Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[VB1001]

Have been asked to expand on this. While we have such limited data during the 2 full cycles thus far we've seen comparable $BTC performance in the 1,2, & 3 years pre-halving. Do we see similar performance yet again the year of and year post which would mean +100% performance? https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432 …

https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1213194896535891969

Although we will have difficult days, I think that every day, month, year, hodlers increase against weak hands and this is a clear sign of consolidation.

[1679798435]

1679798435

[1679798435]

1679798435

[jojo69]

back in a bit guys, it is make a log time

[Biodom]

Have been asked to expand on this. While we have such limited data during the 2 full cycles thus far we've seen comparable $BTC performance in the 1,2, & 3 years pre-halving. Do we see similar performance yet again the year of and year post which would mean +100% performance? https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432 …

https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1213194896535891969

Although we will have difficult days, I think that every day, month, year, hodlers increase against weak hands and this is a clear sign of consolidation.

I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.

[fillippone]

<...>

I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.

“Don’t trust, verify”

[VB1001]

<...>

I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.

“Don’t trust, verify”

https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432

Now I can't do the check, but I think it refers to this graph.

[bitserve]

It's almost funny how some days I decide to quietly contemplate and compare Bitcoin graphs in different timeframes, during hours, as if I was gonna see a signal/pattern that instantly enlightened my mind and everything were going to be crystal clear then.


Spoiler: Nope. Nothing. Again. Will just keep hodling and waiting. As always.

Don't abandon your quest.
Siddhartha had to sit under the bodhi tree seven weeks before he saw the signal that enlightened his mind.

Good one

I have checked your post history: You are funny, knowledgeable and seem to have been involved in crypto since 2013. (#nohomo)

Why do you not have a hat? You surely deserve one.

[realr0ach]

Hi Wall Observers,

Better late than never: ****** Happy new year, the best wishes and good health in 2020!! ******

xoxo Cryptoqueeen

This is why wahmen are banned from the forum.  We would be permanently knee deep in vapid, meaningless text like this resembling a last minute, gas station birthday or Christmas card written by a Chinese man then translated into English.  Sort of like JayJuanGee posts except shorter.

Wahmen are sort of low effort organisms in general.  Life takes the path of least resistance in evolutionary terms, so as long wahmen believe the sheer act of existing and being a 3/10 or higher makes them some sort of valuable resource, and loser men worship them for this fact and put them up on a pedestal, it's a system of positive reinforcement creating an endless assembly line of more bimbos.  Lauda - leader of the global, digital scamcoin movement - is probably around a 2/10, just under the 3/10 threshold for wahmen believing they're some sort of deity that should be worshipped instead of negative yielding assets, so her posts are much higher effort; but still, being a wahmen, completely terrible.

To top things off, the flooding of countries with 3rd world brown zombies amplifies this phenomenon exponentially higher.  Virtually nobody wants to invest in negative yielding assets (white women), and even less people want junk bonds (brown women).  So the demand that does exist is entirely for white bimbos.  Importing a bunch of brown zombies just lopsides the demand of white bimbos to be vastly higher than supply, making white bimbos think they're delusionally even more valuable and important than they already are.  It's a lose/lose scenario for everyone except bimbos whose relative worth skyrockets, until they hit their expiration date of 25.  Then the bimbos themselves lose because they irrationally thought their value was ridiculously higher than it really is and don't even know how to act at that point.

[Millionero]

It's almost funny how some days I decide to quietly contemplate and compare Bitcoin graphs in different timeframes, during hours, as if I was gonna see a signal/pattern that instantly enlightened my mind and everything were going to be crystal clear then.


Spoiler: Nope. Nothing. Again. Will just keep hodling and waiting. As always.

Don't abandon your quest.
Siddhartha had to sit under the bodhi tree seven weeks before he saw the signal that enlightened his mind.

Good one

I have checked your post history: You are funny, knowledgeable and seem to have been involved in crypto since 2013. (#nohomo)

Why do you not have a hat? You surely deserve one.

I'm phlattered.

back in a bit guys, it is make a log time

Pinch a loaf for Satoshi.

[makrospex]

Hi Wall Observers,

Better late than never: ****** Happy new year, the best wishes and good health in 2020!! ******

xoxo Cryptoqueeen

Again, a lot of

...vapid, meaningless text...

by some

...low effort organism  

in short:

...completely terrible.

