Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 11:36:21 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 [153] 154 155 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]  (Read 809640 times)
klopcoin
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
November 05, 2016, 04:31:18 AM
 #3041

Can I have a list of Vanitygen commands? After I made post #2126, I started my Vanitygen again. With normal commands. It is now at 5.9 percent.
The -i command means that it will run a case insensitive search. So if yo u want it to generate a 1JTK wallet with the "-i" command, it might then generate 1JtK instead. It basically just speeds up the generation time, but you're giving up case sensitivity.
1481326581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481326581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481326581
Reply with quote  #2

1481326581
Report to moderator
1481326581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481326581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481326581
Reply with quote  #2

1481326581
Report to moderator
1481326581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481326581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481326581
Reply with quote  #2

1481326581
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
altcointalk14
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188


View Profile
November 05, 2016, 05:26:02 PM
 #3042

Does anyone know how to search for Suffixes instead of Prefixes, using OCLvanitygen?

(I know we can use vanitygen -r Bitcoin$ )
LoyceV
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 616


hi


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2016, 08:21:01 PM
 #3043

Can I have a list of Vanitygen commands?
This gives the available commands:
./vanitygen -h
Code:
./vanitygen -h
Vanitygen 0.22 (OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014)
Usage: ./vanitygen [-vqnrik1NT] [-t <threads>] [-f <filename>|-] [<pattern>...]
Generates a bitcoin receiving address matching <pattern>, and outputs the
address and associated private key.  The private key may be stored in a safe
location or imported into a bitcoin client to spend any balance received on
the address.
By default, <pattern> is interpreted as an exact prefix.

Options:
-v            Verbose output
-q            Quiet output
-n            Simulate
-r            Use regular expression match instead of prefix
              (Feasibility of expression is not checked)
-i            Case-insensitive prefix search
-k            Keep pattern and continue search after finding a match
-1            Stop after first match
-N            Generate namecoin address
-T            Generate bitcoin testnet address
-X <version>  Generate address with the given version
-F <format>   Generate address with the given format (pubkey or script)
-P <pubkey>   Specify base public key for piecewise key generation
-e            Encrypt private keys, prompt for password
-E <password> Encrypt private keys with <password> (UNSAFE)
-t <threads>  Set number of worker threads (Default: number of CPUs)
-f <file>     File containing list of patterns, one per line
              (Use "-" as the file name for stdin)
-o <file>     Write pattern matches to <file>
-s <file>     Seed random number generator from <file>

Quote
The -i command means that it will run a case insensitive search. So if yo u want it to generate a 1JTK wallet with the "-i" command, it might then generate 1JtK instead. It basically just speeds up the generation time, but you're giving up case sensitivity.
You could add -k to -i, so it keeps searching. That way you can be lucky to find the right case-sensitive prefix, and if you're not that lucky, at least you have a case insensitive prefix. Or more likely: a lot of them.

Does anyone know how to search for Suffixes instead of Prefixes, using OCLvanitygen?
You can't.

                                                                       
    ▄▄███████▄▄                           ▄      ▄
   ██████████████▄                       ███    ███
  ███▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀████                     ███    ███
  █████████████▄ ▀███                    ███    ███   █▄ ▄▄
   ▀████▄  ▄▄███  ▀███                   ███    ███  ▄████
   ▄███████████   ▄███                  ███    ███  ▀▀███▀▀
   ███           ▄███         ▄▄▄▄      ███    ███     █    ▄▄  ▄▄▄▄
  ▄███     ▄▄▄▄█████        ▄█████▄    ▄██▀   ▄██▀    ███   █████████
  ███▄    ████████         ▄███▀▀███   ███    ███    ███▀   █████▀████
   ███     ▀▀█████▄      ▄█████▄ ███   ███    ███    ███    ████   ███
   ███         ▀███▄     ███▀███ ███  ███▀   ███▀    ███    ███▀   ███
   ███           ███▄    ███  ▀▀ ███  ███    ███    ███▀   ▄███    ███
   ▀██▄           ███    ███▄  ▄███   ███    ███    ███    ███    ███▀
    ███           ▀███▄   ████████    ███    ███    ███    ███    ███
    ▀██            ▀████   ▀████▀      ██     ██    ▀██    ▀█▀    ▀█▀


