Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bones261]

By any rational standard, an organism that is incapable of reproducing has failed natural selection and is a genetic error...  

I would invite you to look into research on homosexuality in simian populations - the non-reproducing members contribute to the group in other ways, such as helping raise the young within the tribe, and resource gathering.

things like "SJW-ism" and liberalism - cancer cells attempting to attack the functional cells.

No argument with you there. Fuck everything about SJW-ism and liberalism.

I'm not even convinced that being gay or lesbian is genetic destiny. There have been studies with identical twins, and the correlation is far from the 100% expected if it were entirely genetic. This suggests that there are environment factors at work. Even if there were genes that increase the likelihood someone will turn out homosexual, this isn't necessarily an "error." The exact same genes could also enhance a person's ability to pass on the genes to the next generation,  either through a survival advantage or making them more attractive to the opposite sex.

[windjc]

By any rational standard, an organism that is incapable of reproducing has failed natural selection and is a genetic error...  

I would invite you to look into research on homosexuality in simian populations - the non-reproducing members contribute to the group in other ways, such as helping raise the young within the tribe, and resource gathering.

things like "SJW-ism" and liberalism - cancer cells attempting to attack the functional cells.

No argument with you there. Fuck everything about SJW-ism and liberalism.

I'm not even convinced that being gay or lesbian is genetic destiny. There have been studies with identical twins, and the correlation is far from the 100% expected if it were entirely genetic. This suggests that there are environment factors at work. Even if there were genes that increase the likelihood someone will turn out homosexual, this isn't necessarily an "error." The exact same genes could also enhance a person's ability to pass on the genes to the next generation,  either through a survival advantage or making them more attractive to the opposite sex.

Nothing like some closet homosexual conversation to bring in the new years!

[sirazimuth]

 MILF

oh now you hadda make me google that, eh?...
...ah ok,  stupid frikkin me..I shoulda known. I guess my interwebz acronym literacy is sadly lacking...

Hello sirazimuth?

Are you for real? 

You know that if you want to be "woke" to these kinds of terms, you gotta consume a bit more internet porn.  We are no longer in the 90s.


 

we're not in the nineties anymore?
oh shit, no wonder the dial up prodigy internet service on my netscape browser
is so slow. Guess I'll upgrade so I can get all those cool acronyms and porn.
Jeezus, I'm so behind the times....

[TERA2]

I thought homosexuality was epigenetic or something that happened while you were in the womb.

[bones261]

By any rational standard, an organism that is incapable of reproducing has failed natural selection and is a genetic error...  

I would invite you to look into research on homosexuality in simian populations - the non-reproducing members contribute to the group in other ways, such as helping raise the young within the tribe, and resource gathering.

things like "SJW-ism" and liberalism - cancer cells attempting to attack the functional cells.

No argument with you there. Fuck everything about SJW-ism and liberalism.

I'm not even convinced that being gay or lesbian is genetic destiny. There have been studies with identical twins, and the correlation is far from the 100% expected if it were entirely genetic. This suggests that there are environment factors at work. Even if there were genes that increase the likelihood someone will turn out homosexual, this isn't necessarily an "error." The exact same genes could also enhance a person's ability to pass on the genes to the next generation,  either through a survival advantage or making them more attractive to the opposite sex.

Nothing like some closet homosexual conversation to bring in the new years!

Neither BobLawblaw or I are in the closet.    However, throughout human history, many were. Most of these closeted individuals ended up getting married to the opposite sex and having offspring. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the reproductive systems of most gay and lesbian people. In fact, even in today's Western cultures, where the taboo of homosexual relations is beginning to wane, homosexuals are still reproducing offspring. Reproductive technology and alternative arrangements are being actively utilized.

[TERA2]

I dont like this latest daily candle for bears. It could mean we're going back up or that we need to bounce off of 16k again.

[bitserve]

Fucking genious!

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

WISHING YOU ALL 2018 BE EVEN BETTER THAN 2017!

[realr0ach]

By any rational standard, an organism that is incapable of reproducing has failed natural selection and is a genetic error...  

I would invite you to look into research on homosexuality in simian populations - the non-reproducing members contribute to the group in other ways, such as helping raise the young within the tribe, and resource gathering.

things like "SJW-ism" and liberalism - cancer cells attempting to attack the functional cells.

No argument with you there. Fuck everything about SJW-ism and liberalism.

That doesn't really counter my original point that if the super gay monkeys are not passing on their genetic material, in terms of evolution, everything they do in life is kind of null and void since they are not passing on those traits. It's not an insult to any particular group since it affects everyone, but if you are not passing on any genetic traits, you're a one-off or "error" in other words.  Humans are biologically K-selection apex predators, so the idea that they would purposelly invest massive time and resources on evolutionary dead ends is obviously invalid.