(plus other hater shitpost blah)

I'd like to know your mum's opinion on this s*#t, honestly.
She must be very proud of her cute lil boy, no?

[spooderman]

You're implying that this would be high quality content in this thread if not for women.

 

[makrospex]

You're implying that this would be high quality content in this thread if not for women.

 

Nope, quoted CQ just for reference.
My reply was all about Roachies feminophobic shitpost content (which i edited out for your eyesight safety).

-------------

Chart view:
I expect 4H candle to become (and close in) green, and in turn, daily too.
The road for next pump should be paved then.

[whiteboy420]

BTC/USD
Long/Short Ratio
89:10
% of supply long:short
0.25:0.029
Long Daily Charge
$43,384
Short Daily Charge
0.19135 BTC
Total Long
45,584 ($336,779,150)
Funded Longs
$131,467,927
Total Short
5,314 ($39,260,363)
Funded Shorts
4,450 BTC


shorts gave up rather easily

marketmaker's actual geniuses for making everyone bullish at a lower low and lower high

run the fucking numbers

[realr0ach]

You're implying that this would be high quality content in this thread if not for women.

 

Virtually everyone in this thread is trolling except for me.

[El duderino_]

You're implying that this would be high quality content in this thread if not for women.

 

Virtually everyone in this thread is trolling except for me.

Haha what have ancient defeated nazi’s correlated with Wall Observing and BTC etc?

[nutildah]

Please don't engage the troll.

His power withers without your attention.

Our New Year's group resolution should be to stop responding to him altogether. When someone does respond, we should gently remind them of this policy.

Even if he does manage a sentence that is half coherent or relevant, please don't respond to that either, as he is only using it as a trick to draw you in for future trollery.

Don't know about you guys but I'd rather read a thousand posts about "stock-to-flow" than see one idi0t post quoted.

[Bossian]

Nice Article ´Falsifying the log growth model of Bitcoin value´

we encounter a good reason to take the log of the price — the span is much too broad.

Source: https://medium.com/@phraudsta/falsifying-the-log-growth-model-of-bitcoin-value-7db6ca3603f2?

Wondering if the correlation between stock to flow ratio and Bitcoin price is real or just coincidental.

An article https://coinrivet.com/fr/guides/cryptocurrencies/how-to-predict-bitcoins-future-value-using-the-stock-to-flow-model/ I don't see a price of 100k in 2021, for sure not... but in 2023 or 2024 why not? Market cap will need a massive boost and it will take years to reach 100k.
2020 still looks bearish for me but long term could be very profitable if we believe the stock to flow analysis.  

Also quite interesting, I like to check the betting odds, they are usually a good indicator for anything.
For this year's December 31 close price, we have the following:
$1000 - $4999.99  @ 3.3
$5000 - $7499.99  @ 3.6
$7500 - $9999.99  @ 5.2
Above $10000       @ 7.5
Not much belief for a bull year among the betting market. Would be curious to see the sources used by the bettors.

[realr0ach]

shorts gave up rather easily

Because Jew puppet Trump assassinated the top military leader of Iran - George Clooney.  And now the Jewish media is claiming Iran is going to "cyber attack the US financial system", aka Jews will stage a false flag and blow up the US financial system that was already about to blow up on it's own, then attempt to blame it on Iran to try and get goyim to go fight and die in a war entirely for Jews.  There's really no depths to the amount of lies and deceit in dealing with Jew scum.  Not even 99%, but 100.01% of everything they say is a lie.  There's some dude named 'Satan' known as "the father of lies".  Coincidence?

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Good morning WO!
Observing @ $7,346

Are we going bullish?

[dragonvslinux]

A decade of returns sorted by asset class (including BTC).
Thank you to http://www.offthechain.capital  for producing this chart.

https://twitter.com/BrianEstes32/status/1212843876337299463

So, btc was either first (by a mile) or dead last...You never know what you gonna get, but much better chance than even for btc outperformance (so far)

It looks like one think we're still guaranteed to get is volatility  
It's a nice table though, good perspective for 2020.

Good morning WO!
Observing @ $7,346

Are we going bullish?

Not yet.

[makrospex]

Good morning WO!
Observing @ $7,346

Are we going bullish?

As long as we stay below $8.200 in january, i'd be bearish (short term).