.
.
.
        ▄▄▀                ▀▄▄
     ▄ ▀▀                    ▀▀ ▄
   ▄ ▀▀▀                      ▀▀▀ ▄
  ▄▀▀▀                          ▀▀▀▄
 ▀█▄▄                            ▄▄█▀
▄█  ▄                            ▄  █▄
▀█ █▀                            ▀█ █▀
█▄  ▄                            ▄  ▄█
▀█ █                              █ █▀
█▄   █                          █   ▄█
 ██▄█▀                          ▀█▄██
  ▀▀  ▄█                      █▄  ▀▀
  ▀██▄ ▀  █▄              ▄█  ▀ ▄██▀
    ▀▀▀   ██  █▄      ▄█  ██   ▀▀▀
     ▀███▄▄▀  ███    ███  ▀▄▄███▀
        ▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀    ▀▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
          ▀▀█████▀▀▀▀█████▀▀
.
.
Free Bitcoins
Chat Lottery & Games
Level Up System with Rewards
▄████████▄  ▄████████▄
██      ██  ██      ██
██      ██  ██      ██
██      ██  ██      ██
██      ██  ██      ██
 ████████    ████████
██      ██  ██      ██
██      ██  ██      ██
██      ██  ██      ██
██      ██  ██      ██
▀████████▀  ▀████████▀
.
altcointalk14
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 05:11:44 PM
 #3044

the oclvanitygen code would have to be modified to have suffix search.

Does anyone know how to do that?
Blazed
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 07:29:50 PM
 #3045

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134


I've never had an Alt.


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 07:35:28 PM
 #3046

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


 Just tested it to make sure

Code:
Difficulty: 925465219
Pattern: 1Blazed
Address: 1BLAZedY8w6DiBiX1utEzaMPW7jCUJzeoy
Privkey: 5Kk28uFdAt8xwWVLzbvrk3vpypXK4ACJaGamJPmcCW3e9SzR43Y
[26.13 Mkey/s][total 1686110208][Prob 60.3%][75% in 16.4s][Found 1]

Puțin dai, puțin primești.
Blazed
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 07:37:56 PM
 #3047

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed


xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134


I've never had an Alt.


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 07:42:32 PM
 #3048

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed



 Sorry!  I missed that part.

 
Code:
C:\Users\xhomerx10\Downloads\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen -d 0:0 -k -i 1Blazed

 Are you running in safe mode with the -S switch?  That slows me down to 12Mkeys/s

Puțin dai, puțin primești.
Blazed
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 08:35:00 PM
 #3049

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed



 Sorry!  I missed that part.


 
Code:
C:\Users\xhomerx10\Downloads\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen -d 0:0 -k -i 1Blazed

 Are you running in safe mode with the -S switch?  That slows me down to 12Mkeys/s


Was using exactly what I Pasted. I am running Win 7 x64. Maybe the 280X are just slow at finding keys?

shorena
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092


ALL escrow is signed! https://keybase.io/verify


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 08:43:37 PM
 #3050

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?


 Sounds a little slow.  I would think you should see almost double that.
My single 7970 runs @ 25 Mkeys/s and the 280X is essentially the same thing.


Do you use any switches?

I tried using oclvanitygen.exe -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 1BLazed



 Sorry!  I missed that part.


 
Code:
C:\Users\xhomerx10\Downloads\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen -d 0:0 -k -i 1Blazed

 Are you running in safe mode with the -S switch?  That slows me down to 12Mkeys/s


Was using exactly what I Pasted. I am running Win 7 x64. Maybe the 280X are just slow at finding keys?

How is the performance if you only use the primary?

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030


Powered by NastyFans


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 09:13:05 PM
 #3051

Was using exactly what I Pasted. I am running Win 7 x64. Maybe the 280X are just slow at finding keys?

You should be getting >80Mkey/s with that setup I would think...

Try running a different instance for each GPU and see if you can determine the problem.  One GPU could be locking up, you could accidentally be using a CPU, etc...  

Another thing if you haven't generated a vanity on that machine before, is to generate a short one and make sure you are getting the public/private key combo as some driver combinations don't return valid keys (if anyone has that issue, search this thread for lifeboat).

