Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[infofront]

Masterluc:

I adjusted 2nd trend line according to support/resistance levels.

I think price trace historical wave 4. Wave 5 top would be above $20k. Probably, even above $100k.

Price may start climbing 5th wave either right now or after doing another low - not less than $3300. Hitting lower zone would invalidate bullish long term count.

[explorer]

You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

Rightly what? Illegal opinions? That's the last stage of cucked.

It's a female.  Don't bother.  Women are large children that are not capable of logic and reason.  Through the course of human evolution, 99.9% of the time women are 100% incapable of surviving on their own.  They were never good at resource gathering or trying to compete against men as a group, while their brains also demand hypergamy - meaning they want someone else to provide for them anyway.  Due to these circumstances, it's FAR MORE detrimental for a woman to be ostricized from her tribe/group/whatever than for a man, who is far more self sufficient.  

This means the female brain is incapable of doing anything besides trying to adhere to whatever they perceive popular opinion is, because they don't want to be ostricized from the group at any cost since it's death for them and their desired way of life.  This moronic female in question perceives the (((media's))) constant spam of cultural Marxism as being the social norm, even though it's not, so that's what she's going to try and adhere to.  If she believed Nazism was the popular opinion of the day, then she would be a Nazi instead.  

Women don't have any type of ideals or anything like that.  They're just mindless hedonists that adapt to whatever they think gives the best benefits for them and their offspring.  The so called "women's empowerment" movement simply means empowering whatever propaganda is put out by the state and media because that's what women are going to adhere to, just like the bumper sticker "support our troops" really means "support your tyrannical govt" and has zero to do with troops.

What you describe are sheep.  Average People.  Not necessarily women.  You should talk to [be destroyed by] some of the women in my family/circle.  Not that I'd introduce you.

[realr0ach]

You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

Rightly what? Illegal opinions? That's the last stage of cucked.

It's a female.  Don't bother.  Women are large children that are not capable of logic and reason.  Through the course of human evolution, 99.9% of the time women are 100% incapable of surviving on their own.  They were never good at resource gathering or trying to compete against men as a group, while their brains also demand hypergamy - meaning they want someone else to provide for them anyway.  Due to these circumstances, it's FAR MORE detrimental for a woman to be ostricized from her tribe/group/whatever than for a man, who is far more self sufficient.  

This means the female brain is incapable of doing anything besides trying to adhere to whatever they perceive popular opinion is, because they don't want to be ostricized from the group at any cost since it's death for them and their desired way of life.  This moronic female in question perceives the (((media's))) constant spam of cultural Marxism as being the social norm, even though it's not, so that's what she's going to try and adhere to.  If she believed Nazism was the popular opinion of the day, then she would be a Nazi instead.  

Women don't have any type of ideals or anything like that.  They're just mindless hedonists that adapt to whatever they think gives the best benefits for them and their offspring.  The so called "women's empowerment" movement simply means empowering whatever propaganda is put out by the state and media because that's what women are going to adhere to, just like the bumper sticker "support our troops" really means "support your tyrannical govt" and has zero to do with troops.

What you describe are sheep.  Average People.  Not necessarily women.  You should talk to [be destroyed by] some of the women in my family/circle.  Not that I'd introduce you.

Bullshit.  Nature always overrides nurture, and women are defacto socialists by their biology.  If a woman claims to be a "traditional conservative woman", it simply means they want a man to worship them and provide for them.  As opposed to some new age freak, leftist woman that wants the govt to be their metaphorical husband and provider - an unwilling coalition of the aggregate of all men.  

Women can not be allowed to have any input in any type of decision making.  Since women value security over freedom, and demand hypergamy, how it works out in the end is them always trying to create some type of socialist dystopia solely to benefit themselves with zero regards to how it affects anything else.  The weak and unproductive trying to enslave the strong and productive in other words.  This is the real Atlas Shrugged, not Ayn Rand's bullshit writings.

Hypergamy means women are somewhat sociopathic in regards to the feelings of men.  They do not care about ideas such as impartiality, fairness, or the golden rule.  They only care about trying to set up the most hedonistic, lopsided, broken system to benefit themselves that would just collapse anyway.  It's not a coincidence things like republics were invented by >100 IQ white men.  Such systems are completely alien to women and incompatible with their desires, which is why if women were allowed to vote, they would instantly destroy them.

[infofront]

Ain't it funny what you can get away with saying when you're a sassy fag tho.

Being rich, gay, black, and mostly conservative has some absolutely fantastic privileges !  

You can screw guys in a lambo while eating watermelon and fried chicken.
Then feel guilty about it later. 

