Bitcoinaire
|
|
May 08, 2019, 07:51:31 PM |
|
In 2016 when bitfinex got hacked we dropped at least 20%. This price action looks uber bullish.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 3561
|
|
May 08, 2019, 07:51:52 PM |
|
I read the above and still don't get the problem. What type of address was needed before sending to Bech32 and why was it unspendable? And how can it be unspendable if it is sent back to the company's wallet and thus "proves" it's an inside job?
My understanding is that if you send coins from address starting with '1' (legacy) to bech 32 address (starting with 'bc1'), then you might have difficulty spending the coins, although I am not 100% sure because Coinomi claims that in their wallet you can "upgrade" legacy account to bech32. In any case, if you send from '1 to '3' first, then to 'bc1', it should be OK. Read here: https://coinomi.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/29000009746-what-are-default-compatibility-and-legacy-addresses-all-about-segwit-Re sending back at Binance-it is a puzzle and if true (I did not check), then the whole thing is definitely their own error. That guy at binance...I would not listen to one word outta his mouth one way or another any more. The way I understand it, the problem isn't with the address, but with the wallet software. Not all wallets deal bith 'bc1' (bech32) addresses yet. Bech32 is supposed to be the new universal format after the segwit fork. Legacy (B2SH) non-segwit addresses begin with '1'. Legacy (B2SH) multi-sig addresses begin with '3'. '1' addresses can only receive funds in non-segwit (old-style) transactions. '3' and 'bc1' can receive funds in segwit transactions too.
|
|
|
|
rdbase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1578
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
May 08, 2019, 07:53:07 PM Merited by BobLawblaw (1) |
|
In 2016 when bitfinex got hacked we dropped at least 20%. This price action looks uber bullish.
This was around the price before the hack happened so yeah uber thor like bullish! Next major green dildo will likely top out near $6,300.
Hodl.
Bawb? He has BobLawblaw going down the street with the price pumping again as if binance gate never happened.
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10357
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
May 08, 2019, 07:53:58 PM |
|
oh can we not with the football again pleeeeeze it's too boring I'll bet we have our Final yup NZ to thrash ENG again. Probably by 3 tries or so. Can't wait Fucking egg chasing
|
|
|
|
MrFreeRoMan
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:02:53 PM |
|
oh can we not with the football again pleeeeeze it's too boring I'll bet we have our Final yup NZ to thrash ENG again. Probably by 3 tries or so. Can't wait Fucking egg chasing
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 2779
Bitcoingirl 2 is downloading 💓
|
oh can we not with the football again pleeeeeze it's too boring I'll bet we have our Final yup NZ to thrash ENG again. Probably by 3 tries or so. Can't wait Fucking egg chasing @V8 it's the season ending time and also LFC is in the final so I am afraid you will hear about it more 🤪 Bitcoin, football, hot girls, dildo, tits (fake one by the way 🤣) what else?
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 2779
Bitcoingirl 2 is downloading 💓
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:08:58 PM |
|
Oh wait! wait!! Were you talking about Rugby 😝
Damn! it's confusion LOL
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:13:58 PM |
|
I read the above and still don't get the problem. What type of address was needed before sending to Bech32 and why was it unspendable? And how can it be unspendable if it is sent back to the company's wallet and thus "proves" it's an inside job?
My understanding is that if you send coins from address starting with '1' (legacy) to bech 32 address (starting with 'bc1'), then you might have difficulty spending the coins, although I am not 100% sure because Coinomi claims that in their wallet you can "upgrade" legacy account to bech32. In any case, if you send from '1 to '3' first, then to 'bc1', it should be OK. Read here: https://coinomi.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/29000009746-what-are-default-compatibility-and-legacy-addresses-all-about-segwit-Re sending back at Binance-it is a puzzle and if true (I did not check), then the whole thing is definitely their own error. That guy at binance...I would not listen to one word outta his mouth one way or another any more. The way I understand it, the problem isn't with the address, but with the wallet software. Not all wallets deal bith 'bc1' (bech32) addresses yet. Bech32 is supposed to be the new universal format after the segwit fork. Legacy (B2SH) non-segwit addresses begin with '1'. Legacy (B2SH) multi-sig addresses begin with '3'. '1' addresses can only receive funds in non-segwit (old-style) transactions. '3' and 'bc1' can receive funds in segwit transactions too. Hmm.. so if the above applies then the software must be able to pick the right transaction style. If it doesn't then it's broken software so to speak.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3878
Merit: 11065
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:17:09 PM |
|
There are some folks, including WO regulars, who either buy into the FUD or allow the bullshit shenanigans (and "fuckery," as asserted by V8) to overly influence their BTC strategy, either causing them to sell, fail to buy or perhaps go so far as to short, our lil friend, aka BTC. Whether we buy into manipulation or not, as Torque rightfully asserted, the more bullshit FUD spreading desperations might be a kind of condition precedent for the price to go up, while the weak hands shed their coins too early, and the no coiners sit on the sidelines waiting, waiting and waiting for a dip that will come much later than they had expected.. or perhaps after they finally choose to buy.
