Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/WhalePanda/status/1021477834236342274
It didn't take long... there are now multiple assassination markets live on @AugurProject. (not posting a screenshot/link for obvious reasons) $REP $ETH
...including 2 for Trump apparently

[1686362503]

1686362503

[1686362503]

1686362503

[1686362503]

1686362503

[1686362503]

1686362503

[1686362503]

1686362503

[JayJuanGee]

big movement soon? It looks like something is around the corner

good timing !

Yes.. you already admitted that you are full of hope for $3k to $4k BTC prices.  Good luck with that ongoing hope..    

Hopefully (speaking of hope), you are not dumb enough to be betting more than 50% of your BTC on such an event that seems to be less than 50% of happening, but you talk about as if it were a certainty... just like when you were 1) talking about sub-$100 prices in around early 2016 when we were in the $350 to $450 range, 2) talking about sub $500 prices when we were in the 890 correction of early 2017, and 3) talking about 3 digit prices in the summer of 2017 when we were in the $2ks...

Yes, every once in a while a stopped clock is correct, but you tend to be full of supposed inevitable bearish corrections that never take place and would cause folks to be largely without BTC if they were to be gambling based on your ongoing wrong BTC prognoses.

Nothing too exciting yet although volatility is up

currently at the 38.2% fib retracement from the 9950 peak at 7370.   Bearish enguling on the 1 2 4 and 6 hours, and a doji on the 12h.  

What are your thoughts?

Thoughts are that you are full of hopium.   

[Heater]

This is insane

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/07/22/millions-dollars-sent-ponzi-like-ethereum-smart-contract-game-might-never-end

[Rosewater Foundation]

https://twitter.com/WhalePanda/status/1021477834236342274
It didn't take long... there are now multiple assassination markets live on @AugurProject. (not posting a screenshot/link for obvious reasons) $REP $ETH
...including 2 for Trump apparently

Seems to me there was an original assassination market with a bounty for Obama. For some reason this idea won't fly.

[infofront]

This is insane

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/07/22/millions-dollars-sent-ponzi-like-ethereum-smart-contract-game-might-never-end

A ponzi scheme on the Eth blockchain? I don't believe that for one second.

[V1lpu]

Altcoiners right now:

[JayJuanGee]

I believe the Daily Stormer has a comments section you might find more to your satisfaction.

Again, political mud slinging is not useful. Debunk my argument. Are womenless men not more violent and aggressive than womened men? This is not a matter of opinion, it's an observable fact. Unless you know something I don't, in which case don't be selfish and share with the class.

Are most of them not muslims? What do their doctrine teach? Does life not want to reproduce? And on and on. Get to work.

It sounds reasonable that men who do not have women are likely more violent and more socially inept that men who have relationships with women, but so fucking what?  What does that have to do with bitcoin?  Furthermore, what is the reason for your muslim assertions, except perhaps to make claims that some societal arrangements have more dysfunctionalism within them in terms of a kind of lack of ease (and perhaps repression) in their men/women relationships.  We could study a large number of societies and find various dysfunctions based on their social imbalances, but again, does this relate to bitcoin?  Is bitcoin going to make this worse or better?   How are societies going to use bitcoin in such direction?  We have already seen decent evidence that bitcoin is a considerable potential disrupter on the personal financing level, so that is likely going to cause a lot of varied reactions in societies who attempt to still remain relevant along side bitcoin, which they are not going to be able to shut down on a long term basis.

[ThePunisher49X]

This is insane

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/07/22/millions-dollars-sent-ponzi-like-ethereum-smart-contract-game-might-never-end

A ponzi scheme on the Eth blockchain? I don't believe that for one second.

Just heard about this Ethereum ponzi scheme game.
They call it "weak hands" and the one who opts out sooner than the others lose.

The creators dont even try anymore to mask  what they are.

[JayJuanGee]

You're quite off topic.

Are sandwich wrappers really any more on topic?

Nope. Just sayin. Maybe I shouldn't have singled you out, since this thread is a sea of off-topic.

They say you're hardest on the ones you love.  

Nice of you to respond, but seems that you can wear two hats, if you wish.

Make all kinds of comments in the thread, and then make your administrative decisions whether to delete a post or two or a series of posts... If we did not have any of these various trite non-topical responses, I would actually be able to get something done in life, rather than reading and participating in this thread.

Perhaps there is some better ongoing running thread on anything bitcoin, but I have not seen it yet.  Anyone have a link to a bitcoin related thread that continues to run that is better than this one on a long term basis?

[Last of the V8s]

...
Anyone have a link to a bitcoin related thread that continues to run that is better than this one on a long term basis?

http://btcbase.org/log/

[Rosewater Foundation]

It sounds reasonable that men who do not have women are likely more violent

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/WhalePanda/status/1021477834236342274
It didn't take long... there are now multiple assassination markets live on @AugurProject. (not posting a screenshot/link for obvious reasons) $REP $ETH
...including 2 for Trump apparently

Seems to me there was an original assassination market with a bounty for Obama. For some reason this idea won't fly.

Aw go on, give it a shot. I mean a go.

[JayJuanGee]

It was a sell wall, only flashed for few seconds. Exactly 500 BTC on a single order.

It could mean anything.... and nothing.... Just saying.

*Most of the time* walls are there to be eaten.

Well, it could be a fake out, and also a kind of ploy (signal) to show that one of the bears is not running out of coins, yet, but whether s/he/it is willing to actually dump them remains a different question.  In some context, could be a sign of desperation to attempt to figure out if there are any other bears out there who have coins and who will perform similar flashes of coins.

[Last of the V8s]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMDZ5Nwk3rQ
I do love these guys.
I know - they are gayer than Mad Max meets Tina Turner, but I love them like bros

[JayJuanGee]

It sounds reasonable that men who do not have women are likely more violent

Surely, you are quoting me out of context a bit... but what I was attempting to say is that it seems to be a reasonable claim to make that the empirical evidence would largely support that men who are not socializing with women would have a tendency to be more violent... of course, you can find examples of men who purposefully seem to employ such practices, like monks, and those monks might show a relatively low level of violence...   

Anyhow, the truth of the matter about men and violence question was not as much my point as much as was my question regarding how such topic could be made to relate to bitcoin, and/or how the evolution of bitcoin could affect such asserted dynamics, assuming that the underlying factual assertions were true.

[Rosewater Foundation]

Surely, you are quoting me out of context a bit...

Maybe.

Aw go on, give it a shot. I mean a go.

Maybe. Let me consult my list... I mean, no. That's crazy talk!

[Last of the V8s]

[HairyMaclairy]

Lots of noise but not a huge amount of action.  We are still stuck very firmly behind the resistance lines. 



Interesting the yellow resistance line, which is a long standing support line before flipping to resistance, may be flipping to support again.  Which would be quite bullish to have an upward sloping support line. 

[HairyMaclairy]

It sounds reasonable that men who do not have women are likely more violent

Of course they are.  Al Quaeda and ISIS are predominantly made up of Muslim incels.  There's very little difference between your average Daily Stormer and Muslim extremist.  Loser males who can't get mates are violent and dangerous.  That's what makes the current Chinese demographics so dangerous for the Chinese Communist Party. 

[El duderino_]

Just saw AGAIN the Carlos matos bitconeeeeect.... how funny was that Guy