prelude2018
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
July 15, 2018, 09:22:44 PM |
|
Is there way to see PCI addresses for GPU´s? I have 11 GPU's in use and i want to know what physical GPU is bminer GPU N. I first assume that it't using cuda dev id's but seems that is not case. example GPU 2 in bminer seems to be GPU 1 in nvidia-smi (00000000:02:00.0) It's not a big issue but it's pretty annoying to figure out what GPU is running too hot. (Im limiting temp to 80 with bminer -max-temperature option) bminer log: [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:45+03:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 495.65 Sol/s 265.71 Nonce/s Temp: 80C Fan: 90% Power: 183W 2.71 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:46+03:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 475.57 Sol/s 253.95 Nonce/s Temp: 71C Fan: 90% Power: 154W 3.09 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:47+03:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 288.09 Sol/s 154.22 Nonce/s Temp: 60C Fan: 90% Power: 143W 2.01 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:48+03:00] [GPU 3] Speed: 306.80 Sol/s 162.08 Nonce/s Temp: 75C Fan: 90% Power: 167W 1.84 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:48+03:00] [GPU 4] Speed: 288.12 Sol/s 154.35 Nonce/s Temp: 80C Fan: 90% Power: 154W 1.87 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:49+03:00] [GPU 5] Speed: 289.64 Sol/s 155.68 Nonce/s Temp: 58C Fan: 90% Power: 153W 1.89 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:50+03:00] [GPU 6] Speed: 301.21 Sol/s 161.80 Nonce/s Temp: 79C Fan: 90% Power: 167W 1.80 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:51+03:00] [GPU 7] Speed: 514.39 Sol/s 275.13 Nonce/s Temp: 71C Fan: 90% Power: 177W 2.91 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:52+03:00] [GPU 8] Speed: 301.68 Sol/s 161.02 Nonce/s Temp: 74C Fan: 90% Power: 159W 1.90 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:53+03:00] [GPU 9] Speed: 304.61 Sol/s 164.49 Nonce/s Temp: 78C Fan: 90% Power: 182W 1.67 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:54+03:00] [GPU 10] Speed: 274.70 Sol/s 146.87 Nonce/s Temp: 80C Fan: 90% Power: 136W 2.02 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:59+03:00] Total 3840.46 Sol/s 2055.31 Nonce/s Accepted shares 163 Rejected shares 0
nvidia-smi output: Mon Jul 16 00:14:54 2018 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | NVIDIA-SMI 390.25 Driver Version: 390.25 | |-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC | | Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. | |===============================+======================+======================| | 0 GeForce GTX 1070 On | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 71C P2 151W / 153W | 621MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 1 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:02:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 60C P2 143W / 144W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 2 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:03:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 75C P2 167W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 3 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 80C P2 155W / 207W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 4 GeForce GTX 107... On | 00000000:05:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 80C P2 184W / 195W | 752MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 5 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:08:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 59C P2 158W / 176W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 6 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:09:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 79C P2 167W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 7 GeForce GTX 107... On | 00000000:0A:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 71C P2 180W / 195W | 643MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 8 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:0C:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 74C P2 159W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 9 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:0D:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 78C P2 182W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 10 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:0E:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 80C P2 136W / 207W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 16, 2018, 09:06:00 AM |
|
I mining Bytom.
At stock clock i have about 1120H/s with 1080ti and 1200H/s with TitanXP.
I expected 1300H/s with 1080ti. I tried W7 and W10 x64, 4 different Nvidia drivers..... and still same hashing power, what can be wrong?