Things like lesbians have to be genetic errors in K-selection in other words.  They would go extinct overnight if lesbianism was not considered an error in K-selection.  Things like lesbianism can only exist or thrive in R-selection populations.  In K-selection, nobody can be dead weight.  In terms of genetic evolution, non-reproducing K-selection members are either errors, dead weight, or have failed the natural selection process from some other deficiency.  K-selection groups do not produce disposable cannon fodder worker ants, that's the definition of R-selection.

You could also make the case that some groups of humans actually do operate in R-selection mode by looking at birth rates of places like Africa, India, Mexico, etc.  If left unchecked, they will eventually flood into the K-selection territories, overwhelm their land and resources, and cause the K-selection groups to go extinct unless they wage war against them or build a wall around them.  Until Trump was elected, the entire political climate was K-selection Jews waging war against other K-selection groups like whites through subterfuge.  Now it has shifted to building a wall around R-selection populations which is the most humane solution in reality unless the R's want to die instead.

[Spaceman_Spiff_Original]

Happy New Year everyone !

[mymenace]

By any rational standard, an organism that is incapable of reproducing has failed natural selection and is a genetic error...  

I would invite you to look into research on homosexuality in simian populations - the non-reproducing members contribute to the group in other ways, such as helping raise the young within the tribe, and resource gathering.

things like "SJW-ism" and liberalism - cancer cells attempting to attack the functional cells.

No argument with you there. Fuck everything about SJW-ism and liberalism.

That doesn't really counter my original point that if the super gay monkeys are not passing on their genetic material, in terms of evolution, everything they do in life is kind of null and void since they are not passing on those traits. It's not an insult to any particular group since it affects everyone, but if you are not passing on any genetic traits, you're a one-off or "error" in other words.  Humans are biologically K-selection apex predators, so the idea that they would purposelly invest massive time and resources on evolutionary dead ends is obviously invalid.

Things like lesbians have to be genetic errors in K-selection in other words.  They would go extinct overnight if lesbianism was not considered an error in K-selection.  Things like lesbianism can only exist or thrive in R-selection populations.  In K-selection, nobody can be dead weight.  In terms of genetic evolution, non-reproducing K-selection members are either errors, dead weight, or have failed the natural selection process from some other deficiency.  K-selection groups do not produce disposable cannon fodder worker ants, that's the definition of R-selection.

You could also make the case that some groups of humans actually do operate in R-selection mode by looking at birth rates of places like Africa, India, Mexico, etc.  If left unchecked, they will eventually flood into the K-selection territories, overwhelm their land and resources, and cause the K-selection groups to go extinct unless they wage war against them or build a wall around them.  Until Trump was elected, the entire political climate was K-selection Jews waging war against other K-selection groups like whites through subterfuge.  Now it has shifted to building a wall around R-selection populations which is the most humane solution in reality unless the R's want to die instead.

oooohhh this is why the economy is shifting to africa, cannon fodder

[Arriemoller]

By any rational standard, an organism that is incapable of reproducing has failed natural selection and is a genetic error...  

I would invite you to look into research on homosexuality in simian populations - the non-reproducing members contribute to the group in other ways, such as helping raise the young within the tribe, and resource gathering.

things like "SJW-ism" and liberalism - cancer cells attempting to attack the functional cells.

No argument with you there. Fuck everything about SJW-ism and liberalism.

I'm not even convinced that being gay or lesbian is genetic destiny. There have been studies with identical twins, and the correlation is far from the 100% expected if it were entirely genetic. This suggests that there are environment factors at work. Even if there were genes that increase the likelihood someone will turn out homosexual, this isn't necessarily an "error." The exact same genes could also enhance a person's ability to pass on the genes to the next generation,  either through a survival advantage or making them more attractive to the opposite sex.

https://youtu.be/g0Tr_G5s6aM?t=487

[bones261]

https://youtu.be/g0Tr_G5s6aM?t=487

LOL. You would actually be surprised to know that a good protion of gay men have actually had sex with a women without having to go to such an extreme. Think there is absolutely no chance that your wife/gf could be unfaithful to you if she is hanging out with a gay man? Think again. 

[realr0ach]

https://youtu.be/g0Tr_G5s6aM?t=487

LOL. You would actually be surprised to know that a good protion of gay men have actually had sex with a women without having to go to such an extreme. Think there is absolutely no chance that your wife/gf could be unfaithful to you if she is hanging out with a gay man? Think again.  

We all know those type of people exist in abundance particularly for males and they're more full blown regression into animal-level, R-selection state that will have sex with anything that does or doesn't move rather than gay.  You see this type of thing in females much less often because women are inherently prostitutes seeking to exchange sex for some type of resources or escalation in status.  The woman is hard wired to try and extort people for some type of gain utilizing sex and if there is no gain to be had, they're not interested.  The word wife is a synonym for live-in prostitute.

