Jude Austin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1140
Merit: 1000
The Real Jude Austin
|
|
June 13, 2016, 06:44:59 PM |
|
Yeah, I've been searching for a collision for like 3 years now, not a single one. I would think that Electrum would be far less efficient than a purpose-made application that simply has a set datastructure designed for fast contains() operations containing all addresses with non-dust amounts (by searching the chain) attached to an iterated key generator would increase your efficiency (still extremely futile and not likely at all to find any collisions). Remember that people actually use the Electrum servers for real transactions they need to send and receive. Out of curiosity what kind of hash rate have you been getting over that 3 years? and how many addresses have you scanned so far? Also you say youve been looking for non dust addresses, does this mean youve found some with very small amounts? thanks I average about 2 addresses a second due to having to check the balance against my Insight server, some times more depending on response time. Scanned so far, billions, I haven't kept track. I am looking for any address that has a totalReceived greater than 0.0, I haven't found a single one. I probably won't ever find any this way due to the amount of possible addresses. I have, however, found thousands of BTC addresses and keys by turning passwords into BTC addresses, brainwallets. With the exception of brainwallets, generating a random address and checking the totalReceived or balance the odds are not favorable, at all. So why do I do it? For fun, duh. And I am a persistent fuck, lol.
|
Buy or sell $100 of Crypto and get $10!
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 17650
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
June 13, 2016, 06:58:51 PM |
|
I average about 2 addresses a second due to having to check the balance against my Insight server, some times more depending on response time.
Scanned so far, billions, I haven't kept track.
At 2 per second and only 31.5 million seconds per year, it'll be about 200 million checks in 3 years. Not so much, and indeed, very unlikely to find a double. Extremely unlikely. Impossible, I dare say I've read before that brain wallets are very insecure, when enough people use it, it becomes inevitable to have simple passwords, and brute-forcing you can find either one of them. Finding thousands though is a LOT! How aren't these people all getting robbed?
|
| | Peach BTC bitcoin | │ | Buy and Sell Bitcoin P2P | │ | . .
▄▄███████▄▄ ▄██████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀
▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀ | | EUROPE | AFRICA LATIN AMERICA | | | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
███████▄█ ███████▀ ██▄▄▄▄▄░▄▄▄▄▄ █████████████▀ ▐███████████▌ ▐███████████▌ █████████████▄ ██████████████ ███▀███▀▀███▀ | . Download on the App Store | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
▄██▄ ██████▄ █████████▄ ████████████▄ ███████████████ ████████████▀ █████████▀ ██████▀ ▀██▀ | . GET IT ON Google Play | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ |
|
|
|
bitba.org
|
|
June 13, 2016, 07:27:59 PM |
|
Yeah, I've been searching for a collision for like 3 years now, not a single one. I would think that Electrum would be far less efficient than a purpose-made application that simply has a set datastructure designed for fast contains() operations containing all addresses with non-dust amounts (by searching the chain) attached to an iterated key generator would increase your efficiency (still extremely futile and not likely at all to find any collisions). Remember that people actually use the Electrum servers for real transactions they need to send and receive. Out of curiosity what kind of hash rate have you been getting over that 3 years? and how many addresses have you scanned so far? Also you say youve been looking for non dust addresses, does this mean youve found some with very small amounts? thanks I average about 2 addresses a second due to having to check the balance against my Insight server, some times more depending on response time. Scanned so far, billions, I haven't kept track. I am looking for any address that has a totalReceived greater than 0.0, I haven't found a single one. I probably won't ever find any this way due to the amount of possible addresses. I have, however, found thousands of BTC addresses and keys by turning passwords into BTC addresses, brainwallets. With the exception of brainwallets, generating a random address and checking the totalReceived or balance the odds are not favorable, at all. So why do I do it? For fun, duh. And I am a persistent fuck, lol. I don't have extra money for this why aren't you trying to share it for free?