Hi Maxpower666: Thanks for the feedback. Would you please give me more information such as command line and the output on the screen if it is normal. The mining speed may be lower if the temperature is higher than the default number.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 17, 2018, 03:09:05 PM |
|
Is there way to see PCI addresses for GPU´s? I have 11 GPU's in use and i want to know what physical GPU is bminer GPU N. I first assume that it't using cuda dev id's but seems that is not case. example GPU 2 in bminer seems to be GPU 1 in nvidia-smi (00000000:02:00.0) It's not a big issue but it's pretty annoying to figure out what GPU is running too hot. (Im limiting temp to 80 with bminer -max-temperature option) bminer log: [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:45+03:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 495.65 Sol/s 265.71 Nonce/s Temp: 80C Fan: 90% Power: 183W 2.71 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:46+03:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 475.57 Sol/s 253.95 Nonce/s Temp: 71C Fan: 90% Power: 154W 3.09 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:47+03:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 288.09 Sol/s 154.22 Nonce/s Temp: 60C Fan: 90% Power: 143W 2.01 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:48+03:00] [GPU 3] Speed: 306.80 Sol/s 162.08 Nonce/s Temp: 75C Fan: 90% Power: 167W 1.84 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:48+03:00] [GPU 4] Speed: 288.12 Sol/s 154.35 Nonce/s Temp: 80C Fan: 90% Power: 154W 1.87 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:49+03:00] [GPU 5] Speed: 289.64 Sol/s 155.68 Nonce/s Temp: 58C Fan: 90% Power: 153W 1.89 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:50+03:00] [GPU 6] Speed: 301.21 Sol/s 161.80 Nonce/s Temp: 79C Fan: 90% Power: 167W 1.80 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:51+03:00] [GPU 7] Speed: 514.39 Sol/s 275.13 Nonce/s Temp: 71C Fan: 90% Power: 177W 2.91 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:52+03:00] [GPU 8] Speed: 301.68 Sol/s 161.02 Nonce/s Temp: 74C Fan: 90% Power: 159W 1.90 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:53+03:00] [GPU 9] Speed: 304.61 Sol/s 164.49 Nonce/s Temp: 78C Fan: 90% Power: 182W 1.67 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:54+03:00] [GPU 10] Speed: 274.70 Sol/s 146.87 Nonce/s Temp: 80C Fan: 90% Power: 136W 2.02 Sol/J [INFO] [2018-07-16T00:13:59+03:00] Total 3840.46 Sol/s 2055.31 Nonce/s Accepted shares 163 Rejected shares 0
nvidia-smi output: Mon Jul 16 00:14:54 2018 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | NVIDIA-SMI 390.25 Driver Version: 390.25 | |-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC | | Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. | |===============================+======================+======================| | 0 GeForce GTX 1070 On | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 71C P2 151W / 153W | 621MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 1 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:02:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 60C P2 143W / 144W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 2 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:03:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 75C P2 167W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 3 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 80C P2 155W / 207W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 4 GeForce GTX 107... On | 00000000:05:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 80C P2 184W / 195W | 752MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 5 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:08:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 59C P2 158W / 176W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 6 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:09:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 79C P2 167W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 7 GeForce GTX 107... On | 00000000:0A:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 71C P2 180W / 195W | 643MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 8 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:0C:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 74C P2 159W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 9 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:0D:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 78C P2 182W / 198W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 10 GeForce GTX 970 On | 00000000:0E:00.0 Off | N/A | | 90% 80C P2 136W / 207W | 596MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
Hi, prelude2018: very good question, please check two links below first. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26123252/inconsistency-of-ids-between-nvidia-smi-l-and-cudevicegetnamehttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/13781738/how-does-cuda-assign-device-ids-to-gpus?utm_medium=organic&utm_source=google_rich_qa&utm_campaign=google_rich_qaplease export CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID then you will see the same output of Bminer and nvidia-smi.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 17, 2018, 03:09:54 PM |
|
Some not very scientific testing reveals that recent versions of `ethminer` deliver a higher hashrate than `bminer` (eth-only) for ETH algo coins. However, `bminer` results were similar to those from `claymore` in eth-only mode. So, I think there is more to gain in `bminer`with regards to eth mining. Looking forward to future improvements!
Hi wetblanket, Thanks! I will check it!
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
maxpower666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 2
|
|
July 18, 2018, 06:23:18 AM |
|
I mining Bytom.
At stock clock i have about 1120H/s with 1080ti and 1200H/s with TitanXP.
I expected 1300H/s with 1080ti. I tried W7 and W10 x64, 4 different Nvidia drivers..... and still same hashing power, what can be wrong?
Hi Maxpower666: Thanks for the feedback. Would you please give me more information such as command line and the output on the screen if it is normal. The mining speed may be lower if the temperature is higher than the default number. SET ADDRESS= my adress SET USERNAME=%ADDRESS%.atlas SET POOL=btm.91pool.com:9221 SET SCHEME=tensority START "Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast" bminer.exe -uri %SCHEME%://%USERNAME%@%POOL% -api 127.0.0.1:1880 -max-temperature 95 1200H/s with 1080ti stock clock
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 19, 2018, 04:22:55 PM |
|
I mining Bytom.
At stock clock i have about 1120H/s with 1080ti and 1200H/s with TitanXP.
