Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2020, 09:39:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 [179] 180 181 182 183 184 185 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]  (Read 1143614 times)
jasemoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1005


Forget-about-it


View Profile
July 02, 2018, 10:48:31 PM
Last edit: July 02, 2018, 11:52:41 PM by jasemoney
 #3561

<blah blah see origional post>
anyways heres a tiny game.
https://chainmapper.com/acm/address/NYzzBK9LSumUaMkGjvZteEzxAVc9KPf72d
heres one of the keypairs i generated.
Quote
NYzzBK9LSumUaMkGjvZteEzxAVc9KPf72d
76AMq9SKNATcHWsLntS87KN7K3ASJXHzNfudNcXU3CTVHXmnptf
theres 43,000 ACM coins there. they just launched but are trading on https://bitfex.trade/en/ACM/BTC for 375 satoshi. thats a $1000 bounty (if you dump into the buyside). So if theres any way to transform the priv created by vanitygen to what it needs to be to be used for this coin... id appreciate a rundown here so i can unlock the other wallet i generated. you can have the 43k coins.
Looks like someone was able to claim the coins.

Tried the newer ACM wallet for my other coins and the privkey imported just fine, not sure what changes were made. anyways all good. enjoy the 43k coins whomever got them! trades at bitfex and tradeogre now for ~2k sats, thats like 0.8 btc worth of ACM you got if ya hodled.

$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
1590442767
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1590442767

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1590442767
Reply with quote  #2

1590442767
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1590442767
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1590442767

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1590442767
Reply with quote  #2

1590442767
Report to moderator
brakmic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 456
Merit: 13


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2018, 12:13:46 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #3562

Hi,

Actinium developer here. Smiley

We have changed the prefixes for private keys between versions. Simply install the latest version (0.16.1.0) and then start the Wallet-Application (or Daemon) with option -upgradewallet to upgrade to the latest wallet version.

Regarding vanity key generators, please take into account that some of them assume certain numerical distances between public & private keys (128 numbers).
 
This was not the case with Actinium in the beginning (and several other cryptocurrencies as well). Or more specifically: the variant of the wallet that preceded Actinium, which had a different name, wasn't following this pattern. But the new versions do follow it.

I have provided a Pull Request to one of such projects named vanitygen plus. The change was accepted by their team, so please check out their releases. They might have released a new version which supports Actinium by default. If not, then you'll have to clone & compile their code from GitHub. Check their compilation docs for more info on this.

Here their repo:

https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus

Here the pull request for Actinium:

https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus/pull/113

To generate an valid Actinium address you can now use these flags:

vanitygen -C ACM N

You won't need to provide numbers anymore as the app will automatically set them for you.

There are also additional flags, for compressed & uncompresses privkeys, scriptkey-hashes etc.

I hope this could help you solve the problems with Actinium's address generation. In general: the keys aren't lost, but only the parsing of underlying numbers that constitute them has changed.

For further support you can join our Discord (channel #support). Welcome!

https://discord.gg/5xRppjz

Regards,

ACTINIUM ➢✈✅[No Premine]✅[No ICO]✅[Fair Launch]✈★
jasemoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1005


Forget-about-it


View Profile
July 03, 2018, 01:31:22 PM
 #3563

Hi,

Actinium developer here. Smiley



Hey Brak thanks for the hard work! I was able to salvage half my mined coins the other half (in the privkey i posted above as a bounty) were snapped up by someone else. Hopefully they join and help the community Smiley take care!

$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
brakmic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 456
Merit: 13


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2018, 01:52:11 PM
 #3564

Hi,

Actinium developer here. Smiley



Hey Brak thanks for the hard work! I was able to salvage half my mined coins the other half (in the privkey i posted above as a bounty) were snapped up by someone else. Hopefully they join and help the community Smiley take care!

Many thanks for your kind words and sorry for any inconvenience, but we have no influence over those external tools. At least the one project I mentioned above now officially supports Actinium.

And I too hope that our little community will soon get more members. We hope that our transparency will attract people who are into crypto not only because of quick gains. Making money is ok and we want our users to become wealthier, but ideally they should also stay with us! Smiley

We're currently waiting for Ledger HQ's response regarding our Ledger Nano Integration.

Let's hope the best!