[Arriemoller]

And if you complain about migrants on facebook or twitter, you go to jail. At least in germany and england, same pattern everywhere, just a matter of degrees.

Slight exaggeration. If true, the 51.9% of UK population who voted for Brexit primarily due to immigration concerns would be in jail.  You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

In other news....it's a sea of green in cryptoland  

The problem is the word 'racism' has been changing definitions at least colloquially.

Where it used to mean the belief that one race is superior to another, it now includes people making racial stereotypes.

Plus why on earth should racism be illegal?  A belief should not be illegal.  Acts should be.

OK, let's try and make this a little bit clearer. Racism is not illegal in Europe, saying racist stuff is not illegal in Europe, but spreading racist stuff to a wider audience is. So it's not the idea that's outlawed, it's the spreading of the idea. Is this wrong? Hell yes, all ideas must be allowed to be spread if you want to call yourself a democratic country.

Arrie that’s just bullshit.  Off the top of my head, there are all sorts of limits on the free spread of ideas:

*employee confidentiality agreements

*official secrets acts

*intellectual property law

*export controls on dual use software

*prohibited pornographic material

*conspiracy to commit terrorist acts

*prohitions on making bomb threats

*prohibtions on making death threats to public officials

You cannot say that you don’t live in a democratic society just becaus you have one or more of the above limitations on free speech. Inciting racial hatred is just another category of speech subject to limitations.  

With the possible exception of pornography your examples are not examples of what is traditionally seen as infringements of free speech.

Furthermore, the law is very vague and is used to try to stop political opponents from airing their opinion.

Said by Justice Neil Gorsuch in Sessions v. Dimaya.
"Vague laws invite arbitrary power. Before the (American) Revolu­tion, the crime of treason in English law was so capa­ ciously construed that the mere expression of disfavored opinions could invite transportation or death."
The same applies to anti racism laws in Europe today. (Well, not death or transportation (yet))

[realr0ach]

Masterluc:

The current bear market looks to have interesting effects on the ASIC industry.  If it gets pump and dumped (like it just did to $20k for no reason), you have situations where there's a glut of huge amounts of mining units all with the same hardware and costs of production far above that $3k level it will likely crash to.  It then turns into a game of chicken to see who is the last to turn off their unprofitable miners.  You could view this as a cyclical culling of the inefficient in the space, but in reality, it will either just consolidate more power into a single monopoly by removing all competitors, or just bankrupt them all.

[jbreher]

Racism is illegal? Despite our problems, I'm often glad I live in America, where at least we have truly free speech.

Whoa there, little buddy - I think you've overshot the mark.

agree with jbreher that you are way out of line.
 there is a very interesting "debate" going on in Australia at the moment where a famous sports player has said because of his religious beliefs he must speak out about homosexuals and how bad they are. Those with much saner minds have pushed back at what he has said including the top referee who is openly gay.  You cannot be racist or anything else just on the grounds that you can say things because you have the right to free speech. What you say should have consequences. There is a famous saying that Kennedy used and I am sure he was a very patriotic President and a supporter of free speech in America. " The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

Thanks, but... You seem to be agreeing with me without understanding my point. Which is: that there are very real limitations upon free speech in America which disqualifies it as 'truly free speech'.

As exhibit A, I give you: National Security Letters

[jbreher]

There a couple of possibilities here.  

We either have a minimum standard of behaviour (no genocide allowed) or we can fork the thread.  I don’t doubt our good moderator has the best of intentions but it is embarrassing to be associated with some of this stuff, even if only anonymously.  Ain’t nobody got time for Stormfront Word Salad. 

[realr0ach]

There a couple of possibilities here.  

We either have a minimum standard of behaviour (no genocide allowed) or we can fork the thread.  I don’t doubt our good moderator has the best of intentions but it is embarrassing to be associated with some of this stuff, even if only anonymously.  Ain’t nobody got time for Stormfront Word Salad.  

You got it backwards.  Nobody has time for your (((Marxist))) pro-white genocide propaganda.  You want to censor because you always lose in the realm of debate.  It's unfortunate for you that cultural Marxism has tried to portray itself as the norm - the state, so Nazism is essentially the new counter culture.  Nazi Woodstock imminent.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV6wm6LARVU

[d_eddie]

Come on, someone post some classic TA, please. This kind of OT is distracting, irritating and plain disgusting.

[bitserve]

Racial differences, the basic cliffnotes version:

Whities are pretty smart. We have good IQ.
Hispanics have lower IQ than whities.
Black americans lower.
African africans even lower on account of not being contaminated with white blood.
Certain asian countries have higher IQ than uses, especially china and japan.
Jews have the highest IQ of all.

