[ANN][SRC] Securecoin | A Fast and Secure Version of Bitcoin | 2013

[murraypaul]

Well it has just been dumped down below 0.000125, the buy side is looking very grim at the moment.
If you want lots more, now is the time to buy.

[1715241097]

1715241097

[Eli0t]

my best guess, somebody bought/used 100 MH worth of cpu power mined 10,000 then dumped to cash out. some people just want to drive all coins to 0

[bogidu]

Ok, noob question.

I sent some coins to a stablecoin address (there's getting to be too many coins!) are they gone for good?

[Hazard]

just import the private key associated with the stablecoin address

[bogidu]

Ah!  Thank you!  Like I said . . . .

[gwedo]

Well it has just been dumped down below 0.000125, the buy side is looking very grim at the moment.
If you want lots more, now is the time to buy.

Unfortunately I was at work without good access to exchange.
I missed it.    
 But the price is still cheap, I think. Everything under 0.00040000 is good I would say.
I am sure Securecoin will be among winners of autumn race when the rallye beginns. But besides all this I love the core idea of securecoin and all of its functions.
In my opinion developers did excellent work and made very strong coin with unique features.

[Spoetnik]

Watching the Cryptsy market, someone has just pumped SRC from 0.00048 to 0.00075 in two large buys!

yeah its crazy theres no big buywalls at a decent price just massive pumps every few days

It's not pumping. This is someone accumulating 1000's of coins while the price is still low.

Yep that was me back then, not pumping, buying up, 8 BTC worth so far. i found it hard to buy, as its in dribs and draps and bots gobble it up.  Secure coin will kick ass on ave and i think its gunna give DGC a run for its money.

a user named ikarus bought everything up to 0.0006 many times and i had luckily set my orders over and over at 0.0005999
meanwhile current sell prices were way lower
..i'm mining them so i have them coming in regardless
that guy hasn't done that in a few days i think now though, but i have in the last week or two sorta been saving what i mine and buying more and more
and with the lower prices lately i've been buying more than normal.. occasionally i sell some for a very small profit but i'm holding them long term
i've easily got over a thousand
so you may not being fighting with a bot for them.. more than likely it's me

[Snail2]

getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<

This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out.

Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA

[baloo_kiev]

getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<

This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out.

Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA

Try sending in smaller parts or use raw transaction API for fine tuning: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Raw_Transactions

[SpaceCadet]

getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<

This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out.

Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA

Use a pool that accumulates those small payments into a larger, single transaction (i.e., not p2pool)...

[captainfuture]

our pool is running stable and with steady hash. It could still need love 

https://coinex.pw/mining/pools/SRC

[testz]

our pool is running stable and with steady hash. It could still need love 

https://coinex.pw/mining/pools/SRC

Nice idea to combine exchange with mining pool's, but if you place useful information about available CPU/GPU miners, donwload links and command line parameters for mining with your pool probably you will get even more users.

Keep growing, good luck!

[Arros]

The multiple algorithms listed for this coin, are they all used in every block of the blockchain, or do they take turns and individual block only gets worked on with one or two of the algorthms?

(Sorry if the question has been asked before.)

[markn]

our pool is running stable and with steady hash. It could still need love 

https://coinex.pw/mining/pools/SRC

great work, good job, thank you 

[Neisklar]

getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<

This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out.

Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA

Also, if any of p2pool node hosters here are interested, I can post my networks.py so we can turn our separate nodes into true p2pool.

Thats one of the reasons why i blocked the p2p port of my pool. I also discussed this with other p2pool operators for QRK a while ago and we agreed that with the lower diff we still have, it's ok to have separate standalone pools.

Creating one big p2pool network would create even more tiny fractions than standalone pools. Also if it's one big decentralized p2pool network, or many seperate p2pools both is a decentralization and good for the coin network


The wallet has that nasty behavior when sending out money to behave like the following:
If it finds a received transaction with the exact amount you try to send, it uses this.
If not it tries to assemle the needed amount from smaller amounts IMHO starting at the smalles amount it has. That way the final transaction will consists of thousend mini-inputs and will be to large.
So as stated you will need to send smaller transactions (smaller in the amount of inputs, i think you can look that up in the logfile of the wallet). After that transaction succeded all used mini-imputs are now consolidated as a new bigger input for the next transaction.

The multiple algorithms listed for this coin, are they all used in every block of the blockchain, or do they take turns and individual block only gets worked on with one or two of the algorthms?

(Sorry if the question has been asked before.)

For every block all of those hashing algorithms are used sequentially and often more than once. That more than once thing is determined randomly simplified spoken.

[Spoetnik]

ya he's right.. toying with a miner you can get some accepted shares 50% of the time by dropping half the algo work
which is proof that all algos are not used at all times.. like he said its random ..at least i think so too. (lot of the algo stuff is over my head)

reading first page it seems like block reward will always be 5 is that correct ? (it's not going to halve or what ever ?)

difficulty is getting high these days

[paymetodostuff]

ya he's right.. toying with a miner you can get some accepted shares 50% of the time by dropping half the algo work
which is proof that all algos are not used at all times.. like he said its random ..at least i think so too. (lot of the algo stuff is over my head)

reading first page it seems like block reward will always be 5 is that correct ? (it's not going to halve or what ever ?)

difficulty is getting high these days

Wouldn't you find less blocks overall though if you drop some of the algos? Have you seen any performance gains pool/solo mining by doing this?
This is a very interesting find indeed. Thank you for sharing.

[kyher]

our pool is running stable and with steady hash. It could still need love 

https://coinex.pw/mining/pools/SRC

great work, good job, thank you 

This pool was great sadly users 2many280s and spoetnik ruined it by coming in huge hashrate (5 Mh/s and more) without ever finding any block! They just keep most of the profits for themselves without real contribution while the honest miner are finding block but earning only a very low amount of SRC (about 1/10 of the normal gain when those people were not on the pool).

Clearly there is a problem and I hope it comes from the pool and not from the coin. There really is a security flaw somewhere about accepting hashs that are not producive to block finding in the appropriate statistical amount...

Meanwhile I had to change pool until this problem is solved.

[Spoetnik]

our pool is running stable and with steady hash. It could still need love 

https://coinex.pw/mining/pools/SRC

great work, good job, thank you 

This pool was great sadly users 2many280s and spoetnik ruined it by coming in huge hashrate (5 Mh/s and more) without ever finding any block! They just keep most of the profits for themselves without real contribution while the honest miner are finding block but earning only a very low amount of SRC (about 1/10 of the normal gain when those people were not on the pool).

Clearly there is a problem and I hope it comes from the pool and not from the coin. There really is a security flaw somewhere about accepting hashs that are not producive to block finding in the appropriate statistical amount...

Meanwhile I had to change pool until this problem is solved.

your a lying sack of shit !

security flaw ?

what called Github where buddy posted his fucking code ?

every occur to you i'm hashing more because i have faster hardware ?

2many280's OWNS SERVERS he has SERVER HARDWARE and he has given me hash for testing occasionally..
this is not an exploit idiot its called mining.

and go look at that pool dumb ass.. the one you quoted and tell me who found the last block..
that would be me by myself with a fucking core 2 duo 7500

your an idiot and i don't appreciate the accusations.

[captainfuture]

we have it on our list to investigate that.