Best regards,

ACTINIUM ➢✈✅[No Premine]✅[No ICO]✅[Fair Launch]✈★
fedderam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:42:12 PM
 #3565

Sorry to insist, but are you sure? How do compressed private keys (introduced in bitcoind/bitcoin-qt 0.6.0) fit in there? From what I've been able to read, vanitygen doesn't support them and they are actually separate from noncompressed keys (ie, can't be expressed as normal uncompressed base58 keys) - so what proportion of the 2^256 search range do they represent? Or am I totally misunderstanding compressed keys?
DevilOper
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 23


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 11:46:42 AM
 #3566

Sorry to insist, but are you sure? How do compressed private keys (introduced in bitcoind/bitcoin-qt 0.6.0) fit in there? From what I've been able to read, vanitygen doesn't support them and they are actually separate from noncompressed keys (ie, can't be expressed as normal uncompressed base58 keys) - so what proportion of the 2^256 search range do they represent? Or am I totally misunderstanding compressed keys?

Yes you are misunderstanding the compressed keys.

Uncompressed key is a pair of (X,Y) EC point coordinates prefixed with 04.

Compressed key is just X coordinate of the same point prefixed with 03 if Y is odd or 02 if it is even.

Then the key is hashed as: ripemd160(sha256()), which gives you a (bitcoin) address.

You can actually hash a string of any length, so it is not evident what do you mean by "can't be expressed as ...".

Piggy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1408



View Profile WWW
July 21, 2018, 11:02:23 AM
 #3567

This tool is quite amazing.

The thing i don't understand is how is even possible to get an address with a pattern we want. I didn't read into the code yet (i see is quite complicated) but, aren't private keys of two address wich differ  just by these chars occuring in the same position *piggy* or *piggp* completely different? So how is it finding those patterns so relatively fast?

If was already answered somewhere please point me to the answer, thanks.

EDIT: found some good explanation with some more details in here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Vanitygen

racminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 16


View Profile
July 22, 2018, 10:29:19 PM
 #3568

Hi

I don't understand what the -Z option does ?

-Z <prefix>   Private key prefix in hex (vipco.in)

is it related to mining vipcoins?

Also I have question:
When vanitygen  generates a coin  address matching a <pattern>,  is it possible to limit the search within a certain range and not  the full
 256bit range of the private key ?

Any thoughts?

 Thanks for sharing.
CruE11a
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 01:29:56 PM
 #3569

hey,

found this project today and tried it out.
so i ran vanitygen on the pattern "1", expecting it would write every address it generates to the out-file, what it did.

but when i tried oclvanitygen, it creates masses of addresses, but writes only very few (1 per second) to the out-file.
Whats wrong?
manotroll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 03, 2018, 11:56:52 PM
 #3570

How do I search for random private keys?
even if it is practically impossible to find I would like to test
using gpu
tarball
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 5


View Profile
August 04, 2018, 12:46:42 AM
Merited by DarkStar_ (1)
 #3571

I suppose you could just type in '1' and no other characters. This would be random. You can then add an argument that tells vanitygen to repeat step as well as write them in a text file.

Thanks for reading my post.
manotroll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2018, 01:08:02 AM
 #3572

I have now received this message with the R9 390x

D:\Desktop\Nova pasta (2)\Nova pasta\oclvanitygen>oclvanitygen.exe -d 0 -v 1LGU
Prefix difficulty:                77178 1LGU
Difficulty: 77178
Device: Hawaii
Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002)
Driver: 2639.5
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (2639.5)
Max compute units: 44
Max workgroup size: 256
Global memory: 0
Max allocation: -50331648
clCreateCommandQueue: CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
  0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  1: [AuthenticAMD] AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core Processor
AlanSbor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 18, 2018, 10:40:33 AM
 #3573

Hello!

I'm a beginner and I will not be able to compile program oclvanitygen.exe and vanitygen64.exe

I want to ask you to compile your program with one change

in pattern.c
=======================
      if (i == zero_prefix) {
         if (c == 0) {
            /* Add another zero prefix */
            zero_prefix++;
            if (zero_prefix > 50) {
               fprintf(stderr,
                  "Prefix '%s' is too long\n",
                  pfx);
               goto out;
            }
            continue;
         }
========================
Put the number 50 instead of 19.
if (zero_prefix> 50)

Thanks in advance.
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 6342


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader


View Profile WWW
August 18, 2018, 11:25:05 AM
 #3574

I'm a beginner
~
Put the number 50 instead of 19.
if (zero_prefix> 50)
If I understand correctly, this increases the maximum number of characters to search for from 19 to 50, correct?
If so, you can just safe yourself the trouble: it's never going to happen!
But if you still want to try, you can just as well search for "only" the first 19 characters. If there is a hit, which takes somewhere around a quintillion years, you can manually verify the remaining characters to see if they are correct too.