IQ correlates with lifetime earning potential. That is, jews own a highly disproportionate amount of all the wealth in the world. Blacks will always be poor.

In addition different races are better at certain things than others. For example, the fastest olympic runners are mostly black. Comes from running from lions and after gazelles. Chinks are smarter than whites, but less creative. And asians have faster reflexes than the rest of us.

There is no controversy over any of this among professionals, it's all pure biology. There are evolutionary explanations for all of it and it can all be measured. And yet it is called racist and if I had a normal people job this post could get me fired. If I was german or british I could be jailed for it.

I am not sure if you are right or not... but... I think it is not very smart to SAY all that... more so if you don't refer to the scientific studies where all that is proved beyond any possible doubt. Yes, in some countries it could even be considered racist speech. Not that I fucking care, but I don't know the need of doing it.

[JayJuanGee]

Of course r0ach is on to me now. I always feared this day would come.

You're not really qualified to be here. Are you?

Rosewater F... fits right in... just a bit sensitive, from time to time.

[bitserve]

I have some internal conflict here... I have ALWAYS been pro free speech, but this racist shit is getting, at the very least, too much in every sense. I don't even fucking understand what's the point of it beyond just pissing people. I don't like it. No.

[andreibi]

It is clear as day that #bitcoin needs to break out past above the daily ichimoku cloud to confirm a trend reversal.



3 DAY: Bulls have less than 19 hours to push the price above $7928 to prevent a bearish railway track pattern or else the price slumps to $7400.

[jojo69]

oh no

less than 19 hours or the railroad tracks?

don't throw me in that briar patch

[JayJuanGee]

Bitcoin has been fluctuating near 8k for a past few days. It was similar last year around November when the price was fluctuating from 6k to 9k and then it boosted up to 19 k in the next month.
This is the chart of a few days-

This is the complete year's chart-

Yeah... but we still need context...

The context of today if quite different from the context of November 2017...

And, I recall August to 2017 to January 2018... had a real lot of action.. of course, Mid-August to Mid-December was mostly the UPs out pacing the DOWNS...

Sure, we could reverse (and head up), here, but even a reversal here is a different kind of dynamic, as compared with what was going on in November 2017..

[realr0ach]

This kind of OT is distracting, irritating and plain disgusting.

Captain's log - supplemental:  Random noobs on bitcoin forum disagree that Nazism is the future and a thousand year physical silver reich will reign.

[JayJuanGee]

Me reading the last ten(s) pages of WO:
....

Seriously, why so many trolls are posting here garbage? Can't you find your forum or what?

Agreed, so much shit being spewed on here.  I'm guessing mostly teenagers who live in a basement and think they have a handle on geopolitics. At least the trolls of the past used to be entertaining. I'm out of here for a few months.  Have fun arguing with each other about Russia and anything other than the BTC price.  Adios.

Sometimes, the trolls are funny retrospectively, but frequently, they are not funny while in the midst of the matter... take notlambchop, for example.... S/he/it... was annoying as fuck.. and sure, some funny mixed in there, but the annoying considerably outweighed the funny... but in retrospect, we can go back and find a lot of his/her/its annoying funny posts.

[JayJuanGee]

There a couple of possibilities here.  

We either have a minimum standard of behaviour (no genocide allowed) or we can fork the thread.  I don’t doubt our good moderator has the best of intentions but it is embarrassing to be associated with some of this stuff, even if only anonymously.  Ain’t nobody got time for Stormfront Word Salad.  

You seem to be letting them get to you.

Moderator (thread owner) seems to have a way more liberal non-deletion policy than many would prefer, but I think that he is living up to what he said that he would do, and perhaps even better than expected... ... Yeah, of course a few deletions of posts, here and there would send a decent signal to some of the off-topic hate-speech, and I am sure that he does some of that, but for the most part, it is likely better to error on the side of non-deletion and each of us can decide the extent to which we partake or even acknowledge the nonsense...

And, by the way, regarding price... not a whole hell-of-a-lot of action there, recently..... price explosion imminent?  Up, down  or sideways... ?

Edit:  Half an hour later... we looking like the start of a little bit of UP?  Would be nice to see another $1k up... .. which would start to get some juices flowing, no?

[HairyMaclairy]

We are close enough to the downtrend line that sideways is bullish.  We need to be losing at least $100 a day to sustain the bear narrative.

It’s hard and dangerous work, those bears aren’t going to feed themselves.