Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2024, 01:31:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 [210] 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 ... 334 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Analysis  (Read 941578 times)
ssmc2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 10:00:48 PM
 #4181

can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?

we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)

i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart


Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger  Smiley
jehst
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000

21 million. I want them all.


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 10:33:50 PM
 #4182

can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?

we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)

i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart


Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger  Smiley

that would last several years and peak at over $100,000, correct?

Year 2021
Bitcoin Supply: ~90% mined
Supply Inflation: <1.8%
ssmc2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 10:49:48 PM
 #4183

can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?

we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)

i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart


Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger  Smiley

that would last several years and peak at over $100,000, correct?

Several years- yes. I've heard anything from $30k-$100k.  Cheesy
SmoothCurves
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 10:52:29 PM
 #4184

can someone post a chart of what wave 3 would look like?

we're talking about "[III]" correct? as in the "supercycle"? or are we talking about [3] (primary)

i'm confused. i wish he would've left a big picture chart


Yes, he's referring to historical wave III, or supercycle. Typically the biggest wave out of the 5. So like $5-$1168, but bigger  Smiley

It looks something like this: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/GNvrlZxC-History-repeating/
SmoothCurves
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 10:58:18 PM
 #4185

This is a better view of historical wave III

jehst
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000

21 million. I want them all.


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 11:09:36 PM
 #4186

what about 2011?

Year 2021
Bitcoin Supply: ~90% mined
Supply Inflation: <1.8%
SmoothCurves
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2015, 11:30:16 PM
 #4187

what about 2011?

2011 was part of I
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2015, 01:41:08 AM
 #4188

get out.
what about 2011?

2011 was part of I

get out.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 06, 2015, 02:26:39 AM
 #4189


Fits my long term count.... 1200ish was top of wave I.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
November 06, 2015, 05:07:32 AM
 #4190


So then you understand why this can't be III?

Zavyalov
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 06, 2015, 08:21:50 AM
 #4191

What about now? Its the wave 2 in the wave 3?
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 06, 2015, 01:51:49 PM
 #4192


So then you understand why this can't be III?

Not entirely... which rule would be violated?

Quote
Rule 1: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1.

Rule 2: Wave 3 can never be the shortest of the three impulse waves.

Rule 3: Wave 4 can never overlap Wave 1.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 06, 2015, 02:06:56 PM
 #4193


So then you understand why this can't be III?

Not entirely... which rule would be violated?

Quote
Rule 1: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1.

Rule 2: Wave 3 can never be the shortest of the three impulse waves.

Rule 3: Wave 4 can never overlap Wave 1.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 900
Merit: 1014


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
November 09, 2015, 05:45:34 AM
 #4194

Crickets.

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 09, 2015, 06:43:44 AM
 #4195

Inappropriate response from how I read it. Yeah, pure shitbag response.
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
November 09, 2015, 06:49:11 AM
 #4196

I predict Luc will return. Maybe he'll surprise us with the 3rd reincarnation of this thread. He checked out a while after selling in 2013 and declaring a multi year bear market. So maybe he returns when we are in the 5 figures to tell us he sold again.

Or perhaps next month when we realizes we are still in a flat. LOL Smiley
BTCtrader71
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 09, 2015, 12:37:16 PM
 #4197

Inappropriate response from how I read it. Yeah, pure shitbag response.

Maybe he was just channeling Elaine from Seinfeld (therefore saying it comedically):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-XgvHPt1cg

BTC: 14oTcy1DNEXbcYjzPBpRWV11ZafWxNP8EU
birr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 870
Merit: 585


View Profile
November 09, 2015, 03:38:36 PM
 #4198

Geddoudaheah!
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012



View Profile
November 09, 2015, 04:11:31 PM
 #4199

Crickets.

RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
November 10, 2015, 12:51:24 AM
 #4200

I guess it was me who got "burned"? Maybe I shouldn't have a real life outside this forum so that I can address every reply within minutes?  Roll Eyes


So then you understand why this can't be III?

Not entirely... which rule would be violated?

Quote
Rule 1: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1.

Rule 2: Wave 3 can never be the shortest of the three impulse waves.

Rule 3: Wave 4 can never overlap Wave 1.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=274613.msg11887151#msg11887151

Pages: « 1 ... 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 [210] 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 ... 334 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!