BITSLER                 ▄███
               ▄████▀
             ▄████▀
           ▄████▀  ▄██▄
         ▄████▀    ▀████▄
       ▄████▀        ▀████▄
     ▄████▀            ▀████▄
   ▄████▀                ▀████▄
 ▄████▀ ▄████▄      ▄████▄ ▀████▄
█████   ██████      ██████   █████
 ▀████▄ ▀████▀      ▀████▀ ▄████▀
   ▀████▄                ▄████▀
     ▀████▄            ▄████▀
       ▀████▄        ▄████▀
         ▀████▄    ▄████▀
           ▀████▄▄████▀
             ▀██████▀
               ▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄            
▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀    ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄         
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄      
█  ▀▄▄  ▀█▀▀ ▄      ▀████   ▀▀▄   
█ █▄  ▀▄   ▀████       ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█  ▀▀       ▀▄▄ ▀████      ▄▄▄▀▀▀  █
█            ▄ ▀▄    ▄▄▄▀▀▀   ▄▄  █
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█ ▄▄   ███   ▀██  █           ▀▀  █ 
█ ███  ▀██       █        ▄▄      █ 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  
▀▄            █        ▀▀      █  
▀▀▄   ███▄  █   ▄▄          █   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    
▀▀▄   █   ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀         
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀              
              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄▄████████████████▄▄
        ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄
▄     ▄█████▀             ▀█████▄
██▄▄ █████▀                ▀█████
 ████████            ▄██      █████
  ████████▄         ███▀       ████▄
  █████████▀▀     ▄███▀        █████
   █▀▀▀          █████         █████
     ▄▄▄         ████          █████
   █████          ▀▀           ████▀
    █████                     █████
     █████▄                 ▄█████
      ▀█████▄             ▄█████▀
        ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀
          ▀▀████████████████▀▀
              ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀
            ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
         ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄
       █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█
     █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█
    █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█
   █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█
 ▄█▀ ██████████████▀      ▀█████ ▀█▄
███ ███████████▀▀            ▀▀██ ███
███ ███████▀▀                     ███
███ ▀▀▀▀                          ███
▀██▄                             ▄██▀
  ▀█▄                            ▀▀
    █▄       █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█
     █▄      ▀█████████▀
      ▀█▄      ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
        ▀▀█▄▄  ▄▄▄
            ▀▀█████
[]
helloeverybody
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2016, 05:35:14 PM
 #3052

does anyone know if its possible to search for multiple prefixes when using multiple ECDSA keypairs?

Or is it only possible to generate one of these at a time? When ive searched for my own addresses previously i can obviously seach multiple prefixes but im not sure the method to try and acheive the same reults here.

altcointalk14
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188


View Profile
November 08, 2016, 01:16:56 PM
 #3053

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

It "Seems" like the oclvanitygen does not increase rate like we are use to mining with GPU cards.  If you get 10Mk/sec with one card, if you double, you get less than 2x10; triple the exact same card you get <3x10.  and the more cards you add, it seems to gain less of the next card you add.

To prove this, in your 4x 280x system, try this:

oclvanitygen -D 1:0 -D 1:1 -D 1:2 -D 1:3 -k 1Bitcointalk
Then Record
Speed All4 =

Then each card

oclvanitygen -D 1:0 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D0 =

oclvanitygen -D 1:1 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D1 =

oclvanitygen -D 1:2 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D2 =

oclvanitygen -D 1:3 -k 1Bitcointalk
Speed D3 =

I bet your speeds
D0+D1+D2+D3 >>>  Speed All4

Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


Timelord2067.com


View Profile
November 08, 2016, 02:18:20 PM
 #3054

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

It "Seems" like the oclvanitygen does not increase rate like we are use to mining with GPU cards. 


I make mention of this effect some dozen pages back...

This thread has reached a natural conclusion and should be locked so that a more relevant one can be started by somebody else (and no, not me...)

Get Paid in BitCoin | (NetHack 3.6.0 Hearse V 1.0.6e) | Twitter: @Timelord2067 | Vanity Wallet Generation Service | Wallet Verified | ⚝ BTC💕 ♀ SXC ♂ ➳42 EACTAG ⚝ | (USA) Donate Blood today at One Blood dot ORG | £ $ ₹ € ¥ ¢ BTC ❝I am not an escrow service...‼ ❞ | Stake Your AltCoin Address Here
buckrogers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 918



View Profile
November 08, 2016, 03:13:46 PM
 #3055

Hi,

I'm having issues with vanitygen using my GPU's

I'm on WIn 10 Enterprise,

I have 3 rigs i've tried.