AlanSbor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 18, 2018, 11:35:19 AM
 #3575

I'm a beginner
~
Put the number 50 instead of 19.
if (zero_prefix> 50)
If I understand correctly, this increases the maximum number of characters to search for from 19 to 50, correct?
If so, you can just safe yourself the trouble: it's never going to happen!
But if you still want to try, you can just as well search for "only" the first 19 characters. If there is a hit, which takes somewhere around a quintillion years, you can manually verify the remaining characters to see if they are correct too.

Yes, I need 50 number of characters
I know that the generation itself is 2 ^ 256

I need a program with this change.
Can you help?
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 6342


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader


View Profile WWW
August 18, 2018, 12:19:29 PM
 #3576

Yes, I need 50 number of characters
You're missing my point: what you want, is not possible.
If it would be possible to brute-force private keys, Bitcoin wouldn't exist. You can try this for the rest of your life, but you'll never find what you're looking for. So safe yourself the trouble and don't bother.

AlanSbor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 18, 2018, 12:23:58 PM
 #3577

Yes, I need 50 number of characters
You're missing my point: what you want, is not possible.
If it would be possible to brute-force private keys, Bitcoin wouldn't exist. You can try this for the rest of your life, but you'll never find what you're looking for. So safe yourself the trouble and don't bother.

I'm not trying to say what's possible or not. Will you be able to compile these programs for me with the changes I need?
I do not want to plant a flame here.
If you can help, you will be plus a hundred in karma.
AlanSbor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 19, 2018, 11:49:00 AM
 #3578

Yes, I need 50 number of characters
You're missing my point: what you want, is not possible.
If it would be possible to brute-force private keys, Bitcoin wouldn't exist. You can try this for the rest of your life, but you'll never find what you're looking for. So safe yourself the trouble and don't bother.

I'm not trying to say what's possible or not. Will you be able to compile these programs for me with the changes I need?
I do not want to plant a flame here.
If you can help, you will be plus a hundred in karma.

The problem is solved. De-seeded the binaries, found the place of the number, replaced it with 50 by binaries.
manotroll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 19, 2018, 01:22:28 PM
 #3579

would it solve the problem of not running on 390x?
no win 10
DaveF
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1269



View Profile WWW
September 03, 2018, 01:03:41 PM
 #3580

I know I asked a few months ago. Does anyone have the performance numbers running oclvanitygen on a GTX1050 vs 1050ti ?
OR
The RX 550 vs 560?
They are all going to cost me the same more or less but I figure if someone has the answer it will save me the time of mucking about.
Thanks,
Dave

███████████████████████████
█████████▀▄▄▄▄▄██▀▀████████
█████▀▄█▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▄▄▀█████
████ █▀▄███████████▄▀██████
███▄█ ███████▀ ██████ █ ███
██▀█ ███  ▀▀█  ▀██████ █ ██
██ █ ████▄▄      ▀▀▀██ █ ██
██ █ █████▌        ▄██ ████
███▄█ █████▄▄   ▄▄███ █▀███

████▀█▄▀█████▌  ▀██▀▄█ ████

█████▄▀▀▄▄▀▀▀▀   ▄▄█▀▄█████
████████▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████

███████████████████████████
IIII★ ‎
‎ ★
.
█▀▀ █▀█ █▀█  ▄  ▄▀▀ █   ▄▀█ ▀█▀ ▄▀▀  ▄███▄
▀▀█ █ █ █ █ ▀█▀ ▀▀█ █   █ █  █  ▀▀█  ▀███▀
▄▄█ █▄█ █▄█     ▄▄▀ ▀▄▄ █▄▀  █  ▄▄▀   
                                       █

████████████████████████████████████
███▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▀▀▀███
█▀▄██▀███▄▀██▀▄██▀███▄▀██▀▄██▀███▄▀████▄
█ █ ▀ ▀███ ██ █ ▀ ▀███ ██ █ ▀ ▀███ █████
█ ██    ▄█ ██ ██    ▄█ ██ ██    ▄█ █████
█▄▀██  ▀█▀▄██▄▀██  ▀█▀▄██▄▀██  ▀█▀▄████▀
███▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▄▄▄▄▄▄███
████████████████████████████████████

‎ ★
UP
TO
15%...CASH BACK
EVERY SPIN
IIII..PLAY NOW..
Pages: « 1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 [179] 180 181 182 183 184 185 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!