HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s

[raskul]

I think HF may need to retract that 'most powerful ASIC' statement: isn't this using a more powerul chip: http://btcolympus.com ?
and one of their customers with a working unit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg5966533#msg5966533

[cedivad]

I think HF may need to retract that 'most powerful ASIC' statement: isn't this using a more powerul chip: http://btcolympus.com ?
and one of their customers with a working unit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg5966533#msg5966533

You learned nothing about scammers and scams, right?
Edit, wait, 2000 posts in 3 months, ok. Got it.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #EMrf6SiDMM9FG6nS

[raskul]

I think HF may need to retract that 'most powerful ASIC' statement: isn't this using a more powerul chip: http://btcolympus.com ?
and one of their customers with a working unit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg5966533#msg5966533

You learned nothing about scammers and scams, right?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #fgKQqhqlvuSxohan

so you are calling scam on that one too? OK. was just asking. once bitten.. and all that.

[RoadStress]

I think HF may need to retract that 'most powerful ASIC' statement: isn't this using a more powerul chip: http://btcolympus.com ?
and one of their customers with a working unit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg5966533#msg5966533

You learned nothing about scammers and scams, right?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #fgKQqhqlvuSxohan

so you are calling scam on that one too? OK. was just asking. once bitten.. and all that.

First they are claiming 550GH per chip. HashFail has reached 700-750? GH per chip. So HF still has the fastest chip.

Secondly: 2 posts user? picture of only one case and blurred cgminer way back in background? Also might want to read here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=362756.0 it's obviously a scam. I still don't understand why is it so hard for people to spot scams.

[raskul]

I think HF may need to retract that 'most powerful ASIC' statement: isn't this using a more powerul chip: http://btcolympus.com ?
and one of their customers with a working unit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg5966533#msg5966533

You learned nothing about scammers and scams, right?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #fgKQqhqlvuSxohan

so you are calling scam on that one too? OK. was just asking. once bitten.. and all that.

First they are claiming 550GH per chip. HashFail has reached 700-750? GH per chip. So HF still has the fastest chip.

Secondly: 2 posts user? picture of only one case and blurred cgminer way back in background? Also might want to read here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=362756.0 it's obviously a scam. I still don't understand why is it so hard for people to spot scams.

anyone who was actually going to order from these, would have thought about it for more than a nanosecond. i was simply making conversation about something that flashed across my screen. 'spot scams'

[cedivad]

^^ The ignore feature of my website works, great.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #e5vVieLqAt9todNf

[raskul]

^^ geeks without social skills. works great 

[cedivad]

https://twitter.com/cedivad/status/449913457832632320

The Chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation joined the discussion. Let me remember how many bankruptcy he filled for...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #VXGAq9DideNCzg0H

[CurcO]

More Important is what the judicial system has just done... a previous factual precedent for any other lower court ... so this means maye CT , BFL, are all up for grabs.

EXTRA EXTRA Read all about it, Court freeze's hashfast's Wallet, http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/

[cedivad]

HF is unique, way worse than BFL, so no, no one but them are up for grabs.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #cfX4v4RjVBwYXbEW

[RoadStress]

More Important is what the judicial system has just done... a previous factual precedent for any other lower court ... so this means maye CT , BFL, are all up for grabs.

EXTRA EXTRA Read all about it, Court freeze's hashfast's Wallet, http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/

CT and BFL never promissed full BTC refunds

[cedivad]

CT and BFL never promissed full BTC refunds

And CT never promised to ship in October.
BFL never promised to ship at all.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #DpnwujeYe7J3X6RJ

[S M I L Y]

ALL of these companies Im sure have trays of chips sitting on shelves doing nothing.     Their issues are that they cant build boards fast enough, or they dont know how to properly design a power regulator, or they cant cool the chip they designed.

Thank you cedivad for pointing this. Somehow i didn't even read it the first time. All i can say is WOW. You are a tard troll from my point of view after reading this. So KnC announces that they will have a 10 MW datacenter ready in a few months and you are telling us that "ALL" companies have chips doing nothing and that they can't build boards fast enough? O'RLY??? How does this picture look to you? So sick of dumbfucks who can't even do a little research before talking out of their ass...




Edit:

EXTRA EXTRA Read all about it, Court freeze's hashfast's Wallet, http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/

Who is Cypher Enterprises? The name reminds me of cypherdoc and that's so funny...

Well then, would you care to take a stab at why so many of these startup bitcoin ASIC companies cant get product out the door?    Any why they want to sell chips?