|
|
|
|
Jude Austin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1140
Merit: 1000
The Real Jude Austin
|
|
June 13, 2016, 09:53:10 PM |
|
Yeah, I've been searching for a collision for like 3 years now, not a single one. I would think that Electrum would be far less efficient than a purpose-made application that simply has a set datastructure designed for fast contains() operations containing all addresses with non-dust amounts (by searching the chain) attached to an iterated key generator would increase your efficiency (still extremely futile and not likely at all to find any collisions). Remember that people actually use the Electrum servers for real transactions they need to send and receive. Out of curiosity what kind of hash rate have you been getting over that 3 years? and how many addresses have you scanned so far? Also you say youve been looking for non dust addresses, does this mean youve found some with very small amounts? thanks I average about 2 addresses a second due to having to check the balance against my Insight server, some times more depending on response time. Scanned so far, billions, I haven't kept track. I am looking for any address that has a totalReceived greater than 0.0, I haven't found a single one. I probably won't ever find any this way due to the amount of possible addresses. I have, however, found thousands of BTC addresses and keys by turning passwords into BTC addresses, brainwallets. With the exception of brainwallets, generating a random address and checking the totalReceived or balance the odds are not favorable, at all. So why do I do it? For fun, duh. And I am a persistent fuck, lol. I don't have extra money for this why aren't you trying to share it for free? Time is money my friend. You can easily learn yourself. Script to generate random Bitcoin address + Insight server. It'll take you about 3 days to get the Insight server up to date due to blockchain. That's if you are familiar with Linux and what ever programming language you choose to generate random addresses. I considered making a "mining pool" for this but then thought it would be kind of sketchy, haha.
|
Buy or sell $100 of Crypto and get $10!
|
|
|
InvestexMarkets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2016, 11:27:24 PM |
|
Interesting stuff. Think ill pull some resources and give this a go. Its a fantastic way to provide that extra bit of security testing your own wallets just to be sure.
You say you have been testing this for 3 years with no collision?
What sort of hardware are you running that on?
|
|
|
|
Jude Austin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1140
Merit: 1000
The Real Jude Austin
|
|
June 13, 2016, 11:32:09 PM |
|
Interesting stuff. Think ill pull some resources and give this a go.
You say you have been testing this for 3 years with no collision?
Yes, 3 years, not a single thing. To be honest, I may have hit one but I think I had it set to integer and the server returned a float so the application failed and yeah, lol.
|
Buy or sell $100 of Crypto and get $10!
|
|
|
InvestexMarkets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2016, 11:35:43 PM |
|
Do you have any links to resources you used when you set this up? or did you follow the main topic information?
Would like to set this up to test some of my own things for that added bit of security.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4914
Merit: 4844
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
July 07, 2016, 11:10:06 PM |
|
Has anyone used vanitygen with a rx-480 yet? I'm curious what it can do.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
aarons6
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
|
|
July 08, 2016, 01:08:22 AM |
|
Has anyone used vanitygen with a rx-480 yet? I'm curious what it can do.
it gives an error C:\oclvanitygen>oclvanitygen64.exe -o done.txt -D 0:0 -D 0:1 1aarons6 Difficulty: 51529903411245 Compiling kernel, can take minutes...failure. clBuildProgram: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE Build log: C:\Users\Aaron\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL588T5.cl:180:19: error: variable in consta nt address space must be initialized __constant bignum bn_zero; ^ C:\Users\Aaron\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL588T5.cl:180:19: error: constant address s pace qualified variables are required to be initialized 2 errors generated.
error: Clang front-end compilation failed! Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Compiling CL to IR Device: Ellesmere Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002) Driver: 2079.5 (VM) Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2079.5) Max compute units: 36 Max workgroup size: 256 Global memory: 0 Max allocation: -50331648 Could not open device '0:0', ignoring Compiling kernel, can take minutes...failure. clBuildProgram: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE Build log: C:\Users\Aaron\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL588T11.cl:180:19: error: variable in const ant address space must be initialized __constant bignum bn_zero; ^ C:\Users\Aaron\AppData\Local\Temp\\OCL588T11.cl:180:19: error: constant address space qualified variables are required to be initialized 2 errors generated.
error: Clang front-end compilation failed! Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Compiling CL to IR Device: Ellesmere Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002) Driver: 2079.5 (VM) Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2079.5) Max compute units: 36 Max workgroup size: 256 Global memory: 0 Max allocation: -50331648 Could not open device '0:1', ignoring Available OpenCL platforms: 0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing 0: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Ellesmere 1: [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.] Ellesmere 2: [AuthenticAMD] AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
C:\oclvanitygen>
|
|
|
|
Velkro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1014
|
|
July 09, 2016, 12:41:55 AM |
|
Is there somewhere comparision how much Mkey/s generate nvidia cards? For example 8xx series, 9xx series and newest 1xxx series? I know there are for mining but for vanitygen?
