tell by the visceral, emotionally charged posts. I like to think I'm pretty objective and level headed, but sometimes I lose my shit over Bcash too.

Consensus decides what Bitcoin is. If, sometime in the future, consensus dictates that Bcash is the real Bitcoin, I would acknowledge that. However, I'd also acknowledge that Bitcoin has failed, and I would disengage from the space altogether, and focus on Monero or something.

[Torque]

Didn't you know this is the Wall Observer Maximalist thread.

I know exactly what you mean but risk being shouted at to say that here  

On the date of the bitcoin cash fork. Bitcoin core forked too didn't they? That was when segwit was activated. The original bitcoin in reality is an etheric and ambigous thing which probably no longer exists. The real shit slinging match is over the brand.

"Wall Observer BTC/USD"
You may be confused by /r/btc, but BTC is Bitcoin. You're more than welcome to create a Bcash or Bitcoin Pizza Wall Observer thread in the altcoin section.

As far as the "original" Bitcoin, I'm sure you can find a copy of Satoshi's original software release from 2009, but you're going to be the only one running it. And you'd be missing out on some amazing new features, which have allowed Bitcoin to scale relatively well without increasing the blocksize or increasing centralization.

I would still like to see any of these supposed non-'Bitcoin Maximalists' dispute or debate, either logically, philosophically or otherwise, the statement I made just earlier today. When confronted with the undeniable truth, they just tuck their tail and run away.

The "real Bitcoin" is the one that the majority of end users agree on through belief and mutual consensus of Bitcoin's fundamental attributes and philosophical values.

That's it. Period. The majority of end users decides. It literally is a popularity contest.

It has nothing to do with what Ver thinks, what miners think, what brokers/exchanges think, what developers think, what features, which has the biggest block size or fastest transactions, which was "first", which one "closest to Satoshi's original vision", which is objectively "better", or better for humanity, better for the planet/ecosystem, or any of that other garbage.

Consensus decides what Bitcoin is. If, sometime in the future, consensus dictates that Bcash is the real Bitcoin, I would acknowledge that. However, I'd also acknowledge that Bitcoin has failed, and I would disengage from the space altogether, and focus on Monero or something.

Exactly this. +1000.

[El duderino_]

I am emotionally ready for $9300.

how are youre emotions for +10k ?
ready as well ?