Who goes out and spends millions on NRE for a 28nm ASIC with the intention to screw people over by not shipping product?

Make no mistake, I am in no way condoning the ignorance and incompetence that many of these companies exhibit.  I have been screwed over by almost all on the list that I listed... which is how I have first hand knowledge of why each of them has had issues.!

 

[RoadStress]

Well then, would you care to take a stab at why so many of these startup bitcoin ASIC companies cant get product out the door?    Any why they want to sell chips?

Who goes out and spends millions on NRE for a 28nm ASIC with the intention to screw people over by not shipping product?

Make no mistake, I am in no way condoning the ignorance and incompetence that many of these companies exhibit.  I have been screwed over by almost all on the list that I listed... which is how I have first hand knowledge of why each of them has had issues.!

 

Except BFL i think the other companies had good intentions, but bad knowledge or they just made the wrong decisions at the wrong time (AMT rushed to make 400 cases which later weren't useful, HashFail booked CIARA assembly time, if they really did it and not lied about it, without testing board design first, and so on). Remember that BFL's CEO is a convicted felon for mail scamming so i have no doubt that their intentions were bad from the start. On the other hand Avalon never had any problem getting products out of the door, they sold customers stuff to 3rd party buyers because they got greedy and also instead of shipping B2 Avalons they mined with them first for a period of time and then they shipped them.

The problem with the startup bitcoin ASIC companies is that they know that they can a lot of money from pre-orders and they don't think about the rest. They just want to grab a lot of money in very little time. The plan goes second i guess (see HF promising full BTC refunds only to get sales or the MPP).

Please tell me how were you screwed by KnC.

[cedivad]

Who goes out and spends millions of customers money on NRE for a 28nm ASIC with the intention to screw people over by not shipping product mining themselves?

ftfy
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #EsIjc4WrDK0sIRTx

[kevin911]

This might be a bit of a silly question but, this TRO against hashfast, will it stop orders from being dispatched?

[cedivad]

This might be a bit of a silly question but, this TRO against hashfast, will it stop orders from being dispatched?

And this might be a silly answer, but they didn't give a f. before, they won't be a f. now.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #AQAmofeDlBOwAesf

[kevin911]

This might be a bit of a silly question but, this TRO against hashfast, will it stop orders from being dispatched?

And this might be a silly answer, but they didn't give a f. before, they won't be a f. now.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #AQAmofeDlBOwAesf

True, i was just hoping that i was going to get something out of hashfast sometime soon.

[cedivad]

I really hate all the enthusiasm they are putting in convincing us to be bankrupted without saying a single word.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kaqvL6utYvaucUXW

[Phildo]

ALL of these companies Im sure have trays of chips sitting on shelves doing nothing.     Their issues are that they cant build boards fast enough, or they dont know how to properly design a power regulator, or they cant cool the chip they designed.

Thank you cedivad for pointing this. Somehow i didn't even read it the first time. All i can say is WOW. You are a tard troll from my point of view after reading this. So KnC announces that they will have a 10 MW datacenter ready in a few months and you are telling us that "ALL" companies have chips doing nothing and that they can't build boards fast enough? O'RLY??? How does this picture look to you? So sick of dumbfucks who can't even do a little research before talking out of their ass...




Edit:

EXTRA EXTRA Read all about it, Court freeze's hashfast's Wallet, http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/

Who is Cypher Enterprises? The name reminds me of cypherdoc and that's so funny...

Well then, would you care to take a stab at why so many of these startup bitcoin ASIC companies cant get product out the door?    Any why they want to sell chips?

Who goes out and spends millions on NRE for a 28nm ASIC with the intention to screw people over by not shipping product?

Make no mistake, I am in no way condoning the ignorance and incompetence that many of these companies exhibit.  I have been screwed over by almost all on the list that I listed... which is how I have first hand knowledge of why each of them has had issues.!

 

It's happening because they aren't good enough to do what they say they will do, and they do it because it doesn't cost them anything. they get marks to pay off all the expenses up front, give themselves a nice salary while they try, and then disappear or eventually come up with a machine that took so long to make that it will never ROI.

In the real world these guys would try to make a miner, take so long that it wouldn't be profitable, and we'd never hear from them. For some reason, in the bitcoin world people bankroll them from the start, so they try to make a bunch at a time before they even know how to make one. Now, since they have enough money to make all of them (if they get that far) they send out useless machines that people will plug in to try and make back some of their investment, raising the difficulty, and making this situation that much harder for the next person to make a miner.