lebing
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
|
 |
May 02, 2016, 08:23:31 PM |
|
Great to see you back Luc! We all missed you. I want to reiterate something I think was implied but never explicitly said before: We don't expect you to always be right. You don't wear the brunt of our losses on your shoulders if you make a bad call. This responsibility is ours and ours alone. We simply appreciate you for your elliot wave gift and whether we choose to integrate that into our own final decisions is our call alone. Keep doing what you do so well!  |
Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 15, 2016, 01:49:56 AM |
|
slowly but surely..  |
|
|
|
|
Fakhoury
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1027
Permabull Bitcoin Investor
|
|
May 15, 2016, 02:28:56 AM |
|
slowly but surely.. Everything when it takes it's own time, becomes wounderful  |
Feb. 14, 2010: I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 15, 2016, 02:33:51 AM |
|
volume looks pretty shitty though
wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.
|
|
|
|
|
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
|
|
May 15, 2016, 03:17:17 AM |
|
volume looks pretty shitty though
wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.
When triangles break out, they break violently. This is pretty tame for a triangle that lasted ~6 months.  |
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2016, 07:23:57 AM |
|
I see 3 pages of bullish topics in Speculation... |
|
|
|
|
Tzupy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
|
|
May 15, 2016, 04:47:20 PM |
|
volume looks pretty shitty though
wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.
Testing 370$ would trigger a bearish flip of the weekly PSAR.  |
Sometimes, if it looks too bullish, it's actually bearish
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:40:03 PM |
|
volume looks pretty shitty though
wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.
When triangles break out, they break violently. This is pretty tame for a triangle that lasted ~6 months. ... and this? |
|
|
|
Wexlike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:59:53 PM |
|
Funny how things can change in just two weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
Tzupy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:45:12 PM |
|
Funny how things can change in just two weeks days.
FTFY. |
Sometimes, if it looks too bullish, it's actually bearish
|
|
|
|
BTCtrader71
|
|
May 29, 2016, 07:16:05 PM |
|
|
BTC: 14oTcy1DNEXbcYjzPBpRWV11ZafWxNP8EU
|
|
|
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
|
|
May 29, 2016, 07:43:49 PM |
|
LOL that is about as bullish as I am. smh It's true that all you have to do is draw arrows pointing up and everyone will suck your balls. What he isn't showing is the arrow pointing down when his count completes in the area of 685-720 which (OMG!1!), is the same area I have in the charts I've posted recently and everyone calls me a troll...  Too funny... |
|
|
|
Wexlike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086
|
|
May 29, 2016, 07:52:57 PM |
|
No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.
But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
|
|
May 29, 2016, 08:02:30 PM |
|
No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.
But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.
That is a path, not a target. I can only begin to find a target for that point after the rise completes. And that would still only be a preliminary target. The thing is is that as the rise gets higher, the higher that target gets. I removed the arrow pointing down.  Now it's less threatening. |
|
|
|
Wexlike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086
|
|
May 29, 2016, 08:45:21 PM |
|
This looks much better! You are such a bull. |
|
|
|
|
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
|
|
May 29, 2016, 08:45:57 PM |
|
This looks much better! You are such a bull. That's all I'm asking  |
|
|
|
BldSwtTrs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 861
Merit: 1010
|
|
May 29, 2016, 09:31:49 PM |
|
Ryn, what makes you think this run won't pass the old ATH?
|
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 29, 2016, 11:32:19 PM |
|
No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.
But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.
because it won't happen |
|
|
|
|
|
davidorentol
|
|
June 03, 2016, 02:34:58 AM |
|
No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.
But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.
because it won't happen sure That chart was more to show the time aspect of a large wave-II versus the smaller degree but potentially complete wave-(4) of III. The finer resolution count is what I was referring to. Something like this  If it wasn't a (4) of III as it is in the bottom pic of that link, then I have no option for a bull market to new highs before making new lows or at least getting a full impulse lower (but still truncated) with a bullish looking rise from the lows (not any of this high volume for the initial bounce and then quickly dying off through the rest of the rise nonsense). As Tzupy said, the B kind of fell short and though it's not exactly invalidated as a count, it seems much less likely now... The highest high since January and yet indicators are showing a bearish divergence. Not good for those currently bullish. |
|
|
|
|
|
davidorentol
|
|
June 03, 2016, 02:45:16 AM |
|
The bad analisis and the Reality......  |
|
|
|
|
|
