|
knybe
|
 |
February 12, 2014, 05:22:23 PM |
|
I suggest Litecoin BAMT… works like a charm for pool switching:  |
|
|
|
|
|
elpsycongro
|
|
February 12, 2014, 11:58:27 PM |
|
Its what i use  so i can vouch for it |
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
 Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:01:54 AM |
|
Its what i use so i can vouch for it Is this the 1.4 version? I didn't know you can add pools via the web page... |
|
|
|
|
kylekartan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:37:07 AM |
|
Catching up on a couple of missed days in this thread...thank you all for the lols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:01:36 AM |
|
I suggest Litecoin BAMT… works like a charm for pool switching: ... Its what i use so i can vouch for it Is this the 1.4 version? I didn't know you can add pools via the web page... it's lilyth's pool manager |
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:37:52 AM |
|
I suggest Litecoin BAMT… works like a charm for pool switching: ... Its what i use so i can vouch for it Is this the 1.4 version? I didn't know you can add pools via the web page... it's lilyth's pool managerThank you! |
|
|
|
|
|
elpsycongro
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:44:30 AM |
|
I suggest Litecoin BAMT… works like a charm for pool switching: ... Its what i use so i can vouch for it Is this the 1.4 version? I didn't know you can add pools via the web page... it's lilyth's pool managerThank you! is included with version 1.4 of litecoin BAMT you just put "2" after status on the webpage and it lets you do all kinds of things like switch order of pools and edit the config , shows lots of detail info per GPU too. |
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:47:00 AM |
|
I've found using the username 1CVTp4Bk2GkbRDdfVCuEuVXphmzyYJq3Cn seems to reduce the number of rejects I recieve (and hopefully improves the payout), you're welcome to try it out and see if it works.  Let me know how it works for you, the more people that try it the more accurate the results...  For the failover use 1EEqY8axyTB7SVuaVoNaieUqg5z77buy2t Look, hardly any rejects  See, I told you this special code it produces less rejects 1EEqY8axyTB7SVuaVoNaieUqg5z77buy2t  Did you notice how the hash rate went up when you use it? |
|
|
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
February 13, 2014, 03:10:42 AM |
|
lol dork
|
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 03:27:18 AM |
|
Decent payout.
Looks like all of the haters went back into their holes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
February 13, 2014, 03:38:52 AM |
|
Decent payout.
Looks like all of the haters went back into their holes.
Wafflecleverbros ftw!!!!!111 |
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
|
gsrcrxsi
|
|
February 13, 2014, 04:20:31 AM |
|
about .0122ish per MH today.
not as good as the last 2 days, but nothing to turn your nose up at. not bad. i hope the payouts stay this consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
February 13, 2014, 04:26:04 AM |
|
about .0122ish per MH today.
not as good as the last 2 days, but nothing to turn your nose up at. not bad. i hope the payouts stay this consistent.
Today was 0.018 for the pool overall. Check out this link if you haven't already: http://mc-watcher.eu/?wallet=<yourwallet> |
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
|
gsrcrxsi
|
|
February 13, 2014, 04:41:05 AM |
|
about .0122ish per MH today.
not as good as the last 2 days, but nothing to turn your nose up at. not bad. i hope the payouts stay this consistent.
Today was 0.018 for the pool overall. Check out this link if you haven't already: http://mc-watcher.eu/?wallet=<yourwallet> thats not taking into account the fees, or the ACTUAL time between payments (as in, today's payout was about 45mins later than yesterday). so the individual earnings are less. not only that, but the ".018" is for yestderday, not today. they havent added todays earnings yet, as the stats are paused, and hasnt indicated a payout yet (even though a payout HAS happened as referenced by my BTC wallet). on that site "TODAY" will be feb 13th, since it goes by UTC time... its more accurate to track your personal earnings. which i do to excruciating detail.  |
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 07:22:05 AM |
|
thats not taking into account the fees, or the ACTUAL time between payments (as in, today's payout was about 45mins later than yesterday). so the individual earnings are less. not only that, but the ".018" is for yestderday, not today. they havent added todays earnings yet, as the stats are paused, and hasnt indicated a payout yet (even though a payout HAS happened as referenced by my BTC wallet).
on that site "TODAY" will be feb 13th, since it goes by UTC time...
its more accurate to track your personal earnings. which i do to excruciating detail.
Again, decent payout. Nothing to brag about but about what you should be able to expect on a normal day. |
|
|
|
|
dency45
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 13, 2014, 08:47:21 AM |
|
Hi. Which reject rates are better? 880khs, I = 20, 8-9% reject rates. 850khs, I = 18, 5-6% reject rates.
|
|
|
|
|
Vinz87
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 09:58:20 AM |
|
Tonight I didn't received my usual weekly payout, for balances under 0.01btc. Anyone noticed the same problem?
|
|
|
|
|
zoonosis
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 199
Merit: 14
|
|
February 13, 2014, 10:48:07 AM |
|
Tonight I didn't received my usual weekly payout, for balances under 0.01btc. Anyone noticed the same problem?
+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
elpsycongro
|
|
February 13, 2014, 11:35:55 AM |
|
Tonight I didn't received my usual weekly payout, for balances under 0.01btc. Anyone noticed the same problem?
+1 +1 i usually get past the 0.01 minimun but had downtime on my rig so i tough i would still get paid guess its delayed, no worries usually h20 will still roll the payment a day late for those or by the next day you got way more than 0.01 so you get paid. |
|
|
|
|
KS
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:19:02 PM |
|
Hi. Which reject rates are better? 880khs, I = 20, 8-9% reject rates. 850khs, I = 18, 5-6% reject rates.
The one with the better (WU x (100% - reject rate)). |
|
|
|
|
|