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2242
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
July 09, 2016, 12:49:12 AM |
|
Is there somewhere comparision how much Mkey/s generate nvidia cards? For example 8xx series, 9xx series and newest 1xxx series? I know there are for mining but for vanitygen?
There's bound to be something in the 140 pages of talk on the subject - use the search box on the top of this page (at top right) to search through this tread. Hope you find what you are looking for.
|
|
|
|
sorryforthat
|
|
July 09, 2016, 09:22:01 PM |
|
Is there somewhere comparision how much Mkey/s generate nvidia cards? For example 8xx series, 9xx series and newest 1xxx series? I know there are for mining but for vanitygen?
NVIDIA GeForce 96xx, 98xx, GT 1xx, GT 2xx, GTX 2xx (G90/GT200): Key/s = (CUDA Cores) x (Shader MHz) x 17 AMD Radeon 58xx, 59xx, 67xx, 68xx (VLIW5): Key/s = (Stream Processors) x (Core MHz) x 20.1 AMD Radeon 69xx (VLIW4): Key/s = (Stream Processors) x (Core MHz) x 13.6 From the OP
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4914
Merit: 4844
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
July 11, 2016, 11:14:13 PM |
|
So nobody has yet been able to get a rx-480 to work with vanitygen?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2242
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
July 12, 2016, 09:36:34 AM |
|
So nobody has yet been able to get a rx-480 to work with vanitygen?
I'd be delighted to give one a go if you would like to send one my way... (Worth a shot)...
|
|
|
|
albysprx
|
|
July 13, 2016, 08:58:09 AM |
|
is there any ways to get it for cloud wallet like bitgo or blockchain?
|
|
|
|
helloeverybody
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
July 13, 2016, 09:19:05 AM |
|
is there any ways to get it for cloud wallet like bitgo or blockchain? I don't know about bitgo but blockchain allows you to import your own private key fairly easy so you could generate a vanity on your pc and then import it into their no problem.
|
|
|
|
jacktheking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1001
Personal Text Space Not For Sale
|
|
July 13, 2016, 09:38:40 AM |
|
is there any ways to get it for cloud wallet like bitgo or blockchain? I use my vanity address on Mycelium - an Android application. With just a scan on the QR code, you will be able to import your vanity address' private key. One thing that Mycelium lack is only browser based wallet but it is an extremely good mobile & cloud based wallet - if I'm not wrong.
|
So sad! This profile does not appear as the #1 result (on anonymous) Google searches anymore.
Time to be active on the crypto forums again? Proud to be one of the few Legendary members of the Sparkie Red Dot!
Gonna put this on my resume if I ever join a cryptocurrency/blockchain industry!
|
|
|
apofis
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
July 16, 2016, 03:55:16 PM |
|
I pick up this job 2xHD5850 how long it will take?
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2242
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
July 16, 2016, 05:24:27 PM |
|
I pick up this job 2xHD5850 how long it will take? It will take 3.1 years to reach 50% of the required work. However, if you are lucky, it can take a shorter time, if you are unlucky, it can take 6.2 years. There are discussions within this thread about the "luck" factor. Feel free to ask questions.
|
|
|
|
helloeverybody
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
July 16, 2016, 06:23:14 PM |
|
Does anyone know if the vanity pool website is still operational and paying for solving various work? Is it legit? i thought i read a thread a while back that it was stealing private keys or something? Or was this a different website? i dont want to spend weeks crunching a vanity address only to not get paid for it.
|
|
|
|
|