[JayJuanGee]

Fuck games.

You disgruntled non-entrant... aka party pooper.

[JayJuanGee]

 MILF

oh now you hadda make me google that, eh?...
...ah ok,  stupid frikkin me..I shoulda known. I guess my interwebz acronym literacy is sadly lacking...

Hello sirazimuth?

Are you for real?  

You know that if you want to be "woke" to these kinds of terms, you gotta consume a bit more internet porn.  We are no longer in the 90s.


 

we're not in the nineties anymore?
oh shit, no wonder the dial up prodigy internet service on my netscape browser
is so slow. Guess I'll upgrade so I can get all those cool acronyms and porn.
Jeezus, I'm so behind the times....

Yep...

Buy some of dem coins too....

I think they be called bit something..... and get a hardware wallet, too - rather than the old fashion paper wallets.  

You will thank me later.  

[realr0ach]

2018 looking good so far



But wait, there's more

[HairyMaclairy]

Trying to trade these markets is like trying to trade a wet noodle.  The only volume is 2 bots fighting over $10.

[cAPSLOCK]

Will you have some patience? It looks like LN is coming soon enough.

Ramblings of a idiotic bigoted shithead deleted.

I am completely serious. The trees aren't letting you see the forest behind. Yes, LN in its first phase might introduce some sort of "centralization" in that a hub and spoke model will be easier, cheaper and faster to deploy. But:

1- We are talking about L2. I wouldn't have any problem in additional layers more or less de/centralised. You shouldn't too, as they are all optional... just additional layers!

2- That's just at its first stage. It won't be that hard to evolve into a more decentralized structure some time later.

3- Rerouting a big amount of tx's to those (maybe) more "centralised" layers will free up more "space" for direct blockchain tx's.

... And, above all, it will be the best digital payment system ever known to man... Invest now, wait for it, and then fucking sell all your BTC for more shiny metals if that's your thing. Do you have some ethical (or mental) problem getting profits for your investments? No wonder you hate Jews so much. They don't fucking care about all those irrelevant details.

Don't try to reason with that awful shithead.  Many of us have him on ignore.

[realr0ach]

Will you have some patience? It looks like LN is coming soon enough.

You cannot be serious.  Do you actually know what LN is?  I'll tell you what it is.  LN is nothing more than establishing bitcoin banks on top of the blockchain.  All of the exact same regulation traditional banks have will be applied to them and bitcoin will be virtually identical to your current banking system.  The only reason it hasn't happened yet is because it's too difficult for them to play whack-a-mole with regulating miners, but the LN "nodes" aka banks are less ambiguous in nature and will be regulated to infinity just like any normal financial services provider or bank.  

The costs, compliance, and amount of lawyers needed will be so high only entities like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs will run them.  This is how crony capitalism works.  You introduce regulation with compliance requirements and fees so high that only your existing monopoly can participate while all small competitors are eliminated.

Nevermind the fact LN doesn't function in a decentralized manner in the first place.  There is also ZERO incentive for LN nodes aka banks to broadcast transactions to external peers.  There is actually incentive for these bitcoin banks to FORCE a hub and spoke model or cartel collective in order to hold their users hostage for usury fees (just like regular banks do). There's also nothing that stops them from changing usage of bitcoin as settlement to ripple, US dollars, or anything else.  I wrote more on why LN is unworkable on the technical side here:

I am completely serious. The trees aren't letting you see the forest behind. Yes, LN in its first phase might introduce some sort of "centralization" in that a hub and spoke model will be easier, cheaper and faster to deploy. But:

1- We are talking about L2. I wouldn't have any problem in additional layers more or less de/centralised. You shouldn't too, as they are all optional... just additional layers!

2- That's just at its first stage. It won't be that hard to evolve into a more decentralized structure some time later.

3- Rerouting a big amount of tx's to those (maybe) more "centralised" layers will free up more "space" for direct blockchain tx's.

... And, above all, it will be the best digital payment system ever known to man... Invest now, wait for it, and then fucking sell all your BTC for more shiny metals if that's your thing. Do you have some ethical (or mental) problem getting profits for your investments? No wonder you hate Jews so much. They don't fucking care about all those irrelevant details.

Don't try to reason with that awful shithead.  Many of us have him on ignore.

Probably because any thread dealing with money is going to be filled to the brim with dirtbags from the evil cult known as judaism who are going to cry for days about every single r0ach post since they all blow apart their Marxist agenda.  Here, dirtbag, have another fun r0ach fact.  Not only do they run the media and banks, it's 10x worse.  Any type of evil, vile thing you can possibly think of, it's right out in the open they will run that too:

NYT Finds 'Disproportionate Role' of Israelis in World Organ Trafficking

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.610986

They are a plague upon humanity.

[TERA2]

When is this blizzard on the chart going to let up? It's been going on for a month and is giving me lag.