|
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 13096
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:29:47 PM |
|
oh can we not with the football again pleeeeeze it's too boring I'll bet we have our Final yup NZ to thrash ENG again. Probably by 3 tries or so. Can't wait Fucking egg chasing @V8 it's the season ending time and also LFC is in the final so I am afraid you will hear about it more 🤪 Bitcoin, football, hot girls, dildo, tits (fake one by the way 🤣) what else? Sorry just read an article ^that actually =something else
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 2779
Bitcoingirl 2 is downloading 💓
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:32:47 PM |
|
@V8 it's the season ending time and also LFC is in the final so I am afraid you will hear about it more 🤪 Bitcoin, football, hot girls, dildo, tits (fake one by the way 🤣) what else?
Sorry just read an article ^that actually =something else Lol you made me huge laugh 🤣 Come on theymos!
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 13096
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:35:38 PM |
|
^ It mainly was to make a laugh, had to laugh myself with the idea (only already), if I only would be able to work it out proper as XhomerX would be able to
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 4069
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:48:53 PM |
|
I haven't seen a single person use their watch to pay for anything regardless of payment method.
Seems gimmicky. Like who really is going to pull up a qr code on their watch rather than their phone.
ive used my watch to pay but it uses NFC so you just tap the machine. its linked to a credit card. but you still need to open the app on the phone 1st. i consider it more of a novelty as im still in the habit of using actual cards. btw i use the android universe. not sure how the apple stuff works.
|
|
|
|
Toxic2040
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 4170
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:57:46 PM |
|
despite tether fud and binance hacks (snafu's?) bitcoin continues on 1h of note the higher high on coinbase was opposite of bitstamps shorts continue to rise #dyor 4h #stronghands'19
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 4069
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
May 08, 2019, 08:59:35 PM |
|
It seems that once the app is developed for the Iphone, then the watch becomes almost a seamless addition whether people would use the app to pay from the watch or not, they have the option. I bought an Apple watch, less than a year ago, mostly because I wanted to keep track of some exercises that I had started to do earlier in the year, and after wearing the watch for a few months, it became more and more apparent that I was able to increase certain avenues a lot more with the watch than I had previously thought within what I wanted to do. The interface with the phone is also quite seamless, and caused me to get used to doing a lot more on the watch, than I had even thought to be practical [...]
same on the android side (samsung phone and watch here) and i figure apple integration is probably ever tighter. i use it more and more as time goes on. its pretty impressive the amount of usefulness they can cram into those things.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 13096
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
May 08, 2019, 09:03:54 PM |
|
oh can we not with the football again pleeeeeze it's too boring I'll bet we have our Final yup NZ to thrash ENG again. Probably by 3 tries or so. Can't wait Fucking egg chasing So I was wrong Damn I hoped for Ajax, cause they had been much easier for LFC Still I respect Pochettino and only cheer for him .... F***I hoped for a not 2 of the same league final
|
|
|
|
yefi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
|
|
May 08, 2019, 09:29:30 PM |
|
In the wake of the attack, Tron CEO Justin Sun offered to personally make up for Binance’s shortfall by depositing “7,000 BTC worth USDT” into the exchange. To support @binance , I will personally deposit 7000 BTC worth USDT (40 million USDT) into @binance to buy $BNB, $BTC , $TRX & $BTT if @cz_binance agrees. No need to #FUD! Funds are #SAFU! — Justin Sun (@justinsuntron) May 8, 2019That doesn't make up for the shortfall as he isn't donating the money. The only way it helps is in the trade fees generated.
|
|
|
|
|
bitmover
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 6255
bitcoindata.science
|
|
May 08, 2019, 10:06:03 PM |
|
Just read on Twitter. Why didn't the hackers steal bcash? Lol
|
|
|
|
|