ssmc2
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
 |
November 05, 2015, 10:00:48 PM |
|
can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?
we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)
i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart
Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
jehst
|
|
November 05, 2015, 10:33:50 PM |
|
can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?
we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)
i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart
Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger that would last several years and peak at over $100,000, correct? |
Year 2021
Bitcoin Supply: ~90% mined
Supply Inflation: <1.8%
|
|
|
ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
|
November 05, 2015, 10:49:48 PM |
|
can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?
we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)
i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart
Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger that would last several years and peak at over $100,000, correct? Several years- yes. I've heard anything from $30k-$100k.  |
|
|
|
|
|
SmoothCurves
|
|
November 05, 2015, 10:52:29 PM |
|
can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?
we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)
i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart
Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger It looks something like this: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/GNvrlZxC-History-repeating/ |
|
|
|
|
|
SmoothCurves
|
|
November 05, 2015, 10:58:18 PM |
|
This is a better view of historical wave III  |
|
|
|
|
|
jehst
|
|
November 05, 2015, 11:09:36 PM |
|
what about 2011?
|
Year 2021
Bitcoin Supply: ~90% mined
Supply Inflation: <1.8%
|
|
|
|
SmoothCurves
|
|
November 05, 2015, 11:30:16 PM |
|
what about 2011?
2011 was part of I |
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
November 06, 2015, 01:41:08 AM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. |
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2015, 02:26:39 AM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Fits my long term count.... 1200ish was top of wave I. |
|
|
|
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
|
|
November 06, 2015, 05:07:32 AM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Fits my long term count.... 1200ish was top of wave I. So then you understand why this can't be III? |
|
|
|
Zavyalov
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
November 06, 2015, 08:21:50 AM |
|
What about now? Its the wave 2 in the wave 3?
|
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2015, 01:51:49 PM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Fits my long term count.... 1200ish was top of wave I. So then you understand why this can't be III? Not entirely... which rule would be violated? Rule 1: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1.
Rule 2: Wave 3 can never be the shortest of the three impulse waves.
Rule 3: Wave 4 can never overlap Wave 1.
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2015, 02:06:56 PM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Fits my long term count.... 1200ish was top of wave I. So then you understand why this can't be III? Not entirely... which rule would be violated? Rule 1: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1.
Rule 2: Wave 3 can never be the shortest of the three impulse waves.
Rule 3: Wave 4 can never overlap Wave 1.
|
|
|
|
|
keystroke
|
|
November 09, 2015, 05:45:34 AM |
|
Crickets.
|
"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
|
|
|
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 09, 2015, 06:43:44 AM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Inappropriate response from how I read it. Yeah, pure shitbag response. |
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
November 09, 2015, 06:49:11 AM |
|
I predict Luc will return. Maybe he'll surprise us with the 3rd reincarnation of this thread. He checked out a while after selling in 2013 and declaring a multi year bear market. So maybe he returns when we are in the 5 figures to tell us he sold again. Or perhaps next month when we realizes we are still in a flat. LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
BTCtrader71
|
|
November 09, 2015, 12:37:16 PM |
|
get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Inappropriate response from how I read it. Yeah, pure shitbag response. Maybe he was just channeling Elaine from Seinfeld (therefore saying it comedically): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-XgvHPt1cg |
BTC: 14oTcy1DNEXbcYjzPBpRWV11ZafWxNP8EU
|
|
|
|
birr
|
|
November 09, 2015, 03:38:36 PM |
|
Geddoudaheah!
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
|
|
November 09, 2015, 04:11:31 PM |
|
Crickets.
 |
|
|
|
|
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
|
|
November 10, 2015, 12:51:24 AM |
|
I guess it was me who got "burned"? Maybe I shouldn't have a real life outside this forum so that I can address every reply within minutes?  get out. what about 2011?
2011 was part of I get out. Fits my long term count.... 1200ish was top of wave I. So then you understand why this can't be III? Not entirely... which rule would be violated? Rule 1: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1.
Rule 2: Wave 3 can never be the shortest of the three impulse waves.
Rule 3: Wave 4 can never overlap Wave 1.
|
|
|
|
|