I expected 1300H/s with 1080ti. I tried W7 and W10 x64, 4 different Nvidia drivers..... and still same hashing power, what can be wrong?
Hi Maxpower666: Thanks for the feedback. Would you please give me more information such as command line and the output on the screen if it is normal. The mining speed may be lower if the temperature is higher than the default number. SET ADDRESS= my adress SET USERNAME=%ADDRESS%.atlas SET POOL=btm.91pool.com:9221 SET SCHEME=tensority START "Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast" bminer.exe -uri %SCHEME%://%USERNAME%@%POOL% -api 127.0.0.1:1880 -max-temperature 95 1200H/s with 1080ti stock clock Thanks, I will check it.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
supermoew
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
|
July 20, 2018, 05:37:44 PM |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 23, 2018, 04:20:57 PM |
|
Congratulations Bminer. Your software is now faster than DSTM mining ZEC with 3 GTX 1060 3 GB using Flypool. Thank you.
Thanks!
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 23, 2018, 04:21:26 PM |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
Soon!
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
supermoew
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
|
July 24, 2018, 05:04:25 PM |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
Soon! thanks! are you working on equihash 144,5 already? or you are working on other new algorithms?
|
|
|
|
Seast
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
|
July 25, 2018, 10:47:23 PM |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
Soon! thanks! are you working on equihash 144,5 already? or you are working on other new algorithms? We need more algorithms.
|
|
|
|
toptek12
Member
Offline
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
|
|
July 26, 2018, 05:13:04 AM |
|
Bminer i use your miner over DSTM any day for a few reason one i can turn off the fee if i want to, which i don't and right now it's about the only miner that lets me mine BTM with NV cards, i love it mining asic type coins better then the ASIC miner with video cards right now and i know that might change soon so I'm mining what i can an holding and hoping more exchanges take them soon .
plus you all are working on the equihash 144,5 algorithm adding support i wish there was a better one for amd cards for that algorithm but atm there is only one and it seems to be moving a long to slow and it looks like CM may not support it .
also i got a feeling yours will run better then EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.4 once it's done for the equihash 144,5 algorithm.
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 27, 2018, 03:29:56 PM |
|
Bminer i use your miner over DSTM any day for a few reason one i can turn off the fee if i want to, which i don't and right now it's about the only miner that lets me mine BTM with NV cards, i love it mining asic type coins better then the ASIC miner with video cards right now and i know that might change soon so I'm mining what i can an holding and hoping more exchanges take them soon .
plus you all are working on the equihash 144,5 algorithm adding support i wish there was a better one for amd cards for that algorithm but atm there is only one and it seems to be moving a long to slow and it looks like CM may not support it .
also i got a feeling yours will run better then EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.4 once it's done for the equihash 144,5 algorithm.
Hi, toptek12. Thanks for your feedback. Glad that you like our BTM mining feature. We are also trying to do some research on more algorithms and see what we can do for NVIDIA GPU mining users. if you have good ideas please feel free to leave us messages here.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 27, 2018, 03:30:19 PM |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
Soon! thanks! are you working on equihash 144,5 already? or you are working on other new algorithms? We need more algorithms. any suggestions to what algorithm to add? thanks!
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
RoninAlek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 1
|
|
July 27, 2018, 09:43:56 PM Last edit: July 28, 2018, 09:47:51 PM by RoninAlek |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
Soon! thanks! are you working on equihash 144,5 already? or you are working on other new algorithms? We need more algorithms. any suggestions to what algorithm to add? thanks! Equihash 144_5 Algo. Equihash 192.7 for Zero coin.
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2018, 10:32:21 AM |
|
Hi, realbminer any news about Bminer's next version? any new feature? Thanks!
Soon! thanks! are you working on equihash 144,5 already? or you are working on other new algorithms? We need more algorithms. any suggestions to what algorithm to add? thanks! Equihash 144_5 Algo. Equihash 192.7 for Zero coin. Thanks for the suggestion!
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
TAKCuCT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2018, 10:39:50 AM |
|
Please add support for mining equihash 96_5
|
|
|
|
Andrey09
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2018, 01:51:47 PM |
|
Please ADD Equihash 144_5 Algo
|
|
|
|
gs777
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
July 30, 2018, 07:03:07 PM |
|
Equihash 144_5 Algo
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
July 31, 2018, 10:45:54 AM |
|
Equihash 144_5 Algo
I see, thanks for the feedback.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
|