Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Cryptotourist]

^ Please don't feed the troll. Thanks. ^

I'll ignore him now.

edit:

[d_eddie]

....... the real value of the BTC is definitely BTC+BCH+BSV (+BTG and other offsprings), so they say, which is at least true for unclaimed coins mined before the chainsplit(s).......

Seems like a real erroneous way of thinking about these matters.

Who fucking cares if some coins share a transactional history with bitcoin?  It is nearly irrelevant.  It does not mean much if anything in terms of actual value.  We should have learned that, after the bcash fork.

I think @makrospex's assessment is correct.  Consider the difference in value between btc in addresses that haven't moved since before the bch fork and btc minted today.  You can still extract BCH, BSV, BTG, and so on from the former, but not from the latter.

Which of course doesn't imply bcash & co. are more than altcoins.

[VB1001]

Ha ha, I hear the hammer, it's on its way.

[VB1001]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

[d_eddie]

You must be a faggot, didn't you say when you first appeared, that the offer is on limited time, and once expired you would go - never to be seen again?

How are we supposed to trust you, you toothless faggot?
(don't get confident now, I was just making a point)

Hard sarcastic blow!
Toothless faggot delivers...


...better you-know-whats




#haiku

TL;DR Being toothless can be a selling point sometimes.

[d_eddie]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

I didn't merit you only because I'm short, and you're well above 1k already!

[d_eddie]

Who is US ? Your headmates ?

Or the United States (to inflate USD just a little bit more)? 

[VB1001]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

I didn't merit you only because I'm short, and you're well above 1k already!

lol, I explained myself badly, the first one who would have said that the WO symbol was in the picture, I, would have given him 1 sM.

[buyinbtc]

$100,000.00 per BTC ?
Keep day dreaming, you need US for that to happen !

Who is US ? Your headmates ?

Lol, can imagine his reaction to your comment being this:

[kurious]

From V8 (who is just being launched into cyberspace):

https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/former-cftc-chair-launches-the-digital-dollar-project.htm

[kurious]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  Relevant crypto women, on the other hand, are rare enough, so the two visible chicks made me curious. I wondered if they're just random bimbos with photoshopped bodies or actual significant voices in the choir.

From V8, somewhere out in the ether:


"The one on the left with no clothes on is Leah Wald
https://twitter.com/LeahWald

and the one in the yellow is Elizabeth Stark
https://twitter.com/starkness


Leah Wald (@LeahWald) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Leah Wald (@LeahWald). Entrepreneur x #Bitcoin Enthusiast | Co-founder of @Veterati | fmr Economist at @WorldBank | Writer for @Forbes | Partner at Lucid Investments. Singapore

elizabeth stark (@starkness) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from elizabeth stark (@starkness). big fan of the internet. like building things. cofounder @lightning labs, fellow @coincenter. taught @stanford + @yalelawtech. sf + brooklyn"

[Cryptotourist]

TL;DR Being toothless can be a selling point sometimes.

Yeah, so much for the toothbrush position.
I wonder if there's another urban sex act term, which defines the toothless situation of our cuntonian friend.

Epiphany! Sperm boarding.

[kurious]

Channeling one more from V8 (seems he can't do the WO with his space suit on):

https://static.bitwiseinvestments.com/Research/Bitwise-Research-ETF-Trends-2020.pdf

v bullish

"Among the surveyed advisors who have allocations to crypto in client portfolios, 42% intend to increase their clients’ allocation to crypto in the next 12 months, and 58% intend to hold that position steady. None of the advisors with positions today intend to decrease or eliminate their position in the next year."

[JayJuanGee]

Channeling one more from V8 (seems he can't do the WO with his space suit on):

https://static.bitwiseinvestments.com/Research/Bitwise-Research-ETF-Trends-2020.pdf

v bullish

"Among the surveyed advisors who have allocations to crypto in client portfolios, 42% intend to increase their clients’ allocation to crypto in the next 12 months, and 58% intend to hold that position steady. None of the advisors with positions today intend to decrease or eliminate their position in the next year."

I quickly glanced at that publication/survey.

My main criticism of the whole survey and approach would be its failure/refusal to distinguish bitcoin from crypto or at least define what the fuck is "crypto."  

So in some sense we don't really know what the fuck they are asking about in their survey questions, do we?  

Implicitly they are referring to bitcoin, but that surely seems a bit unclear from the wording of the vast majority of their questions.. with this amorphous concept of "crypto".

[rdbase]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  Relevant crypto women, on the other hand, are rare enough, so the two visible chicks made me curious. I wondered if they're just random bimbos with photoshopped bodies or actual significant voices in the choir.

From V8, somewhere out in the ether:


"The one on the left with no clothes on is Leah Wald
https://twitter.com/LeahWald

and the one in the yellow is Elizabeth Stark
https://twitter.com/starkness

Leah Wald (@LeahWald) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Leah Wald (@LeahWald). Entrepreneur x #Bitcoin Enthusiast | Co-founder of @Veterati | fmr Economist at @WorldBank | Writer for @Forbes | Partner at Lucid Investments. Singapore

elizabeth stark (@starkness) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from elizabeth stark (@starkness). big fan of the internet. like building things. cofounder @lightning labs, fellow @coincenter. taught @stanford + @yalelawtech. sf + brooklyn"

So this is a "Wheres waldo?" of the cryptoworld type meme. Very interesting now to look at it more in-depth.
Thanks!
I knew I merited it for some reason I didnt realize at the time other than for entertainment purposes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here). 

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

I didn't merit you only because I'm short, and you're well above 1k already!

I gave him 3.

[kurious]

Last one from V8, he's so far out into the asteroid belt, the signal is getting iffy:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/876

GitHubGitHub
Add bip-schnorr, bip-taproot, bip-tapscript by sipa · Pull Request #876 · bitcoin/bips
This adds the 3 BIPs that describe the consensus rules and (basic) wallet operation for the Taproot proposal (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-May/016914.html). There ha...


(Transmission ends).

[d_eddie]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  Relevant crypto women, on the other hand, are rare enough, so the two visible chicks made me curious. I wondered if they're just random bimbos with photoshopped bodies or actual significant voices in the choir.

From V8, somewhere out in the ether:


"The one on the left with no clothes on is Leah Wald
https://twitter.com/LeahWald

and the one in the yellow is Elizabeth Stark
https://twitter.com/starkness


Leah Wald (@LeahWald) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Leah Wald (@LeahWald). Entrepreneur x #Bitcoin Enthusiast | Co-founder of @Veterati | fmr Economist at @WorldBank | Writer for @Forbes | Partner at Lucid Investments. Singapore

elizabeth stark (@starkness) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from elizabeth stark (@starkness). big fan of the internet. like building things. cofounder @lightning labs, fellow @coincenter. taught @stanford + @yalelawtech. sf + brooklyn"

Thanks for the relaying, kurious. It seems V8 is able to deliver even from the asteroid belt.

[jojo69]

I'm sure he will get the big comm laser working soon enough.  Those Mormons thought of everything.

[buyinbtc]

Lol, monopoly is more accurate than I thought... They need to make a bitcoin/crypto edition too where bank is non existent in the game, I'm surprised they haven't come up with that yet

[fillippone]

Pretty accurate indeed.
Actually more accurate if not only banks could print notes out of thin air, but also tax players to finance herself.