Rig1: 5x RX480

Rig2: 5x R9 290X

Rig 3: 6X R9 280X

Not sure if Win 10 is the issue, but I have gotten errors on the RX480 rig, which I have heard simply doesn't play well.

But the other 2 rigs, I can see my gpus, and when I select them in a bat file similar to this:


C:\Users\R2\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen.exe -D 0:0 1buckrogers
Difficulty: 10054102514374869638
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...failure.
clBuildProgram: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE
Build log:
C:\Users\R2\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL3888T3.cl:173:19: error: variable in constant address space must be initialized
__constant bignum bn_zero;
                  ^
C:\Users\R2\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL3888T3.cl:173:19: error: constant address space qualified variables are required to be initialized
2 errors generated.

error: Clang front-end compilation failed!
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compiling CL to IR
Device: Hawaii
Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002)
Driver: 2117.13 (VM)
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (2117.13)
Max compute units: 44
Max workgroup size: 256
Global memory: -1073741824
Max allocation: -1073741824
Could not open device '0:0', ignoring
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
  0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  1: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  2: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  3: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  4: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Hawaii
  5: [GenuineIntel] Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G3220 @ 3.00GHz

C:\Users\R2\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>


Not sure why it is returning the error on the gpu, but as a side note, if I just run the:

C:\Users\R2\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>vanitygen64.exe 1buckrogers
Difficulty: 10054102514374869638
[548.54 Kkey/s][total 1977344][Prob 0.0%][50% in 402856.1y]

The cpu portion will run, but obviously I would want to use the GPU's, and have many different rigs to choose from, all are running Win 10 enterprise though.

If anyone has some suggestions, please ...i'm all ears.

thanks!

altcointalk14
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188


View Profile
November 08, 2016, 04:16:08 PM
 #3056

Does 46 Mkeys/s sound right for 4 x 280X using oclvanitygen?

It "Seems" like the oclvanitygen does not increase rate like we are use to mining with GPU cards. 


I make mention of this effect some dozen pages back...

This thread has reached a natural conclusion and should be locked so that a more relevant one can be started by somebody else (and no, not me...)

Sooo, was the conclusion that no one understand how to fix it,  still?
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


Timelord2067.com


View Profile
November 08, 2016, 10:48:06 PM
 #3057

Sooo, was the conclusion that no one understand how to fix it,  still?

What a pity you didn't go back and read the thread.  Does it really matter in the larger picture if you loose a Meg or two of hashes with two or more cards?

Get Paid in BitCoin | (NetHack 3.6.0 Hearse V 1.0.6e) | Twitter: @Timelord2067 | Vanity Wallet Generation Service | Wallet Verified | ⚝ BTC💕 ♀ SXC ♂ ➳42 EACTAG ⚝ | (USA) Donate Blood today at One Blood dot ORG | £ $ ₹ € ¥ ¢ BTC ❝I am not an escrow service...‼ ❞ | Stake Your AltCoin Address Here
buckrogers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 918



View Profile
November 08, 2016, 10:55:45 PM
 #3058

Sooo, was the conclusion that no one understand how to fix it,  still?

What a pity you didn't go back and read the thread.  Does it really matter in the larger picture if you loose a Meg or two of hashes with two or more cards?

Hi can you assist with my issue on the program not allowing me to use any of the gpu's while i get that error i posted?

thanks!

buckrogers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 918



View Profile
November 09, 2016, 02:06:56 AM
 #3059

Has anyone in this thread experienced the issue i posted?

Is it an OS thing? a specific driver? anyone?

thanks!

apoorvlathey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


▓▓ Signature Designer ▓▓


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2016, 04:54:59 AM
 #3060

I was reading an article on how to destroy bitcoins and i found some awesome bitcoin addresses :

1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE
1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr
1111111111111111111114oLvT2               (hash 160 : 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 )
1QLbz7JHiBTspS962RLKV8GndWFwi5j6Qr    (hash 160 : ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff )

I wonder how were these addresses even generated ??

Pages: « 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 [153] 154 155 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!